§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2807202016481900
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2020.00830
論文名稱(中文) 社會責任導向人力資源管理與企業社會責任投入之影響
論文名稱(英文) The Influence of Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on CSR Engagement
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 108
學期 2
出版年 109
研究生(中文) 林雨萱
研究生(英文) Yu-Hsuan Lin
學號 607610101
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2020-06-09
論文頁數 64頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 汪美伶
委員 - 涂敏芬
委員 - 林俊佑
關鍵字(中) 社會責任導向人力資源管理
企業社會責任投入
道德價值觀
倫理型領導
工具性動機
關係性動機
關鍵字(英) Socially Responsible Human Resource Management
CSR Engagement
Instrumental Motives
Relational Motives
Ethical Values
Ethical Leadership
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
近年來,企業愈來愈重視社會責任之議題,然而,如何使員工投入企業社會責任,或是透過人力資源管理推展永續意識,已成為企業人資管理的新課題。本研究以社會責任導向人力資源管理(Socially Responsibility Human Resource Management, 簡稱SRHRM)的概念,驗證員工的工具性動機與關係性動機對其企業社會責任投入的直接與中介影響,並討論道德價值觀與倫理型領導在員工動機與企業社會責任投入之間,是否具有干擾效果。本研究以國內107年市占率佔八成的七家壽險公司為主要研究對象,以問卷方式蒐集共347份從業人員之資料,採用結構方程模型進行分析。結果發現,當員工知覺到企業落實SRHRM,會提高其對社會責任之投入;其次,道德價值觀也會強化員工動機與企業社會責任投入之關聯性;最重要的是,雖然倫理型領導並不會強化員工的關係性動機與社會責任投入,但倫理型領導會強化員工的工具性動機,因此主管在企業社會責任投入上扮演著不可或缺的角色。針對上述結果,本研究提出管理意涵與後續研究建議。
英文摘要
Recently, enterprises have paid more and more attention to the issue of social responsibility. However, how to engage employees in corporate social responsibility or promote the sense of sustainability through human resource management has become a new topic in human resource management. This study on Socially Responsible Human Resource Management (SRHRM), the concept of employee is proven to be instrumental motives and relational motives for its corporate social Responsibility into direct influence with the mediation, and discuss the ethical values and ethical leadership between employee motivation and corporate social responsibility, whether have interference effect. In this study, seven life insurance companies with a market share of eighty percent in 107 were selected as the main research objects. Total of 347 employees' data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed by structural equation model. The results show that when employees perceive the implementation of SRHRM, they will increase their commitment to social responsibility. Secondly, ethical values also strengthen the correlation between employee motivation and CSR investment. Most importantly, although ethical leadership does not strengthen employees' relational motivation and social responsibility investment, ethical leadership strengthens employees' instrumental motivation. Therefore, supervisors play an indispensable role in corporate social responsibility investment. In view of the above results, this study proposes management implications and suggestions for follow-up studies.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
第壹章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景	1
第二節 研究動機	3
第三節 研究目的	4
第四節 研究流程	5
第貳章 文獻探討	7
第一節 社會責任導向人力資源管理	7
第二節 企業社會責任投入	11
第三節 工具性動機	13
第四節 關係性動機	14
第五節 道德價值觀	15
第六節 倫理型領導	16
第七節 假設發展	17
第參章 研究方法	22
第一節 研究架構	22
第二節 質化研究設計-前測	22
第三節 量化研究設計	24
第四節 變項衡量	26
第肆章 結果與討論	29
第一節 敘述性統計分析	29
第二節 相關分析	30
第三節 信效度分析	33
第四節 結構方程模型	41
第五節 假設驗證	46
第伍章 結論與建議	47
第一節 研究結論	47
第二節 理論意涵	50
第三節 管理意涵	51
第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議	53
參考文獻	55

圖目錄
圖1 研究流程圖	6
圖2 研究架構	22
 
表目錄
表1  SRHRM觀點的人資功能	8
表2 前測對象資料表	23
表3 壽險公司107年總保費收入與總市場占有率	26
表4 問卷回收人口統計特性分析表	31
表5 模型配適度衡量分析結果	33
表6 研究變項之平均數、標準差及相關係數表	35
表7 SRHRM構面之驗證性因素分析	37
表8 工具性動機之驗證性因素分析	37
表9 關係性動機之驗證性因素分析	38
表10 企業社會責任投入之驗證性因素分析	39
表11 道德價值觀之驗證性因素分析	39
表12 倫理型領導之驗證性因素分析	40
表13 信度表	41
表14 整體模型配適表	42
表15 路徑係數表	42
表16 中介效果摘要表	43
表17 道德價值觀(IM)樣本路徑係數恆等性檢驗結果表	44
表18 高與低道德價值觀組(IM)模型之路徑係數分析表	44
表19 道德價值觀(RM)樣本路徑係數恆等性檢驗結果表	45
表20 高與低道德價值觀組(RM)模型之路徑係數分析表	45
表21 倫理型領導(IM)樣本路徑係數恆等性檢驗結果表	45
表22 高與低道德價性領導(IM)模型之路徑係數分析表	45
表23 倫理型領導(IM)樣本路徑係數恆等性檢驗結果表	46
表24 研究假設檢驗結果表	46
參考文獻
李郁怡、路易絲.戴維斯(2013)。企業社會責任讓企業、員工、社會三贏。2013年12月1日,擷取自https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0002550.html
金寶玲、珍穎、吳怡慧(2015)。企業社會責任對企業形象與顧客忠誠度影響之研究-人壽保險業實證。保險專刊,31(1),57-88。
財團法人保險事業發展中心。人身保險業財務業務指標。2019年9月12日,擷取自https://www.tii.org.tw/tii/information/information1/000003.html
翁慧圓(2009)。社會福利機構運用企業資源與挑戰。社區發展季刊,126,34-47。
陳春后(2016)。企業社會責任、志工參與與組織認同(未出版之碩士論文),國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
簡淑華、謝淑慧、陳虹花(2019)。保險業企業社會責任實踐之質性研究。服務學習與社會連結學刊,2,61-83。
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Angus-Leppan, T., Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2010). Leadership styles and CSR practice: An examination of sensemaking, institutional drivers and CSR leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 189-213.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization.
Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of Thought and action. Englewood. Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall.
Barrena-Martinez, J., López-Fernández, M., & Romero-Fernandez, P. (2018). Drivers and barriers in socially responsible human resource management. Sustainability, 10(5), 1532.
Becker, W. (2011). Are you leading a socially responsible and sustainable human resource function? People & Strategy, 34(1), 18.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange And Power In Social Life Wiley, New York, 1964.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.
Bučiūnienė, I., & Kazlauskaitė, R. (2012). The linkage between HRM, CSR and performance outcomes. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(1), 5-24.
Cable, D. M. and D. S. DeRue. (2002). The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Subjective Fit Perceptions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884. 
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management, 5thedn. South-Western, Mason, Ohio.
Chen, Y. R. R., & Hung-Baesecke, C. J. F. (2014). Examining the internal aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Leader behavior and employee CSR participation. Communication Research Reports, 31(2), 210-220.
Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156-159.
Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business ethics: A European review, 16(1), 19-33.
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational bBehavior, 58(2), 164-209.
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(8), 1019-1024.
Dare, J. (2016). Will the truth set us free? An exploration of CSR motive and commitment. Business and Society Review, 121(1), 85-122.
Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-Job Fit: A Conceptual Integration, Literature Review, and Methodological Critique. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393-406.
Epstein, M. J. & M. J. Roy. (2001). Sustainability in Action: Identifying andMeasuring the Key Performance Drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585–604.
Gond, J. P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person‐centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 225-246.
Gazzola, P., & Colombo, G. (2014). CSR integration into the corporate strategy.
Cross- Cultural Management Journal, 16(2), 331-338.
Graafland, J., & Mazereeuw-Van der Duijn Schouten, C. (2012). Motives for corporate social responsibility. De Economist, 160(4), 377-396.
Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Leaders,values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 223-241.
Groves, K. S., & LaRocca, M. A. (2011). An empirical study of leader ethical values,transformational and transactional leadership, and follower attitudes toward corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 511-528.
Gully, S. M., Phillips, J. M., Castellano, W. G., Han, K., & Kim, A. (2013). A mediated moderation model of recruiting socially and environmentally responsible job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 935-973.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
Hui, C., Lam, S. S., & Law, K. K. (2000). Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: a field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 822.
Im, S., Chung, Y., & Yang, J. (2017). Employees’ participation in corporate social responsibility and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of person–CSR fit. Sustainability, 9(1), 28.
Jia, X., Liao, S., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Guo, Z. (2019). The effect of socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) on frontline employees’ knowledge sharing. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Judge, T. A., D. M. Cable, J. W. Boudreau and R. D. Bretz (1995). An Empirical Investigation of the Predictors of Executive Career Success, Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 485-519. 
Karim, K., Suh, S., & Tang, J. (2016). Do ethical firms create value? Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1), 54-68.
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. Basel, NY: Karger.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99-115.
Marin, L., S. Ruiz & A. Rubio. (2009). The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 65-78.
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 738-748.
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151-171.
Melynyte, O., & Ruzevicius, J. (2008). Framework of links between corporate social responsibility and human resource management. Forum Ware International, 1(1), 23-34.
Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 503-545.
Orlitzky, M., & Swanson, D. (2006). Socially responsible human resource management: Charting new territory. Human Resource Management Ethics. Greenwich: Information Age.
Philipp, B. L., & Lopez, P. D. J. (2013). The moderating role of ethical leadership: Investigating relationships among employee psychological contracts, commitment, and citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(3), 304-315.
Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not.Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2‐3), 259-278.
Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Peus, C. (2020). Leading by example: Testing a moderatedmediation model of ethical leadership, value congruence, and followers' openness to ethical influence. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(2), 314-332.
Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Stahl, G. K. (2012). Promoting corporate social responsibility and sustainable development through management development: What can be learned from international service learning programs? Human Resource Management, 51(6), 873-903.
Qablan, N., & Farmanesh, P. (2019). Do organizational commitment and perceived discrimination matter? Effect of SR-HRM characteristics on employee's turnover intentions. Management Science Letters, 9(7), 1105-1118.
Reed II, A., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270-1286.
Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265-283.
Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 537-543.
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Thornton, M. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). Applicants' and employees' reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first‐party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 895-933.
Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer‐oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(1), 29-49.
Shao, D., Zhou, E., & Gao, P. (2019). Influence of Perceived Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Task Performance and Social Performance. Sustainability, 11(11), 3195.
Shao, D., Zhou, E., Gao, P., Long, L., & Xiong, J. (2019) . Double-edged effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee task performance and organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating by role ambiguity and moderating by prosocial motivation. Sustainability, 11(8), 2271.
Shen, J., & Benson, J. (2016). When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1723-1746.
Shen, J., & Jiuhua Zhu, C. (2011). Effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3020-3035.
Shen, J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Socially responsible human resource management and employee support for external CSR: roles of organizational CSR climate and perceived CSR directed toward employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 875-888.
Simpson, B., Robertson, J. L., & White, K. (2019). How Co-creation Increases Employee Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Engagement: The Moderating Role of Self-Construal. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-20.
Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831-1838.
Strand, R. (2011). Exploring the role of leadership in corporate social responsibility: A review. Journal of Leadership, Accountability, and Ethics, 8(4), 84-96.
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader, 56, 65.
Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189-204.
Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 333-344.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). Academic Press.
Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.
Voegtlin, C., & Greenwood, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 26(3), 181-197.
Weber, M. (2008). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Company-Level Measurement Approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261.
Zhu, W., He, H., Treviño, L. K., Chao, M. M., & Wang, W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: The role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 702-718.
Zhu, Y., Sun, L. Y., & Leung, A. S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: The role of ethical leadership. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 925-947.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信