本研究旨在探討人工智慧寫作感知對接受國際業務意願之影響，並檢驗寫作滿意度在其中所扮演之中介角色。隨著生成式人工智慧（Generative AI）迅速發展，AI 工具如 ChatGPT 已廣泛應用於英語學習與跨文化溝通情境中。既有研究指出，AI 能有效降低學習焦慮、提升語言能力與寫作自我效能，進而增強學習動機與英語使用意願，惟其是否能透過改善寫作體驗進一步提升個體對國際工作的接受度，仍有待實證探討。本研究以曾使用生成式 AI 進行英語寫作之學習者，透過問卷調查蒐集 422 份有效樣本，並以 SPSS 統計軟體進行敘述性統計、信效度分析、皮爾森相關分析及多元迴歸分析。研究變項包含 AI 寫作感知（優化學習、推理與問題解決、自然語言處理及虛擬學習體驗）、寫作滿意度，以及接受國際業務意願。研究結果顯示，AI 寫作感知對寫作滿意度具有顯著正向影響，寫作滿意度亦對接受國際業務意願具有顯著正向影響，且寫作滿意度在 AI 寫作感知與接受國際業務意願之間具有部分中介效果。整體而言，本研究顯示生成式 AI 不僅能提升英語寫作體驗，亦可能促進學生之國際流動性與跨國職涯意向，研究結果可作為教育與跨文化人才培育之參考依據。

This study aims to examine the effect of perceived AI writing on willingness to engage in international business and to investigate the mediating role of writing satisfaction. With the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI), tools such as ChatGPT have been widely applied in English learning and cross-cultural communication contexts. Previous studies have indicated that AI can effectively reduce learning anxiety, enhance language proficiency and writing self-efficacy, and subsequently strengthen learners’ motivation and willingness to use English; however, whether improvements in writing experiences facilitated by AI can further increase individuals’ willingness to accept international work remains insufficiently explored. To address this gap, this study who had used generative AI for English writing tasks. A total of 422 valid questionnaire responses were collected. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0, including descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analyses, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The research variables included perceived AI writing (optimized learning, reasoning and problem-solving, natural language processing, and virtual learning experience), writing satisfaction, and willingness to engage in international business. The results show that perceived AI writing has a significant positive effect on writing satisfaction, and writing satisfaction also has a significant positive effect on willingness to engage in international business. Furthermore, writing satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between perceived AI writing and willingness to engage in international business. Overall, the findings suggest that generative AI not only enhances English writing experiences but may also facilitate students’ international mobility and cross-border career intentions. The results provide valuable implications for education and cross-cultural talent development.

目錄
目錄	iv
表目錄	vi
圖目錄	vii
第一章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景	1
第二節 研究目的	5
第三節 研究範圍及對象 6
第四節 研究流程 7
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 AI寫作工具 9
第二節 AI寫作感知與寫作滿意度 13
第三節 寫作滿意度與接受國際業務意願 16
第四節 AI寫作感知與接受國際業務意願 21
第五節 AI寫作感知、寫作滿意度與接受國際業務意願 22
第三章 研究方法 23
第一節 研究架構 23
第二節 研究假說 24
第三節 研究變數之操作型定義與衡量 29
第四節 問卷設計 37
第五節 資料分析方法 40
第四章 資料分析結果 45
第一節 敘述性統計分析 46
第二節 效度分析與信度分析	53
第三節 相關分析 64
第四節 迴歸分析 66
第五章 研究結論與發現 75
第一節 研究結論 75
第二節 研究貢獻 76
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 78
參考文獻	82
附錄 研究問卷 95

表目錄
表3-1 AI寫作感知之操作性定義與衡量問項 31
表3-2 寫作滿意度之操作性定義與衡量問項 34
表3-3 接受國際業務意願之操作性定義與衡量問項 36
表3-4 研究問卷發放與回收情形 39
表3-5 四步驟中介變數檢定條件 44
表4-1 整體有效樣本性別分布情形 46
表4-2 整體有效樣本年齡分布情形 47
表4-3 整體有效樣本教育程度分布情形	48
表4-4 整體有效樣本職業分布情形 49
表4-5 整體有效樣本國籍分布情形 50
表4-6 受測者是否曾使用生成式AI之分布情形 41
表4-7 受測者曾經使用過生成式AI之種類分布情形 52
表4-8 AI寫作感知KMO值與球型檢定 54
表4-9 寫作滿意度KMO值與球型檢定 55
表4-10 接受國際業務意願KMO值與球型檢定 56
表4-11 信效度分析表 58
表4-12 各研究變項之相關分析表 65
表4-13 AI寫作感知對寫作滿意度迴歸分析表 69
表4-14 寫作滿意度對接受國際業務意願迴歸分析表 71
表4-15 AI寫作感知對接受國際業務意願迴歸分析表 73
表4-16 假說驗證彙整表 74

圖目錄
圖1-2 本研究之研究流程 8
圖3-1 研究架構	23
圖4-1 本研究之分析流程 45

參考文獻
一、中文文獻
陈倩, 王诗怡, & 吴丽丽. (2024). ChatGPT 对语言学习的影响及应对策略研究. Creative Education Studies, 12, 18.
張程皓. (2024). 人工智慧寫作助理對於英文學習者的寫作之成效研究. 
黃翊之. (2020). Automated writing evaluation in foreign language writing instruction:   
Application of Grammarly in English. Hwa Kang English Journal, 25, 79-95.
二、英文文獻
Almufarreh, A. (2024). Determinants of students’ satisfaction with ai tools in education: A pls-sem-ann approach. Sustainability, 16(13), 5354.
Almulla, M. A. (2024). Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: University students perspective. Heliyon, 10(11).
Alshammari, S. H., & Babu, E. (2025). The mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and students’ behavioural intention to use ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 7169.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bisdas, S., Topriceanu, C. C., Zakrzewska, Z., Irimia, A. V., Shakallis, L., Subhash, J., ... & Ebrahim, E. H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in medicine: a multinational multi-center survey on the medical and dental students' perception. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 795284.
Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: what is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty?. Journal of marketing, 73(3), 52-68.
Brannen, M. Y., Piekkari, R., & Tietze, S. (2017). The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance. In Language in international business: Developing a field (pp. 139-162). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Burger, B., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Corvello, V. (2023). On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European journal of innovation management, 26(7), 233-241.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 64.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). Deconstructing student perceptions of generative AI (GenAI) through an expectancy value theory (EVT)-based instrument. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01186.
Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview. Procedia computer science, 136, 16-24.
Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3443-3463.
Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of second language writing, 13(4), 313-335.
Consiglio, C., Borgogni, L., Di Tecco, C., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2016). What makes employees engaged with their work? The role of self-efficacy and employee’s perceptions of social context over time. Career development international, 21(2), 125-143.
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of science education and technology, 32(3), 444-452.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge university press.
Demir, M., Demir, Ş. Ş., & Yaşar, E. (2022). Big data and innovative organizational performance: Evidence from a moderated‐mediated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(4), 696-709.
Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023, September). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1206936). Frontiers Media SA.
Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2023). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Benefits, 2(2), 2022.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Indianapolis, Indiana, 17.
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge.
Duan, H., Gao, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025). The Application of AI Translation Tools in Improving Students' Translation Fidelity and Accuracy.
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students' learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 57.
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of management Journal, 46(5), 618-630.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(3), 460-474.
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: a qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-40.
Fitria, T. N. (2021, December). Artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Using AI tools for teaching and learning process. In Prosiding seminar nasional & call for paper STIE AAS (pp. 134-147).
Fitria, T. N. (2023, March). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. In ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 44-58).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gayed, J. M., Cross, J. S., & Oriola, A. M. Human-mediated AI writing assistance: A case study with Japanese English Language Learners.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning.
Goel, A. K., & Polepeddi, L. (2018). Jill Watson: A virtual teaching assistant for online education. In Learning engineering for online education (pp. 120-143). Routledge.
Graddol, D. (2008). Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a foreign language’. ULIS.
Grant, N., & Metz, C. (2022). A New Chat Bot Is a'Code Red'for Google's Search Business. International New York Times, NA-NA.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis.
Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of management, 21(5), 967-988.
Hu, K. (2023). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base-analyst note. Reuters, 12, 2023.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.
Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Grotewold, K., Hartwick, P., & Papin, K. (2023). Generative AI and teachers’ perspectives on its implementation in education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 313-338.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large   language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.
Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2008). Task response and text construction across L1 and L2 writing. Journal of second language writing, 17(1), 7-29.
Konara, P., & Wei, Y. (2019). The complementarity of human capital and language capital in foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 28(2), 391-404.
Konopaske, R., Robie, C., & Ivancevich, J. M. (2009). Managerial willingness to assume traveling, short-term and long-term global assignments. Management International Review, 49(3), 359-387.
Lazuwardiyyah, F., Setiawan, S., & Widyastuti, W. (2024). The Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Translators to Improve Writing in EFL Classroom. English Education: English Journal for Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 197-211.

Lee, I. (2002). Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of second language writing, 11(2), 135-159.
Lee, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, P. Y. (2022). Impacts of an AI-based cha bot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educational technology research and development, 70(5), 1843-1865.
Li, J., Zhao, Y., & Han, X. (2020). Would you work abroad? The effect of English proficiency on Chinese employees’ willingness to accept international assignments. International Business Review, 29(2), 101669.
Ling, Y., Jin, Z., Li, Y., & Huang, J. (2022). Learner satisfaction-based research on the application of artificial intelligence science popularization kits. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 901191.
Lin, T., & Lei, J. (2021). English-medium instruction and content learning in higher education: Effects of medium of instruction, English proficiency, and academic ability. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211061533.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education sciences, 13(4), 410.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language learning, 44(2), 283-305.
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 9.
Möller, M., Nirmal, G., Fabietti, D., Stierstorfer, Q., Zakhvatkin, M., Sommerfeld, H., & Schütt, S. (2024). Revolutionising distance learning: A comparative study of learning progress with AI-driven tutoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14642.
Murphy, K. P. (2022). Probabilistic machine learning: an introduction. MIT press.
Muthuswamy, V., & Nithya, N. (2024). Mobile Learning Environment’s Effect on AI Tool Satisfaction: Mediated by Visual Style, Moderated by Interaction. Foro de   Educación, 22(2), 1-22.
Neeley, T. B., Hinds, P. J., & Cramton, C. D. (2012). The (un) hidden turmoil of language in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 41(3), 236-244.
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research, 17(4), 460-469.
Patil, A. S., & Abraham, A. (2010). Intelligent and interactive web-based tutoring system in engineering education: Reviews, perspectives and development. In Computational intelligence for technology enhanced learning (pp. 79-97). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Pham, S. T., & Sampson, P. M. (2022). The development of artificial intelligence in education: A review in context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1408-1421.
Rafida, T., Suwandi, S., & Ananda, R. (2024). EFL students’ perception in Indonesia and Taiwan on using artificial intelligence to enhance writing skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 987-1016.
Ranalli, J., & Yamashita, T. (2022). Automated written corrective feedback: Error-correction performance and timing of delivery.
Raoofi, S., Gharibi, J., & Gharibi, H. (2017). Self-efficacy and its relation to ESL writing proficiency and academic disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(5), 127.
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of applied learning & teaching, 6(1), 342-363.
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18(1), 54.
Sit, C., Srinivasan, R., Amlani, A., Muthuswamy, K., Azam, A., Monzon, L., & Poon, D. S. (2020). Attitudes and perceptions of UK medical students towards artificial intelligence and radiology: a multicentre survey. Insights into imaging, 11(1), 14.
Skorupiński, P. M. (2015). American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Standards for educational and psychological testing. Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, 238(4), 201-203.
Srinivasa, K. G., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022). Harnessing the Power of AI to Education. In Learning, teaching, and assessment methods for contemporary learners: pedagogy for the digital generation (pp. 311-342). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative higher education, 49(2), 223-245.
Strzelecki, A. (2024). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive learning environments, 32(9), 5142-5155.
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational technology research and development, 68(1), 1-16.
Tenzer, H., Pudelko, M., & Harzing, A. W. (2014). The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 508-535.
Thomson, S. R., Pickard-Jones, B. A., Baines, S., & Otermans, P. C. (2024). The impact of AI on education and careers: What do students think?. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1457299.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart learning environments, 10(1), 15.
Tsai, S. C. (2022). Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing. Computer assisted language learning, 35(5-6), 1250-1272.
Wang, C. H., Harrison, J., Cardullo, V., & Xi, L. (2017). Exploring the relationship among international students' English self-efficacy, using English to learn self-efficacy, and academic self-efficacy. Journal of International Students, 8(1), 233-250.
Wang, C. H., Varma, A., Hung, L. S., & Wu, P. Y. (2024). A meta‐analysis of the antecedents of employee willingness to expatriate. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 62(1), e12359.
Xu, Z. (2025). Patterns and Purposes: A Cross-Journal Analysis of AI Tool Usage in Academic Writing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00632.
Yamao, S., & Sekiguchi, T. (2015). Employee commitment to corporate globalization: The role of English language proficiency and human resource practices. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 168-179.
Zhang, C., Meng, Y., & Ma, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. System, 121, 103259.
Zhou, C., Qiu, C., Liang, L., & Acuna, D. E. (2025). Paraphrase identification with deep learning: A review of datasets and methods. IEEE Access.