§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-0402202517030400
DOI 10.6846/tku202500058
論文名稱(中文) 行動學習管理系統之介面使用性之個案研究
論文名稱(英文) A Case Study on the Usability of the Mobile Learning Management System Interface
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 教育科技學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Educational Technology
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 113
學期 1
出版年 114
研究生(中文) 彭柏愷
研究生(英文) Peng-Po Kai
學號 612730076
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2025-01-06
論文頁數 125頁
口試委員 口試委員 - 王怡萱(annywang12345@hotmail.com)
口試委員 - 賴阿福(lai@tmue.edu.tw)
指導教授 - 沈俊毅(dannyshen1202@gmail.com)
關鍵字(中) 行動學習
學習管理系統
使用性測試
介面設計
使用者體驗
關鍵字(英) Mobile Learning
Learning Management System
Usability Testing
Interface Design
User Experience
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
隨著科技進步和行動學習的普及,學習管理系統(LMS)已從傳統網頁版發展至行動版本。然而,許多行動版LMS仍沿用網頁版的設計思維,未能充分考慮行動裝置的特性和使用情境,影響了使用者體驗。本研究以台灣大專院校普遍使用的IclassAPP為研究個案,探討行動學習管理系統的介面使用性問題。
    研究招募八位來自不同學校、具備不同行動學習管理系統使用經驗的大學生和研究生作為受試者,透過使用性測試方法,評估IclassAPP的使用性並提出改善建議。測試結果顯示,IclassAPP在基本功能設計上表現良好,具有較高的任務完成率和較低的操作難度。然而,「查看學習進度」和「上傳文章在討論區」等特定功能存在明顯的使用性問題,包括操作時間過長和較高的主觀難度。
    使用滿意度調查發現,使用者對系統的小螢幕空間利用、導航一致性和功能簡化等方面給予正面評價,但對適性化學習路徑設計的滿意度較低。研究歸納出三個主要使用性問題:跨平台的一致性不足、部分設計缺乏直觀性,以及某些功能操作路徑過於單一。
    基於研究發現,本研究提出三項具體改進建議:1) 統一網頁版和應用版的介面設計,降低使用者記憶負荷;2) 提升介面直觀性,優化學習進度呈現方式並增強圖示辨識度;3) 改善功能操作路徑,增加快速存取選項,提高系統使用彈性。研究結果不僅為IclassAPP提供了實質改進方向,也為其他行動學習管理系統的介面設計提供了重要的參考依據。
英文摘要
With the advancement of technology and the prevalence of mobile learning, Learning Management Systems (LMS) have evolved from traditional web versions to mobile applications. However, many mobile LMS still adopt web-based design principles without fully considering the characteristics and usage contexts of mobile devices, which affects user experience. This study examines the interface usability of mobile learning management systems, using IclassAPP, a widely adopted LMS in Taiwan's higher education institutions, as a case study. The research recruited eight university and graduate students from different schools with varying levels of experience in mobile learning management systems as test subjects. Through usability testing methods, the study evaluated the usability of IclassAPP and proposed improvement suggestions. Test results showed that IclassAPP performed well in basic functional design, achieving high task completion rates and low operational difficulty. However, specific functions such as "checking learning progress" and "posting articles in discussion forums" revealed notable usability issues, including extended operation time and higher subjective difficulty. User satisfaction surveys indicated positive feedback regarding screen space utilization, navigation consistency, and function simplification. However, satisfaction with adaptive learning path design was relatively low. The research identified three main usability issues: lack of cross-platform consistency, insufficient intuitiveness in certain designs, and limited operational paths for some functions. Based on these findings, the study proposes three specific improvements: 1) unifying interface design across web and mobile versions to reduce users' memory load; 2) enhancing interface intuitiveness by optimizing learning progress presentation and improving icon recognition; 3) improving functional operation paths by adding quick access options to increase system flexibility. The research results not only provide substantial improvement directions for IclassAPP but also offer valuable reference for interface design of other mobile learning management systems.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄	
第一章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的與問題	4
第三節 名詞定義	4
第四節 研究限制	6
第二章 文獻探討	8
第一節 學習管理系統	8
第二節 行動學習	20
第三節 介面設計原則	29
第四節 使用性測試方法	44
第三章 研究方法	52
第一節 研究設計	52
第二節 研究流程	53
第三節 研究對象	57
第四節 研究工具	59
第五節 資料處理與分析	68
第四章 研究結果	70
第一節 使用性分析	70
第二節 滿意度分析	90
第三節 使用性改善分析	96
第五章 結論與建議	103
第一節 研究結論	103
第二節 研究建議	105
參考文獻	107
壹、 中文部分	107
貳、 英文部分	109
附錄	119

 
表目錄
表 2-1-1學者對行動學習之定義(研究者整理)	20
表 2-3-1網頁版與行動應用版的設計考量比較表	31
表 2-3-2行動應用程式三層設計指南(Ayob et al,.2009)	34
表 2-3-3行動學習應用程式用戶介面設計指南	36
表 2-3-4 網路教學平台使用效能評估總表(賴世偉,2010)	39
表 2-4-1 Neilsen九種使用性評估法分析表(研究者整理)	47
表 3-4-1 使用效能測試任務清單	60
表 4-1-1使用經驗較多組任務完成率	70
表 4-1-2 使用經驗較少組任務完成率	77
表 4-1-3 各項任務平均難易度分數(使用經驗較多組)	80
表 4-1-4 各項任務平均難易度分數(使用經驗較少組)	80
表 4-1-5 使用經驗較多組受試者任務操作時間(*為超過操作時間限制)	83
表 4-1-6 使用經驗較少組受試者任務操作時間(*為超過操作時間限制)	84
表 4-1-7 使用經驗較多組受試者任務操作錯誤率	86
表 4-1-8 使用經驗較少組受試者任務操作錯誤率	86
表 4-2-1 受試者滿意度平均數	90

圖目錄
圖 2-1-1上網率歷年趨勢(台灣網路報告,2022)	23
圖 2-1-2固網寬頻、行動寬頻和5G使用普及率趨勢(台灣網路報告,2022)	24
圖 2-1-3均一碎片化課程內容(均一教學平台)	26
圖 2-3-1三種介面設計指南的適用範圍比較圖	30
圖 3-1-1 研究設計圖	53
圖 3-2-1 研究流程圖	54
圖 3-4-1 Iclass APP主畫面	63
圖 3-4-2 Iclass APP課程章節畫面	64
圖 3-4-3 Iclass APP測驗畫面	65
圖 3-4-4 討論區畫面	66
圖 4-1-1待辦事項置於APP首頁	72
圖 4-1-2 APP中「我的」頁面並沒有顯示待辦事項	73
圖 4-1-3課程內討論區按鈕(方框)	74
圖 4-1-4課程內線上測驗按鈕(方框)	75
圖 4-1-5 Iclass APP學習進度呈現(白色方框)	76
圖 4-1-6 Iclass 網頁版學習進度呈現(方框)	77
圖 4-1-7 APP中課程內部頁面並沒有顯示待辦事項	79
圖 4-1-8 任務難易度分數平均值比較圖	81
圖 4-1-9 應用版的課程介面	82
圖 4-1-10網頁版的課程介面	83
圖 4-1-11 受試者平均操作時間比較圖	85
圖 4-1-12受試者錯誤率比較圖	87
圖 4-2-1 使用經驗較多組與較少組受試者滿意度比較圖	91
圖 4-2-2 IclassAPP首頁,設有導覽列(Navigation Bar)	92
圖 4-2-3 某大學應用版首頁,相較於IclassAPP,缺乏導覽列(Navigation Bar)整體介面也缺乏整理與編排	93
圖 4-2-4某大學應用版系統,因連結至外部網頁,導致亂了導航	94
圖 4-3-1 IclassAPP學習進度呈現修改前後比較圖	96
圖 4-3-2應用版課程介面與網頁版課程介面差異圖	97
圖 4-3-3應用版修改前後比較圖	98
圖 4-3-4修改建議圖(網頁版)	98
圖 4-3-5「線上測驗」按鈕設計修改建議圖	99
圖 4-3-6 IclassAPP文字說明學習進度呈現圖	100
圖 4-3-7 於個人區新增待辦事項按鈕	101
參考文獻
參考文獻
壹、 中文部分
余鑑、于俊傑、呂俊毅、張珮禎(2012)。行動學習(Mobile Learning)應用於公務人員培訓之研究。T&D 飛訊季刊,104。
朱培玲(2010)。數位學習eLearning 101: Action Learning 行動學習:打造學習型組織。
李世忠(1993)。多媒體教學-互動性探討。教育資料與圖書館學,第30卷,第4期。
李世忠 、徐瑜璘(2004)。網路教學互動討論方法之介面設計與發展。教育資料與圖書館學,41(3),389-404。
吳振遠(2008)。以Moodle 建置中學數位學習平台之研究。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文,未出版。
周楷蓁 (2013)。翻轉教室結合行動學習之教學成效,未出版。國立臺中教育大學,台中市。
林伯鴻(2012)。人性化的行動裝置介面。科學發展期刊,472,44-49。
林傑聖、林怡均(2013)。Action Learning到Mobile Learning:淺談行動學習的進化與可能之影響。科學教育月刊,365期,19-28。
林詮翔、陳麒麟、楊竹星、盧育群(2016)。智慧行動測驗管理系統。《TANET2016 臺灣網際網路研討會》Pp. 1222-1227-217。
羅景瓊、蘇照雅(2009)。縮短城鄉數位落差-從數位學習到行動學習。《生活科技教育》 42卷6期。
高台茜(2001)。未來教室學習-以無線網路應用為基礎的認知學徒制學習環境。台大教與學,9。
郭孟倫、楊叔卿(2015)。挑選平板電腦應用程式以協助英語低成就學習者之研究。教育傳播與科技研究,112期,19-39。
許珮玲(2015)。誦讀《蒙求》對國小二年級學生識字量提升之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
許有麟、陳鴻源(2007)。實體產品操作介面設計理論之異同性探討。高苑學報,13 , 327-339。
張桇羿(2012)。網路教學平台使用效能對學生的心流經驗與學習經驗之影響。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班。
翁慧娟(2020)。從微學習的觀點談護理資訊素養數位教材設計與評估。當代通識,(2),62-85。
莊伊琪 (如果有這篇文獻,將會依筆畫順序插入)
黃直美(2023)。從「中小學數位學習精進方案」談行動學習應用於提升學生的英語學習成效。《臺灣教育評論月刊》 12卷10期。
黃敬恆(2017)。社群媒體與教學平台對輔助學習成效之研究。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00157。
黃添丁(2015)。數位學習融入課程之學習動機及學習行為對學習成效的影響。《慈濟科技大學學報》 1期25,35-52。
黃麒中(2006)。以工作流程與Portlet為基礎整合學習管理系統以支援課程編組。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
黃莉雯(2005)。數位學習管理系統與個人屬性對使用者滿意度之研究-以台灣知識庫數位學堂為例。臺中健康暨管理學院國際企業學系碩士論文,未出版,臺中。
黃俊豪 (2018) 。不同教學風格的教師在Iclass使用評估上之差異分析,碩士論文。淡江大學,新北。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2018.00065。
黃敬恆(2017)。社群媒體與教學平台對輔助學習成效之研究。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00157。
蔡汶鴻(2011)。基於專家系統知識擷取技術之行動學習導引模式-以高中地球科學課程為例。國立臺南大學數位學習科技研究所。台南市。
蕭恩芳(2009)。運用Moodle教學平台提升國中學生音樂學習興趣之行動研究。國立臺灣師範大學音樂學系在職進修碩士班,未出版。台北市。
賴世偉 (2010)。建構網路學平台使用效能評估方法之研究 (碩士論文)。淡江大學,台北。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00054
魏澤群(2007)。優使性2.0網站經驗設計與使用者研究。網奕資訊科技。台北。
謝琬琪(2013)。電子書系統使用效能之研究-以HamiBook為例。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班。
劉雯瑜、蔡瓊卉(2011)。以整合型科技接受理論探討大專教師學習管理系統採用行為之研究。*《績效與策略研究》 8卷2期 (2011/10) Pp. 49-60。
游雅婷、劉遠楨、黃思華(2016)。中小學行動學習準備度探究與分析。《教育科學研究期刊》 61卷4期。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2022)。2022台灣網路報告。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2023 年 8 月 29 日)。2023 年台灣網路報告。台灣網路報告官網。https://report.twnic.tw/2023/
陳年典、楊錦潭(2006)。數位學習理論與實務。台北:博碩文化。
陳鴻源、許有麟(2007)。實體產品操作介面設計理論之異同性探討。高苑學報,13 , 327-339。
施伯燁、劉怡亭(2018)。多元數位學習平臺與社群媒體之可用性、互動性與學習滿意度比較。教育傳播與科技研究,(119),47-57。
霍偉棟(2016)。電子學習.新世代 III。香港大學電機電子工程系電子學習發展實驗室。 
貳、 英文部分
Abdulquadir, A., Abdulsalam, O. & Mcmahon, R. & Prabhakar, A. (2023). Usability Study of a Learning Management System (LMS). In Proceedings of the SIGITE '23: The 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education.	
Aberdour, M. (2013). Moodle for Mobile Learning. Packt Publishing.	
Alshehri, A., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2020). The Effects Of Utaut And Usability Qualities On Students’ Use Of Learning Management Systems In Saudi Tertiary Education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 891-930.	
Almrashdeh, I., Ashaari, N., Zin, N., & Alsmadi, M. (2011).Instructor's success measures of Learning Management System.International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, ICEEI 2011, Bandung, Indonesia, 17-19.	
Althobaiti, M. & Mayhew, P. (2016). Assessing the Usability of Learning Management System: User Experience Study. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 9-18.	
Alturki, U. T., Aldraiweesh, A., & Kinshuck, D. (2016). Evaluating The Usability And Accessibility Of LMS “Blackboard” At King Saud University. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 9(1), 33–44.	
Amiaya, A. & Ranor, C. (2015). Challenges and benefits of mobile learning adoption in OTM programme in Delta state polytechnics. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(4), 86-91.	
Andreasen, M. S., Nielsen, H. V., Schrøder, S. O., & Stage, J. (2007). What happened to remote usability testing? An empirical study of three methods. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1405-1414).	
Ardito,C.& Costabile,M.& Marsico,M.& Lanzilotti,R.& Levialdi,S.& Roselli,T.& Rossano,V.(2006).An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications.Universal Access in the Information Society,4(3),270-283	
Ayob, N. A., Che Hussin, A. R., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2009). Three Layers Design Guideline for Mobile Application. Presented at the 2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME '09). DOI: 10.1109/ICIME.2009.99.	
Bevan, N., & Macleod, M. (1994). Usability measurement in context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(1-2), 132-145.	
Brill, A., & Frank, J. (2016). Using inertial and visual sensing from a mounted smartphone to stabilize a ball and beam test-bed. In 2016 American Control Conference (ACC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525103	
Cerf, V. (2016). Apps and the web. Communications of the ACM, 59, 7 - 7.	
Chang, Y., Sheu, J. P., & Chan, T. W. (2003). Concept and design of Ad Hoc and Mobile classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 336-346.	
Cheung, B., Stewart, B., & McGreal, R. (2006). Going Mobile with MOODLE: First steps. Paper presented at the IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning 2006. Dublin: International Association for the Development of the Information Society.	
Darko, C. (2021). An Evaluation of How Students Use Blackboard and the Possible Link to Their Grades. SAGE Open, 11(4).	
Darko-Adjei, N. (2019) The Use and Effect of Smartphones in Students’ Learning Activities: Evidence from the University of Ghana, Legon. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), Article No. 2851.	
Diego, S., Jonathan P., Ballard, J., Hatzipanagos, S., Webb, M., Khan, E., Blake, P., Dore, T., Konstantinidis, A., & Barrett, I. (2012). Do Moodle analytics have a role to play in learning design, feedback and assessment? In Proceedings of the 1st Moodle Research Conference (MRC2012).	
Drakidou, C. (2018). Micro-learning as an Alternative in Lifelong eLearning. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Repository.	
El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. (2010). Defining Mobile Learning in the Higher Education Landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.	
Ertürk, A. & Önaçan, M. (2016). USABILITY EVALUATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 2(10), 73-73.	
Faudzi, M., Cob, Z., Omar, R., Sharudin, S., & Ghazali, M. (2023). Investigating the User Interface Design Frameworks of Current Mobile Learning Applications: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 94. เข้าถึงได้จาก https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010094	
Fox, J. (2015). The science of usability testing. National Center for Education Statistics.	
Ginns, P., & Leppink, J. (2019). Special Issue on Cognitive Load Theory: Editorial. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 255-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-019-09474-4.	
Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1(1), 1.	
He, L., Hu, X., & Jiang, Y. (2014). The Micro-Courses for Mobile Learning-Based Wireless Network. In Foundations of Intelligent Systems (pp. 1061–1066).	
Hornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International journal of human-computer studies, 64(2), 79-102.	
Hudson, W. (2001). How many users does it take to change a Web site?. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin - a supplement to interactions, 2001, 6 - 6. https://doi.org/10.1145/967222.967230.	
Isnaeni, M., & Kastri, E. M. (2022). Enhancing Student’s Vocabulary, Interest, and Motivation for Novice Learners by Using Kahoot! In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Languages and Arts across Cultures (ICLAAC 2022) (pp. 249-259).	
ISO9241-11(2018).Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.	
Kamilali, D. & Sofianopoulou, C. (2015). Microlearning as Innovative Pedagogy for Mobile Learning in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Learning. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Technology.	
Kaufmann, M. (2014). User Interface Design and Evaluation. The Open University.	
Keenan, H. L., Duke, S. L., Wharrad, H. J., Doody, G. A., & Patel, R. S. (2022). Usability: An introduction to and literature review of usability testing for educational resources in radiation oncology. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol, 24, 67–72.	
Kiruthika, J., Khaddaj, S., Greenhill, D., & Francik, J. (2016). User Experience Design in Web Applications. 2016 IEEE Intl Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE Intl Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC) and 15th Intl Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications for Business Engineering (DCABES), 642-646.	
Kulshrestha, T., Ramswaroop, S., & Kant, A. (2013). Benefits of Learning Management System (LMS) in Indian Education.	
Kushniruk, A., & Patel, V. (2021). Usability methods and attributes reported in electronic health record usability studies. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(01), 040–048.	
Kynäslahti, H. (2003). In Search of Elements of Mobility in the Context of Education. In H. Kynäslahti & P. Seppälä (Eds.), (p. 41–48).	
Lee, Y.-M., Jahnke, I., & Austin, L. (2021). Mobile microlearning design and effects on learning efficacy and learner experience. Educational Technology Research and Development.	
Lewis, J. R. (2014). Usability: lessons learned… and yet to be learned. International journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(9), 663-684.	
Lonn,S., Teasley,S.D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686–694.	
Lupton, D. (2020). Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic. UNSW Sydney.	
Maramba, I. D., Chatterjee, A., & Newman, C. (2019). Methods of Usability Testing in the Development of eHealth Applications: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 126(21).	
Markopoulos, P., & Bekker, M. (2003). On the assessment of usability testing methods for children. Interacting with computers, 15(2), 227-243.	
Martin Dougiamas(2010). Moodle 2.0 and the community.	
Martin, L., Roldán Martínez, D., Revilla, O., Aguilar, M. J., Santos, O. C., & Boticario, J. G. (2008). Usability in e-Learning Platforms: heuristics comparison between Moodle, Sakai and dotLRN. aDeNu Research Group, Artificial Intelligence Department, Computer Science School, UNED.	
Maslov, I., Nikou, S., & Hansen, P. (2021). Exploring User Experience of Learning Management System. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(4), 344-363.	
Mastoras, T., Fotaris, P., Politis, A., & Manitsaris, A. (2005). Designing simplicity: Usability perspectives on Learning Management Systems. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 2(10), 1731-1741.	
Mehdipour, Y., & Zerehkafi, H. (2013). Mobile Learning for Education: Benefits and Challenges. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 3, 93-101.	
Miya,T.& Govender,I.(2022).UX/UI design of online learning platforms and their impact on learning: A review.International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478).	
Minović, M., Štavljanin, V., Milovanović, M., & Starčević, D. (2008). User-centered Design of m-Learning System: Moodle On The Go. Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, 4(1), 80-95.	
Moodle Moodle Official website (2020).Thanks to educators around the world, we’ve reached 200 million education resources on Moodle sites! Moodle Official website, About us, News.	
Newton Lee(2021). Facebook nation. Springer New York.	
Nilsson, E. (2009). Design patterns for user interface for mobile applications. Adv. Eng. Softw., 40, 1318-1328. 	
Nielsen,J.(1993).Usability Engineering. San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.	
Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 152–158).	
Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. (1994). Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 66-75.	
Papadakis,S., & Kalogiannakis,M. (2018). Access Moodle Using Smart Mobile Phones. A Case Study in a Greek University. In ArtsIT 2017/DLI 2017 (pp. 376-385). ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering.	
Phongphaew, N., & Jiamsanguanwong, A. (2018). Usability evaluation on learning management system. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 604, pp. 35-44). Springer.	
Phongphaew, N., & Jiamsanguanwong, A. (2018). Usability evaluation on learning management system. In T. Ahram & C. Falcão (Eds.), Advances in Usability and User Experience (pp. 37-47). Springer.	
Piguillem, J., Alier, M., Casany, M. J., Mayol, E., Galanis, N., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Á. (2012). Moodbile: a Moodle web services extension for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 1st Moodle Research Conference (MRC2012).	
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017). Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact., 2017, 6787504:1-6787504:22.	
Quesenbery, W. (2001) What Does Usability Mean: Looking beyond Ease of Use. Proceeding of 48th Annual Conference-Society for Technical Communication, Chicago, 13-16.	
Riihiaho, S. (2018). Usability Testing. In The Wiley Handbook of Human Computer Interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 255-275). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.	
Rodgers, S. (2000). Blackboard Overview by a Technology Coordinator. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(6), 700.	
Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. Wiley Technical Communications Library.	
Sanderson, P. E., & Rosenberg, M. J. (2002). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Performance Improvement, 41(2), 36-42.	
Shathaghazal, & Salkhlailah, R. (2016). Moodle (Electronic Learning System) Community. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojcst/9.02.08.	
Shin, W. & Kang, M. (2015). The Use of a Mobile Learning Management System at an Online University and Its Effect on Learning Satisfaction and Achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110-130.	
Soegaard, M. (2018). The Basics of User Experience Design: A UX Design Book by the Interaction Design Foundation.	
Stoesz, B. & Niknam, M. (2022). Student Perceptions of the Visual Design of Learning Management Systems. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(3), 1-22.	
Stone, D. & Zheng, G. (2014). Learning Management Systems in a Changing Environment. In Handbook of Research on Education and Technology in a Changing Society (Chapter 56).	
The University of Zululand(2020)。Definitions - E-Learning Portal. RetrievedNovember,20, 2013 ,from:http://elearn.uzulu.ac.za/index.php/definitions	
Tkachuk, S., Melnyk, O., & Voroshilov, S. (2023). Implementation of Mobile Learning Technologies In The System Of Distance Education. Collection of Scientific Papers of Uman State Pedagogical University.	
Tobarra, L., Ros, S., Hernandez, R., & Robles-Gómez, A. (2014). Integration of Multiple Data Sources for predicting the Engagement of Students in Practical Activities. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 2(7), 53-62. 	
Topf, J. M., & Hiremath, S. (2019). Got CKD? There's an App for That! Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 14(4), CJN.02350219.	
Wang, Y., Qiu, D., Teng, F., & Strbac, G. (2024). Towards Microgrid Resilience Enhancement via Mobile Power Sources and Repair Crews: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.	
Watson, W. R. (2007). An Argument for clarity: What are Learning Management Systems, what are they not, and what should they become. TechTrends, 51(2), 28-34.	
Wichansky, A. M. (2000). Usability testing in 2000 and beyond. Ergonomics, 43(7), 998-1006.	
Williams, T., & Williams, M. (2009). Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures of Usability in a Human-Robot Dialogue System. Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference, 74-81.	
Wood, W., Tam, L., & Witt, M. (2005). Changing circumstances, disrupting habits.. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88 6, 918-933 . https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.918.	
Yosiana, Y., Djuandi, D., & Hasanah, A. (2021). Mobile learning and its effectiveness in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.	
Zhang, W., Deng, L., Zhang, L., & Wu, D. (2020). A Survey on Negative Transfer. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10, 305-329. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2022.106004.	 
論文全文使用權限
國家圖書館
同意無償授權國家圖書館,書目與全文電子檔於繳交授權書後, 於網際網路立即公開
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權於全球公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權予資料庫廠商
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信