本研究旨在探討同儕互評導入國中八年級數位作品創作歷程之成效，即透過製作數位作品，探究同儕互評對國中生的數位作品創作自我效能與作品品質是否有影響。本研究採用不等組實驗研究設計。研究對象為國中八年級生共計114人，採隨機分派方式，將其中兩個班指派為實驗組(評分組)58人，另外兩班則為控制組(接收組)56人。在實驗過程會製作三份數位作品，電子繪本、電子報與預告片，依據這三份作品進行三次的同儕互評。教學方式皆以數位敘事與專題導向的方式帶領學生進行數位作品製作流程。研究結果如下：學生在數位作品創作過程中融入同儕互評的機制，對於學生的資訊課數位作品創作自我效能有正向的影響。而在同儕互評中扮演不同的角色(接收者或評分者)的學生的資訊課數位作品創作自我效能8的成長具顯著差異，且兩者在所製作的數位作品的品質亦有顯著差異。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of peer assessment on the 8th grades students’ self-efficacy on digital production and the quality of the digital products they created. The quasi-experimental design was adopted.144 students were involved. 58 students were randomly assigned to the experimental group while were assigned to the control group. Throughout the experiment, the participants needed to produce three digital products, including electronic books, e-papers and movie trailers. An peer-assessment activity was conducted immediately after students produced their digital productsion. The results showed that the peer-assessement activity had positive impact on students self-efficacy on digital production. Besides, students playing different roles (assessor or assesse) in peer assessment were significantly different in students’ self-efficacy and quality of digital products.

目次
第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的與問題	5
第三節 研究範圍與限制	7
第四節 名詞解釋	9
第五節 研究貢獻	10
第二章	文獻探討	11
第一節 數位作品創作之教學	11
第二節 同儕互評	19
第三節 數位作品製作之評估	27
第三章 研究方法	33
第一節 研究對象	33
第二節 研究架構與變項	34
第三節 實驗設計與研究流程	36
第四節 研究工具	43
第四節 資料處理	56
第四章 研究結果與討論	57
第一節 數位作品創作自我效能研究結果	57
第二節 學生在同儕互評過程中扮演不同角色對創作自我效能的影響	60
第三節 同儕互評中接收組與評分組學生的數位作品品質	61
第三節 綜合討論與分析	64
第五章 結論與建議	67
第一節 研究結論	67
第二節 研究建議	69
參考文獻	72
中文部分：	72
英文部分：	75
附錄一、家長同意書	80


表目錄

表2-1-1數位敘事實證研究	13
表2-1-2專題導向學習實證研究	15
表2-2-1相關實證研究	21
表3-3-1實驗設計	36
表3-4-1電子繪本教學流程表	43
表3-4-2教師任務與學生任務表	45
表3-4-3教師任務與學生任務表	47
表3-4-4電子繪本評分指標	49
表3-4-5電子報評分指標	51
表3-4-6預告片評分指標	52
表4-1-1自我效能前後測描述性統計摘要	58
表4-1-2全體受試者自我效能的前後測之成對樣本T檢定摘要表	58
表4-1-3接收組在工作價值與自我效能的前後測之成對樣本T檢定摘要表	59
表4-2-1自我效能量表總分共變數分析	60
表4-3-1三份數位作品描述性統計表	61
表4-3-2 Brown-Forsythe & Welch 校正表	62
表4-3-3 Brown-Forsythe & Welch 校正表	63


 
圖目錄
圖3-1-1研究架構圖	34
圖3-3-1實驗流程	38
圖3-3-2同儕互評流程	40
 

中文部分：
方彩欣(2009)。藝術或技術：數位媒材創作思維探究。輔仁大學設計研究學報，3，18-25。
王士樵（2008）。視不識－視覺文化教與學。臺北市：國立臺灣藝術教育館 。
王秀鶯(2013)。導入Scratch程式教學對國中生自我效能與學習成就之探究-以程式設計課程為例。人文社會學報，9 (1)，1-15。
吳昕縈(2013)。迷宮多路徑融入品德素養之數位敘事方法研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。新竹市。
呂冠賢(2012）。導入同儕互評於數位故事創作(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園縣。
林鳳雯、崔夢萍(2011)。網路摘要策略教學與同儕互評對國小六年級學童學習成效之研究。國民教育，51(5)，25-34。
林妙貞(2007)。國小學童創意自我效能、目標導向、依附關係與創意活動投入及創意表現之關係-以科展團隊為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。.
林麗華、林清文(2003)。國中生數學科學習之目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與課業壓力關係研究。彰化師大輔導學報，25，87-132.
相孟琳.(2011)。國中學生創意自我效能與同儕依附關係對創意表現之研究: 以新竹縣科展為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學，桃園縣。
徐靜儀(2006)。童話電子書創作教學研究──以某國小五年某班為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
張文哲譯（2013）。教育心理學：理論與實際。臺北市：學富。	
張春興(1999)。心理學思想的流變。臺北市：臺灣東華出版。		
張琬翔(2007)。電子報融入主題統整活動之設計範例與經驗分享。生活科技教育月刊，40(2)。
張雅萍(2006)。我是小評審！同儕互評於國小五年級視覺藝術課程之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
陳年興(2007)。數位學習：理論與實務。台北縣：博碩文化。	
陳彤宣(2011)。專題式程式設計教學對國小學童問題解決歷程之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 
陳冠綺(2014)。提供回饋輔助機制於學習者自律學習活動對學習者自我效能，學習態度及學習成效之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學，台南市。
陳麗茹(2010)。專題導向學習運用於國小節能減碳教學之行動研究－以「太陽－永續家園」主題為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
符寧馨(2010)。運用共識評量於數位敘事作品創意表現分析(未出版之碩士論文)。新竹教育大學碩士論文，新竹市。
許喬雯、岳修平、林維真(2010)。專題式學習小組溝通行為與成員角色之研究。圖書資訊學刊，8(1)，137-164。
程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。測驗年刊，48(1)，1-41。
黃信義(2006)。網路同儕互評對創造力的影響－以小五生電腦繪圖學習為例（未出版之碩士論文）。私立銘傳大學，臺北市。
黃惠卿、林啟超(2005)。國中生數學之成就目標導向對自我效能和不適應學習行為之關係。教育科學期刊，5(2)，27-51.
曾聖超(2004)。以網路同儕互評系統輔助高中電腦課程教學：學習成效及同儕回饋之分析 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學，新竹市。
劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志、吳有城(2010)。國中小學習動機量表之編製及其信效度研究。測驗學刊，57(3)，371-402。
劉映孜(2012)。以數位說故事教學法融入新加坡小學道德教育課之課程設計、發展與評鑑(未出版之碩士論文) 。國立交通大學，新竹市。
樊台聖、李一靜、蔡翌潔(2014)。電腦自我效能影響因素之實證。教育大學學報：數理科技類臺中教育大學學報：數理科技類，28(2)，1-24。
蕭純如（2008）。網路同儕互評應用於藝術設計領域之研究－以「電腦動畫」課程為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學，嘉義縣。
鍾生官（2006）。數位說故事在統整藝術教育之應用。國際藝術教育學刊，52，51-63。
顏膺修、吳為聖、張惠博(2013)。透過雲端應用軟體延伸科學學習—國小「天氣的變化」單元專題導向學習。Research and Development，65，27-48。
 
英文部分：
Aziz, Z., Shamsuri, S. M., & Damayanti, L. (2013). Project Based Learning to Pose Reasoning Skills for Year 1 Pupil.Review of European Studies,5(4), 82.
Bandura. A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Barrett, H. (2006). Researching and evaluating digital storytelling as a deep learning tool. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1, 647-654.	
Bjrgen, A. M. (2010). Boundary crossing and learning identities - digital storytelling in primary schools.	Seminar.net - International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning ,6 (2),161-177
Burmark, L. (2004). Visual presentations that prompt, flash & transform. Media and Methods, 40(6).
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.Psychological review,106(4), 676.
Chang, S.H, Wu, T.C., Kuo, Y.K., & You, L.C. (2012) Project-Based Learning with an Online Peer Assessment System in a Photonics Instruction for Enhancing LED Design Skills. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 236-246.
Çevik, Y. D. (2015). Assessor or assessee? Investigating the differential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students’ problem-solving skills.Computers in Human Behavior,52, 250-258.
Li-Chiou Chen (2015). My Comic- Utilizing “Comic Composition System” to Improve Students’ Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction of Arts Learning, 2nd International Conference on Teaching and Education Sciences (ICTES2015),Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 9-10 June.
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243-255.
Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 111-133.
Dogan, B., & Robin, B. (2008). Implementation of digital storytelling in the classroom by teachers trained in a digital storytelling workshop. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference,. 1,  902-907. 
Dziedzic, M., Janissek, P. R., & Bender, A. P. (2008). Assessment by peers - an effective learning technique. 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY. T2F-1-T2F-5.
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348.
Lambert, J. (2003). Digital storytelling cookbook and traveling companion. Retrieved from http://www.storycenter.org/cookbook.pdf
Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F. & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Learning effects of web-based peer assessment for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432.
Lu & Law(2012) .Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science,40(2), 257-275.
Lundby, K. (2008).Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. Peter Lang, New York.
Nyboe, L., & Drotner, K. (2008). Identity, aesthetics and digital narration.Digital storytelling, mediatized stories. Self-presentations in new media, 52, 161-176.
Fatma Sasmaz Oren (2012). The effects of gender and previous experience on the approach of self and peer assessment: a case from Turkey. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(2)123-133.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.
Porter, B. (2005). The art of digital storytelling. Revista Discovery Education. Retrieved from www. unitedstreaming. com.
Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into practice, 47(3), 220-228. 
Robin, B. (2006).The educational uses of digital storytelling. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1, 709-716).	
Sprague, B. L., Stout, N. K., Schechter, C., van Ravesteyn, N. T., Cevik, M., Alagoz, O, & Tosteson, A. N. (2015). Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Annals of internal medicine, 162(3), 157-166.
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and instruction, 20(4), 291-303.
Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2007). Using video‐stimulated reflective dialogue to learn from children about their learning with and without ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(3), 321-335. 
Thesen, A., & Kara-Soteriou, J. (2011). Using digital storytelling to unlock student potential. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(2), 93-100.	
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning.	
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. 
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning.Educational psychology,25(6), 631-645. 
Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment.Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 339-343. 
Sandra K. M. Tsang, Eadaoin K. P. Hui, and Bella C. M. Law.(2012). Self-Efficacy as a Positive Youth Development Construct: A Conceptual Review The Scientific World . The Scientific World Journal. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/452327
Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174. 
Tsivitanidou, O. E., Zacharia, Z. C., & Hovardas, T. (2011). Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 506-519.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 125-141.
Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical education, 44(1), 85-93. 
Via, S. (2002). Digital storytelling evaluation rubric. Retrieved from http://its.ksbe.edu/dst/PDFs/Rubrics/rubric.pdf 
Wasson, B., & Vold, V. (2012). Leveraging new media skills in a peer feedback tool. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 255-264. 
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339-352. 
Yuksel, P., Robin, B., & McNeil, S. (2011, March). Educational uses of digital storytelling all around the world. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference,1, 1264-1271.
Yusuff, K. B. (2014). Does self-reflection and peer-assessment improve Saudi pharmacy students’ academic performance and metacognitive skills? Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal,23(3), 266-275
Zundert, Sluijsmans, & Merrienboer(2010) Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction,20(4),270–279