本研究針對台灣股市檢定股票報酬與週轉率之間的實證關係，使用2000年1月至2017年12月間，於臺灣證券交易所上市或中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心上櫃之普通股股票為研究對象，依據每月之成交量(或成交值)週轉率來建構投資策略，探討各週轉率組合之投資績效，檢定是否存在週轉率效應，並試圖使用不同公司特性與風險因子解釋之；最後檢視週轉率效應對樣本特性或研究期間之敏感度。
結果發現較低週轉率股票經風險調整後之平均報酬高於高週轉率股票。即使在控制樣本期間、交易所、產業、規模、淨值市價比、獲利與投資等因素之下，此「週轉率效應」仍然存在。不過，在多頭市場存在反向週轉率效應。

This study examines the empirical relationship between the stock return and the turnover rate for Taiwan listed companies from January 2000 to December 2017. According to the monthly volume (or value) turnover rate to construct investment strategies, explore the investment performance of each turnover rate portfolio. Then, this paper test whether there is a turnover rate effect, and try to explain using different company characteristics and risk factors. Finally, this study examines the sensitivity of the turnover rate effect to characteristics or periods of the sample.
It is found that lower turnover stocks have had higher risk adjusted returns, on average, than higher turnover stocks. This ‘turnover rate effect’ has been in existence even after controlling for sample period, exchange, industry, size, book-to-price, profitability, and investment factors. However, there exists a reverse turnover rate effect during up markets.

目錄
第一章	緒論	                      1
第一節	研究動機與背景	              1
第二節	研究目的                       3
第三節	研究架構                       4
第四節	研究流程圖	              5
第二章	文獻探討	                      6
第一節   週轉率與報酬	              6
第二節   週轉率效應可能的解釋	      9
第三節   動能生命週期	             15
第三章	研究方法                      17
第一節	研究樣本、研究期間與樣本來源    17
第二節	投資策略	                      18
第三節	因子模式	                      19
第四章	實證研究結果	              23
第一節	平均報酬	                      23
第二節	因子模式分析	              27
第三節	敏感度分析	              32
第五章	結論	                      51
參考文獻	                              53
一、	中文文獻	                      53
二、	英文文獻	                      54
表目錄
表3-1 本研究樣本數分年統計表	                        18
表4-1 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：全部樣本	        26
表4-2成交量週轉率組合因子模式之估計與檢定結果：全部樣本	30
表4-3成交值週轉率組合因子模式之估計與檢定結果：全部樣本	31
表4-4 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：上市股票	        35
表4-5 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：上櫃股票	        36
表4-6 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：電子類股票	        40
表4-7 週轉率組合平均譏笑與檢定結果：非電子類股票	        41
表4-8 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：子期間2000~2008	45
表4-9 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：子期間2009~2017	46
表4-10 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：多頭市場	        49
表4-11 週轉率組合平均績效與檢定結果：空頭市場	        50
圖目錄
圖1-1本研究流程圖	               5

中文文獻
1.王怡靜，2003，台灣股市價格動能與流動性之整合研究，清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
2.胡星陽，1998，流動性對台灣股票報酬率的影響，中國財務學刊 5，1-19。
3.馬維平，2000，交易量基準值與動量策略之研究，東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
4.馬黛和陳效踐，1995，臺灣股市異常交易監視制度與股價行為關係之實證研究，中國財務學刊 3，69-93。
5.陳光華，1999，台灣股市動能生命週期之再探討，銘傳大學金融研究所碩士論文。
6.劉伊陞，2003，交易量對報酬的影響，東華大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
7.潘威豪，1999，台灣股市類股週轉率與報酬率及報酬波動之關係研究，中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8.蔡維芬，2009，流動性與價值效應對股票異常報酬率之影響，高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
9.顧廣平，2016，投資者關注與動能效應，企業管理學報 111，67-97。
 
英文文獻
1.Amihud, Y., and H. Mendelson, 1986, Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Economics 17, 223-249.
2.Amihud, Y., and H. Mendelson, 1989, The effects of beta, bid-ask spread, residual risk, and size on stock returns, Journal of Finance 44, 479-486.
3.Baker, H. K., 1996, Trading location and liquidity: An analysis of U.S. dealer and agency markets for common stocks, Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 5, 1-51.
4.Bernstein, P. L., 1987, Liquidity, stock markets and market makers, Financial Management 16, 54-62.
5.Black, F., Jensen M. C., and Scholes M., 1972, The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical test, in: M. C. Jensen. ed., Studies in the theory of capital market, New York, NY: Praeger.
6.Blume, L., D. Easley, and M. O’Hara, 1994, Markets statistics and technical analysis: The role of volume, Journal of Finance 49, 153-184.
7.Brailsford, T. J., 1996, The empirical relationship between trading volume, returns, and volatility, Accounting & Finance 36, 89-111.
8.Brennan, M. J., T. Chordia, and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998, Alternative factor specifications, security characteristics, and the cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics 49, 345-383.
9.Chordia, T., A. Subrahmanyam, and V. R. Anshuman, 2001, Trading activity and   expected stock returns, Journal of Financial Economic 59, 3-32.
10.Cooper, M., 1999, Filter rules based on price and volume in individual security overreaction, The Review of Financial Studies 2, 901-935.
11.Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer, and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998, A theory of overconfidence, self-attribution, and security market under- and overreactions, Journal of Finance 53, 1839-1886.
12.Daniel, K., M. Grinblatt, S. Titman, and R. Wermers, 1997, Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks, Journal of Finance 52, 1035-1508.
13.Datar, V., N. Naik, and R. Radcliffe, 1998, Liquidity and asset returns: An alternative test, Journal of Financial Markets 1, 203-219.
14.Demsetz, H., 1968, The cost of transacting, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 33-53.
15.Epps, T. W., 1975, Security price changes and transaction volumes: theory and evidence, American Economic Review 65, 586-597.
16.Fama, E. F., 1970, Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work, Journal of Finance 25,383-423.
17.Fama, E. F., 1998, Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance, Journal of Financial Economics 49, 283-306.
18.Fama,. E. F., 1991, Efficient capital markets: II, Journal of Finance 46, 1575-1617.
19.Fama, E. F., and J. MacBeth, 1973, Risk, return, and, equilibrium: Empirical tests, Journal of Political Economy 81, 607-636.
20.Fama, E. F., and K. R. French, 1992, The cross-section of expected returns, Journal of Finance 47,427-465.
21.Fama, E. F., and K. R. French, 1993, Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks, Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56.
22.Fama, E. F., and K. R. French, 2015, A five-factor asset pricing model, Journal of Financial Economics 116, 1-22.
23.Gallant, A. R., P. E. Rossi, and G. Tauchen, 1992, Stock prices and volume, Review of Financial Studies 5, 199-242.
24.Gervais, S., R. Kaniel, and D. H. Mingelgrin, 2001, The high‐volume return premium, Journal of Finance 56, 877-919.
25.Groth, J. C., and D. A. Dubofsky, 1992, The liquidity factor, in D. F. Parrillo, E. R. Hobbing, M. V. Porter, and J. G. Gutman eds., The NASDAQ Handbook, Chicago: Probus Publishing Company.
26.Grouch, R. L., 1970, The volume of transactions and price changes on the New York Stock Exchange, Financial Analysts Journal 26, 104-109.
27.Haugen, R. A., and N. L. Baker, 1996, Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics 41, 401-439.
28.Haugen, R. A., 1996, The effects of intrigue, liquidity, imprecision, and bias on the cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Portfolio Management 22, 8-17.
29.Hogan, S., R. Jarrow, M. Teo, and M. Warachka, 2004, Testing Market efficiency using statistical arbitrage with applications to momentum and value strategies, Journal of Financial Economics 73, 525-565.
30.Hong, H., and J. C. Stein, 1999, A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets, Journal of Finance 54, 2143-2184.
31.James, C., and R. O. Edmister, 1983, The relation between common stocks returns, trading activity and market value, Journal of Finance 38, 1075-1086.
32.Karpoff, J. M., 1986, A theory of trading volume, Journal of Finance 41, 1069-1088.
33.Karpoff, J. M., 1987, The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 109-126
34.Lee, C. M., and B. Swaminathan, 2000, Price momentum and trading volume, Journal of Finance 55, 2017-2069,
35.Marsh, T., and K. Rock, 1986, Exchange listing and liquidity: A comparison of the American Stock Exchange with the NASDAQ National Market System, American Stock Exchange Transactions Data Research Project #2.
36.Morgan, I. G., 1976, Stock prices and heteroskedasticity, Journal of Business 49, 496-508.
37.Rogalski, R. J., 1978, The dependence of prices and volume, The Review of Economics and Statistics 36, 268-274.
38.Schwartz, R. A., 1991, Reshaping the equity markets: A guide for the 1990s, New York, NY: Harper Business.
39.Sheu, H-J. and K.-P. Ku, 1999, An empirical study of forecasting power of turnover and book-to-price for stock returns in Taiwan, Advances in Pacific Basin Financial Markets 5, 325-336.
40.Sheu, H.-J., S. Wu, and K.-P. Ku, 1998, Cross-sectional relationships between stock returns and market beta, trading volume, and sales-to-price in Taiwan, International Review of Financial Analysis 7, 1-18.
41.Tinic, S., 1972, Economics of liquidity services, Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 79-93.
42.Ying, C. C., 1996, Stock market prices and volumes of sales, Econometrica 34, 676-686