§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-2906202012481700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2020.00844
論文名稱(中文) 探討產品稀少性對消費者購買意願之影響—以香奈兒限量包款為例
論文名稱(英文) Exploring the Influence of Perceived Scarcity on Consumer Purchase Intention: In the Case of Chanel Limited Edition Handbags
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 管理科學學系企業經營碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Master's Program In Business And Management, Department Of Management Sciences
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 108
學期 2
出版年 109
研究生(中文) 陳伶宜
研究生(英文) Ling-Yi Chen
學號 608620042
學位類別 碩士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2020-06-24
論文頁數 111頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 陳水蓮
委員 - 康信鴻
委員 - 李培齊
關鍵字(中) S-E-D模型
知覺稀少性
消費者心理
知覺價值
購買意願
關鍵字(英) S-E-D model
Perceived scarcity
Consumers’ psychology effect
Perceived value
Purchase intention
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
在經濟繁榮發展下,每人平均所得與消費逐年增加,隨之心生物質慾望和享受擁有。當今消費市場中,尤其時尚精品領域,限量行銷手法備受採用;品牌透過稀少性來增加產品價值且帶動消費者購買意願。對於遲遲下不了手的稀有品或限量品,消費者興起入手念頭,期待商品能滿足的心理感受和帶來的實際效益。本研究基於Lynn(1992) S-E-D模型建立研究架構,針對了解香奈兒包款限量策略的消費者,探討產品稀少性和購買意願之關係,並以消費者心理與知覺價值為中介效果。然而,因知覺價值會隨消費者心理側重的層面(求新、求名、從眾、好奇和炫耀心理)而有異,本研究期望補足過去研究缺口,釐清消費者心理作用與知覺價值之影響。

本研究使用網路問卷進行資料採樣,收集600份有效問卷,透過Amos 20.0進行信效度分析和中介效果分析,並以結構方程模型實證假設。研究發現:一、知覺稀少性對消費者心理作用有顯著正向影響;二、求新心理和好奇心理皆對功能性價值有顯著正向影響;三、求名心理和炫耀心理皆對情感性價值有顯著正向影響;四、求名心理和好奇心理皆對新奇性價值有顯著正向影響;五、從眾心理、求名心理和炫耀心理皆對社會性價值有顯著正向影響;六、知覺價值對購買意願有顯著正向影響。最後,提出理論以及管理意涵,給予未來研究相關提議和方向,並就香奈兒包款限量行銷提供策略見解。
英文摘要
With per capita income and private consumption rising year after year, consumers’ desire for material possession escalates. When luxury fashion brand adopts scarcity strategy to incite purchase volume, consumers used to hesitate but now spur purchase willingness, awaiting psychological and substantial contentment upon limited products. Thus, forming on the S-E-D model, this study purports to fathom the impacts perceived scarcity (PS) on purchase intention (PI), mediated by consumers’ psychology effect (CPE; uniqueness, conformity, vanity, novelty, conspicuousness) and perceived value (PV), also clarifying relations betwixt respective CPEs and PV.

Collecting 600 valid online questionnaires, this study testifies hypotheses through structural equation modeling and substantiates: (a) PS significantly and positively affect CPE; (b) uniqueness and novelty psyche significantly and positively affect functional value; (c) vanity and conspicuousness psyche significantly and positively affect emotional value; (d) vanity and novelty psyche significantly and positively affect epistemic value; (e) conformity, vanity and conspicuousness psyche significantly and positively affect social value; (f) PV significantly and positively affect PI. Synthesizing findings, this study bestows theoretical implication for academics and researchers to further investigation, also provides managerial suggestion for Chanel scarcity strategy on handbags.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
Contents
Contents-I
List of Tables-IV
List of Figures-V
Chapter 1 Introduction-1
1.1 Research Background-1
1.2 Research Purpose-5
1.3 Research Process-6
Chapter 2 Literature Review-8
2.1 S-E-D Model-8
2.2 Perceived Scarcity (PS)-10
2.3 Consumers’ Psychology Effect (CPE)-12
2.3.1 Uniqueness (U)-13
2.3.2 Conformity (Cf)-14
2.3.3 Vanity (V)-15
2.3.4 Novelty (N)-17
2.3.5 Conspicuousness (Cs)-18
2.4 Perceived Value (PV)-20
2.4.1 Functional Value (FV)-21
2.4.2 Emotional Value (EmV)-22
2.4.3 Social Value (SV)-24
2.4.4 Epistemic Value (EpV)-25
2.5 Purchase Intention (PI)-27
2.6 Relationship between PS and CPE-28
2.7 Relationship between CPE and PV-33
2.7.1 Relationship between Uniqueness and PV-33
2.7.2 Relationship between Conformity and PV-36
2.7.3 Relationship between Vanity and PV-39
2.7.4 Relationship between Novelty and PV-41
2.7.5 Relationship between Conspicuousness and PV-44
2.8 Relationship between PV and PI-47
Chapter 3 Research Methodology-51
3.1 Research Framework-51
3.2 Questionnaire Design-52
3.2.1 Operational Definition-52
3.2.2 Construct Measurement-52
3.3 Pre-testing-57
3.4 Sampling Procedure and Data Collection-58
3.5 Data Analysis Methods-59
3.5.1 Descriptive Statistical Analysis-60
3.5.2 Reliability and Validity Analysis-60
Chapter 4 Data Analysis and Results-61
4.1 Sampling and Respondent Profile-61
4.2 Analysis of Measurement Model-65
4.2.1 CFA and Model Fit-65
4.3 Analysis of Reliability and Validity-66
4.3.1 Reliability Analysis-66
4.3.2 Validity Analysis-69
4.4 Analysis of Structural Equation Model-73
4.4.1 Overall Model Validation-73
4.4.2 Hypothesized Relationships Testing-74
4.5 Analysis of Mediating Effect-77
Chapter 5 Conclusion-82
5.1 Discussion-82
5.2 Theoretical Implication-87
5.3 Managerial Implication-89
5.4 Limitation and Future Research-91
References-93
中文文獻-93
英文文獻-94
Appendix-107

List of Tables
Table 3.1 Operational Definition-53
Table 3.2 Construct Measurement-54
Table 3.3 Amount of Measurement Items-58
Table 4.1 Analysis of Respondents’ Personal Information-63
Table 4.2 Analysis between Respondents with Chanel-64
Table 4.3 Analysis of Research Model Fitness-66
Table 4.4 Analysis of Reliability and Convergent Validity-67
Table 4.5 HTMT and Difference of Chi-square-70
Table 4.6 Confidence Interval Test-71
Table 4.7 Goodness of Research Model Fit-74
Table 4.8 Hypotheses Test Analysis-76
Table 4.9 Direct, Indirect and Total Effect-79
Table 5.1 Result of Hypothesis Test-85

List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Taiwanese Per Capita Income and Private Consumption-1
Figure 1.2 Research Process-7
Figure 2.1 The S-E-D Model-9
Figure 3.1 The Conceptual Research Model-51
Figure 4.1 Analysis of Structural Equation Model-77
參考文獻
中文文獻
行政院主計總處,2019。國民所得統計摘要—主要指標 平均每人所得與消費。取自:https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=33338&ctNode=3099&mp=1

英文文獻
Abosag, I., Ramadan, Z. B., Baker, T., and Jin, Z. (2019). Customer’s need for uniqueness theory versus brand congruence theory: The impact on satisfaction with social network sites. Journal of Business Research.

Aggarwal, P., Jun, S. Y., and Huh, J. H. (2011). Scarcity messages: A consumer competition perspective. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 19–30.

Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., and Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.

Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1998). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

Bearden, W. O., and Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-194.

Beneke, J., Flynn, R., Greig, T., and Mukaiwa, M. (2013). The influence of perceived product quality, relative price and risk on customer value and willingness to buy: A study of private label merchandise. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(3), 218-228.

Brehm, S. S., and Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. London: Academic Press.

Brock, T. C. (1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. In: Greenwald, A. G., Brock, T. C., and Ostrom, T. M. (Eds.), Psychological Foundations of Attitude. New York: Academic Press.

Burke, L. A., and James, K. E. (2008). Powerpoint-based lectures in business education: An empirical investigation of student-perceived novelty and effectiveness. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(3), 277-296.

Byun, S. E., and Sternquist, B. (2008). The antecedents of in-store hoarding: Measurement and application in the fast-fashion retail environment. International Review of Retail Distribution & Consumer Research, 18(2), 133-147.

Byun, S. E., and Sternquist, B. (2012). Here today, gone tomorrow: Consumer reactions to perceived limited availability. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 223-234.

Chaudhuri, H. R., Mazumdar, S., and Ghoshal, A. (2011). Conspicuous consumption orientation: Conceptualisation, scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10(4), 216-224.

Chen, Z., and Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 20(4), 323-347.

Cheng, J. M. S., Wang, E. S. T., Lin, J. Y. C., and Vivek, S. D. (2009). Why do customers utilize the internet as a retailing platform? A view from consumer perceived value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(1), 144-160.

Chiu, C. M., Wang, E. T. G., Fang, Y. H., and Huang, H. Y. (2014). Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions on B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85-114.

Chung, N., Song, H. G., and Lee, H. (2017). Consumers’ impulsive buying behavior of restaurant products in social commerce. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 709-731.

Cialdini, R. B., and Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.

Confente, I., Scarpi, D., and Russo, I. (2019). Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value. Journal of Business Research.

Cronje, A., Jacobs, B., and Retief, A. (2016). Black urban consumers’ status consumption of clothing brands in the emerging South African market. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(6), 754-764.

Dhurup, M. (2014). The effects of fashion interest, product novelty and product quality on brand consciousness and brand loyalty in fashion apparel purchase. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 32-38.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.

Doll, W. J., Xia, W., and Torkzadeh, G. A. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.

Eastman, J. K, Goldsmith, R. E., and Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41-52.

Ebrahimy, S., and Osareh, F. (2014). Design, validation, and reliability determination a citing conformity instrument at three levels: Normative, informational, and identification. Scientometrics, 99(2), 581-597.

Ferber, R. (1973). Consumer economics, A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 11(4), 1303-1342.

Fine, B., and Leopold, E. (1993). The World of Consumption, London: Routledge.

Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Franke, N., and Schreier, M. (2008). Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Marketing Letters, 19(2), 93-107.

Giovannini, S., Xu, Y., and Thomas, J. (2015). Luxury fashion consumption and Generation Y consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 19(1), 22-40.

Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., and Borin, N. A. (1998). The effect of store name, brand name, and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331-352.

Gupta, S. (2012). The psychological effects of perceived scarcity in a retail setting and its impact on consumer buyer behavior (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Gupta, S. (2013). The psychological effects of perceived scarcity on consumers’ buying behavior (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115-135.

Herpen, E. V., Pieters, R., and Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 302-312.

Herpen, E. V., Pieters, R., and Zeelenberg, M. (2014). When less sells more or less: The scarcity principle in wine choice. Food Quality and Preference, 36, 153-160.

Hightower Jr, R., Brady, M. K., and Baker, T. L. (2002). Investigating the role of the physical environment in hedonic service consumption: An exploratory study of sporting events. Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 697-707.

Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 283-295.

Ho, H. Y., Lin, P. C., and Lu, M. H. (2014). Effects of online crowdfunding on consumers’ perceived value and purchase intention. Anthropologist, 17(3), 837-844.

Ho, Y. C, and Hu, H. H. (2009). A study of consumer’s purchase intention toward retail store brands in the food sector. Journal of Hospitality and Home Economics, 5(3), 273-293.

Hsu, Y. W. (2019). The effect of the industrial culture and conformity on startups and investors in the industry of the claw crane machines (Unpublished master’s thesis). Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Huang, L. T. (2016). Flow and social capital theory in online impulse buying. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2277-2283.

Hung, K. P., Chen, A. H., Peng, N., Hackley, C., Tiwsakul, R. A., and Chou, C. L. (2011). Antecedents of luxury brand purchase intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(6), 457-467.

Jamal, A., and Shukor, S. A. (2014). Antecedents and outcomes of interpersonal influences and the role of acculturation: The case of young British-Muslims. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 237-245.

Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., and Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 974-981.

Kantamneni, S. P., and Coulson, K. R. (1996). Measuring perceived value: Scale development and research findings from a consumer survey. Journal of Marketing Management, 6(2), 72-86.

Kantar and WPP (2019). BrandZ top 100 most valuable brands 2019, retrieved from: https://kantartns.io/brandz-top-100-most-valuable-brands-2019/

Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., and Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305.

Kastanakis, M. N., and Balabanis, G. (2014). Explaining variation in conspicuous luxury consumption: An individual differences’ perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2147-2154.

Kauppinen-Raisanen, H., Bjork, P., Lonnstrom, A., and Jauffret, M. N. (2018). How consumers’ need for uniqueness, self-monitoring, and social identity affect their choices when luxury brands visually shout versus whisper. Journal of Business Research, 84, 72-81.

Kim, T. D., Yang, M. Y., Bae, J., Min, B. A., Lee, I., and Kim, J. (2017). Escape from infinite freedom: Effects of constraining user freedom on the prevent of dropout in an online learning context. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 217-231.

Kotler, P., and Keller, K. L. (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: PT Index.

Lee, H. J., and Park, S. Y. (2013). Environmental orientation in going green: A qualitative approach to consumer psychology and sociocultural factors of green consumption. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 23(3), 245-262.

Li, G., Li, G., and Kambebe, Z. (2012). Luxury fashion brand consumers in china: perceived value, fashion lifestyle, and willingness to pay. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1516-1522.

Lo, W. K., and Wu, P. C. S. (2017). Effects of product scarcity: The mediating role of consumer need for uniqueness and conformity. International Journal of Business Environment, 9(1), 34-50.

Luo, J., Dey, B. L., Yalkin, C., Sivarajah, U., Punjausri, K., Huang, Y. A., and Yen, D. A. (2018). Millennial chinese consumers’ perceived destination brand value. Journal of Business Research.

Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing, 8(1), 43–57.

Lynn, M. (1992). Scarcity's enhancement of desirability: The role of naive economic theories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 67-78.

Matz, S. C., and Netzer, O. (2017). Using big data as a window into consumers’ psychology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 7-12.

Morwitz, V. G., and Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which ‘intenders’ actually buy. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405.

NetBase (2017). Top 50 European love list 2017, retrieved from: https://www.rankingthebrands.com/The-Brand-Rankings.aspx?ranking&year=1146

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. NP: McGraw-Hill.

O’cass, A., and McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 4(1), 25-39.

Packard, V. (1959). The Status Seekers. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Pandza Bajs, I. (2015). Tourist perceived value, relationship to satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: The example of the Croatian tourist destination Dubrovnik. Journal of Travel Research, 54(1), 122-134.

Parasuraman, A., and Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 168-174.

Peng, M. F. (2016). The effect of story marketing on consumer psychology and purchase intention (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Pingtung University, Taiwan.

Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., and Gross, B. L. (1991). Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and Applications. Cincinnati, OH: South Western Publishing.

Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., and Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.

Shukla, P. (2010). Status consumption in cross-national context. International Marketing Review, 27(1), 108-129.

Song, M., Noone, B. M., and Han, R. J. (2019). An examination of the role of booking lead time in consumers’ reactions to online scarcity messages. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 483-491.

Song, Y., Guo, S., and Zhang, M. (2019). Assessing customers’ perceived value of the anti-haze cosmetics under haze pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 685, 753-762.

Snyder, C. R., and Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518-527.

Sweeney, J. C., and Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220.

Teimourpour, B., and Hanzaee, K. (2011). The impact of culture on luxury consumption behavior among iranian consumers. Journal of Islamic Research, 2(3), 309-328.

Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., and Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66.

Tian, S. B., and Da, C. (2016). ‘Hunger marketing’ strategy and its application research – Based on Apple products. In International Conference on Economics and Management.

Ton, Z., Corsi, E., and Dessain, V. (2010). Zara: Managing Stores for Fast Fashion. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Trigg, A. B. (2001). Veblen, bourdieu, and conspicuousness consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(1), 99-115.

Tsai, J. H. (2013). B & B image, the novelty and the theory of planned behavior – Chingjing region B & B (Unpublished master’s thesis). Nanhua University, Taiwan.

Turel, O., Serenko, A., and Bontis, N. (2010). User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective. Information & Management, 47(1), 53-59.

Vartanian, L. R., and Hopkinson, M. M. (2010). Social connectedness, conformity, and internalization of societal standards of attractiveness. Body Image, 7(1), 86-89.

Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class, In The Collected Works of Thorstein Veblen. Reprint, London: Routledge.

Verhallen, T. M. M. (1984). Unavailability and the evaluation of goods: a behavioral economics approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Verhallen, T. M. M., and Robben, H. S. J. (1994). Scarcity and preference: an experiment on unavailability and product evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(2), 315-331.

Wang, H. Y., Liao, C., and Yang, L. H. (2013). What affects mobile application use? The roles of consumption values. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(2), 11-22.

Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., and Wang, J. (2019). Understanding consumers’ willingness to use ride-sharing services: The roles of perceived value and perceived risk. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 504-519.

Well, J. D., Campbell, D. E., Valacich, J. S., and Featherman, M. (2010). The effect of perceived novelty on the adoption of information technology innovations: A risk/reward perspective. Decision Sciences, 41(4), 813-843.

Wu, W. Y., Lu, H. Y., Wu, Y. Y., and Fu, C. S. (2012). The effects of product scarcity and consumers’ need for uniqueness on purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(3), 263-274.

Yang, W., and Mattila, A. S. (2017). The impact of status seeking on consumers’ word of mouth and product preference – A comparison between luxury hospitality services and luxury goods. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 41(1), 3-22.

Yeniaras, V (2016). Uncovering the relationship between materialism, status consumption and impulsive buying: Newfound status of islamist in Turkey. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 15(44), 153-177.

Yeo, B. L., Mohamed, R. H. N., and Muda, M. (2016). A study of malaysian customers purchase motivation of Halal cosmetics retail products: Examining theory of consumption value and customer satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37(16), 176-182.

Yi, M. Y., Fiedler, K. D., and Park, J. S. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovation: Comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 393-426.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

Zhang, C. X. (1994). Modern Psychology. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.

Zhang, C. X. (2011). Consumer Psychology. Taipei: Tunghua Book.

Zhao, G. L. (2012). Hunger marketing strategies based on consumers’ psychology. Journal of Hebei North University (Social Science Edition), 28(4), 48-50.

Zhou, L., and Wong, A. (2008). Exploring the influence of product conspicuousness and social compliance on purchasing motives of young Chinese consumers for foreign brands. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 7(6), 470-483.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文延後至2025-07-01公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文延後至2025-07-01公開
校內書目立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文延後至2025-07-01公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信