§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2206201615103900
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2016.00692
論文名稱(中文) 油價對亞洲四國航空業股價報酬之非線性影響
論文名稱(英文) Nonlinear Effects of Oil Prices on Stock Returns of the Airline Industry: Evidence from Four Asian Countries
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 財務金融學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Banking and Finance
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 林怡坊
研究生(英文) Yi-Fang Lin
學號 603530436
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2016-06-19
論文頁數 69頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 聶建中
共同指導教授 - 沈中華
委員 - 何宗武
委員 - 韋伯韜
委員 - 聶建中
關鍵字(中) 原油價格
航空業
股價報酬
關鍵字(英) Crude oil prices
Airline industry
Stock returns
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本文實證模型使用González, Teräsvirta and van Dijk (2004, 2005)的縱橫平滑移轉迴歸模型,探討不同的原油價格對亞洲四國航空業股價報酬是否存在縱橫平滑移轉效果。並進一步探討其他變數如原油價格、利率、匯率及ROE對航空業股價報酬的影響。
實證結果顯示,原油價格低並不代表就會有正報酬;反之,當油價上漲時,油價對股價報酬的影響為顯著負相關,但這觀點並不適用於日本與南韓市場。在絕大部分的原油價格區間上,匯率對中國與台灣的股價報酬為顯著正相關。然而,匯率對日本股價報酬為負相關;利率對四國的股價報酬皆為正相關。ROE對任何市場的股價報酬在任何門檻值的區間上都是無顯著影響,除了當原油價格介於105.8817~106.3475美元的時候,ROE對韓國的股價報酬才有顯著正相關。
綜合以上所述,本研究建議投資人在選擇航空產業投資時,不能只看原油價格低就投資,仍然需多參考總體經面如利率、匯率等去評估當時經濟與市場環境是否適合投資,再去觀察原油價格走勢會是較為合適的做法。
英文摘要
We adopt the panel smooth transition regression model developed by González, Teräsvirta and van Dijk (2004, 2005) to examine whether crude oil prices may cause smooth transition effects on airline’s stock returns in four Asian countries. In addition, we also evaluate the influence of some independent variables on stock returns. The empirical results are as below:
Firstly, lower crude oil prices do not guarantee that there will be a positive return. On the contrary, when crude oil prices go up, it has a significant positive relationship with stock returns except in Japanese and South Korean stock markets. Secondly, in most of the crude oil price regimes, the exchange rate has a significant positive relationship with Chinese and Taiwanese stock returns. However, the exchange rate has a significant negative relationship with Japanese stock returns. In addition, the interest rate has a significant positive relationship with four countries’ stock returns. Finally, the influence of ROE on stock returns is not significant in the stock market in three of the four countries. However, ROE has a significant positive relationship with South Korean stock returns when the crude oil price is between USD $105.8817 and USD $ 106.3475.
To summarize, investors are not advised to invest in the airline industry by merely considering crude oil prices. It is also crucial to look at macroeconomic aspects, e.g., the interest rate and the exchange rate. In other words, it would be better to estimate whether the economic conditions and the market environment for the present are suitable for investment before considering the crude oil prices.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目  錄 III
表目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
第一章 緒  論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的6
第三節 研究流程7
第四節 研究架構8
第二章 文獻探討9
第一節 原油價格對股票市場的影響與關係9
第二節 原油價格對航空業與其他運輸業的影響12
第三節 其他總體與個體因素與股價報酬間關係14
第三章 研究方法17
第一節 研究資料17
第二節 研究方法21
第三節 縱橫單根檢定22
第四節 縱橫平滑移轉迴歸模型25
第五節 縱橫平滑移轉迴歸模型之設定30
第四章 實證結果與分析37
第五章 結論與建議61
參考文獻	64

表  目  錄
表3-1-1 本次研究地區與對象	20
表3-1-2 模型變數彙整表20
表4-1-1 各變數敘述統計量37
表4-1-2 依各國家區分之敘述統計量39
表4-2-1 縱橫單根檢定40
表4-2-2 縱橫單根檢定(資料經一階差分)41
表4-3-1 原油價格對中國航空業股價報酬之同質性檢定42
表4-3-2 原油價格對日本航空業股價報酬之同質性檢定43
表4-3-3 原油價格對南韓航空業股價報酬之同質性檢定43
表4-3-4 原油價格對台灣航空業股價報酬之同質性檢定43
表4-3-5 空間向量的位置參數之檢測44
表4-3-6 原油價格對中國之航空業股價報酬之區間個數檢定44
表4-3-6 原油價格對中國之航空業股價報酬之區間個數檢定(續)45
表4-3-7 原油價格對日本之航空業股價報酬之區間個數檢定45
表4-3-8 原油價格對南韓之航空業股價報酬之區間個數檢定45
表4-3-9 原油價格對台灣之航空業股價報酬之區間個數檢定46
表4-3-10 原油價格對中國航空業股價報酬之模型估計結果50
表4-3-10 原油價格對中國航空業股價報酬之模型估計結果(續)51
表4-3-11 解釋變數在不同原油價格下對中國航空業股價報酬的影響52
表4-3-12 原油價格對日本航空業股價報酬之模型估計結果55
表4-3-13 解釋變數在不同原油價格下對日本航空業股價報酬的影響55
表4-3-14 原油價格對南韓航空業股價報酬率之模型估計結果57
表4-3-15 解釋變數在不同原油價格下對南韓航空業股價報酬的影響57
表4-3-16 原油價格對台灣航空業股價報酬之模型估計結果59
表4-3-17 解釋變數在不同原油價格下對台灣航空業股價報酬的影響60

圖目錄
圖1-1-1 布蘭特原油現貨價格	3
圖1-4-1 研究架構圖8
圖3-4-1 m=1之轉換模型27
圖3-4-2 m=2之轉換模型28
參考文獻
一、國外文獻
Abhyankar, A., X. Bing and J. Wang, (2013), “Oil Price Shocks and the Stock Market: Evidence from Japan,” Energy Journal, Vol. 34(2), pp. 199-222.
Ahsan, A. F. M. M. (2012), “Can ROE Be Used to Predict Portfolio Performance?,” Economics, Management and Financial Markets, Vol. 7(2), pp.132-148.
Andrews, D. W. K. and W. Ploberger, (1994), “Optimal Tests When a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Econometrica, Vol. 62(6), pp. 1383-1414.
Chaibi, A., S. Alioui and B. Xiao, (2015), “On the Impact of Firm Size on Risk and Return: Fresh Evidence from the American Stock Market Over the Recent Years,” Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 31(1), pp. 29-36.
Chen, S. W. and T. C. Chen, (2013), “Untangling the Non-Linear Causal Nexus between Exchange Rates and Stock Prices,” Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 39(2), pp. 231-259. 
Davies, R. B. (1977), “Hypothesis Testing When a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Biometrika, Vol. 64, pp. 247-254.
Davies, R. B. (1987), “Hypothesis Testing When a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Biometrika, Vol. 74, pp. 33-43.
Filis, G., S. Degiannakis and C. Floros, (2011), “Dynamic Correlation between Stock Market and Oil Prices: The Case of Oil-Importing and Oil-Exporting Countries,” International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 20(3), pp. 152-164.
Gonza′lez, A., T. Teräsvirta and D. van Dijk, (2004), “Panel Smooth Transition Regression Model and an Application to Investment under Credit Constraints,” Stockholm School of Economics, Working papers.
Gonza′lez, A., T. Teräsvirta and D. van Dijk, (2005), “Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models,” Stockholm School of Economics, Working papers.
Granger, C. W. J. and T. Teräsvirta, (1993), “Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships,” Oxford University Press.
Hansen, B. E. (1996), “Inference When a Nuisance Parameter is Not Identified under the Null Hypothesis,” Econometrica, Vol. 64, pp. 413-430.
Hansen, B. E. (1999), “Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 93, pp. 345–368.
Islam, M. S., M. A. Salam and M. M. Hasan, (2015), “Factors Affecting the Stock Price Movement: A Case Study on Dhaka Stock Exchange,” International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 10(10), pp. 253-262.
Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran and Y. Shin, (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 115(1), pp. 53-74.
Jansen, E. S. and T. Terasvirta, (1996), “Testing Parameter Constancy and Super Exogeneity in Econometric Equations,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58, pp. 735-763.
Kumar, M. (2013), “Returns and Volatility Spillover between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates,” International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 8(2), pp.108-128.
Lee, R. L., M. M. Lo, H. H. Chu and H. J. Su, (2015), “Does Price Increases in Chinese Stock Index Cause Brent Crude Oil Index? Applying Threshold Cointegration Regression,” Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, Vol. 5(4), pp. 131-149.
Levin, A., C. F. Lin and C. S. Chu, (2002), “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 108(1), pp. 1-24.
Lin, C. C., C. R. Fang and H. P. Cheng, (2014), “The Impact of Oil Price Shocks on the Returns in China's Stock Market,” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 50(5), pp. 193-205.
Luukkonen, R., P. Saikkonen and T. Teräsvirta, (1988), “Testing Linearity against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Biometrika, Vol. 75, pp. 491–499.
Maddala, G. S. and S. Wu, (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, pp. 631–652.
Miller, J. I. and R. A. Ratti, (2009), “Crude Oil and Stock Markets: Stability, Instability, and Bubbles,” Energy Economics, Vol. 31(4), pp. 559-568.
Mohanty, S. K. and M. Nandha, (2011), “Oil Shocks and Equity Returns: An Empirical Analysis of the US Transportation Sector,” Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, Vol. 14(1), pp. 101-128.
Mukherji, R. (2015), “What Determines Stock Returns? - A Comparative Study of the Effects of Fiscal, Monetary and Trade Variables,” IUP Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 14(1), pp. 33-46.
Murphy, F., N. Li, B. Murphy and M. Cummins, (2013), “The Link between Jet Fuel Prices, Carbon Credits and Airline Firm Value,” Journal of Energy Markets, Vol. 6(2), pp. 83-97.
Nandha, M. and R. Brooks, (2009), “Oil Prices and Transport Sector Returns: An International Analysis,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 33(4), pp. 393-409.
Nandha, M., R. Brooks, and R. Fatt, (2013), “Oil, Oil Volatility and Airline Stocks: A Global Analysis,” Accounting and Management Information Systems, Vol. 12(2), pp. 302-318.
Nieh, C. C. and C. F. Lee, (2001), “Dynamic Relationship between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates for G-7 Countries,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 41(4), pp. 477-490.
Rahman, M. A. and M. K. Hassan, (2013), “Firm Fundamentals and Stock Prices in Emerging Asian Stock Markets: Some Panel Data Evidence,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 41(3), pp. 463-487.
Rahman, M. L. and J. Uddin, (2009), “Dynamic Relationship between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates: Evidence from Three South Asian Countries,” International Business Research, Vol. 2(2), pp. 167-174.
Teräsvirta, T. (1994), “Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 89, pp. 208-218.
Zhao, H. (2010), “Dynamic Relationship between Exchange Rate and Stock Price: Evidence from China,” Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 24(2), pp. 103-112.

二、中文文獻	
劉燕東,(2015) ,「國際油價波動對我國上市航空公司股價的影響」,石油和化工設備,第7期,頁102-105。

三、相關網站
美國能源資訊署EIA https://www.eia.gov/
中華民國交通部民航局http://www.caa.gov.tw/big5/index.asp
台灣中油股份有限公司http://new.cpc.com.tw/Home/
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權予資料庫廠商
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信