| 系統識別號 | U0002-2312202209583600 |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2023.00121 |
| 論文名稱(中文) | 臺灣社區照顧關懷據點永續經營關鍵因素之建構與應用 |
| 論文名稱(英文) | The Study of Construction and Application of Exploring the Key Sustainable Factors of Taiwan’s Community Care Centers |
| 第三語言論文名稱 | |
| 校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
| 系所名稱(中文) | 管理科學學系博士班 |
| 系所名稱(英文) | Doctoral Program, Department of Management Sciences |
| 外國學位學校名稱 | |
| 外國學位學院名稱 | |
| 外國學位研究所名稱 | |
| 學年度 | 111 |
| 學期 | 1 |
| 出版年 | 112 |
| 研究生(中文) | 陳貴芝 |
| 研究生(英文) | Kuei-Chih Chen |
| 學號 | 803620102 |
| 學位類別 | 博士 |
| 語言別 | 繁體中文 |
| 第二語言別 | |
| 口試日期 | 2022-12-12 |
| 論文頁數 | 151頁 |
| 口試委員 |
指導教授
-
洪英正(aloha@mail.tku.edu.tw)
共同指導教授 - 陳怡妃(enfatw@gmail.com) 口試委員 - 陳宥杉 口試委員 - 蔡維奇 口試委員 - 陳水蓮 口試委員 - 李旭華 |
| 關鍵字(中) |
人口高齡化 社區照顧關懷據點 永續經營 層級程序分析法 |
| 關鍵字(英) |
Population Aging Community Care Centers Sustainable Management AHP |
| 第三語言關鍵字 | |
| 學科別分類 | |
| 中文摘要 |
人口高齡化已成為各國所關注之議題,臺灣政府以高齡長者為目標,積極推動高齡人口相關政策。臺灣在1993年已邁入高齡化,且超過八成的高齡人口屬於健康、亞健康者。因此,相關單位針對健康高齡者持續推動以社區營造為基點,設置社區照顧關懷據點,使每位年長者能實現在地老化。有鑑於此,本研究目的為探討符合臺灣社區照顧關懷據點之經營模式與方向,使社區照顧關懷據點得以永續發展,進而建立完善的在地老化照顧服務體系。本研究透過修正式德菲法以及層級程序分析法確認影響臺灣社區照顧關懷據點永續經營的關鍵因素為何,並對部分專家進行深度訪談,利用深度訪談內容瞭解關鍵因素優先排序之原因,以及強化層級程序分析法之分析結果。 分析結果指出經營管理能力與專業照顧服務能力為權重最高的因素構面。在專業照顧服務能力構面下,照服人員具有同理心為權重最高且排序第一的因素準則。創造服務對象價值構面中,服務對象滿意度為權重最高且排序第一的因素準則。在財務資源運用能力構面下,財務穩健度為權重最高且排序第一的因素準則。經營管理能力中,完善的管理制度為權重最高且排序第一的因素準則。最後,本研究期許研究結果能擴展社區照顧關懷據點相關研究之學術範疇,並將研究結果提供給當前的社區照顧關懷據點或未來將設置社區照顧關懷據點,其永續經營方向之參考。 |
| 英文摘要 |
Aging becomes a concern to all countries, and government targets the elderly to promote policies which relate to the elderly population. Taiwan has entered an aging society in 1993, and more than 80% of the elderly are healthy or sub-healthy. Therefore, units of government continue to promote the establishment of community for the healthy elderly and set up community care centers to make each elderly achieve aging in place. The purpose of this research is to explore the model of operating and management and direction of community care centers in Taiwan, that the community care centers could develop sustainably, and establish a complete care service system for ageing in place. Our research used the Modified Delphi Method and AHP to identify the key factors that affect the sustainable management of community care bases in Taiwan and conducted in-depth interviews with experts. The in-depth interview content helped us to understand the reasons for the prioritization of key factors and strengthened the analysis results of the AHP. The analysis results of the AHP showed management ability and professional care service ability were the factors with the highest weight. In the dimension of professional care service ability, the care workers’ empathy was the highest weight and the first ranking. In the dimension of creating service object value, service object satisfaction was the factor criterion with the highest weight and the first ranking. In the dimension of financial resource utilization ability, financial soundness was the factor criterion with the highest weight and the first ranking. In the management ability, the improve management system was the factor criterion with the highest weight and the first ranking. Finally, this research hopes that the research results could expand the academic research scope of community care centers and provide to the community care centers as a reference for sustainable management. |
| 第三語言摘要 | |
| 論文目次 |
目錄 I 表目錄 III 圖目錄 V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 7 第三節 研究流程 9 第四節 論文結構 11 第二章 文獻探討 12 第一節 社區照顧關懷據點 12 第二節 社區照顧關懷據點與永續發展 21 第三節 社區照顧關懷據點永續經營之關鍵因素 25 第四節 AHP法之應用領域與相關研究 31 第三章 研究設計與研究方法 33 第一節 研究設計 33 第二節 修正式德菲法 34 第三節 層級程序分析法 35 第四節 社區照顧關懷據點永續經營之關鍵因素構面與相關準則 39 第五節 建立初步層級架構 40 第六節 專家名單 42 第七節 專家意見與正式問卷 44 第八節 深度訪談法 45 第四章 分析結果 46 第一節 修正式德菲調查法之分析結果 46 第二節 構面與準則AHP分析結果 54 第三節 深度訪談分析結果 73 第五章 結論、討論及建議 83 第一節 結論與討論 83 第二節 管理意涵 91 第三節 研究貢獻 95 第四節 研究限制與建議 98 參考文獻 101 附錄一:第一回合修正式德菲法問卷 115 附錄二:第二回合修正式德菲法問卷 125 附錄三:AHP問卷 136 附錄四:深度訪談問項 145 表目錄 表2-1 社區照顧關懷據點相關研究文獻彙整 17 表2-2 臺灣社區照顧關懷據點永續經營構面與相關準則 29 表2-3 應用AHP法之文獻彙整 32 表3-1 AHP法評估尺度意義及說明 37 表3-2 問卷訪談專家名單 42 表3-3 訪談專家背景資料統計 43 表3-4 專家之深度訪談 45 表4-1 第一回合修正式德菲法分析結果 48 表4-2 第一回合準則刪除、新增與修改名稱 49 表4-3 第二回合修正式德菲法分析結果 50 表4-4 修正後之構面、準則與定義 51 表4-5 四構面之矩陣分析-實務產業單位 55 表4-6 四構面之矩陣分析-政府單位 55 表4-7 四構面之矩陣分析-學術研究單位 55 表4-8 產官學四構面之權重值與重要性排序 55 表4-9 專業照顧服務能力(C1)構面之準則矩陣分析-實務產業單位 57 表4-10 專業照顧服務能力(C1)構面之準則矩陣分析-政府單位 57 表4-11 專業照顧服務能力(C1)構面之準則矩陣分析-學術研究單位 58 表4-12 產官學專業照顧服務能力(C1)構面準則之權重值與重要性排序 58 表4-13 創造服務對象價值(C2)構面之準則矩陣分析-實務產業單位 60 表4-14 創造服務對象價值(C2)構面之準則矩陣分析-政府單位 60 表4-15 創造服務對象價值(C2)構面之準則矩陣分析-學術研究單位 61 表4-16 產官學創造服務對象價值(C2)構面準則之權重值與重要性排序 61 表4-17 財務資源運用能力(C3)構面之準則矩陣分析-實務產業單位 63 表4-18 財務資源運用能力(C3)構面之準則矩陣分析-政府單位 63 表4-19 財務資源運用能力(C3)構面之準則矩陣分析-學術研究單位 64 表4-20 產官學財務資源運用能力(C3)構面準則之權重值與重要性排序 64 表4-21 經營管理能力(C4)構面之準則矩陣分析-實務產業單位 66 表4-22 經營管理能力(C4)構面之準則矩陣分析-政府單位 66 表4-23 經營管理能力(C4)構面之準則矩陣分析-學術研究單位 67 表4-24 產官學經營管理能力(C4)構面準則之權重值與重要性排序 67 表4-25 準則之整體權重值與重要性排序-實務產業單位 69 表4-26 準則之整體權重值與重要性排序-政府單位 70 表4-27 準則之整體權重值與重要性排序-學術研究單位 71 表4-28 產官學準則之整體權重值與重要性排序 72 表5-1 AHP分析結果與深度訪談 84 圖目錄 圖1-1 本研究流程 10 圖2-1 臺灣社區照顧關懷據點發展三階段 13 圖2-2 ABC社區整體照顧模式 15 圖3-1 AHP法進行步驟 38 圖3-2 初步層級架構 41 圖4-1 修正後之層級架構 53 |
| 參考文獻 |
一、中文文獻 王天津、陳盈秀(2005)。模糊偏好關係與AHP在實施先進製造技術(AMT)預測上之比較研究。中華管理學報,6(3):61-72。 王仕圖(2013)。非營利組織在社區照顧服務的協調合作:以社區照顧關懷據點為例。臺大社會工作學刊,27:185-228。 王光旭(2016)。社區據點服務品質與成功老化提升程度關連性之初探:政府角色認知的調節效果。公共行政學報,50:77-115。 王惠蘭、許秀月、陳芬如(2013)。養護機構經營管理者對長期照護保險觀點之研究。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,14:99-125。 王朝源、王淑滿、陳逸珊(2020)。長期照顧項目下社區整體照顧服務體系之實證研究。科技法律評析,12:69-102。 司徒達賢(1996)。策略管理。臺北市:遠流。 江亮演、應福國(2005)。美國老人福利政策的新趨勢。社區發展季刊,110:369-378。 吳思華(2000)。策略九說。臺北市:臉譜。 吳鄭善明、余昕庭(2014)。建構高雄市長期照顧機構平衡計分卡指標之研究。社會工作實務與研究學刊,1:71-88。 李智明、張睿凱(2022)。消費者選擇叫車平台之關鍵因素。輔仁管理評論,29(2):81-115。 周宇翔、王舒芸(2019)。機器人在社區照顧關懷據點應用與挑戰之初探研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,7(3):262-279。 林宛萱、陳黛芬、林育德(2016)。社區照顧關懷據點經營管理策略之研究-以彰化市為例。嶺東學報,40:27-69。 林淑萱(2009)。英國社區照顧改革的省思。社區發展季刊,124:180-188。 林廣易、溫源鳳、林水金(2011)。以AHP模式評估台灣PC零組件供應商綠色供應鏈管理項目。創新研發學刊,7(1):126-137。 邱泯科、傅秀秀(2014)。初探高齡者使用社區照顧關懷據點服務之經驗-以台北市關渡關懷據點為例。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,4(1):1-39。 邱淵明、劉春初、何三平(2018)。運用AHP、TOPSIS於臺南市政府消防局化災處理隊據點評估之研究。建築學報,103:87-100。 馬振來、郭俊巖、呂季芳(2017)。體適能導入社區關懷據點對高齡者身心健康影響之探討。社會發展研究學刊,20:1-38。 高家常、林沛綺、黃惠滿、林祐樺(2013)。參與社區關懷據點之長者身體活動與生活品質關係之探討。護理暨健康照護研究,9(2):157-167。 國家發展委員會(2020)。中華民國人口推估(2020至2070年)。臺北市:國家發展委員會。 郭登聰(2014)。建構「高齡友善城市」:從活躍老化到在地老化的重要課題-以社區照顧關懷據點為例。輔仁社會研究,4:1-42。 陳俊合(2016)。景觀生態規劃方案評選模式研究-分析階層程序(AHP)法應用。建築與規劃學報,17(2/3):117-136。 曾明性、吳慧卿(2020)。臺灣社區照顧關懷據點與需求人口之資源供需差異分析:應用地理可近性方法評估社區照顧資源配置妥適性。調查研究-方法與應用,44:41-95。 游曉微、鞏愛華、植村尚史、陳雅美(2019)。日本介護制度沿革對台灣長期照顧體系發展之啟示。台灣公共衛生雜誌,38(5):457-469。 新北市政府主計處(2020)。新北市高齡圖像108年。取自https://www.kanner.org.tw/user_file/user_file/320001/file/68640/108%E5%B9%B4%E6%96%B0%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E9%AB%98%E9%BD%A1%E5%9C%96%E5%83%8F.pdf 溫如慧(2011)。老人社區照顧-檢視台灣、英國、與香港之政策。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,10:73-87。 劉佳怡、蕭志同、劉仲戌(2017)。社會企業之永續經營模式:以里仁公司為例。管理與系統,24(3):455-476。 劉素芬(2016)。從培力觀點看社區照顧老人關懷據點之發展。社區發展季刊,153:305-317。 衛生福利部(2016)。長期照顧十年計畫2.0(106~115年)(核定本)。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-46355-2d5102fb-23c8-49c8-9462-c4bfeb376d92.html 衛生福利部(2017)。長期2.0懶人包。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-41398-de03f2b4-64b0-4d1a-9b01-18bf2f7cadb8.html 衛生福利部(2019a)。長照基金之財務規劃「以支定收」無破產之虞。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-4252-49616-1.html 衛生福利部(2019b)。長期照顧的整體政策藍圖。取自https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-5198-42393-201.html 衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2005)。臺灣健康社區六星計畫推動方案。社區發展季刊,110:517-526。 衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2016)。社區照顧關懷據點服務入口網站-據點介紹。取自https://ccare.sfaa.gov.tw/home/other/about 衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2017)。普設社區照顧關懷據點廣佈多元長照服務據點。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/doltc/cp-4170-37558-123.html 衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2020)。社區照顧服務關懷據點入口網。取自https://ccare.sfaa.gov.tw/ 衛生福利部國民健康署(2021)。高齡社會白皮書。 盧龍泉、顏禎瑩(2015)。行銷策略與永續經營之研究-以台灣旅行業者為例。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,14(2):38-53。 賴兩陽(2012)。聯合社區的推動歷程與功能分析:以桃園縣觀音鄉為例。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,2(2):1-39。 謝振裕、王春展、曾薔霓、盧禹璁(2013)。社區照顧關懷據點之志願服務人員運用管理探討—以原台南縣為例。嘉南學報,39:380-396。 謝聖哲(2018)。從社區照顧關懷據點到巷弄長照站:挑戰與困境。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,8(1):1-34。 二、英文文獻 Al-Harbi, K. M. A. S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1): 19-27. Allen, E. P., Muhwezi, W. W., Henriksson, D. K., & Mbonye, A. K. (2017). Health facility management and access: A qualitative analysis of challenges to seeking healthcare for children under five in Uganda. Health Policy and Planning, 32(7): 934-942. Al-Tabbaa, O., Gadd, K., & Ankrah, S. (2013). Excellence models in the non-profit context: Strategies for continuous improvement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30(5): 590-612. Balser, D., & McClusky, J. (2005). Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3): 295-315. Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18): 5375-5393. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2003). How the resource‐based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate‐level strategy. British Journal of Management, 14(4): 289-303. Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3): 317-339. Bryson, J. M., Gibbons, M. J., & Shaye, G. (2001). Enterprise schemes for nonprofit survival, growth, and effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3): 271-288. Chang, K. S., Tsai, W. H., Tsai, C. H., Yeh, H. I., Chiu, P. H., Chang, Y. W., Chen, H. Y., Tsai, J. M., & Lee, S. C. (2017). Effects of health education programs for the elders in community care centers – Evaluated by health promotion behaviors. International Journal of Gerontology, 11(2): 109-113. Chen, Y. J. (2008). Strength perspective: An analysis of ageing in place care model in Taiwan based on traditional filial piety. Ageing International, 32(3): 183-204. Chen, Y. M., Thompson, E. A., Berkowitz, B., Young, H. M., & Ward, D. (2011). Factors and home-and community-based services (HCBS) that predict older adults’ residential transitions. Journal of Service Science and Management, 4: 368-379. Chiliza, J., Laing, R., Feeley III, F. G., & Borba, C. P. C. (2021). Program sustainability post PEPFAR direct service support in the Western Cape, South Africa. PLoS ONE, 16(5): 1-16. Chun, S., & Nam, K. (2022). Analyzation and prioritization of healthcare environment criteria for designing geriatric long-term care private hospitals in South Korea using an analytic hierarchy process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1-16. Claesson, M., Jonasson, L. L., Lindberg, E., & Josefsson, K. (2020). What implies registered nurses' leadership close to older adults in municipal home health care? A systematic review. BMC Nursing, 19(30): 1-11. Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9, 458- 467. Eng, T. Y., Liu, C. Y. G., & Sekhon, Y. K. (2011). The role of relationally embedded network ties in resource acquisition of british nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6): 1092-1115. Evashwick, C. (2005). The continuum of long-term care (3rd). Boston: Cengage Learning. Evashwick, C., & Riedel, J. (2004). Managing long-term care. Chicago: Health Administration Press. Falk-Huzar, E. (2016). The need for caregiver education and training in the assisted living industry. Adult Learning, 28(3): 125-127. Faul, A. C., Schapmire, T. J., D'Ambrosio, J., Feaster D., Oak, C. S., & Farley, A. (2010). Promoting sustainability in frontline home care aides: Understanding factors affecting job retention in the home care workforce. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 22(6): 408-416. Figueiredo, D., Barbosa, A., Cruz, J., Marques, A., & Sousa, L. (2013). Empowering staff in dementia long-term care: towards a more supportive approach to interventions. Educational Gerontology, 39(6): 413-427. Francis, J., & Netten, A. (2003). Quality in home care: Client and provider views. Retrieved from https://www.pssru.ac.uk/pub/dp2017.pdf Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y. (2015). Extending the business model canvas: A dynamic perspective. International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, 5: 86-95. Frumkin, P., & Andre-Clark, A. (2000). When missions, markets and politics collide: Values and strategy in the nonprofit human services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29: 141-163. Gaitonde, R., Muraleedharan, V. R., San Sebastian, M., & Hurtig, A. K. (2019). Accountability in the health system of Tamil Nadu, India: Exploring its multiple meanings. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(44): 1-11. García-Muiña, F. E., Medina-Salgado, M. S., Ferrari, A. M., & Cucchi, M. (2020). Sustainability transition in industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing with the triple-layered business model canvas. Sustainability, 12(6): 1-19. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 654-681. Gilchrist, A. (2004). The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development. Bristol: Policy Press. Golubeva, E. Y., & Khabarova, L. G. (2019). Family care as a tool for mitigating the social risks of the elderly people in remote areas. Advances in Gerontology, 9(3): 373-378. Harvath, T. A., Swafford, K., Smith, K., Miller, L. L., Volpin, M., Sexson, K., White, D., & Young, H. A. (2008). Enhancing nursing leadership in long-term care. A review of the literature. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 1(3): 187-196. Hatten, M. L. (1982). Strategic management in not-for-profit organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2): 89-104. Jeuvons, T. H. (1992). When management is the message relating values to management practice in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2(4): 403-417. Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135: 1474-1486. Kammer, B. A. (1997). An interior renovation of the community care center of Muncie, Indiana: An honors thesis (HONRS 499). Undergraduate Senior Honors Thesis. Kearns, K. P., Bell1, D., Deem, B., & McShane, L. (2012). How nonprofit leaders evaluate funding sources. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1): 121-143. Klir, G. J., & Folger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi. Kusmaul, N. (2016). The content of education for direct caregivers. Educational Gerontology, 42(1): 19-24. Lee, H. L., & Tang, C. S. (2017). Socially and environmentally responsible value Chain innovations: New operations management research opportunities. Management Science, 64(3): 983-996. Lee, Y. J., & Hsu, Y. H. (2016). An integrated system of engaging social workers and community volunteers in social care for the elderly: Case studies in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 26(4): 203-216. Liang, C. C., Change, Q. X., Hung, Y. C., Chen, C. C., Lin, C. H., Wei, Y. C., & Chen, J. C. (2017). Effects of a community care station program with structured exercise intervention on physical performance and balance in community-dwelling older adults: A prospective 2-Year observational study. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 25(4): 596-603. Lipe, M. G., & Salterio, S. E. (2000). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75(3): 283-298. Lu, J. (2015). Which nonprofit gets more government funding? Nonprofits’ organizational attributes and their receipts of government funding. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(3): 297-312. Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2003). Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3): 169-249. Materla, T., Cudeny, E. A., & Antony, J. (2017). The application of Kano model in the healthcare industry: A systematic literature review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(5-6): 660-681. Mickus, M., Luz, C. C., & Hogan, A. (2004). Voices from the front: Recruitment and retention of direct care workers in long term care across Michigan. Retrieved from https://phinational.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/clearinghouse/MI_vocices_from_the_front.pdf Mirońska, D., & Zaborek, P. (2018). NGO - business collaboration: A comparison of organizational, social, and reputation value from the NGO perspective in Poland. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(3): 532-551. Murry, J. W. & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. The Review of Higher Education, 18, 426-436. Nouri, H., & Parker, R. J. (1998). The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5-6): 467-483. OECD (2013). OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality: Sweden 2013. Raising Standards, in OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. New York: Wiley. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4): 41-50. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Powell, J. L. (2011). Towards a sociology of trust: Community care and managing diversity. Sociology Mind, 1(2): 27-32. Renwick, D. (1996). Caring for older people: Community care and social services. British Medical Journal, 313(7061): 869-872. Ritchie, W. J., & Kolodinsky, R. W. (2003). Nonprofit organization financial performance measurement: An evaluation of new and existing financial performance measures. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 13(4): 367-381. Saaty, T. L. (1971). On polynomials and crossing numbers of complete graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 10(2): 183-184. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill. Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic network process - Decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburg: RWS Publications. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: Across-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9): 8182-8192. Smith, B. D., & Mogro-Wilson, C. (2007). Multi-level influences on the practice of inter-agency collaboration in child welfare and substance abuse treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(5): 545-556. Solangi, Y. A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N. H., & Ali, S. (2019). Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236: 117655. Swartz, K. (2013). Searching for a balance of responsibilities: OECD countries' changing elderly assistance policies. Annual Review Public Health, 34: 397-412. Tourangeau, A., Patterson, E., Rowe, A., Saari, M., Thomson, H., MacDonald, G., Cranley, L., & Squires, M. (2014). Factors influencing home care nurse intention to remain employed. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(8): 1015-1026. United Nations (2015a). United nations development programme. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals United Nations (2015b). The sustainable development goals report 2016. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/ United Nations (2019). World population prospects 2019. Retrieved from https://population.un.org/wpp/ van Lier, L., Bosmans, J. E., van der Roest, H. G., Heymans, M. W., Garms-Homolová, V., Declercq, A., Jónsson, P. V., & van Hout, P. J. (2019). Development and validation of a prediction model for six-month societal costs in older community care-recipients in multiple countries; the IBenC study. Health Services Insights, 13: 1-13. Vian, T., Koseki, S., Feeley, F. G., & Beard, J. (2013). Strengthening capacity for AIDS vaccine research: Analysis of the Pfizer Global Health Fellows Program and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. BMC Health Services Research, 13(378): 1-12. Victor, C. R. (1997). Community care and older people. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes the Limited. Wang, J. Y., & Xu, J. Y. (2021). Growing old with esteem - Chengdu LONG LIVE’s journey from community care to elderly-oriented service. Beijing: Renmin University Wang, P. (2015). The impact of german long-term care insurance: 1995-2013. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 27(1): 135-203. Wang, W. L., Chang, H. J., Liu, A. C., & Chen, Y. W. (2007). Research into care quality criteria for long-term care institutions. Journal of Nursing Research, 15(4), 255-264. Wei, C. C., Chien, C. F., & Wang, M. J. J. (2005). An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(1): 47-62. Wei, W. L., Chung, C. H., & Chan, S. C. (2020). Empirical study of innovative service design of environmental facilities in the elderly community - Taking health care station as example. Sustainable Innovation in Education and Technology, Education and Awareness of Sustainability: 105-109. WHO Centre for Health Development (2004). A glossary of terms for community health care and services for older persons. Japan: WHO Centre for Health Development. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2): 75-94. Witmer, H., & Mellinger, M. S. (2016). Organizational resilience: Nonprofit organizations' response to change. Work, 54(2): 255-265. World Health Organization (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67215/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y World Health Organization (2015). World report on ageing and health. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/186463 Wu, H. C., & Tseng, M. H. (2018). Evaluating disparities in elderly community care resources: Using a geographic accessibility and inequality index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7): 1353. Zhu, J., Ye, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Legitimacy, board involvement, and resource competitiveness: Drivers of NGO revenue diversification. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29: 1176-1189. |
| 論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信