系統識別號 | U0002-1006202511030100 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/tku202500213 |
論文名稱(中文) | 探討永續議題ETF與能源情緒之動態關係 |
論文名稱(英文) | Examining the Relationship between Sustainability ETFs and Energy Market Sentiment |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 財務金融學系博士班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Department of Banking and Finance |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 113 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 114 |
研究生(中文) | 梁美珠 |
研究生(英文) | Mei-Chu Liang |
學號 | 810530013 |
學位類別 | 博士 |
語言別 | 繁體中文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2025-05-25 |
論文頁數 | 50頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
邱建良(100730@o365.tku.edu.tw)
共同指導教授 - 倪衍森(103490@o365.tku.edu.tw) 口試委員 - 張鼎煥 口試委員 - 林惠文 口試委員 - 林允永 口試委員 - 鄭婉秀 口試委員 - 王譯賢 口試委員 - 姜淑美 口試委員 - 邱建良 |
關鍵字(中) |
永續ETF 能源情緒 動態外溢效益 COVID-19 |
關鍵字(英) |
Sustainability ETFs Energy Sentiment Dynamic spillover effect COVID-19 |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
隨著全球對氣候變遷與再生能源的重視不斷加深,ESG 相關金融商品亦迅速發展。然而在政策推動、投資人行為與外部事件(如COVID-19 疫情)影響下,永續ETF 與能源情緒之間的連動性變得更為複雜,面對執行層面的種種挑戰,仍需更多努力以實現可衡量且持續的成效。這使得ESG 投資成為備受矚目的領域,而一般投資大眾也想關注ESG,本文認為相關ESG 商品實有探討的必要。本研究引用 Diebold and Yilmaz (2012, 2014)的實證方法,探討七檔交易量較大之ESG-ETF 和能源情緒波動率指数(OVX)於疫情前後的報酬外溢效應,藉以評估ESG-ETF 與能源情緒之動態關係的影響。主要的研究目的為:探討目前市場上永續ETF 與能源情緒(OVX)間之連動性;永續ETF 間也會互相干擾嗎? 以及疫情外生干擾期間,是否關係變得不同? 研究結果顯示,在疫情前OVX 多數時間為波動的接收者,對ESG-ETF 影響有限;但疫情後ESG-ETF 間的連動性明顯提高,且部分 ESG-ETF 對OVX亦有回饋作用,顯示投資人風險偏好與資產配置策略因疫情產生結構性改變。此發現有助於了解市場對永續金融資產在不同經濟情境下的反應,並為投資者與政策制定者提供重要參考。 |
英文摘要 |
With increasing global attention on climate change and renewable energy, ESGrelated financial products have rapidly developed. However, the dynamic relationship between sustainability ETFs and energy market sentiment has become more complex due to the influence of policy initiatives, investor behavior, and exogenous shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite growing awareness, challenges in implementation remain, requiring further efforts to achieve measurable and sustained impact. As ESG investment continues to attract interest, especially among retail investors, it is necessary to examine the behavior of related financial instruments. This study adopts the spillover index framework proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012, 2014) to investigate the return spillover effects between seven major ESG ETFs and the Crude Oil Volatility Index (OVX) before and after the COVID-19 outbreak, aiming to evaluate their evolving dynamic relationship. The main research questions include: What is the current linkage between ESG ETFs and energy market sentiment (OVX)? Do ESG ETFs interact with each other? And how has the relationship changed during the pandemic-induced external shock? The empirical findings indicate that prior to the pandemic, OVX mostly acted as a recipient of volatility with limited influence on ESG ETFs. However, in the postpandemic period, the interdependence among ESG ETFs increased significantly, and certain ETFs even exerted feedback effects on OVX. This suggests that the pandemic triggered structural changes in investor risk preferences and portfolio strategies. These insights contribute to a better understanding of how sustainable financial assets respond under different economic conditions and provide valuable references for investors and policymakers. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
第一章 緒論 ..................... 1 第一節 研究動機 ........ 1 第二節 研究目的 ........ 4 第三節 研究架構 ........ 4 第四節 研究流程 ........ 6 第二章 文獻回顧 ............. 7 第一節 影響ESG-ETF 績效之因素 ....... 7 第二節 影響ESG-ETF 波動之因素 ..... 11 第三節 能源情緒OVX 之相關文獻 ..... 13 第三章 研究方法 ........... 15 第一節 向量自我迴歸模型Vector Autoregression model ............... 15 第二節 衝擊反應分析 Impulse Response Function ......... 16 第三節 動態外溢效應模型 Dynamic Spillover Effects .... 17 第四章 實證結果分析 .................. 20 第一節 資料及敘述統計 ......... 20 第二節 向量自我迴歸模型與衝擊反應函數實證結果 ...... 26 第三節 動態波動外溢 ............. 32 第五章 結論與建議 ....... 42 參考文獻 ...............44 圖目錄 【圖1】研究流程圖..............6 【圖2】疫情前OVX 對各檔ESG ETFs 之衝擊效應...............29 【圖3】疫情後OVX 對各檔ESG ETFs 之衝擊效應...............31 【圖4】疫情前OVX 與ESG-ETF 相對應之淨波動外溢..............35 【圖5】疫情前所有資產之淨波動外溢....36 【圖6】疫情後OVX 與ESG-ETF 相對應之淨波動外溢...........40 【圖7】疫情後所有資產之淨波動外溢....41 表目錄 【表4-1】敘述統計表..........25 【表4-2】疫情前靜態VAR 模型聯合檢定結果.28 【表4-3】疫情後靜態VAR 模型聯合檢定結果.30 【表4-4】疫情前動態波動外溢效果....34 【表4-5】疫情後動態波動外溢效果....39 |
參考文獻 |
Ahmad, W. (2017). On the dynamic dependence and investment performance of crude oil and clean energy stocks. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 376-389. Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Yang, S., & Zhang, C. (2020). Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 593-621. Anand, A., Vanpée, R., & Lončarski, I. (2023). Sustainability and sovereign credit risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, 102494. Behera, C., Priyadarsini, B. T., & Patnaik, D. (2024). The Volatility Spillover Between ESG and Stock Return in the Selected Countries of G7. Asian Economics Letters, 5(3), https://doi.org/10.46557/001c.116242. Boffo, R., & Patalano, R. (2020). ESG investing: Practices, progress and challenges. Éditions OCDE, Paris. Bollen, N. P. (2007). Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3), 683-708. Bondia, R., Ghosh, S., & Kanjilal, K. (2016). International crude oil prices and the stock prices of clean energy and technology companies: Evidence from non-linear cointegration tests with unknown structural breaks. Energy, 101, 558-565. 45 Broadstock, D. C., Cao, H., & Zhang, D. (2012). Oil shocks and their impact on energy related stocks in China. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1888-1895. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. Çelik, İ., Sak, A. F., Höl, A. Ö., & Vergili, G. (2022). The dynamic connectedness and hedging opportunities of implied and realized volatility: Evidence from clean energy ETFs. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 60, 101670. Díaz, A., Esparcia, C., & López, R. (2022). The diversifying role of socially responsible investments during the COVID-19 crisis: A risk management and portfolio performance analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 75, 39-60. Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 57-66. Diebold, F. X., & Yılmaz, K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119-134. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The impact of a corporate sustainability on organization process and performance. Management Science 46 60(11), 2835-2857. Elbannan, M. A. (2024). Returns behavior of ESG ETFs in the COVID‐19 market crash: Are green funds more resilient? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 35(2), 187-223. Fernández, M. S., Abu-Alkheil, A., & Khartabiel, G. M. (2019). Do German green mutual funds perform better than their peers? Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(2), 297-312. Ferrer, R., Shahzad, S. J. H., López, R., & Jareño, F. (2018). Time and frequency dynamics of connectedness between renewable energy stocks and crude oil prices. Energy Economics, 76, 1-20. Fiorillo, P., Meles, A., Pellegrino, L. R., & Verdoliva, V. (2024). Geopolitical risk and stock price crash risk: The mitigating role of ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102958. Fuentes, F., & Herrera, R. (2020). Dynamics of connectedness in clean energy stocks. Energies, 13(14), 3705. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143705 Gisser, M., & Goodwin, T. H. (1986). Crude oil and the macroeconomy: Tests of some popular notions: Note. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 18(1), 95-103. Gong, X., Tao, X., Zhang, M., Xu, Y., Kwok, H. H., Dai, J., & Cheng, J. C. (2024). Secure environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data management for 47 construction projects using blockchain. Sustainable Cities and Society, 114, 105582. Hamilton, J. D. (1996). This is what happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship. Journal of Monetary Economics, 38(2), 215-220. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Oil prices and the stock prices of alternative energy companies. Energy Economics, 30(3), 998-1010. Horan, S. M., Dimson, E., Emery, C., Blay, K., & Yelton, G. (2022). The state of ESG investing: A portfolio management perspective. Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 2(4), 7-29. Kanuri, S. (2020). Risk and return characteristics of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) equity ETFs. Journal of Index Investing, 11(2), 66-75. Kumar, S., Managi, S., & Matsuda, A. (2012). Stock prices of clean energy firms, oil and carbon markets: A vector autoregressive analysis. Energy Economics, 34(1), 215-226. Kyritsis, E., & Serletis, A. (2019). Oil prices and the renewable energy sector. Energy Journal, 40(1_suppl), 337-364. Lundgren, A. I., Milicevic, A., Uddin, G. S., & Kang, S. H. (2018). Connectedness network and dependence structure mechanism in green investments. Energy Economics, 72, 145-153. 48 Managi, S., & Okimoto, T. (2013). Does the price of oil interact with clean energy prices in the stock market? Japan and the World Economy, 27, 1-9. Marín-Rodríguez, N. J., González-Ruíz, J. D., & Botero, S. (2025). Towards New Strategies for Investing: Insights on Sustainable Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). World, 6(1), 8. Nguyen, H. (2023). COVID-19: Performance of ESG ETFs and ESG ETFs vs. their declared indexes. Applied Finance Letters, 12(1), 33-43. Ni, Z. (2023). Corporate ESG investment: Factors affecting the economic sustainability. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 39, 210-214. Omura, A., Roca, E., & Nakai, M. (2021). Does responsible investing pay during economic downturns: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance research letters, 42, 101914. Pástor, Ľ., & Vorsatz, M. B. (2020). Mutual fund performance and flows during the COVID-19 crisis. Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 10(4), 791-833. Pavlova, I., & de Boyrie, M. E. (2022). ESG ETFs and the COVID-19 stock market crash of 2020: Did clean funds fare better? Finance Research Letters, 44, 102051. Polat, O., Demirer, R., & Ekşi, İ. H. (2024). What drives green betas? Climate uncertainty or speculation. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104870. Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. 49 Dynamics of the Eco-efficient Economy: Environmental Regulation and Competitive Advantage, 33, 120-134. Qian, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). Improve carbon emission efficiency: What role does the ESG initiatives play? Journal of Environmental Management, 367, 122016. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723-1742. Schueth, S. (2003). Socially responsible investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 189-194. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1-48. Singh, A. (2020). COVID-19 and safer investment bets. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101729. Tiwari, A. K., Abakah, E. J. A., Doğan, B., Adekoya, O. B., & Wohar, M. (2024). Asymmetric spillover effects in energy markets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 470-502. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72, 46-52. Wen, F., Xiao, J., Xia, X., Chen, B., Xiao, Z., & Li, J. (2019). Oil prices and Chinese 50 stock market: Nonlinear causality and volatility persistence. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(6), 1247-1263. Yao, C. Z., & Kuang, P. C. (2019). A study of lead–lag structure between international crude oil price and several financial markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 531, 121755. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信