現今全球能源市場正處於一個轉型階段，傳統的中心化能源交易系統面臨著成本高昂的中心化數據庫建設和維護、數據被篡改後可能會導致嚴重後果，以及難以保障用戶隱私等三大挑戰。在這樣的背景下，越來越多的國家將目光轉向區塊鏈技術，以應對這些問題，特別是在碳權交易領域。然而，目前台灣碳交易仍然使用的是傳統的交易架構。因此，針對如何在台灣現有交易架構下有效的整合區塊鏈技術，已成為企業極需重視的議題。
本研究通過彙整區塊鏈相關文獻，梳理了在區塊鏈應用中的實際使用情況，透過對這些系統的組成進行了深入分析，並輔以專家訪談，了解專家對於碳交易結合區塊鏈的可行性之看法。根據初次訪談結果及文獻綜述，本研究設計了一個區塊鏈碳交易雛型系統。在系統建置完成後，進行專家使用心得訪談，彙整出雛型系統設計原則與改善建議，為下一代系統設計的可行參考依據。此外，本研究還會總出區塊鏈技術與碳交易結合的可行性分析，並為後續台灣政府對碳交易系統的設計流程提供建議。

The contemporary global energy marketplace is in the midst of a pivotal transformation. Traditional, centralized modalities of energy trade are contending with formidable adversities, including the exorbitant outlays requisite for the establishment and sustenance of centralized databanks, the grave ramifications of data infringement, and the intricacies entailed in the protection of consumer confidentiality. Within this milieu, there is a burgeoning inclination among nations to pivot towards blockchain technology as a panacea for these impediments, with a pronounced focus on the domain of carbon emissions commerce. Nonetheless, the extant carbon trading infrastructure in Taiwan is predicated on conventional transactional frameworks, thereby rendering the seamless assimilation of blockchain into Taiwan's extant trading edifice a matter of acute commercial imperative.
This study consolidates blockchain-related literature to analyze the actual usage of blockchain applications globally. Through an in-depth analysis of these systems' components, coupled with expert interviews, the feasibility of integrating blockchain technology with carbon trading was examined. Based on the initial interview results and literature review, a prototype blockchain-based carbon trading system was designed. After the system was built, a second round of expert interviews was conducted to gather feedback on the system's usability and to compile design principles and improvement suggestions for the prototype. This provides a feasible reference for the next generation of system design. Additionally, this study offers a feasibility analysis of integrating blockchain technology with carbon trading and provides recommendations for the design process of carbon trading systems to inform future government policy in Taiwan.

主目錄	V
表目錄	VIII
圖目錄	IX
第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究背景與動機	1
第二節	研究目的	4
第三節	研究架構	4
第二章	文獻探討	6
第一節	碳交易相關理論	6
第二節	碳交易所	11
第三節	區塊鏈與智慧合約	14
第四節	超級帳本	17
第三章	研究方法	20
第一節	研究流程	21
第二節	系統設計	22
第三節	研究設計	23
第四章	系統開發與實作	25
第一節	建置系統開發環境	25
第二節	實作開發與設計	27
第三節	鏈碼功能描述	30
第四節	碳交易模式	31
第五節	系統展示	32
第六節	回饋搜集	40
第五章 研究討論	44
第一節	系統建置建議與反饋-專家A	44
第二節	系統建置建議與反饋-專家B	46
第三節	系統建置建議與反饋-專家C	48
第四節	整體建議	49
第六章	研究結論	51
第一節	結論	51
第二節	管理意涵	53
第三節	研究限制與建議	54
文獻參考	57
附錄一	訪談大綱	62
附錄二	智慧合約	65


表目錄 
表 2.1 碳定價工具比較............................................................................8
表 2.2 全球主要碳交易所......................................................................12
表 4.1 環境配置表..................................................................................25
表 4.2 鏈碼功能表..................................................................................30
表 4.3 交易狀態碼..................................................................................32
表 4.4 專家訪談背景彙整表..................................................................41
表 4.5 理論-問卷回覆............................................................................42
表 4.6 系統-問卷回覆............................................................................43


圖目錄 
圖 1.1 本文架構圖...................................................................................5
圖 2.1 簡化的支付驗證.........................................................................15
圖 3.1 研究流程圖.................................................................................22
圖 4.1 碳交易區塊鏈流程圖.................................................................27
圖 4.2 碳交易區塊鏈交易系統.............................................................29
圖 4.3 交易流程圖.................................................................................31
圖 4.4 創建資產.....................................................................................33
圖 4.5 查詢所有資產.............................................................................34
圖 4.6 現有資產列表.............................................................................34
圖 4.7 查詢單一碳權.............................................................................34
圖 4.8 查詢資產來源紀錄.....................................................................35
圖 4.9 更新資產.....................................................................................35
圖 4.10 碳權移轉...................................................................................36
圖 4.11 特定專案詳細資訊...................................................................37
圖 4.12 註銷碳權...................................................................................37
圖 4.13 政府介面...................................................................................38
圖 4.14 賣方介面...................................................................................39
圖 4.15 買方介面...................................................................................40
圖 6.1 平台擴展.....................................................................................55

1.	朱敏嘉、林宗昱(2020)。國際碳定價工具現況與減碳績效。經濟前瞻，190，28-31。
2.	吳珮瑛(2022)。台灣邁向淨零碳排放減量路徑之研擬-引入碳預算之國家上位目標規劃。台灣國際研究季刊, 18(2)，1-74。
3.	林宇陽(2018)。巴黎協定生效後中國碳交易市場研究。淡江大學中國大陸研究所，碩士論文。
4.	邱祈榮、許庭瑋(2022)。區塊鏈於碳交易制度之應用。中華林學季刊，55(1)，1-17。
5.	國際貨幣基金組織(IMF) (2022年)。國際碳定價工具現況與減碳績效。https://www.imf.org/zh/Home。
6.	許靖傑(2016)。全球化下我國碳排放權交易制度之探討。中原大學財經法律學系，碩士論文。
7.	黃薇(2017)。台灣推行碳價機制之探討。國立台灣大學會計學系，碩士論文。
8.	韓昭慶(2002)。《京都議定書》的背景及其相關問題分析。復旦學報: 社會科學版，2期，100-104。
9.	全國法規資料庫 (2022年)。碳排放權交易法規。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0020098。
10.	新加坡金融管理局(2022年)。碳交易制度指南。https://www.mas.gov.sg/。
11.	Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2012). The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(2), 152-180.
12.	Alyaseen, I. F. T. (2019). Consensus algorithms blockchain: A comparative study. International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing, 5(2), 66-71.
13.	Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., Enyeart, D., Ferris, C., Laventman, G., & Manevich, Y. (2018). Hyperledger fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, 1-15.
14.	Best, R., & Zhang, Q. Y. (2020). What explains carbon-pricing variation between countries?. Energy Policy, 143, 111541.
15.	Bistarelli, S., Mazzante, G., Micheletti, M., Mostarda, L., Sestili, D., & Tiezzi, F. (2020). Ethereum smart contracts: Analysis and statistics of their source code and opcodes. Internet of Things, 11, 100198.
16.	Blyth, W., Bunn, D., Kettunen, J., & Wilson, T. (2009). Policy interactions, risk and price formation in carbon markets. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5192-5207. 
17.	Breidenich, C., Magraw, D., Rowley, A., & Rubin, J. W. (1998). The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. American Journal of International Law, 92(2), 315-331. 
18.	Calel, R. (2013). Carbon markets: A historical overview. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(2), 107-119.
19.	Dhillon, V., Metcalf, D., & Hooper, M. (2017). The Hyperledger Project. In V. Dhillon, D. Metcalf, & M. Hooper, Blockchain Enabled Applications, 139-149. 
20.	Foschini, L., Gavagna, A., Martuscelli, G., & Montanari, R. (2020). Hyperledger fabric blockchain: Chaincode performance analysis. ICC 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 1-6.
21.	Kim, Y.H., Kwag, H.G., & Kim, J.O. (2011). Carbon Emission Analysis Considering Demand Response Effect in TOU Program. The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers, 60(6), 1091-1096.
22.	Mougayar, W. (2016). The business blockchain: promise, practice, and application of the next Internet technology. John Wiley & Sons.
23.	Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system..
24.	Onica, E., & Schifirnet, C.I. (2021). Towards Efficient Hashing in Ethereum Smart Contracts. ICSOFT, 660-666.
25.	Pan, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Yan, J., Zhou, S., Li, G., & Bao, J. (2019). Application of Blockchain in Carbon Trading. Energy Procedia, 158, 4286-4291.
26.	Pongnumkul, S., Siripanpornchana, C., & Thajchayapong, S. (2017). Performance analysis of private blockchain platforms in varying workloads. In 2017 26th international conference on computer communication and networks (ICCCN), 1-6.
27.	Sands, P. (1992). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 1(3), 270-277.
28.	Schletz, M., Franke, L. A., & Salomo, S. (2020). Blockchain Application for the Paris Agreement Carbon Market Mechanism—A Decision Framework and Architecture. Sustainability, 12(12), 5069. 
29.	Sharma, K., & Jain, D. (2019). Consensus algorithms in blockchain technology: A survey. 2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 1-7.
30.	Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday.
31.	Thakkar, P., Nathan, S., & Viswanathan, B. (2018). Performance benchmarking and optimizing hyperledger fabric blockchain platform. 2018 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 264-276.
32.	Wang, S., Ouyang, L., Yuan, Y., Ni, X., Han, X., & Wang, F.Y. (2019). Blockchain-enabled smart contracts: Architecture, applications, and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 49(11), 2266-2277.
33.	Wu, D. D., Olson, D. L., Wu, D. D., & Olson, D. L. (2015). Pricing of Carbon Emission Exchange in the EU ETS. Enterprise Risk Management in Finance, 183-198. 
34.	Yang, Z. (2012). The Right to Carbon Emission: A New Right to Development. American Journal of Climate Change, 01(02), 108-116. 
35.	Zakeri, A., Dehghanian, F., Fahimnia, B., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Carbon pricing versus emissions trading: A supply chain planning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 197-205.