§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1607202117012300
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2021.00355
論文名稱(中文) 台灣在國際和多邊組織的挑戰和機遇:以聯合國與世界貿易組織為例
論文名稱(英文) The Challenges and Opportunities of Taiwan’s International Quest Case Studies of the UN and WTO
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 臺灣與亞太研究全英語碩士學位學程
系所名稱(英文) Master's Program in Taiwan and Asia-Pacific Studies, College of International Studies (English-Taught Program)
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 109
學期 2
出版年 110
研究生(中文) 歐志妮
研究生(英文) Jenness Opara
學號 609245047
學位類別 碩士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2021-06-21
論文頁數 112頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 鄭欽模博士(107106@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 蔡錫勲博士(114550@mail.tku.edu.tw.)
委員 - 蘇彥斌博士(yenpinsu@nccu.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 台灣
聯合國
世界貿易組織
國際組織
異常
參與
關鍵字(英) Taiwan
United Nations
World Trade Organization
International Organization
Anomalous
Participation
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
台灣像一個主權國家一樣運作,但它被否認和缺乏適當的國際承認。雖然它試圖被納入多邊和國際組織,但在大多數方面都失敗了。它尋求更大的國際參與已成為一種普遍現象,也是當前的熱門話題和熱議話題。它曾面臨無數挑戰。
該研究旨在考察台灣對參與國際和多邊組織的追求。它識別並描述了台灣作為一個異常國家尋求國際參與的挑戰和機遇。聯合國作為案例研究,評估台灣在尋求國際參與時所面臨的挑戰,而世貿組織則作為案例研究,評估台灣參與國際的機會。
定性方法被用來探索可用的文獻,並從關於確定主題的不同論點中得出推論。為了回答首要問題,該研究提出了四個子問題。即: 1. 阻
礙台灣加入聯合國的潛在因素是什麼? 2. 什麼因素使台灣能夠加入
世貿組織? 3. 如何克服台灣面臨的挑戰? 4. 台灣作為自治國家的未來生存是否取決於其是否被納入國際和多邊組織?
這項研究的結果表明,台灣目前的異常狀態對其尋求國際參與構成了相當大的挑戰,因此必須採取務實的步驟來最大限度地發揮其自治姿態。這項研究聲稱完全獨立和改變台灣的憲法作為糾正台灣在國際社會中命運多舛的地位的方法。分析了台灣的政治和國際困境,發現台灣人民通過自決原則有能力將台灣轉變為無可爭議的主權國家。
英文摘要
Taiwan functions like a sovereign state but it is denied and devoid of proper international recognition. While it has attempted to be included in multilateral and international organizations, it has failed on most counts. Its quest for greater international participation has become a common phenomenon, and a current topical and hotly debated topic. It has faced countless challenges.
The research sought to examine Taiwan’s quest for participation in international and multilateral organizations. It identified and described the challenges and opportunities of Taiwan’s quest for international participation as an anomalous state. The United Nations was used as a case study to assess the challenges confronting Taiwan in its quest for international participation, while the WTO was used as a case study to assess the opportunities of Taiwan’s international participation.
Qualitative methods were used to probe the available literature and draw inferences from the different arguments on the determined topic. In an attempt to answer the overarching question, the study posed four sub questions. i.e.: 1. What are the underlying factors hindering Taiwan from joining the UN? 2. What factors enabled Taiwan’s membership in the WTO? 3. How can the challenges confronting Taiwan be overcome? 4. Does Taiwan’s future survival as a self- governing state depend on its inclusion in international and multilateral organizations?
The findings of this study revealed that Taiwan’s current anomalous status poses considerable challenges to its quest for international participation, and as such must take pragmatic steps to maximize it self-governing posture. This study purports complete independence and a change Taiwan’s constitution as ways to correct Taiwan’s ill-fated status within the international community. Having analyzed Taiwan’s political and international dilemma, it was found that the Taiwanese people through the principle of self-determination has the power to transform Taiwan into an undisputed sovereign state.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
CHAPTER 1: Introduction	1
1.1 Overview	1
1.2 Background	3
1.3 Aim/Objective of Study	6
1.4 Research Statement of the Problem	8
1.4.1 Research Questions	9
1.5 International and Multilateral Organizations	9
1.6 Theoretical Approaches	11
1.6.1 Realism/Neo-Realism	13
1.6.2 Liberalism	14
1.6.3 Globalization	15
1.6.4 Sovereignty	17
1.6.5 Self-determination	17
1.6.6 Foreign Policy Analysis	18
1.7 Literature Review	19
1.8 Research Framework	25
1.9 Domain/Scope of Research	26
1.10 Restrictions/Delimitations	27
Chapter 2: Taiwan: An Overview	28
2.1 Historical Perspective	28
2.2 From Chinese to Japanese to Chinese Rule	28
2.2.1 Chinese Rule 1662-1895	28
2.2.2 Japanese Rule 1895-1945	29
2.2.3 Chinese Rule 1949 – Present?	29
2.3 The Constitution of Taiwan	30
2.4 Taiwan’s Major Political Parties: Ideologies	32
2.4.1 The KMT	32
2.4.2 The DPP	33
2.5 The Taiwanese People: Perceptions on National Issues	33
2.6 Foreigners Perception of Taiwan’s International Exclusion	35
2.7 Taiwan: A Problem that Requires a Solution	37
Chapter 3: The United Nations: Taiwan’s Exclusion	39
3.1 The Origins of the United Nations	39
3.2 Taiwan's Participation in the United Nations: Backdrop	40
3.3 Proposals for Taiwan’s UN Inclusion	42
3.4 Taiwan and the WHA/WHO	44
3.5 Theoretical Application to Taiwan and the United Nations	49
3.6 Challenges to Taiwan’s UN Quest	52
Chapter 4: Taiwan and the WTO	61
4.1 Historical Overview	61
4.2 GATT	62
4.3 The WTO	63
4.4 The Structure of the WTO	65
4.5 Functions of the WTO	65
4.6 Trade Rules	66
4.7 Arguments Against the WTO	67
4.8 Taiwan’s Acceptance into WTO	69
4.8.1 Taiwan, the WTO, and Globalization	72
4.8.2 Factors That Enabled Taiwan’s WTO Membership	75
4.8.3 Opportunities of Taiwan’s WTO Membership	76
Chapter 5: Results/ Discussion	78
5.1 Categorical Implications of Taiwan’s International Engagement	88
5.1.1 Political Implications	88
5.1.2 Economic Implications	90
5.1.3 National Security Implications	91
5.1.4 Diplomatic and International Implications	92
5.2 How can the Challenges Be Overcome?	96
5.3 Does Taiwan’s survival as a self-governing state depend on its participation in global institutions?	98
Chapter 6: Conclusion/Recommendation	102
6.1 Conclusion	102
6.2 Recommendation	108
6.3 Future Study	108
Bibliography	110

List of Tables
Table 1: Taiwan’s Bid for WHA/WHO 1997-2019 ....................................................... 44
Table 2: Taiwan’s Bid for Re-entry in UN 1993-2015 .................................................. 53
Table 3: Taiwan’s World Economic Ranking GDP (PPP) 1980-2020 .......................... 68
Table 4: Names used by Taiwan in International and Multilateral Organizations......... 83
參考文獻
Allison, Graham, T. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” The American Political Science Review, vol. 63, no. 3, 1969, pp. 689–718. JSTOR, www3.nccu.edu.tw/~lorenzo/Allison%20Conceptual%20Models.pdf.

Anderson, Kym. “World Trade Organization.” Britannica.Com, www.britannica.com/topic/World-Trade-Organization/Resolution-of-trade-disputes. Accessed 3 May 2021.

Barkin, David. “Globalization Love It or Leave It.” Latin American Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 6, 2002, pp. 132–35. SAGE, doi:10.1177/0094582X0202900615.

Barkin, J. Samuel. International Organizations: Theories and Institutions. 2 Ed., United States, Palgrave, Macmillan, 2013.

Bello, Judith Hippler. “The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is More.” American Journal of International Law, vol. 90, no. 3, 1996, pp. 416–18, doi:10.2307/2204065.

Bueler, William, M. “Taiwan: A Problem of International Law or Politics?” The World Today, vol. 27, no. 6, 1971, pp. 256–66. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40394513?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Burgoyne, Michael, C. “Taiwan’s Fight for International Space.” Hindsight, Insight, Foresight:Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific, Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, 2020, pp. 317–30.

Chan, Susanna. “Taiwan’s Application to the GATT: A New Urgency with the Conclusion of the Uruguay Round Conclusion of the Uruguay Round.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 1994, www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=ijgls&httpsredir=1&referer=.

Chang, Parris, and Kok-ui Lim. “Taiwan’s Case for United Nations Membeship.” UCLA Journal of International and Foreign Affairs, 1996–1997. HeinOnline, heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jilfa1&div=22&id=&page=.
Charnovitz, Steve. “Taiwan WTO Membership and Its International Implications.” Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, vol. 1, no. 2, 2012, pp. 401–32. SSRN, papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1019738.

Chen, Lung-chu. “Taiwan, China and the UN.” Articles and Chapters, vol. 1211, 1996, pp. 189–206. DigitalCommons, core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230513952.pdf.
Chen, Ping-Kuei. “Universal Participation without Taiwan? A Study of Taiwan’s Participation in the Global Health Governance Sponsored by the World Health Organization.” Asia-Pacific Security Challenges, edited by Anthony Masys J. and Leo Lin S.F., Leicester, United Kingdom, Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 263–81.

Chen, Tan Sun. “Joining the Global Village.” Harvard International Review, vol. 27, no. 2, 2005, pp. 24–27. ProQuest, www.proquest.com/openview/71fdddd918409dd791c2bef90e978c75/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=32013.
“Chinese Taipei’s Participation in APEC Meeting Must Comply with Relevant MOU, Customary Practice: Spokesperson.” XinhuaNet [Beijing, China], 26 Sept. 2020, www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-09/26/c_139397400.htm.

Chu, Yun-han, and Andrew Nathan J. “Seizing the Opportunity for Change in the Taiwan Strait.” The Washington Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, 2008, pp. 77–91. Francis and Taylor Online, doi:10.1162/wash.2007.31.1.77.

Croley, Steven, P., and John Jackson H. “WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments.” American Journal of International Law, vol. 90, no. 2, 2017. Cambridge Core, doi:10.2307/2203683.

“Constitution of the Republic of China (Taiwan) - Article Content - Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China.” Laws and Regulations Database of The Republic of China, law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0000001. Accessed 3 July 2021.

deLisle, Jacques. “Taiwan in the World Health Assembly: A Victory, With Limits.” Brookings, 2009, www.brookings.edu/opinions/taiwan-in-the-world-health-assembly-a-victory-with-limits.

---. “Taiwan: Soverignty and Participation in International Organizations.” Foreign Policy Research Institute, 11 July 2011, www.fpri.org/article/2011/07/taiwan-sovereignty-and-participation-in-international-organizations.

“Diplomatic Relations.” Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the UN, New York, 25 May 2021, palestineun.org/about-palestine/diplomatic-relations.

“Evolution of Trade under the WTO: Handy Statistics.” WTO, www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/trade_evolution_e/evolution_trade_wto_e.htm. Accessed 3 May 2021.

Feinerman, James, V. “Taiwan and the GATT.” Business Law Review, 1992, pp. 39–48. Heinonline, heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/colb1992&div=9&id=&page=.

 “Foreign Relations of Taiwan.” Wikipedia, 2021, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Relations_of_Taiwan.

Garrison, Jean A., et al. “Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20.” International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 2, 2003, pp. 155–202. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3186402.

Gau, Michael Sheng-ti. “Legal Controversies between China and Taiwan in the WHO from the Perspectives of an International Law Scholar in Taiwan Regional Focus & Controversies: The Legal Status of Taiwan in the World Health Organization.” Journal of East Asia and International Law, vol. 1, 2008, pp. 159–70. HEINONLINE, journal.yiil.org/home/pdf/publications/2008_1_1_pdf/jeail_v1n1_07.pdf.

Glassner, Martin, Ira. The United Nations at Work. Connecticut, United States, Prager, 1998.

Grieco, Joseph, et al. “The Relative-Gains Problem for International Cooperation.” The American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 3, 1993, pp. 727–43. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/2938747.

---. “The Relative-Gains Problem for International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 3, 1993, pp. 729–43, econpapers.repec.org/article/cupapsrev/v_3a87_3ay_3a1993_3ai_3a03_3ap_3a729-743_5f10.htm.

Hickey, Dennis, V. “The High Cost of Excluding Taiwan from the WHO.” China’s Rise. Taiwan’s Dilemma and International Peace, England, Routledge, 2006, pp. 68–84.
“History of the WTO: Part One.” Office of the United States Trade Representative, ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/blog/2009/november/history-wto-part-one. Accessed 3 May 2021.

Hickey, Dennis V. “More and More Taiwanese Favor Independence – and Think the US Would Help Fight for It.” The Diplomat, 3 Dec. 2020, thediplomat.com/2020/12/more-and-more-taiwanese-favor-independence-and-think-the-us-would-help-fight-for-it.

Horton, Chris. “Taiwan’s Status Is a Geopolitical Absurdity.” The Atlantic, 8 July 2019, www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/07/taiwans-status-geopolitical-absurdity/593371.
Hsieh, Pasha, L. “The Taiwan Question and the One-China Policy: Legal Challenges with Renewed Momentum.” Journal of International Peace and Organization., vol. 84, no. 3, 2009, pp. 59–81, ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/13.

Hsu, Joseph, Y. K. “On Taiwan’s United Nations Membership.” International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, vol. 16, no. 3, 2007, pp. 39–43. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26591062.

Jackson, Robert H. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Vol. 12, Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sørensen. Introduction to International Relation: Theories and Approaches. 5 Ed, Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, 2013.

---. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 6 Ed., Oxford, England, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Jie Chen, Yu-Jie, and Jerome Cohen A. “Why Does the WHO Exclude Taiwan?” Foreign Affairs, 9 Apr. 2020, www.cfr.org/in-brief/why-does-who-exclude-taiwan.

Johnston, Matthew. “A Brief History of International Trade Agreements.” Investopedia, Dotdash, 22 Aug. 2019, www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011916/brief-history-international-trade-agreements.asp.

Keeting, Jerome. “Taiwan’s Constitution Challenge.” Taipei Times [Taipei, Taiwan], 17 May 2021, www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2021/05/18/2003757579.

Kuan, Eugene, Hung-Chang. “Domestic Politics of Foreign Policy: Explaining the Formulation of Taiwan’s ‘Participate in the U.N.’ Policy.” Issues and Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, 2006, pp. 137–62. Airti Library, doi:10.7033/ISE.200603_42(1).0005.

Lauterpacht, Hersch. Recognition in International Law. New York, United States of America, Cambridge University Press, 1947.

“Let Taiwan into the World Health Organization.” The Economist [London, England], 26 Sept. 2020, www.economist.com/asia/2020/03/26/let-taiwan-into-the-world-health-organisation.

Li, Chien-pin. “Taiwan’s Participation in Inter-Governmental Organizations: An Overview of Its Initiatives.” Asian Survey, vol. 46, no. 4, 2006, pp. 597–614. JSTOR, doi:10.1525/as.2006.46.4.597.

Lin, Amber. “From GATT to WTO, Taiwan’s Global Chess Match.” Commonwealth Magazine, 27 Nov. 2018, english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=2203.

Liu, Da-Nien. “The Trading Relationship between Taiwan and the United States: Current Trends and the Outlook for the Future.” Brookings, 2016, www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-trading-relationship-between-taiwan-and-the-united-states-current-trends-and-the-outlook-for-the-future.

Martin, Lisa, L. The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy of International Trade. Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, 2015.

Movsesian, Mark, L. “Sovereignty, Compliance, and the World Trade Organization: Lessons from the History of Supreme Court Review.” Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 20, no. 4, 1999, repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol20/iss4/4.

Ozkan, Ersan, and Hakan Cem Cetin. “The Realist and Liberal Positions on the Role of International Organizations in Maintaining World Order.” European Scientific Journal, ESJ, vol. 12, no. 17, 2016, doi:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n17p85.

Pan, Jason. “Alliance Formed to Draft Taiwanese Constitution.” Taipei Times [Taipei, Taiwan], 23 Jan. 2021, www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2021/01/24/2003751129.

Rees, William, J. “The Theory of Sovereignty Restated.” MIND, vol. LIX, no. 236, 1950, pp. 495–521. Oxford Academic, doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.495.

Rochester, J. Martin. “The Rise and Fall of International Organization as a Field of Study.” International Organizations, vol. 40, no. 4, 1986, pp. 777–813. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2706829.

Rich, Timothy, and Andi Dahmer. “Taiwan Opinion Polling on Unification with China.” Jamestown, 19 Oct. 2020, jamestown.org/program/taiwan-opinion-polling-on-unification-with-china.

Rushton, Simon, and Owain Williams David. Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health Governance. England, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

Sehnálková, Jana, and Ondřej Kučera. “Taiwan’s Participation in International Organizations: Obstacles, Strategies, Patterns?” European Perspectives on Taiwan, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2012, pp. 147–69. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-531-94303-9_8.

“Taiwan Joins WTO - 2002–01-01.” Voice of America (VOA), www.voanews.com/archive/taiwan-joins-wto-2002-01-01. Accessed 3 May 2021.

Tănăsescu, Dorina, et al. “The Role of International Organisms in the Globalization Process.” Globalization A Process to Diversity, Rijeka, Croatia, InTech, 2012, pp. 76–102.

Trondal, Jarle, et al. Unpacking International Organisations The Dynamics of Compound Bureaucracies. Manchester, England, Manchester University Press, 2010.

Tubilewicz, Czeslaw. “Friends, Enemies, or Frenemies? China-Taiwan Discord in the World Health Organization and Its Significance.” Pacific Affairs, vol. 85, no. 4, 2012, pp. 701–22. The University of Adelaide, doi:10.5509/2012854701.

Viotti, Paul R., and Mark V. Kauppi. International Relations Theory. 6 Ed., London, United Kingdom, Rowman and Littlefield, 2019.

Waltz, Kenneth, N. Theory of International Politics. Canada, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.

Wang, Yuan-Kang. “China’s Growing Strength, Taiwan’s Diminishing Options.” BROOKINGS, 8 Nov. 2010, www.brookings.edu/research/chinas-growing-strength-taiwans-diminishing-options.

White, Lynn, T, III. “Globalization and Taiwan.” Asian Perspective, vol. 20, no. 4, 1999, pp. 97–141. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/42704236.

Winkler, Sigrid. “A Question of Sovereignty?” Asia European Journal, vol. 11, 2013, pp. 1–20. SpringerLink, doi:10.1007/s10308-012-0338-y.

Zacher, Mark, W. “Reviewed Work: The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organization by Robert Cox, Harold K. Jacobson.” International Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, 1974, pp. 665–67. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/40201482.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權予資料庫廠商
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信