| 系統識別號 | U0002-0607202311134300 |
|---|---|
| DOI | 10.6846/tku202300320 |
| 論文名稱(中文) | 伊拉克庫爾德斯坦地區營造工程安全評估指標之研究 |
| 論文名稱(英文) | The study of safety assessment Indicators “ factors ” for construction projects in Iraqi Kurdistan |
| 第三語言論文名稱 | |
| 校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
| 系所名稱(中文) | 土木工程學系博士班 |
| 系所名稱(英文) | Department of Civil Engineering |
| 外國學位學校名稱 | |
| 外國學位學院名稱 | |
| 外國學位研究所名稱 | |
| 學年度 | 111 |
| 學期 | 2 |
| 出版年 | 112 |
| 研究生(中文) | 田浩愷 |
| 研究生(英文) | Hawkar Abdullah Taha |
| 學號 | 610385014 |
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
| 語言別 | 英文 |
| 第二語言別 | 英文 |
| 口試日期 | 2023-06-21 |
| 論文頁數 | 121頁 |
| 口試委員 |
口試委員
-
王人牧(wang@mail.tku.edu.tw)
口試委員 - 連立川 (lclien@cycu.edu.tw) 指導教授 - 蔡明修(mht@mail.tku.edu.tw) |
| 關鍵字(中) |
安全評估指標(因素) 營造工程 伊拉克庫爾德斯坦地區 AHP層級分析 專案評估 |
| 關鍵字(英) |
safety assessment Indicators “Factors” construction project Iraqi Kurdistan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) project evaluation |
| 第三語言關鍵字 | |
| 學科別分類 | |
| 中文摘要 |
營建產業由於其特殊性質,在各國皆屬於最危險的行業之一。國際勞工組織報告指出,每三分鐘就有一次因工作相關受傷導致的死亡。本文旨在通過線上調查問卷,調查伊拉克庫爾德斯坦地區一般工程或建築工程的安全管理,以擬定適合該地區的工地安全評估基準。本研究問卷分為三部分,目的在於收集伊拉克庫爾德斯坦地區工程管理人員關於營建工程對工程安全的經驗資訊、安全意識及認知,以及影響建築工程安全因素。問卷的初始階段涵蓋了七十一個工地安全因子。本研究的目的是調查建築工地上最危險的活動,並確定影響安全方面的因素。透過第一階段的問卷分析,了解了伊拉克庫爾德斯坦地區工人的安全與健康問題十分普遍,而這可能是由於工作條件不佳,對安全規章的忽視,或是對安全的態度和文化觀念的差異導致。然而,在發展中國家的安全措施上存在顯著的不平等。作為伊拉克的一個發展地區。問卷的第二部分,則使用平均值對影響建築工程安全的最重要因素進行評估和評價,之後對各影響因子群組和個別因子進行評估與篩,並選擇影響安全的最主要因子使用了分析層次過程(AHP)方法,分析個群組及因子之相對權重。最後則利用分析所得之工地安全評估因子及相對權重,分別選擇了五個伊拉克庫爾德斯坦地區的工程進行安全評估。 綜言之,本研究識別了確保伊拉克庫爾德斯坦建築工程安全的關鍵因子,這些因子包括:穿著頭部保護裝備,設置護欄以防止工作期間土壤崩塌,工作期間適當照明,確保工地環境的正確安排和組織,確保易燃液體和可燃物品的儲存,僱用有經驗的工人,強調使用腳部保護裝備,並在需要時使用危險標誌和護欄。解決這些問題對於促進安全的工作環境並減少伊拉克庫爾德斯坦建築工地的潛在危險至關重要。 |
| 英文摘要 |
Construction is a crucial component of our daily lives; however, due to its distinctive characteristics, it is also one of the most dangerous industries. The International Labour Organization reports that work-related injuries result in one death every three minutes. This paper aims to establish a safety performance baseline in Iraqi Kurdistan by examining the safety management of generic engineering or construction projects in the region through an online survey questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of three parts designed to collect information on the project and respondents, safety awareness in projects, and safety factors affecting construction projects. The initial phase of the questionnaire encompasses seventy-one areas of safety. The purpose of this study is to investigate the riskiest activities on construction sites and determine the factors that affect safety aspects. Although worker safety and health issues are prevalent, they may arise due to inadequate working conditions, disregard for safety regulations, or variations in attitudes and cultures toward safety. However, there is a significant disparity in terms of safety measures in developing countries. As a developing region of Iraq, Iraqi Kurdistan faces safety concerns around construction projects, and this paper seeks to examine the status of safety management in the construction industry in this region. The study will explore the risk-prone activities on construction sites and identify the factors that affect the overall safety of engineering projects. There is a lack of research on the safety of construction sites in Iraqi Kurdistan, and there are few reliable sources or statistics to support the status of safety measures. In the second part of the questionnaire, the most important factors affecting safety in construction projects will be assessed and evaluated using the Mean value for each factors individually and group of factors afterwards. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used for selecting the weights of the most affecting factors that impact safety and later five projects were selected for evaluation with respect to safety assessment. This study identified several key factors that are of utmost importance for ensuring safety in construction projects in Iraqi Kurdistan. These factors include wearing head protection, implementing barricades to prevent soil collapse during work, adequately lighting the site during night working hours, maintaining proper arrangement and organization of the site environment, ensuring the proper storage of flammable liquids and combustible materials, hiring workers with experience, emphasizing the use of foot protection, as well as employing danger signs and barricades as necessary. Addressing these concerns is crucial to promote a safe working environment and mitigate potential hazards on construction sites in Iraqi Kurdistan. |
| 第三語言摘要 | |
| 論文目次 |
Contents The Letter of Authorization (copyright) ii Signature List of the Committee iii Acknowledgment iv 中文摘要 v Abstract vi List of Tables xi List of Figures xii List of Flowcharts xiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Introduction and Background 2 1.2 Research question 4 1.3 Research objectives 5 1.4 Scope of study 5 1.5 Significance of the study to Iraqi Kurdistan 5 1.6 Research Limitation 6 1.7 Research Methodology 6 1.8 Research Flow chart 7 1.9 Chapters organisation 8 CHAPTER 2 9 Literature Review 9 2.1 Introduction 10 2.2 Factors affecting safety performance. 12 2.2.1 Project Nature 23 2.2.2 Emergency Planning and Preparations 23 2.2.3 Signs, Signals and Barricades 23 2.2.4 Historic, Human and Psychological Climate 23 2.2.5 Welfare Facilities 24 2.2.6 Administrative and Management Commitment 24 2.2.7 Safety Inspection 25 2.2.8 Safety Meeting 25 2.2.9 Role of Government & Engineering Societies 25 2.2.10 Crane and Lifting Equipment 25 2.2.11 Safety Educating and Training 26 2.2.12 Disposal of Hazardous Materials and Waste 26 2.2.13 Personal Protective Equipment 26 2.2.14 Excavation, Trenching, Shorting 26 2.2.16 Fire Prevention 27 2.2.17 Transportation 27 2.2.18 Economic Investment 27 2.2.19 Medical Facilities 27 2.3 safety management regulations in Iraqi Kurdistan 28 2.4 Cultural Awareness toward safety 37 CHAPTER 3 39 Research Methodology 39 3.1 Introduction 40 3.2 Research Design 40 3.3 Research Location 41 3.4 Research Population 42 3.5 Pilot Study 42 3.6 Questionnaire Design 42 3.7 Questionnaire Content 43 CHAPTER 4 44 Analysis and Results Discussions 44 4.1 Introduction 45 4.2 Respondent General Information 45 4.2.1 Demography of Participants 45 4.2.2 Job Title of Participants 47 4.2.3 Classification of respondent by contract type 47 4.2.4 Project Areas 48 4.2.5 Respondent experience 48 4.2.6 Staff and Resources 49 4.3 Safety practices and perceptions of the respondents. 50 4.3.1 Dedicated Safety Professional at workplace 50 4.3.2 Dedicated Safety Program at workplace 51 4.3.3 Safety knowledge 51 4.3.4 Safety Responsibility 53 4.3.5 Accident Witness 54 4.3.6 Awareness of Government`s Legislation 55 4.3.7 Safety kits 56 4.3.8 Social Insurance System 57 4.3.9 Health Insurance System 58 4.4 Assessment of Factors Influencing Safety Performance 58 4.4.1 Project Nature 59 4.4.2 Signs, Signals & Barricades 59 4.4.3 Emergency Planning & Preparations 60 4.4.4 Welfare Facilities 60 4.4.5 Historic, Human & Psychological Climates 61 4.4.6 Administrative & Management Commitment 62 4.4.7 Safety Inspections 63 4.4.8 Safety Meetings 64 4.4.9 Role of Government & Engineering Societies 64 4.4.10 Crane & Lifting Equipment 65 4.4.11 Safety Education & Training 66 4.4.12 Disposal of Hazardous Materials & Waste 67 4.4.13 Personal Protective Equipment ‘ (PPE) 67 4.4.14 Excavation, Trenching & Shoring 68 4.4.15 Fire Prevention 68 4.4.16 Transportation 69 4.4.17 Economic Investment 70 4.4.18 Medical Facilities 70 4.5 Summary Rankings of Groups Factors Influencing Safety Performance 72 4.6 Summaries of Ranks for Factors Affecting Safety Performance 73 4.7 Analysing the most effective factors using the AHP method. 76 4.7.1 Creating pair-wise comparison matrix for each Group 78 4.7.1.1 matrix for main factors 78 4.7.1.2 matrix for Project Nature group 80 4.7.1.3 matrix for Signs, Signals & Barricades Group 82 4.7.1.4 matrix for Administrative & Management Commitment Group 84 4.7.1.5 matrix for Personal Protective Equipment Group 86 4.7.1.6 matrix for Excavation, Trenching & Shoring Group 88 4.7.1.7 matrix for fire prevention Group 90 4.7.2 Total weight for each of main factor and sub-factors 91 4.7.3 project evaluation according to our factor’s weight 93 4.7.3.1 Project A 93 4.7.3.2 Project B 95 4.7.3.3 Project C 97 4.7.3.4 Project D 99 4.7.3.5 Project E 101 CHAPTER 5 103 Conclusions and Recommendations 103 5.1 Introduction 104 5.2 Conclusions 104 5.3 Recommendations 106 References 107 APPENDIX-A.1 109 List of Tables Table 1 – Factors Affecting Safety Performance 22 Table 2 – Project Nature 59 Table 3 -Signs, Signals & Barricades 60 Table 4- Emergency Planning and Preparations 60 Table 5 – Welfare Facilities 61 Table 6 - Historic, Human & Psychological Climates 62 Table 7- Administrative & Management Commitment 63 Table 8 - Safety inspections 64 Table 9 - Safety Meetings 64 Table 10- Role of Government & Engineering Societies 65 Table 11- Crane & Lifting Equipment 66 Table 12- Safety Educating & Training 66 Table 13- Disposal of Hazardous Materials & Waste 67 Table 14- Personal Protective Equipment 67 Table 15- Excavation, Trenching & Shoring 68 Table 16- Fire Prevention 69 Table 17- Transportation 69 Table 18- Economic Investment 70 Table 19- Medical Facilities 71 Table 20- Ranks of Groups Factors 72 Table 21- Ranks for Factors Affecting Safety Performance 75 Table 22- AHP matrix for main factors 78 Table 23- matrix for weight calculation (main factors) 78 Table 24- Checking for consistency (main factors) 79 Table 25- AHP matrix for Project Nature group 80 Table 26- matrix for weight calculation (project nature group) 80 Table 27- Checking for consistency (project nature group) 81 Table 28- AHP matrix for Signs, Signals & Barricades Group 82 Table 29 - matrix for weight calculation (Signs, Signals & Barricades Group) 82 Table 30- checking for consistency ( Signs, Signals & barricades Group) 83 Table 31- AHP matrix for Administrative & Management Commitment Group 84 Table 32- matrix for weight calculation (Administrative & Management Commitment Group) 84 Table 33- checking for consistency (Administrative & Management Commitment Group) 85 Table 34- AHP matrix for Personal Protective Equipment Group 86 Table 35- matrix for weight calculation (Personal Protective Equipment Group) 86 Table 36- checking for consistency (Personal Protective Equipment Group) 87 Table 37- AHP matrix for Excavation, Trenching & Shoring Group 88 Table 38- matrix for weight calculation ( Excavation, Trenching & Shoring Group) 88 Table 39- checking for consistency (Excavation, Trenching & Shoring Group) 89 Table 40- AHP matrix for fire prevention Group 90 Table 41- matrix for weight calculation ( fire prevention Group) 90 Table 42- checking for consistency ( fire prevention Group) 90 Table 43- AHP Total weight for each of main factor and sub-factors 92 Table 44- Project A safety evaluation 94 Table 45- Project B safety evaluation 96 Table 46- Project C safety evaluation 98 Table 47- Project D safety evaluation 100 Table 48- Project E Safety evaluation 102 List of Figures Figure 1- Research Location 41 Figure 2- Demography of Participants 45 Figure 3- gender identity 46 Figure 4- respondent's education degree 46 Figure 5- Job Title of Participants 47 Figure 6- Participants by contract type 47 Figure 7- Classification of Project Areas 48 Figure 8- Respondent experience 49 Figure 9- Staff and Resources 49 Figure 10- a percentage of your staff are foreigner 50 Figure 11- Dedicated Safety Professional at workplace 50 Figure 12- Dedicated Safety Program at workplace 51 Figure 13- safety management during university study 52 Figure 14- Safety knowledge 52 Figure 15- how have you gotten knowledge of safety? 53 Figure 16- Safety Responsibility 53 Figure 17- the significant consequences of insufficient safety measures. 54 Figure 18- Accident Witness 54 Figure 19- Awareness of Government`s Legislation 55 Figure 20- safety inspection by goverment 56 Figure 21- safety meetings 56 Figure 22- Safety kits 57 Figure 23- Social Insurance System 57 Figure 24- Health Insurance System 58 Figure 25- a hierarchical model for critical factors affecting safety program 77 List of Flowcharts Flowchart 1- Research Design 7 |
| 參考文獻 |
References Tam, C.M., Zeng, S.X. and Deng, Z.M., 2004. Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China. Safety science, 42(7), pp.569-586. Saeed, Y.S., 2017. Safety management in construction projects. Journal of Duhok University, pp.546-560. Ramzi, Z.S. and Abdulwahid, R.F., 2021. Health and safety management assessment among administrative staff and health and safety committee members in University of Sulaimani. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica, 40(2), pp.165-173. Rashid, H.A., Al-juboori, O.A. and Mahjoob, A.M.R., 2021. Safety management in private construction project in Iraq. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 9(1), pp.322-335. Nassar, Y.S. and Hussein, A.M., 2021. Identify and Analyze the Most Important Factors Affecting the Safety of Employees in Construction Sites in Iraq. Journal of University of Babylon for Engineering Sciences, pp.44-52. Aswed, G .F, Mohammed, H A, Ahmed, M N, 2020. Factors affecting safety in construction projects. International Review of Civil Engineering, Vol. 11, N3. Chen, W.T., You, J.K. and Chen, H.L., 2015. Critical success factors of construction site safety management in Taiwan. Construction Engineering, 3, pp.30-35. Arifin, K., Aiyub, K., Razman, M.R., Jahi, J.M., Awang, A. and Hussain, S.S.H., 2013. Occupational safety management in Malaysia. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 11(2), pp.995-998. Ali, A., Amin, M. and Husin, A.E., 2019. Key success factors for safety programs implementation in Indonesian construction projects. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol, 10(2), pp.1385-1394. Raheem, A.A., Hinze, J.W., Azhar, S., Choudhry, R.M. and Riaz, Z., 2011. Comparative analysis of construction safety in Asian developing countries. Raheem, A.A. and Hinze, J., 2012, September. Reasons for the poor implementation of worker safety in the construction industry of Pakistan: A contractor’s prospective. In Proceedings of the CIB W099 International Conference “Modeling and Building Health and Safety”, Singapore (pp. 10-11). Karakhan, A., 2017. Six Sigma & Construction Safety. Professional Safety, 62(6), pp.38-41. Ministry of construction and housing (MOCAH), Health, safety and environment manual book for construction projects (for projects with the budget of between one and ten billion Iraqi dinars), Erbil, Iraq – October 2020 version 1. Available at: [HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT] (b-cdn.net)] Rahim, S.M. and Kareem, J.A.H., 2020. The Requirements of the Smart Safety Management System and its Role in Achieving Production Excellence: Analytical study of the opinions of workers in two samples of cement plants in Sulaymaniyah Governorate/Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The Scientific Journal of Cihan University–Sulaimaniya, 4(2), pp.161-194. Hatem, Z.M., Hamid, A.R.A. and Abba, N., 2019. Factors that leads to poor welfare facilities implementation at construction sites in Iraq. Proceeding of Civil Engineering UTM, 4(1), pp.72-79. Available at: Factors-that-Leads-to-Poor-Welfare-Facilities-Implementation-at-Construction-Sites-in-Iraq.pdf (researchgate.net) Mahmoud, A.H., 2009. Evaluating the Effectiveness ofOccupational Health and Safety Management Systemof Construction Companies in Iraq (Al-Rasheed State Contracting Construction Companyas a case study). Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 13(2), pp.182-197. Available at: Evaluating the Effectiveness of (iasj.net) Salih, O.O.O., 2016. Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites in Sudan (Doctoral dissertation, Sudan University of Science & Technology) Hoque, I., Ahmed, S. and Sobuz, H.R., 2017. Identification of factors influencing accidents on construction sites. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 7(4), pp.1-16. Alhajeri, M., 2011. Health and Safety in the Construction Industry: Challenges and Solutions in the UAE (Doctoral dissertation, Coventry University). Ali, H.A.O., 2018. Evaluation of the factors affecting safety performance on Construction Project (Doctoral dissertation, Sudan University of Science and Technology). MWANGI, M.W., 2018. FACTORS AFFECTING IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN KENYA: A CASE OF JOMUMU BUILDING AND GENERAL RENOVATORS LIMITED (Doctoral dissertation, MUA). Ali, T.H., 2006. Influence of national culture on construction safety climate in Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation, Griffith University). Durdyev, S., Mohamed, S., Lay, M.L. and Ismail, S., 2017. Key factors affecting construction safety performance in developing countries: Evidence from Cambodia. Construction Economics and Building, 17(4), pp.48-65. Wong, S.S. and Soo, A.L., 2019. Factors influencing safety performance in the construction industry. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 16(3), pp.1-9. Amslak, A.M. and binti Aminudin, E., 2022. Factors Affecting the Development of Safety Management Programmes in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, pp.9005-9015. Hatem, Z.M., Hamid, A.R.A. and Abba, N., 2019. Factors that leads to poor welfare facilities implementation at construction sites in Iraq. Proceeding of Civil Engineering UTM, 4(1), pp.72-79. Rahman, A. M, Salih S. Y. (2022). “ The Reality of the Worker’s Rights between laws and implementations in the Kurdistan Region.” Ayindanasy Journal, 12, Pp 46 – 61 Kawa Karim, 2021, a project on safety Workplace, Awene Newspaper: a project about workplace safety law (awene.com) (last accessible: 19th April 2023) The Peace and Freedom Organization's annual report 2022 available at: KrekarRaport.pdf (pfo-ku.org) (last accessible: 19th April 2023) |
| 論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信