§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-3006201816593400
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00978
論文名稱(中文) 環境策略、環境管理與企業價值關聯性之研究-以台灣上市櫃製造業為例
論文名稱(英文) The Relationships between Environmental Strategy, Environmental Management and Enterprise Value-The Publicly Listed Manufacturing Companies in Taiwan
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 陳詩穎
研究生(英文) Shih-Ying Chen
學號 605600286
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-06-19
論文頁數 70頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 黃振豊
共同指導教授 - 孔繁華
委員 - 黃振豊
委員 - 張琬喻
委員 - 謝宜樺
關鍵字(中) 環境策略
環境管理
企業價值
關鍵字(英) Environmental Strategy
Environmental Management
Enterprise Value
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討環境策略、環境管理與企業價值之關聯性,以2015年與2016年上市櫃製造業為對象,環境策略及環境管理採內容分析法分析企業社會責任報告書所獲得,財務資料則取自台灣經濟新報之財務資料庫。研究結果顯示,實施前瞻式環境策略並不如反應式環境策略有助於提升企業價值。顯示台灣目前對於環境策略較為保守,不如營運策略、行銷策略般重視。其次,實施前瞻式環境策略之效益在短期內可能不顯著,需要長期的關注才能顯現其成效。除此之外,相較於保守式環境管理,實施積極式環境管理更有助於提升企業價值,說明了其藉由成本的節省、減少負面環境事件所產生的罰款,進而提升企業價值。本研究亦發現實施反應式環境策略與積極式環境管理之企業價值最高,表示企業與其費神在環境策略,不如花費更多心力在環境管理。
英文摘要
Using the examples of publicly listed manufacturing companies in Taiwan in 2015 and 2016, this paper examines the relationships between environmental strategy, environmental management and enterprise value. The data of environmental strategy and environmental management are collected from social responsibility report by content analytical method, and financial data are got from TEJ database. The empirical results show that compared to those firms with reactive environmental strategy, the firms implementing a proactive environmental strategy did not increase the enterprise value. This may be due to the fact that companies in Taiwan are more conservative on environmental strategy. While they pay more attention on operational strategy and marketing strategy. The benefit of implementing a proactive environmental strategy may lack significant effect in the short-term. On the other hand, implementing proactive environmental management will increase the enterprises value through cost savings and reduction of penalties arising from negative environmental events.  The empirical results also show that companies that implement reactive environmental strategy and proactive environmental management have high enterprise value. Companies should spent more time and effort on environmental management rather than on environmental strategy.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
第一章、緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的4
第三節 論文架構與流程4
第二章、文獻探討與研究假說6
第一節 企業社會責任6
第二節 企業社會反應10
第三節 環境策略13
第四節 環境管理15
第五節 企業價值17
第六節 環境策略與管理相關理論18
一、利害關係人理論18
二、資源基礎理論18
第七節 研究假說發展21
第三章、研究設計26
第一節 研究期間與對象26
第二節 資料來源與蒐集方法26
第三節 操作性定義與衡量28
第四節 實證模型37
第五節 信度與效度分析38
第四章、研究結果39
第一節 敘述性統計39
第二節 相關性分析41
第三節 多元迴歸分析43
第四節 遞延效果分析51
第五節 敏感性分析54
第五章、結論與建議62
第一節 研究結論62
第二節 研究限制63
第三節 研究建議64
參考文獻65
中文文獻65
英文文獻66

圖目錄
圖1-1:研究流程圖5
圖2-1:企業社會反應分類12
圖2-2:企業營運循環14
圖2-3:資源基礎理論-策略分析架構19
圖2-4:觀念性架構圖25
圖4-1:環境策略、環境管理與Tobin's Q之比較圖46
圖4-2:環境策略、環境管理與ROA之比較圖47
圖4-3:環境策略、環境管理與ROE之比較圖47
圖4-4:環境策略、環境管理與異常報酬之比較圖48
圖4-5:環境策略、環境管理與綜合價值之比較圖48

表目錄
表1-1:企業社會責任定義8
表2-1:策略性資源的內涵20
表3-1:樣本分佈彙總表27
表3-2:樣本彙總表27
表3-3:環境策略評分量表28
表3-4:環境管理評分量表30
表3-5:變數衡量彙總表36
表3-6:變數代號對照表37
表3-7:信度分析38
表4-1:敘述性統計40
表4-2:各變數之Pearson相關係數矩陣42
表4-3:環境策略、環境管理與企業價值之迴歸分析結果彙總45
表4-4:環境策略、環境管理與Tobin's Q之比較表46
表4-5:環境策略、環境管理與ROA之比較表47
表4-6:環境策略、環境管理與ROE之比較表47
表4-7:環境策略、環境管理與異常報酬之比較表48
表4-8:環境策略、環境管理與綜合價值之比較表48
表4-9:高環境敏感產業、低環境敏感產業與企業價值之獨立樣本t檢50
表4-10:環境策略、環境管理與企業價值之迴歸分析結果彙總(遞延效果分析)52
表4-11:環境策略、環境管理與企業價值之迴歸分析結果彙總(敏感性分析一)56
表4-12:環境策略、環境管理與企業價值之迴歸分析結果彙總(敏感性分析二)58
表4-13:環境策略、環境管理與企業價值之迴歸分析結果彙總(敏感性分析三)60
參考文獻
參考文獻
中文文獻
台灣證券交易所,2014,企業社會責任簡介,引用自http://cgc.twse.com.tw/front/responsibility
朱竹元,2016,企業社會責任與永續發展策略:企業的全球通行證,初版,台北市:資誠教育基金會。
吳思華,1998,策略九說:策略思考的本質,二版,台北市:臉譜。
李義昭、洪沛甫與鄭魁香,2008,企業價值之衡量指標-以台灣精品獎通訊類得獎企業為例,中華管理評論國際學報,第十一卷第四期。
洪進朝、李耕年與蔡佑宣,2013,資本支出宣告對股價的影響-以台灣半導體產業為例,管理資訊計算,第2卷第1期: 187-198。
柴玉珂,2015,上市公司資本結構與企業績效關係研究,初版,台北市:元華。
翁霓與蕭運炎,2008,財務報表環境資訊揭露品質影響因素之探討-以國內上市公司為例,東吳經濟商學學報,第61期:1-30。
陳王琨,2014,環境管理學,初版,新北市:高立。
陳可欣,2005,環境資訊揭露程度與公司治理關聯性之研究,淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
陳沛旬,2014,公司治理與企業價值和財務績效之關聯性,東吳大學國際經營與貿易學系未出版碩士論文。
黃德舜,1998,企業財務分析:企業價值的創造及評估,初版,台北市:華泰。
黃瓊瑤、王癸元與張鳳真,2013,企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究,當代會計,第14卷第2期: 175-204。
溫肇東,1999,企業的環境管理,初版,台北市:遠流。
顧洋,1997,ISO14000國際環境管理標準總論及國內政府與產業因應現況,ISO 14000環境管理系統標準專刊,台北市:行政院環境保護署。
 
英文文獻
Aguinis, H., and Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda, Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Alt, E., Díez-de-Castro, E. A., and Lloréns-Montes, F. J. (2015). Linking Employee Stakeholders to Environmental Performance: The Role of Proactive Environmental Strategies and Shared Vision, Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 167-181.
Aragón-Correa, H. A., and Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy, Academy of Management Review, 28 (1), 71-88.
Babiak, K., and Trenda lova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11–24.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman, New York, NY: Harper.
Bosworth, D. and M. Rogers. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australia firms, The Economic Record, 77(239), 323-337.
Brown, S. J. and Waner, J. B. (1980). Measuring security price performance, Journal of Financial Economics, 8(3), 205-258.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate Performance, Academy of Management, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of management review, 20(1), 92-117.
Clarkson, P. M., Yue, L., Richardson, G. D., and Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 303-327.
Du, X., Jian, W., Zeng, Q., and Du, Y. (2013). Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Polluting Industries: Does Religion Matter?, Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 485-507.
Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 1105-1121.
Elsayed, K. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate Governance, 15(6), 1203-1214.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, University Press, Cambridge, NY.           
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gladwin, T. N. (1994). The meaning of greening: A plea for organizational theory, Environmental Strategies for Industry, 37-62.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
Hart, S. L. (2005). Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s Most Difficult Problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Hart, S. L., and Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance, Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.
Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance, The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
Hunt, C. B., and Auster, E. R. (1990). Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap, Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7-18.
Judge, W. Q., and Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment, Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241-262.
Klassen, R. D. (2001). Plan-level environmental management orientation: the influence of management views and plant characteristics, Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 257-275.
Klassen, R. D., and McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance, Management science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
Klassen, R. D., and Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance, Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599-615.
Lee, S. –P., and Chen, H. –J. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value as determinants of CEO compensation in Taiwan, Management Research Review, 34(3), 252-265.
Leung, S. and Horwitz, B. (2010). Corporate governance and firm value during a financial crisis, Rev Quant Finan Acc, 34, 459-481.
Ljungdah, F. (2004). Factors influencing environmental and social disclosures, Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Singapore, 5-10.
Majumdar, S. K., and Marcus, A. A. (2001). Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 170-179.
Marion, D., and Bouchra M., (2018). CSR strategies in response to competitives pressures, Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 603-623.
McConnell, J. J., and Servaes, H., (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value, Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595-612.
McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603-609.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 239-315.
Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garce´s-Ayerbe, C., and Rivera-Torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders pressure approach, Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1225–1240.
Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garce´s-Ayerbe, C., and Rivera-Torres, P. (2011). Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(13), 1417–1425.
Nehrt, C. (1995). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments, Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 535-547.
Peter, C., Yue Li, Richardson, G., and Florin, P. V. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122-144.
Porter, M. E., and Claas van der L. (1995). Green and competitive, Harvard Business Review, Sep/Oct., 120-134.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review, Biological conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431.
Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management strategies, Business Strategy and the Environment, 1(1), 11-24.
Sharma, S., and Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753.
Torugsa, N.A., O’Donohue, W. and Hecker, R. (2012). Capabilities, proactive CSR and financial performance in SMEs: empirical evidence from an Australian manufacturing industry sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 483-500.
Van E. H., Postma, T. J. B., and Sterken, E. (2008). Board Characteristics and Corporate Performance in The Netherlands, Eastern Economic Journal, 29(1), 41-58.
Wartick, S. L. and Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social permance model, Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports, Journal of Accounting, Organizations and society, 7(1), 55-63.
Yeonsoo, K. (2015). Consumer responses to the food industry’s proactive and passive environmental CSR, factoring in price as CSR tradeoff, Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 307-321.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後3年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後3年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後3年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信