淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-2906201117565000
中文論文名稱 精品仿冒品購買動機與購買意圖之研究
英文論文名稱 A Study of the Purchase Motivation and Intention on Counterfeit Luxury Goods
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 全球華商經營管理數位學習碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) E-Learning Executive Master's Program of Business Administration (EMBA) in Global Chinese Management
學年度 99
學期 2
出版年 100
研究生中文姓名 邵澤淵
研究生英文姓名 Tse-Yuan Shao
學號 798670039
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2011-06-03
論文頁數 86頁
口試委員 指導教授-王居卿
指導教授-汪美伶
委員-李文瑞
委員-曾義明
中文關鍵字 精品仿冒品  消費者購買意圖  購買動機  知覺品質  知覺價值 
英文關鍵字 Counterfeit Luxury Goods  Purchase Motivation  Purchase Intention  Perceived Quality  Perceived Value  Material Principle 
學科別分類
中文摘要 精品仿冒品的快速崛起,對現今的經濟規模已造成大衝擊。因此,如何杜絶精品仿冒品,已成為急需解決之課題。雖然可以利用嚴格的法律赫阻不法精品仿冒品製造,或以教育提昇社會大眾的倫理觀念進而杜絕精品仿冒品,但是追根究底,消費者的支持與購買才是促使不法商人生產精品仿冒品真正的動力,因此,唯有從源頭做起,有效降低消費者對於精品仿冒品的購買意圖,才是杜絕精品仿冒品業者繼續生存的根本之道。
本研究旨在探討消費者之購買動機,如知覺品質、知覺價值與物質主義對消費者購買意圖之影響。首先,從相關文獻著手,再根據其理論基礎建立本研究之架構與假設,採用便利抽樣與滾雪球進行問卷調查,選擇大台北地區女性上班族為受測母體,共獲得有效問卷314份,再以SPSS17.0為本研究之統計分析工具,其方法包括:敘述性統計分析、信度分析、效度分析、相關分析、迴歸分析與假設驗證。研究結果如下:
1. 消費者對精品仿冒品的知覺品質、知覺價值與物質主義對購買意圖有顯著正向影響。三者的影響力大小為:物質主義>知覺品質>知覺價值。
2. 消費者的涉入程度對購買意圖呈現高度負相關,亦即研究對象對精品仿冒品如果愈瞭解,其購買意圖越低。
3. 消費者對精品仿冒品之涉入程度會對「精品仿冒品購買動機與購買意圖」之研究架構產生干擾效果不成立,其原因可能在於一般消費大眾主觀認知「精品仿冒品」是贗品,此種物品不是生活必需品,屬衝動性消費,與購買昂貴精品的消費模式明顯不同。
英文摘要 The sales of counterfeit luxury goods raise rapidly and their economical scale have become a huge problem which can’t be underestimated. Therefore, how to eliminate counterfeit luxury goods has become an important issue. Using the strict criminal laws, offering education or emphasizing the ethical concept is the way to rectify the situation, but we can’t entirely stop the selling of counterfeit luxury goods. The motivation of selling counterfeit luxury goods is from the support and purchase of consumers; therefore, reducing the purchase intention of consumers is the best way to stop the selling of counterfeit luxury goods.
The major purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between consumers’ purchase motivation , (such as perceived quality, perceived value and the materialism) and purchase intention to the counterfeit luxury goods. First, according to the related literature and basic theory, we build up the structure and assumptions of this study. This research will collect information by paper questionnaires and random sampling distribution. The distribution area will be focused on the office women workers in grand Taipei. A total of 314 valid questionnaires were obtained and will be analyses and processed by SPSS statistic software windows 17.0 version. The methodologies including: descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis and statistical test. Some major findings in this study are:
1. Consumers indicated that the perceived quality, perceived value and materialism of consumers purchasing counterfeit luxury goods have a significant positive effect on purchase intention. And the influence strength is as follow: materialism> perceived quality> perceived value.
2. Consumers involvement on purchase intention are highly negatively correlated, it means that the more sense of counterfeit luxury goods the consumers have, the lower purchase intention they have.
3. Consumers involvement of counterfeit luxury goods will interfere the structure doesn’t come into existence. The reason may be that the general consumer public awareness of subjective "quality counterfeit goods," is a fake, that such items are not necessities of life, is impulsive spending, and purchase expensive boutique significantly different consumption patterns.
論文目次 目錄
目錄..........I
表次..........III
圖次..........V
第一章 緒論..........1
第一節 研究背景與動機..........1
第二節 研究範圍與研究對象..........7
第三節 研究目的..........9
第四節 研究流程..........9
第二章 文獻探討..........11
第ㄧ節 精品仿冒品.......... 11
第二節 精品仿冒品之購買動機探討..........15
第三節 消費者之購買意圖..........21
第四節 涉入程度對購買意圖之影響..........23
第五節 各變數間之關聯性..........27
第三章 研究方法..........30
第一節 研究架構..........30
第二節 研究假說..........31
第三節 變數的操作型定義與衡量..........32
第四節 問卷設計..........36
第五節 研究對象與抽樣方法..........38
第六節 資料分析方法..........39
第四章 資料分析與結果..........42
第一節 敘述性統計分析..........42
第二節 信度分析與因素分析..........44
第三節 偏態與峰態分析..........56
第四節 變數之相關分析..........58
第五節 假說驗證..........60
第六節 假說驗證結果彙整..........67
第五章 結論與建議.......... 68
第一節 研究發現及結論..........68
第二節 管理意涵..........70
第三節 研究限制..........71
第四節 研究建議..........72
參考文獻.......... 74
附錄:問卷內容..........83

表次
表2-1 近年來精品消費行為之相關研究..........13
表2-2 歷年學者對涉入之定義.......... 24
表2-3 消費者購買決策歷程..........26
表3-1 知覺品質之衡量項目..........32
表3-2 知覺價值之衡量項目..........33
表3-3 物質主義之衡量項目..........34
表3-4 購買意圖之衡量項目..........35
表3-5 涉入程度之衡量項目..........36
表3-6 KMO之判斷標準表..........40
表4-1 有效樣本之人口統計變數..........43
表4-2 各構面之信度..........45
表4-3 KMO與Bartlett球形檢定-知覺品質構面..........48
表4-4 知覺品質之因素分析表..........49
表4-5 KMO與Bartlett球形檢定-知覺價值構面..........50
表4-6 知覺價值之因素分析表.......... 50
表4-7 KMO與Bartlett球形檢定-物質主義構面..........51
表4-8 物質主義構面轉軸後之成份矩陣..........52
表4-9 KMO與Bartlett球形檢定-購買意圖構面..........54
表4-10 購買意圖之因素分析表..........54
表4-11 KMO與Bartlett球形檢定-涉入構面..........55
表4-12 涉入之因素分析表..........56
表4-13 各構面之偏態與峰態..........57
表4-14 相關係數之強度大小與意義..........59
表4-15 各變項之相關分析表..........59
表4-16 自變數對購買意圖之迴歸分析..........62
表4-17 涉入程度與知覺品質對購買意圖之干擾影響......... 62
表4-18 涉入程度與知覺價值對購買意圖之干擾影響......... 65
表4-19 涉入程度與物質主義對購買意圖之干擾影響......... 66
表4-20 假說驗證結果..........67

圖次
圖1-1 研究流程..........10
圖2-1 消費者決策過程模式..........16
圖2-2 影響購買之因素..........17
圖2-3 知覺品質、知覺價格與知覺價值概念性架構圖........ 20
圖2-4 Howard消費者決策模型..........22
圖3-1 研究架構..........30



參考文獻 參考文獻
中文文獻
朱珮儀(2009)。個人消費動機對精品品牌購買意圖之研究。銘傳大學管理研究所碩士論文。
江嘉珍(2005)。精品消費-女性的體驗。世新大學公共關係廣告學研究所碩士論文。
何凱凌(2004)。以名牌精品消費考察台灣消費社會(1970-2004)。
東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。
吳克振(2010)。品牌權益解析。經理人月刊,6,132-139。
吳宥樺(2008)。名牌精品消費者特性、消費者涉入與購買行為之研究。明新科技大學企管研究所碩士論文。
李心福(2008)。兩岸消費者對精品的品牌知覺價值與購買行為之研究。大葉大學國際企業管理所碩士論文。
李吉妮(2008)。精品仿冒品消費者行為分析。國立高雄應用科技大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
李莉娟(2006)。名牌精品涉入程度與消費行為之探討。亞洲大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
沈盈貝(2004)。高雄市都會上班族對咖啡飲品飲食偏好之研究。靜宜大學觀光事業學系研究所碩士論文。
林佳瑩(2006)。八成二網友玩網拍拍賣偏好男女大不同。創市際市場研究顧問,2011年04月06日取自:http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_12_20_06.html
林慧珊(2009)。女性網路使用者的網路購物知覺風險與降低風險策略之研究-以化妝、保養品為例。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
林震岩、黃俊英(1994)。企業研究方法。台北: 華泰書局。
林衢良(2004)。學生撞球參與者撞球場館滿意度、涉入程度與忠誠度之關係研究。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文。
邱浩政(2005)。量化研究與統計分析。台北: 五南圖書公司。
張小虹(2004)。假名牌、假理論、假全球化。台灣社會研究季刊,54,219-252。
張春興(2001)。現代心理學。台北: 東華書局。
許士軍(1987)。現代行銷管理。台北: 商略印書館。
陳有川、黃佑安、程永佳、曾淑婉(2006)。物質主義、金錢態度、虛榮特性、消費者我族主義與產品購買意圖關係之研究--以學生與家長為例。國立空中大學管理與資訊學報,11,25-52。
陳志銘、杜玉蓉、周佳樺、郭庭魁、蕭幼麟(譯)(2005)。消費者行為。台北: 全華科技圖書股份有限公司。
陳澤義、葉香麟(2007)。品牌形象、品牌關係與知覺品質關係之研究-以美白化妝品品牌為例。東吳經濟商學學報,58,1-30。
黃玉吟 ( 2000 )。精品產品購買決策之研究-以大台北地區擁有名牌包消費者為例。淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士在職專班論文。
葉俐均(2011)。男性臉部保養品購買涉入對顧客價值與消費者購買決策影響之研究。淡江大學國際企業學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
詹采萍(2006)。台灣精品之購買意向-以年輕族群購買「名牌包包」為例。中興大學行銷學系所碩士論文。
廖美淑(2003)。仿冒品之符號相似度對消費者態度影響之探討-以服飾品為例。輔仁大學織品服裝研究理所碩士論文。
謝文雀(譯)(2001)。消費者行為。台北: 華泰書局。
蕭清華(2006)。真亦假時假亦真:談台灣名牌精品與仿冒品消費的人類學反思。國立清華大學人類所碩士論文。

英文文獻
Aaker, D. A.(1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M.(1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Anonymous(1993). The luxury goods trade: Upmarket philosophy. The Economist, 325, 95-98.
Best, R. J., Coney, K. A., and Hawkins, D. I.(1992). Consumer Behavior:Implication for Marketing, Strategy Revised. Texas:Business Publication Inc.
Bhuian, S. N.(1997). Marketing cues and perceived quality: Perceptions of saudi consumers toward products of the U.S., Japan, Germany, Italy, U.K. and France. Journal of Quality Management,. 2, (2), 217-235.
Bian, X. and Veloutsou, C.(2005). Consumers’ attitudes regarding non-deceptive counterfeit brands in the UK & China. Brand Management, 14(3), 211-222.
Bioch, P. H., Bush, R. F., and Campbell, L.(1993). Consumer accomplices in product counterfeiting: A demand-side investigation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 27-36.
Blackwell, R. D., Engel, J. E., and Miniard, P. W.(1993). Consumer behavior (7th ed.). Chicago: Dryden Press.
Blackwell, R. D., Engel, J. E., and Miniard, P. W.(1995). Consumer behavior (8th ed.). Chicago: Dryden Press.
Blackwell, R. D., Engel, J.F., and Miniard, P.W.(2001). Consumer behavior (10th ed.). Chicago: Dryden Press.
Bloch, P. H., Bush, R. F., and Dawson, S.(1989). Remedies for product counterfeiting. Business Horizons, 32(1), 59-65.
Bloch, P.H. and Richins, M. L(1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perception, Journal of Consumer Research,47, 69-81.
Broderick, A.J. and Mueller, R.D (1999). A theoretical and empirical exegesis of the consumer involvement construct: the psychology of the food shopper, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7, (4), 97-108.
Chan, A., Leung, P., and Wong, S.(1998). Ethical beliefs of Chinese consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1163-1170.
Chang, Tzung-Zong and Albert R. Wildt(1994). Price product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,22 (1),. 16-27.
Clow, K. E. and Garretson, J. A.(1999), The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectations, risk perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry. The Journal of Services Marketing, 13(1), 59-72.
Dawson, S. and Richins, M. L.(1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement:Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303-316.
Dodds, B. W., Grewal, D., and Monroe, K. B.(1991). Effect of price brands and store information on buyers’ product evaluation. Journalof Marketing Research, 28(Aug.), 307-319.
Feigin, B., Shirley and Young(1975). Using the benefit Chain for improved strategy formulation. Journal of Marketing, 39(7), 72-74.
Furnham, A. and Valgerisson, H.(2007). The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. The journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 677-685.
Gabbott, Mark and Gillian Hogg (1999) . Consumer involvement is services: A replication and extension, Journal of Business Research 46(2), 159-166.
Garvin, D. A.,(1983). Quality on the line. Harvard Business Review, 16(9-10), 65-73.
Guiltinan, J. P. and Schoell, W. F.(1993). Marketing essentials. Kluwer Academic Publishers Press.
Guieford, J. P.(1965). Fundamental statisics in psychology and Education. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Howard, J. A.(1989). Consumer behavior in marketing strategy. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall.
Ian, P., Marishka, S., and Steve, D.(2009)Consumers' willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct marketing: An International Journal, 3(4), 262 – 281.
Jacoby, J. and Olson, J. C.(1985). Perceived quality:How consumers view stores and merchandise. Lexington Books.
Kay, H.(1990). Fake’s progress. Management Today, 54-58.
Krishnan R. and Monroe(1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluation. In perceived quality: How consumers view stores and merchandise. Eds. Jacob and Jerry C. OlsonLexington. MA: Lexington Books, 209-232.
Krishnan R. and Monroe, K. B.(1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. Perceived quality, edited by J. Jacoby and J. Olson, MA: Lexington Books, 209-232.
Lastovicka, J.L. and D. M Gardner(1978). Low involvement versus higt Involvement cognitive structures. Aavance in Consumer Reseaech,1(5), 87-92.
Maynes, E. S.(1976). The concept and measurement of product quality. Household Production and Consumption, 40(5), 529-559.
Monroe, K. B. and J.D. Chapman(1987). Framing effects on buyers' subjective product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 193-197.
Nia, A. and Zaichkowsky, J. L.(2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands? Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9 (7), 485-497.
Olsavsky and Richard W.(1985). Perceived quality in consumer decision making:An integrated theoretical perspective. lexington, MA:Lexington Books, 3-29.
Olson and Reynolds, T. J.(1983). Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures: Implications for advertising strategy. Advertising and consumer psychology, L. Percy and A. Woodside, eds. Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
Parasuraman, A and Grewal, Dhruv (2000, Winter). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty Chain: A research agenda, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, Greenvale,(28), 168-174.
Phau, I. and Teah., M.(2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: a study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15-27.
Popcorn, F.(1991). The popcorn report. Harper Business, New York, 1991.
Rassuli, Kathleen M. and Stanley C. Hollander(1986) . Desire-induced, innate, insatiable? Journal of Macro-marketing, 6 ,4-24.
Richins, M. L.(1987). Media, materialism, and human happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 352-356.
Richins, M. L.(2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 209-219.
Rust, R. T. and R. L. Oliver(1994). Service quality: Insights and managerial implications from the frontier in :Rust, R. T. and R. L. Oliver , Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1-19.
Traylor, M. B.(1981). Product involvement and brand commitment. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(6), 51-56.
Tsai, S. P.(2005). Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value. International Journal of Market Research, 47(4), 429-454.
Vitell, S. J.(2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 33-472.
Wella W., Burnett J. and Moriarty S.(1992). Advertising Principles and Practice, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zaichkowsky, J. L.(1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
Zeithaml, V. A.(1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model & synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing , 52, 2-22.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2013-07-07公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2013-07-07起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信