本研究針對淡江大學進行組織溫室氣體盤查，並深入探討教職員生通勤與返鄉行為所造成之碳排放，目的在於建立完整的碳盤查架構並提出具體減碳策略。研究依據ISO 14064-1:2018標準，將排放來源劃分為六大類別，運用排放係數法計算各類別的碳排放量，並聚焦於第三類（間接運輸相關排放）進行分析。
研究方法透過問卷調查方式，蒐集學生與教職員之通勤模式、距離與交通工具等資料，並運用描述性統計、交叉分析與單因子變異數分析探討不同變項對碳排放的影響。研究結果顯示，雖然通勤排放量在總體碳排中占比不高，但因涵蓋人數龐大，整體影響不容忽視。
全校在111年溫室氣體量化的結果為29,625公噸CO2e ，類別三的排放量最高，達到14,179 (47.86%) 公噸CO2e/年，其餘類別一、類別二、類別四及類別五分別為762 (2.57%) 公噸、11,680 (39.42%)公噸、2,330 (7.86%)公噸、675公噸 (2.28%) CO2e/年。於通勤方面分析結果，大一學生的碳排放量明顯高於其他年級，原因與交通工具、通勤頻率、通勤距離密切相關。

This study conducted an organizational greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory for Tamkang University, with a focus on analyzing the carbon emissions generated by commuting and returning-home behaviors of faculty, staff, and students. The objective was to establish a comprehensive carbon inventory framework and propose concrete carbon reduction strategies.Based on the ISO 14064-1:2018 standard, emission sources were categorized into six major types. The emissions from each category were calculated using the emission factor method, with a particular emphasis on Category 3 emissions (indirect emissions related to transportation).
The research methodology involved a questionnaire survey to collect data on commuting patterns, distances, and modes of transportation used by faculty, staff, and students. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, and one-way ANOVA were employed to examine the influence of different variables on carbon emissions. The results showed that although commuting emissions accounted for a relatively small portion of total emissions, their overall impact should not be overlooked due to the large number of individuals involved.
In 2022, the total quantified GHG emissions of the university were 29,625 metric tons of CO₂e. Category 3 emissions were the highest at 14,179 metric tons of CO₂e/year (47.86%), followed by Category 2 with 11,680 metric tons (39.42%), Category 4 with 2,330 metric tons (7.86%), Category 1 with 762 metric tons (2.57%), and Category 5 with 675 metric tons (2.28%) of CO₂e/year. Commuting analysis revealed that first-year students had significantly higher carbon emissions than students in other years, mainly due to factors such as transportation mode, commuting frequency, and commuting distance.

目錄
中文摘要	         i
Abstract 	ii
目錄	         v
圖目錄	       vii
表目錄	      viii
第一章 緒論	        1
1.1研究緣起	        1
1.2研究內容及目的	3
第二章 文獻回顧  	4
2.1組織溫室氣體盤查	4
2.1.1溫室氣體盤查介紹	4
2.1.2 溫室氣體盤查相關標準	5
2.1.3 溫室氣體盤查組織類別	6
2.1.4 國內碳管理資源及平台	7
2.1.5 溫室氣體盤查實施步驟	8
2.2大專院校溫室氣體盤查現況	14
2.2.1高等教育機構在永續發展中的重要角色	14
2.2.2 國內大學溫室氣體盤查	        16
2.2.3 國外大學溫室氣體盤查	        27
2.3 通勤所造成的碳排放	                31
2.4 國內運輸部門溫室氣體排放管制行動	31
2.4.1 第一期管制行動(2016-2020)	32
2.4.2 第二期管制行動(2021-2025)	33
2.5 分析軟體介紹	                35
第三章 研究方法	                37
3.1 研究流程與架構       	37
3.2問卷設計	                39
3.3 教職員生通勤返鄉碳排放量計算	40
3.4 描述性統計            	44
3.5 交叉分析	                44
3.6單因子變異數分析（ANOVA）	44
第四章 結果與討論	        47
4.1淡江大學組織溫室氣體盤查結果	47
4.1.1本校邊界範圍	47
4.1.2顯著性評估	        49
4.1.3排放源界別結果	52
4.1.4溫室氣體排放量結果	54
4.1.5不確定性分析結果	55
4.2通勤返鄉問卷回收結果	59
4.3問卷結果分析	        60
4.3.1描述性統計資料	60
4.3.2交叉分析結果	64
4.3.3單因子變異數分析結果	67
4.4 減碳策略	        72
第五章 結論與建議	74
5.1 結論	        74
5.2 建議	        74
參考文獻 	        76
附錄一 問卷回收情形	80

圖目錄
圖2-1溫室氣體排放量盤查作業步驟	        8
圖2-2國立臺灣科技大學臺北校總區平面配置圖	17
圖2-3國立臺灣科技大學新竹分部地理位置圖	18
圖2-4國立臺灣科技大學公館新校地平面配置圖	17
圖2-5燕巢校區平面配置圖	                20
圖2-6和平校區平面配置圖	                20
圖2-7逢甲大學校本部校區配置圖	        22
圖2-8逢甲大學福星校區配置圖	        23
圖2-9逢甲大學中科校區配置圖	        23
圖2-10運輸部門溫室氣體排放趨勢及全球占比	32
圖2-11第一期行動方案架構	33
圖3-1研究流程架構	38
圖3-2 線上問卷表單	38
圖3-3 近四年淡江大學境外學生人數統計表	39
圖3-4 GOOGLE MAP 所顯示之運輸距離	        41
圖4-1 淡江大學淡水校園地圖	        48
圖4-2 淡江大學台北校園位置圖	        48
圖4-3 淡江大學蘭陽校園地圖	        49
圖4-4 報告邊界圖          	        52
圖4-5 年級-碳排放量平均值變化折線圖	72

表目錄
表2-1溫室氣體數據品質管理誤差等級評分	11
表2-2 溫室氣體數據品質管理評分區間判斷	11
表2-3 排放量清冊級別判斷	                12
表2-4 不確定性來源參考表	                13
表2-5 國內三間大學比較表(本研究整理)	25
表2-6 每年人均碳排放量比較表(本研究整理)	27
表2-7 第一、二期行動方案對照表	        34
表3-1低地板甲類市區公車運輸服務碳排放係數及相關資料	42
表3-2運輸載具碳排放係數	                        43
表4-1顯著性評估準則表	                        50
表4-2顯著性評估結果表	                        51
表4-3淡江大學邊界排放源彙整表	                53
表4-4各排放統計表	                        55
表4-5溫室氣體排放源不確定分析方法	                56
表4-6不確定性表(定性法)            57
表4-7不確定性評估表(定性法)        57
表4-8數據品質評估區間	         58
表4-9近三年教職員人數統計	59
表4-10近三年學生人數統計	59
表4-11描述性統計資料表	64
表4-12觀察值處理摘要表	64
表4-13年級-交通方式交叉分析表	66
表4-14變異數同質性測試結果	68
表4-15變異數分析結果	        68
表4-16年級-碳排放量描述性統計資料表	69
表4-17變異數同質性測試結果	        69
表4-18變異數分析結果	                69
表4-19 TUKEY HSD法事後檢定結果	70
表4-20 BONFERRONI法事後檢定結果	70

參考文獻
Ali, E.B., & Anufriev, V.P. (2020), ” UI GreenMetric and campus sustainability: a review of the role of African universities.” Int. J. Energy Prod. Manag., 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V5-N1-1-13 
Amaral, A.R., Rodrigues, E., Gaspar, A.R., & Gomes, A. (2020), “ A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university campus operations.” J. Clean. Prod., 250, 119558. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.119558 
Dlouhá, J., Glavič, P., & Barton, A. (2017), ” Higher education in Central European countries – critical factors for sustainability transition.”  J. Clean. Prod., 151, 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.022 
Divya Sharma & Josh Huizinga. (2023), “ Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2022 Reporting Year.” https://www.mcgill.ca/sustainability/files/sustainability/2020_greenhouse_gas_inventory_report_final.pdf 
European Commission. (2023). https://commission.europa.eu/news/eu-2023-succeeding-amidst-challenging-times-2024-03-13_en 
Gamarra, A.R., Herrera, I., & Lechón, Y. (2019). Assessing sustainability performance in the educational sector: A high school case study. Sci. Total Environ., 692, 465–478.
Gómez, N., Cadarso, M.-Á., & Monsalve, F. (2016), “Carbon footprint of a university in a multiregional model: the case of the University of Castilla-La Mancha.” J. Clean. Prod., 138, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.009 
Gómez, N., Cadarso, M.-Á., & Monsalve, F. (2019), “ Carbon footprint of a university in a multiregional model.” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.009 
Greene, W.H. (2003), “ Econometric Analysis (5th ed.).” Prentice Hall.
Hockstad, L., & Hanel, L. (2018), “ Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks.” https://doi.org/10.15485/1464240 
Hopkins, E.A. (2016), “ Barriers to adoption of campus green building policies.” Smart. Sustain. Built Environ., 5, 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2016-0016/FULL/XML 
IBM SPSS software. https://www.ibm.com/spss 
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2006), “ ISO 14064-1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals.”
ITF Transport Outlook. (2021). https://www.itf-oecd.org/itf-transport-outlook-2021 
Jagmohan Sharma & Ravindranath, N.H. (2019), “Applying IPCC 2014 framework for hazard-specific vulnerability assessment under climate change.” https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab24ed 
Kourgiozou, V., Commin, A., Dowson, M., Rovas, D., & Mumovic, D. (2021), “ Scalable pathways to net zero carbon in the UK higher education sector.” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 147, 111234. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111234 
Leon, X., Oregi, C., & Marieta, C. (2018), “ Environmental assessment of four Basque University campuses using the NEST tool.” Sustain. Cities Soc., 42, 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2018.08.007 
Mohamed, N.H., Noor, Z.Z., & Sing, C.L.I. (2019), “ Environmental sustainability of universities: critical review of best initiatives and operational practices. “ Green Eng. Campus Sustain., 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7260-5_2 
Nature Positive Universities. (2022). https://naturepositiveuniversities.net/about/ 
National Development Council, Taiwan. https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/nsdn/about0/2050Path 
Plume, M.L. (2003), “ Encyclopedia of Information Systems.” In H. Bidgoli (Ed.), Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0122272404001660 
Protocol, Greenhouse Gas. (2011), “ Greenhouse gas protocol.” Sector Toolsets for Iron and Steel-Guidance Document, 1–12.
Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., et al. (2014), “ Transport. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, IPCC AR5 WGIII. Cambridge University Press.”
Sustainable Development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2020). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/commitments_hesi.html 
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
Times Higher Education Climate Impact Forum. (2022). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/events/forums 
United Nations. (2021). Sustainable transport, sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/Transportation%20Report%202021_FullReport_Digital.pdf 
United Nations Climate Change. (2022). Race to Zero. https://unfccc.int/climate-action/race-to-zero-campaign 
University of McGill. (2023). 2022 GHG Emission Report. https://www.mcgill.ca/sustainability/files/sustainability/greenhouse_gas_inventory_report_2022.pdf 
University of Otago. (2023). 2022 GHG Emission Report. https://www.otago.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0026/495107/Emissions-report-2022.pdf 
Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008), “ A definition of 'carbon footprint'. In Pertsova, C.C. (Ed.), Ecological Economics Research Trends.” Nova Science Publishers, pp. 1–11.
WRI & WBCSD. (2004), “ The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition).” World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
行政院環保署. (2019). 溫室氣體排放係數管理表6.0.4版。 https://ghgregistry.epa.gov.tw/epa_ghg/Downloads/FileDownloads.aspx?Type_ID=1 
行政院環保署. (2022). 溫室氣體排放量盤查作業指引。  Retrieved from https://ghgregistry.epa.gov.tw/upload/Tools/%E6%BA%AB%E5%AE%A4%E6%B0%A3%E9%AB%94%E6%8E%92%E6%94%BE%E9%87%8F%E7%9B%A4%E6%9F%A5%E4%BD%9C%E6%A5%AD%E6%8C%87%E5%BC%95(2022.05)-final.pdf
淡江大學國際暨兩岸事務處http://www2.oieie.tku.edu.tw/zh_tw/about/about6 
陳尚武、吳定益、張希筠（2015）。未來股價報酬率波動性影響因子分析－ANOVA檢定之應用。東亞論壇，(489)，1-10。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18173675-201509-201510280004-201510280004-1-10
國家永續發展委員會 (2023)，臺灣2050淨零排放路徑。 Retrieved 5/30 from https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/nsdn/about0/2050Path 
溫室氣體盤查議定書第二版－企業會計與報告標準，社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會，2005年 5月初版。
事業溫室氣體排放量資訊平台https://ghgregistry.moenv.gov.tw/epa_ghg/ 
碳足跡資訊網https://cfp-calculate.tw/cfpc/WebPage/index.aspx 
環境部(2024) 。溫室氣體排放量 盤查作業指引113年版 。https://ghgregistry.moenv.gov.tw/epa_ghg/GhgDownload/%E6%BA%AB%E5%AE%A4%E6%B0%A3%E9%AB%94%E6%8E%92%E6%94%BE%E9%87%8F%E7%9B%A4%E6%9F%A5%E4%BD%9C%E6%A5%AD%E6%8C%87%E5%BC%95113%E5%B9%B4%E7%89%88.pdf 
國立台灣科技大學(2023)，溫室氣體盤查報告書 2022 年。https://po.ntust.edu.tw/p/404-1059-123155.php?Lang=zh-tw 
國立高雄師範大學(2024)，溫室氣體盤查報告書 2022 年。https://c.nknu.edu.tw/affair/Page.aspx?PN=610&Kind=envedu 
逢甲大學(2023)，溫室氣體盤查管理報告書 2022年版。
https://s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/web-content.fcu.edu.tw/wp-content/uploads/sites/104/2024/03/19144359/1130311-111%E5%B9%B4%E9%80%A2%E7%94%B2%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E6%BA%AB%E5%AE%A4%E6%B0%A3%E9%AB%94%E7%9B%A4%E6%9F%A5%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E6%9B%B8.pdf
環境部氣候變遷署(2018)， 運輸部門溫室氣體排放管制行動方案核定本(第一期階段)。https://service.cca.gov.tw/File/Get/cca/zh-tw/dWHbn0fEUilEiwe
環境部氣候變遷署(2022)，第二期運輸部門溫室氣體 排放管制行動方案核定本。https://service.cca.gov.tw/File/Get/cca/zh-tw/NR2Xhnl3qwkJekz