淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-2906202013032800
中文論文名稱 遊戲化問題導向學習之研究以人力資源發展課程為例
英文論文名稱 Gamification with Problem-Based Learning : HRD as an example.
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 教育科技學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Educational Technology
學年度 108
學期 2
出版年 109
研究生中文姓名 林宥吟
研究生英文姓名 You-Yin Lin
電子信箱 lily07199639@gmail.com
學號 608730023
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2020-06-23
論文頁數 85頁
口試委員 指導教授-鍾志鴻
委員-卓美秀
委員-沈俊毅
中文關鍵字 遊戲化  問題導向學習  人力資源發展課程  學習滿意度  設計本位研究法 
英文關鍵字 Gamification  Human resource development  Learning satisfaction  Problem-based learning  Design-based Research 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學教育學
中文摘要 遊戲化問題導向教學是將兩種不同的教學法結合,用以提升學習參與度、學習動機、學習成就。然而卻鮮少有研究者將此二種教學法結合,並進行探討影響學習者的各個構面,以及各個構面之間的影響關係為何。本研究以設計本位研究法,進行18週的課程規劃設計,透過問卷蒐集學生於遊戲化問題導向教學之學習滿意度,以及透過期末考試成績用以檢視學習成就,並使用偏最小平方結構方程式模組分析結果可得知,績效預期、付出預期、社會影響於學習滿意度有正向性影響,而幫助條件卻間接影響學習滿意度,因此教學者應適當給予協助並鼓勵學習者,以提升學習者幫助條件於學習滿意度之直接正向性關係。透過本研究結果,期望於教學設計者、教師在教學過程中有實質性之幫助,並提升教學效率與有效性。
英文摘要 Because undergraduate students have typically exhibited low motivation when pursuing traditional learning methods, this study adopted a gamification problem-based learning model and a computer-based three-dimensional sandbox game to motivate students of a human resources development course. For systematicity in our curriculum planning and implementation, we reviewed the literature regarding the following five steps of the proposed gamification problem-based learning model: (1) finding problems, (2) collecting data, (3) integrating information, (4) assessment, and (5) reflection. Our curriculum design focused on four major topics of human resource development: (1) needs analysis, (2) the competency model, (3) training and development planning, and (4) leadership and communication. Teaching activities in our 3D computer sandbox games were as follows: (1) establishing ideal homes, (2) identifying the roles and abilities of each team member, (3) designing beginners’ training courses, and (4) capture-the-flag team competitions. Finally, in this design-based study, we noted that students’ final exam grades significantly improved from 2018 to 2019. For the instructional design, we used four crucial topics to design problems. To explore what significant factors influence students’ learning satisfaction, we developed a student satisfaction questionnaire. We adopted partial least squares structural equation modeling to analyze the relationships between components. Based on the results elucidating the learning outcomes of students who participated in gamified 3D problem-based learning (PBL), we gave prescriptions for implementing such innovative teaching plans, which can enhance learning effectiveness in the courses.
論文目次 目錄

表次v
圖次vi
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的與問題2
第三節 名詞釋義 3
第四節 研究範圍與限制4
第二章 文獻探討6
第一節 遊戲化6
第二節 問題導向學習12
第三節 整合科技接受模式19
第三章 研究設計 30
第一節 研究架構 30
第二節 資料處理與分析 31
第三節 研究流程 35
第四節 抽樣對象與抽樣方法 37
第五節 研究方法 37
第六節 研究工具 49
第四章 研究結果 51
第一節 問卷回收結果51
第二節 信度、效度分析51
第三節 T檢定55
第四節 PLS-SEM分析57
第五節 質化分析 62
第五章 研究討論與結論建議65
第一節 研究討論 65
第二節 研究結論 68
第三節 研究建議與展望69
參考文獻 71
中文部分 71
英文部分 73
附錄82

表次

表 2-1 遊戲設計元素分級表 7
表 2-2 遊戲化之相關研究10
表 2-3 問題導向學習之相關研究16
表 2-4 整合科技接受模式發展歷程19
表 2-5 UTAUT各構面意義及來源23
表 2-6 本研究各項假設26
表 2-7 UTAUT相關研究27
表 3-1 各週授課內容41
表 3-2 成績考核 47
表 4-1 轉軸後因數矩陣表52
表 4-2 驗證性因素分析適配指標標準及分析結果比較表53
表 4-3 CFA區別分析55
表 4-4 相依性t檢定56
表 4-5 獨立性t檢定56
表 4-6 路徑效果值58
表 4-7 各構面之α值、CR值與AVE值整理表58
表 4-8 PLS-SEM區別效度58
表 4-9 本研究各項假設之結果62
表 4-10 文字探勘資料統計結果63

圖次

圖 2-1問題導向學習步驟15
圖 2-2 TAM科技接受模型21
圖 2-3 UTAUT 理論架構圖23
圖 3-1研究架構圖1 31
圖 3-2研究架構圖2 31
圖 3-3資料處理分析步驟34
圖 3-4研究流程圖36
圖 3-5設計本位流程法38
圖 3-6使用教學方法類型39
圖 3-7課程架構40
圖 3-8遊戲化問題導向學習步驟40
圖 3-9理想家園示意圖45
圖 3-10活動二:建立職能模型45
圖 3-11建築團隊競賽示意圖46
圖 3-12訓練課程規劃示意圖46
圖 3-13各週授課進度48
圖 4-1 CFA分析結果54
圖 4-2 PLS-SEM 結果圖60
圖 4-3 IMPA 主要因素影響學習滿意度結果圖61
圖 4-4 IMPA 問項結果圖61



參考文獻 中文部分
侯惠澤(2016)。遊戲式學習。臺北市:親子天下。
許宛琪(2009)。問題本位學習於師資培育職前教育實施之初探。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,2(2),1-19。
楊心怡、李啟嘉。(2015)。問題導向學習對法律系大學生問題解決能力及自我導向學習之研究。教育科學研究期刊。60(1),131-155。 doi:10.6209/jories.2015.60(1).05
涂卉、雷漢聲、黃錦華。(2016)。問題導向學習教學模式下學習動機對學習滿意度影響之研究-以弘光科技大學為例。商管科技季刊,17(4),467-491。
洪志成、洪慧真。(2017)。中小學問題導向學習的研究光譜。課程與教學季刊,20(2),1-27。doi:10.6384/ciq.201704_20(2).0001
郭怡良、林玉雯、陳沛嵐。(2017)。不同學習風格物理治療學生對問題導向學習課程之感受。物理治療教育,42(2),73-79。doi:10.6215/fjpt.Pts20170642023
華根。(2018)。通用設計環境課程應用問題導向學習教學之研究-以南亞技術學院為例。南亞學報,(38),39-52。
陳璽芳。(2019)。PBL問題導向學習教學法應用於國中歷史科校外教學之活動設計。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(1),249-256。
張培華、鄭夙芬、曾清標。(2018)。這是個「問題」嗎?問題導向學習之行動研究。大學教學實務與研究學刊,2(2),91-125。doi:10.6870/jtprhe.201812_2(2).0004
李佳蓉、蘇蕙琪、陳寶如, 潘玟玲、蕭棋蓮、胡慧蘭、任秀如。(2019)。遊戲式創新教學於臨床新進護理人員高警訊藥物訓練之學習成效。新臺北護理期刊,21(2),1-11。doi:10.6540/ntjn.201909_21(2).0001
馬美娟。(2019)。遊戲化測驗對紅樓夢的學習動機之提升的研究。南台人文社會學報,(21),1-28。
張安緹、陳鴻仁。(2018)。即時適性英語字彙遊戲學習系統教學之學習成效與學習動機分析。數位學習科技期刊(4),31-58。doi:10.3966/2071260x2018101004002
石晉陽、陳剛(2016)。 教育遊戲化的動力結構與設計策略。現代教育技術(06)。
紀菲菲(2018)。 “遊戲化教學”在旅遊管理專業的應用及對策研究.。韶關學院學報,(11)。
許宛琪(2009)。問題本位學習於師資培育職前教育實施之初探。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,2(2),1-19。
廖珮妏、余鑑、于俊傑(2012)。應用整合型科技接受模式與創新擴散通用模型於企業導入數位學習之多層次分析。電子商務學報,14(4),657-687。
林志隆、楊乃靜 (2013)。以整合性科技接受理論探討屏東縣國民小學英語教師利用網路社群進行教師專業成長之研究。數位學習科技期刊,5(3),1-23。
黃美利、林修慶、鄭榮祿(2014)。應用科技接受與使用整合模式研究中學生之數位閱讀行為意圖和使用行為。高雄師大學報,(36),15-33。
陳佩宜(2016)。應用整合科技接受模式探討數位閱讀之研究-以桃園地區民眾為例。蘭陽學報,(15),12-22。
呂世鏹(2017)。以整合性科技接受模型探討雲端學習接受度之研究。國立高雄應用科技大學資訊管理系碩士在職專班碩士論文,高雄市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/73kr7j
張瓊穗、翁婉慈、潘璿安(2011)。「問題導向」策略融入數位訓練教材發展之研究─以便利商店新進員工訓練為例。教學科技與媒體,(96),63-80。

英文部分
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R L. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS).
Approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an
illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980a). Problem based-learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company, 1, 224.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980b). Problem based-learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company, 1, 224.
Browne, K., Anand, C., & Gosse, E. (2014). Gamification and serious game approaches for adult literacy tablet software [JOUR]. Entertainment Computing, 5(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2014.04.003
Cain, J., & Piascik, P. (2015). Are serious games a good strategy for pharmacy education? [JOUR]. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 1.
Cheong, C., Flilippou, J., Cheong, F., Filippou, J., & Cheong, F. (2014). Towards the gamification of learning : Investigating student perceptions of game elements [JOUR]. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(3), 233.
Chung, C.-H., Shen, C., & Qiu, Y.-Z. (2019). Students’ Acceptance of Gamification in Higher Education. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 9(2), 1–19.
Chung, C., Anghakoon, P., Ali, J, and Allen, J. (2016). Virtual HRD and national culture: An information processing perspective. European Journal of Training and Development,40(1), 21-35.
Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2014). Academic course gamification: The art of perceived playfulness [JOUR]. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 131–151.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers and Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes [JOUR]. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Hair, J. F. Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). In Long Range Planning (Vol. 46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
Han, H.-C. (2015). Gamified pedagogy: From gaming theory to creating a self-motivated learning environment in Studio Art [JOUR]. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education, 56(3), 257–267.
Handoko, B. L. (2019). Application of UTAUT Theory in Higher Education Online Learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics, 259-264.
Hawari, N., Zain, N. H. M., & Baharum, A. (2020). The need of gamified assessment for engaging learning experience. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9(2), 722-728. doi:10.11591/eei.v9i2.2083

Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the czech republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B), 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.018
Juhary, J. (2014a). Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use of the Learning Management System as a Learning Tool. International Education Studies, 7(8), 23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n8p23
Juhary, J. (2014b). Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use of the Learning Management System as a Learning Tool. International Education Studies, 7(8), 23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n8p23
Kapp, K. (2012). The Gamification of learning and instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.007
Kim, B. (2015). Gamification [JOUR]. Library Technology Reports, 51(2), 10.
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007
Landers, R. N. (2015). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660
Landers, Richard N., & Armstrong, M. B. (2017). Enhancing instructional outcomes with gamification: An empirical test of the Technology-Enhanced Training Effectiveness Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.031
Lin, P. C., Lu, H. K., & Liu, S. C. (2013). Towards an education behavioral intention model for e-learning systems: An extension of UTAUT. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 47(3), 1200–1207.
Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers and Education, 52(3), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., … Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243.
Merwe, M. D. V. der1. (2014). Community of inquiry framework: employing instructor-driven measures in search of a relationship among presences and student learning outcomes. [JOUR]. International Journal of Learning Technology, 9(3), 304–320.
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015a). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015b). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015c). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
Munguatosha, G. M., Muyinda, P. B., & Lubega, J. T. (2011). A social networked learning adoption model for higher education institutions in developing countries. On the Horizon, 19(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111179439
Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Mining learning and crafting scientific experiments: A literature review on the use of Minecraft in education and research. Educational Technology and Society, 19(2), 355–366.
Ocio, S., & Brugos, J. A. L. (2009). Multi-agent systems and sandbox games. AISB 2009.
Parton, B. S. (2014). Using standard and custom mobile Apps to enhance social presence for online learning. [JOUR]. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 4(1), 11–14.
Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Factors Affecting Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning System in Higher Education Using UTAUT and Structural Equation Modeling Approaches, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 845, 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1_43
Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of problem‐based learning: Some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27(5), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00296.x
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey [JOUR]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
Shen, J., & Eder, L. B. (2009). Intentions to Use Virtual Worlds for Education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 225–233.
Short, D. (2012). Teaching Scientific Concepts Using a Virtual World—Minecraft. Teaching Science, 58(3), 55–58.
Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. [JOUR]. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.007
Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of English e-learning websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 3(4), 215824401350383. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503837
Tawfik, A. A., & Lilly, C. (2015). Using a flipped classroom approach to support problem-based learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(3), 299–315.
Tong, X., Gromala, D., Shaw, C. D., & Choo, A. (2016). A field study: Evaluating camification approaches for promoting physical activity with motivational models of behavior changes. In Kurosu M. (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Novel User Experiences. HCI 2016 (Vol. 9733, pp. 248–258). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39513-5
Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, Z., & Plughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modelling, 10(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1002
Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D., & Lu, Y.-J. (2015). The effects of Problem-Based Learning with flipped classroom on elementary students’ computing skills: A case study of the production of Ebooks. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 11(2), 32–40.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003a). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. M. G., Davis, G. G. B., & Davis, F. D. F. (2003b). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Wilkinson, B., Williams, N., & Armstrong, P. (2013). Improving student understanding, application and synthesis of computer programming concepts with Minecraft. The European Conference on Technology in the Classroom 2013.
Zorn, C., Wingrave, C. A., Charbonneau, E., & LaViola Jr, J. J. (2013). Exploring Minecraft as a conduit for increasing interest in programming. Fdg, 352–359.

論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2020-07-02公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-07-02起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2486 或 來信