§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-1206202306062000
DOI 10.6846/tku202300063
論文名稱(中文) 換位思考對助人行為之影響-以工作滿意度為中介變項
論文名稱(英文) The Impact of Perspective Taking on Helping Behaviors-Job Satisfaction as a Mediating Variable
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 111
學期 2
出版年 112
研究生(中文) 張雪伶
研究生(英文) HSUEH-LING CHANG
學號 710610188
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2023-05-31
論文頁數 79頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 王居卿(086511@o365.tku.edu.tw)
共同指導教授 - 羅惠瓊(hclo@mail.tku.edu.tw)
口試委員 - 余坤東(k.d.yu9128@gmail.com)
口試委員 - 李芸蕙(yh@mail.tku.edu.tw)
口試委員 - 王居卿(086511@o365.tku.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 換位思考
工作滿意度
助人行為
關鍵字(英) Perspective Taking
Helping Behaviors
Job Satisfaction
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
    每一個人都希望得到別人的理解和欣賞,獲得別人的欣賞是一個人在生活與奮鬥很大的動力,而每個人都會碰到許多不如意、不順心的事,心情有時候會有鬱悶,有煩惱,有惆悵,有無奈。在生活和工作中難免會遇到不開心的事,然而換個角度,換個思維,換種活法,調整自己的心態,就會對工作滿意度及助人行為有所提升嗎?此議題正是本研究欲探討的。
    本研究透過國內外與換位思考相關研究之文獻回顧,並針對台灣地區在職人員進行實證調查,來探究換位思考、工作滿意度與助人行為的關係,並以工作滿意度為中介變項,來了解其在換位思考與助人行為間的關係是否存在中介效果,本研究有下列重要發現:
1.換位思考對工作滿意度具有顯著的正向影響,即越多的換位思考,工作滿意度就會越高。
2.工作滿意度對助人行為具有顯著正向影響,即工作滿意度越高則展現出助人行為越高。
3.換位思考對助人行為具有顯著正向影響,即越多的換位思考,助人行為的意願越高。
4.工作滿意度在換位思考對助人行為之影響上具有中介效果。
英文摘要
    Everyone hopes to receive understanding and appreciation from others. Obtaining recognition from others is a great motivation for a person in life and struggle. However, everyone will encounter many unpleasant and unhappy things in life, and sometimes feel depressed, troubled, melancholy, and helpless. It is inevitable to encounter unhappy things in life and work, but changing perspectives, changing thinking, changing lifestyles, and adjusting one's mentality can improve job satisfaction and helpful behavior. This is the topic that this research aims to explore.
    This study reviews some related literature in domestic and international journals  and researches, and surveys employed individuals in Taiwan to explore the effects of perspective-taking and job satisfaction on helping behavior. The study also examines whether job satisfaction serves as a mediating variable between perspective-taking and helping behavior. There are some important findings in this study:
1.Perspective-taking has a significant positive impact on job satisfaction;i.e., the more perspective-taking, the higher the level of job satisfaction.
2.Job satisfaction has a significant positive impact on helping behavior;i.e., the higher the level of job satisfaction, the higher the level of helping behavior exhibited by individuals.
3.Perspective-taking has a significant positive impact on helping behavior;i.e., the more perspective-taking, the higher the willingness to engage in helping behavior.
4.Job satisfaction serves as a significant mediator between perspective-taking and helping behavior.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
目錄	I
表次	III
圖次	V
第一章 緒論	1
   第一節 研究背景與動機	1
   第二節 研究目的	5
   第三節 研究範圍	5
   第四節 研究流程	6
第二章 文獻探討	7
   第一節 換位思考之內涵	7
   第二節 工作滿意度之內涵	10
   第三節 助人行為之內涵	12
   第四節 變項間之假說推論	15
第三章 研究方法	21
   第一節 研究架構	21
   第二節 研究假說	21
   第三節 變項之操作性定義與衡量	22
   第四節 研究對象與抽樣方法	26
   第五節 資料分析方法	26
   第六節 預試樣本之描述性統計	28
第四章 資料分析與結果	32
   第一節 回收問卷樣本分析	32
   第二節 各變項題項決斷值分析	36
   第三節 各變項信度與驗證性因素分析	37
   第四節 驗證研究的假設	45
   第五節 各變項獨立樣本T檢定與單因子變異數分析	51
   第六節 研究假設驗證之結果	62
第五章 結論與建議	63
   第一節 結論	63
   第二節 管理意涵	64
   第三節 研究限制	65
   第四節 建議	65
參考文獻	67
   一、中文部分	67
   二、英文部分	69
   三、網站部分	75
附錄:問卷	76
 
表次
表2-1 換位思考之發展階段演變	8
表2-2 助人行為的五大階段	13
表3-1 換位思考之衡量題項與來源	22
表3-2 工作滿意度之衡量題項與來源	23
表3-3 助人行為之衡量題項與來源	24
表3-4 人口統計之衡量構面及問項	25
表3-5 預試樣本之描述性統計表	29
表3-6 預式量表信度分析表	31
表4-1 回收問卷樣本分析表	34
表4-2 各變項題項決斷值分析彙整表	36
表4-3 換位思考之信度分析表	37
表4-4 工作滿意度之信度分析表	38
表4-5 助人行為之信度分析表	39
表4-6 換位思考之因素分析表	43
表4-7 工作滿意度之因素分析表	43
表4-8 助人行為之因素分析表	44
表4-9 各變項驗證性因素分析之主要模型適配度表	44
表4-10 各變項之相關分析表	46
表4-11 各子構面之相關分析表	46
表4-12 換位思考對工作滿意度之迴歸分析表	47
表4-13 工作滿意度對助人行為之迴歸分析表	48
表4-14 換位思考對助人行為之迴歸分析表	49
表4-15 工作滿意度在換位思考對助人行為之影響的迴歸分析表	50
表4-16 性別在各變數上之獨立樣本T檢定	51
表4-17 婚姻在各變數上之獨立樣本T檢定	52
表4-18 年齡在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	53
表4-19 教育程度在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	54
表4-20 職業在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	55
表4-21 年收入在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	56
表4-22 工作年資在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	57
表4-23 職位在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	58
表4-24 健康自我評量在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	59
表4-25 經濟狀況在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	60
表4-26 居住地區在各變數上之單因子變異數分析表	61
表4-27 假設驗證結果	62

圖次
圖1-1 研究流程圖	6
圖3-1 研究架構圖	21
圖4-1 換位思考驗證性因素分析模型圖	40
圖4-2 工作滿意度驗證性因素分析模型圖 41
圖4-3 助人行為驗證性因素分析模型圖	42
參考文獻
一、中文部分
王佩馨 ( 2018 )。領導、組織支持、組織文化、工作滿意度與助人行為相關性之研究-以長榮鳳凰酒店(礁溪)為例。佛光大學管理學系碩士論文。
王雅璇 ( 2022 )。跨文化工作經驗、換位思考和顧客導向之間的關聯—以敏捷措施作為調節。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
艾沛緹 ( 2021)。消防人員情緒勞務、幸福感、工作滿意度與助人行為關係之研究-以新北市消防局為例。國立政治大學學校行政系碩士論文。
吳家云 ( 2008 )。台北縣國民中學校長領導風格、專職行政人員工作滿意度及組織承諾、助人行為關係之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文。
呂翊如 ( 2021 )。成人人際依附風格與工作滿意度之關聯研究-以自我概念清晰度為調節變項,並以助人工作者為例。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩是論文。
周佳慧 ( 2017 )。大五人格、領導部屬交換關係、工作滿意度與員工建言和助人行為之研究。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
林姵萱 ( 2020 )。你的職場環境健康嗎?探討主管的認知同理心、工作滿意度之關係:以工作壓力為中介變項及職場友誼為調節變項。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
禹應仁 ( 2016 )。在軍事情境中助人行為引發感受之歷程分析。國防大學政治作戰學院心理碩士論文。
張志豪 ( 2016 )。助人行為與受助行為之關係:以社會支持、負債 感與組織道德氣候功利性為中介。國立交通大學管理學院管理科學學程碩士論文。
張育敏 ( 2018 )。壽險業務員之同理心對工作投入、工作滿意度的影響-以壓力調適為干擾變項。朝陽科技大學保險金融管理系碩士論文。
張春興 ( 1989 )。張春興心理學辭典。臺北:東華出版社。
張英熙 ( 2017 )。換位思考,連結情感同理心訓練方案。國教新知,doi:10.6701/TEEJ.201712_64(4).0004。
許士軍 ( 1993 )。管理學,台北市:華泰書局。
游知軒 ( 2018 )。員工抱怨時該注意什麼?同理心對離職傾向、工作滿意度之影響:以員工抱怨之敘述方式與關注焦點為調節變項。國立臺灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
黃淑玫 ( 2018 )。加班對工作滿意度及工作績效影響之研究-以人格特質為干擾變數。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
詹志禹 ( 1992 )。年齡與同理心的性別差異。教育與心理研究 ( 15 ),259-276。
潘慧玲 ( 1994 )。角色取替的探討。教育研究所集刊,35,193-207。
鄭佩瑜 ( 2007 )。業務助人行為之分類-以壽險業者為例。國立交通大學管理科學系碩士論文。
盧心雨 ( 2011 )。體育行政人員工作滿意、工作壓力、組織承諾與工作績效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系碩士論文。
簡偉欽 ( 2021)。快樂感、助人行為對工作滿意度之影響。大葉大學運動健康管理學系碩士論文。
羅新興、梁成明 ( 2017 )。正向思考對主觀幸福感和人際公民行為的影響-利他價值觀的調節效果。健行學報,36(4),23-42。
蘇清守 ( 1990 )。國中學生的助人行為及其在道德教育上的涵義。教育心理學報,23,99-118。DOI:10.6251/BEP.19900601.5。
 
二、英文部分
Aron, A., Aron, E. E., Tudor, M., and Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
Atan, T. (2017). Empathy levels of university students who do and not do sports. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5 (3), 500-503.
Attiq, S., Wahid, S., Javaid, N., Kanwal, M., and Shah, H. J. (2017). The impact of employees' core self-evaluation personality trait, management support, co-worker support on job satisfaction, and innovative work behaviour. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 32(1), 1-14.
Aziri, B. (2011). Job satisfaction: A literature review. Management Research and 
Practice, 3(40), 77-86.
Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1981). The empathy cycle: refinement of a nuclear concept. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28 (2), 91-100.
Bar-Tal, D. (1982). Sequential development of helping behavior: A cognitive learning approach. Developmental Review, 2(1), 101-124.
Batson, C. D. (1975). Attribution as a mediator of bias in helping, Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 32 (3), 455-466.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The Altruism Question: Toward a Socio-Psychological Answer.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Batson, C. D., and Shaw, L. L. (1991). Encouraging words concerning the evidence of altruism. Psychological Inquiry, 2(1), 159-168.
Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Griffitt, C. A., Barrientos, S., Brandt, J. R., and Sprengelmeyer, P. (1989). Negative-state relief and the empathy–altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(6), 922-933.
Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., and McMaster, M. R. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52.
Baumann, D. J., Cialdini, R. B., and Kendrick, D. T. (1981). Altruism as hedonism: 
Helping and self-gratification as equivalent responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(6), 1039.
Behson, S. J. (2005). The relative contribution of formal and informal organizational work-family support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 487-500.
Bouton, B. (2016). Empathy research and teacher preparation: benefits and obstacles. Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators, 25(2), 16-25.
Brett, C. (1998). What Life Could Mean to You. Oxford, England: Oneworld.
Brief, A. P., and Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors.  Academy of Management Journal 11(1), 710-725.
Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., and Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107-134.
Chae, H., Park, J., and Choi, J. N. (2019). Two facets of conscientiousness and the knowledge sharing dilemmas in the workplace: Contrasting moderating functions of supervisor support and coworker support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(4), 387-399.
Choi, B., Moon, H. (2016) Prosocial motive and helping behavior: examining helping efficacy and instrumentality: Journal of Managerial Psychology 31(2):359-374.
Chong, H. S., Ko, S. H., and Kim, J. Y. (2017). Impact of empathy ability and gratitude disposition on job satisfaction in psychiatric nurses. Journal of Digital Convergence 15(11), 395-405.
Clercq, D.D., Haq, I. U., and Azeem,M. U. (2018). Why Happy Employees Help: How meaningfulness, collectivism, and support transform job satisfaction into helping behaviours.
Cooper, B. (2011). Empathy in Education: Engagement, Values and Achievement. Bloomsbury, London: Publishing PLC.
Darley, J. M., and Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377-383. 
Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., and Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking 63 on the cognitive representation of persons: a merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 713-726.
Davis, M. R. (1985). Perceptual and affective reverberation components. In Goldstein, A. P., and Michaels, G. Y. (Eds.), Empathy Development, Training, and Consequences. 62-108. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Duan, C., and Hill, C. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43 (3), 261-274.
Eagly, A. H., and Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analysis review of the social psychological literature. Psychol. Bull 100, 283-308.
Edwards, J. R., and Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: Anexamination of personenvironmentfit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(1), 85-129.
Egan, G. (1990). The Skilled Helper: A Systematic Approach to Effective Helping (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Eisenberg, N., McCreath, H., and Ahn, R. (1988). Vicarious emotional responsiveness and prosocial behavior: Their interrelations in young children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 14(1), 298-311.
Eva, N., Newman, A., Miao, Q., Wang, D., and Cooper, B. (2020). Antecedents of duty orientation and follower work behavior: The interactive effects of perceived organizational support and ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 627-639.
George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology 76(1), 299-307.
Grant, A. M., and Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of 64 Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.
Han, H. S., and Thomas, M. S. (2010). No child misunderstood: Enhancing early ch ildhood teachers’ multicultural responsiveness to the social competence of diverse children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 469476.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction.New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.
Hunt, P. A., Denieffe, S., and Gooney, M. (2017). Burnout and its relationship to empathy in nursing: a review of the literature, Journal of Research in Nursing, 22(1), 7-22.
Isen, A. M., and Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 1206-1217.
Isen, A. M., and Levin, P. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 384-388.
Karsh, B., Booske, B. C., and Sainfort, F. (2005). Job and organizational determinants of nursing home employee commitment, job satisfaction and intent to turnover. Ergonomics, 48(10), 1260-1281.
Kaya, B. (2016). An evaluation of the empathy levels of pre-service social studies teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 11 (6), 229-237.
Kim, J. Y., Jin, B. R., and Kim, J. H. (2014). The influence of life satisfaction and gratitude on communicative competence : Mediating effects of cognitive emotion regulations, Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 58(4), 238-262.
Krol, S. A., and Bartz, J. A. (2021). The Self and Empathy: Lacking a Clear and Stable Sense of Self Undermines Empathy and Helping Behavior. American Psychological Association.
Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(4), 309-336.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1297-1349. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
McCabe, M. R. (2002). The Relationship Between Sex Differences and Helping Behavior of College Students.
Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., Sapir-Lavid, Y., Yaakobi, E., Arias, K., and Tal-Aloni, L. (2003). Attachment theory and concern for others’ welfare: Evidence that activation of the sense of secure base promotes endorsement of self-transcendence values. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(1), 299 - 312.
Neeli, B., Singh, S. N., and Venkat, B. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: An intergrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing 60(1), 33-49.
Organ, D. W., and Near, J. P. (1985). Cognitive vs affect in measures of job satisfaction.International Journal of Psychological, 20(1), 241-253.
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., and Cole, E. (2012). High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior.Personality and Individual Differences.
Pandey, A., and Chairungruang, S. (2020). Effects of organizational support, supervisor support and coworkers interpersonal helping behavior on employee job satisfaction: a case study in Bangkok,Thaiand. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR),Peer Reviewed-International Journal, 4(2),141-147.
Park, H. J., Lee, K. J., and Kim,S. S. (2014).A comparative study on the counseling self-efficacy and empathy of psychiatric nurses and general ward nurses, Health and Nursing, 26(1), 9-19,.
Parker, S. K., and Axtell, C. M. (2001). Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 1085-1100.
Porter, L. W., and Lawer, R. E. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turner and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 151-176.
Piliavin, J. A., and Charng, H.W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 16(1), 27-65.
Richards, K. A., Wilson, W. J., Holland, S. K., and Haegele, J. A. (2019). The relationships among perceived organization support, resilience, perceived mattering, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction in adapted physical educators. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 1(1), 1-22.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Essentials of Organizational Behavior. London: Prentice-Hall. 
Robbins, S. P., and Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (14 th Ed.) Upper saddle River,NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rosenhan, D. L., Salovey, P., and Hargis, K. (1981). The joys of helping: Focus of attention mediates the impact of positive affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(5), 899-905.
Segal, E. A., Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C. A.,Wagaman, M. A., and Geiger, J. M.(2017). Assess Empathy. Chichest. New York: Columbia University Press.
Self, T. T., Gordon, S., and Ghosh, A. (2020). Increasing management retention: The mediating role of organizational embeddedness on coworker support and turnover intention. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration, 1-19.
Selman, R. L. (1980). The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding: Developmental and Clinicl Analyses. New York: Academic Press.
Singhapakdi, A., Lee, D. J., Sirgy, M. J., Roh, H., Senasu, K., and Grace, B. Y. (2019). Effects of perceived organizational CSR value and employee moral identity on job satisfaction: a study of business organizations in Thailand. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 8(1), 53-72.
Smith, P.C., Kendall, L., and Hulin, C.L. (1969). The Measurement of Satisfaction Work and Retirement. Rand McNally, Chicago.
Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: John wiley and sons.
Wayment, H. A. (2006). Attachment style, empathy, and helping following a collective loss: Evidence from the september 11 terrorist attacks. Attachment and Human Development, 8(1), 1-9.
Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., and Lofguist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota.
Westmass, J. L., and Silver, R. C. (2001). The role of attachment in responses to victims of life crises. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 425-438.
 
三、網站部分
Cheers快樂工作人 (2021)。換位思考為什麼重要?學會「換位思考」職場大加分。
    檢索日:2022年12月5日。
    網址:https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5098846
黃昆輝、張德銳(2012)。國家教育研究院樂詞網,教育大辭書 。
    檢索日:2022年12月。
    網址:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1302183/
維基百科,同理心的定義。
    檢索日:2022年12月9日。
    網址:https://reurl.cc/NGEQ7q
思想科技MASTER CONCEPT網誌(2022)。未來 AI 智能勢不可擋!企業客服如何兼具智慧與溫度?
檢索日:2022年12月5日。
網址:https://hkmci.com/zh-hant
論文全文使用權限
國家圖書館
同意無償授權國家圖書館,書目與全文電子檔於繳交授權書後, 於網際網路立即公開
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權於全球公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權予資料庫廠商
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信