§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2807200723163000
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2007.00936
論文名稱(中文) 英語為第二外語學生在部落格中的書寫互動之研究:以淡江大學學生為例
論文名稱(英文) EFL Learners’Written Interactions in Blogs: A Case Study of College Students at Tamkang University
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 英文學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of English
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 95
學期 2
出版年 96
研究生(中文) 蕭心茹
研究生(英文) Hsin-Ju Hsiao
學號 693010182
學位類別 碩士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2007-07-05
論文頁數 115頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 王藹玲(wanga@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 范瑞玲(fahn@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 李利德(ltli@mail.usc.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 部落格
溝通寫作
英語為第二外語
關鍵字(英) Blogs
Interaction
Written interaction
English as a foreign language
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究由台灣淡江大學25位英文系學生參與,旨在探討英語為第二外語學生在部落格中的寫作互動。本研究針對學生的發表文章和回應訊息進行分析,進而了解學生在部落格中最喜愛與他人分享和討論的主題為何,並以問卷方式獲悉學生對部落格寫作的看法,以及他們對本研究計畫的態度。研究結果顯示,絕大部分學生偏好在部落格中發表討論與自我揭露和及時重要事件相關的主題,而學生使用部落格的目的也會影響他們對於發表討論某些主題的喜好。由學生的發表文章和回應訊息中發現,他們在部落格中大量使用表情符號,時而附加照片或圖片,這種彈性使用非文字來表達自我的部落格寫作,受到大多數學生的歡迎。本研究亦發現,學生在部落格中的互動情形,最常以陳述意見和提供建議的方式呈現,且學生最常發表的主題與獲得最多回應的主題並無絕對的關聯性。
英文摘要
This study aims to investigate the written interaction of EFL learners in the blogs.  Participants of the study were 25 English majors at Tamkang University, Taiwan.  All of the students’ postings and their responsive messages were analyzed to explore the favorite topics which the students share and discuss with others in the blogging context.  A questionnaire was delivered to the students at the end of the experiment for the speculation about their perception of blog writing and their attitude toward this blog project.  The research findings revealed that a majority of students favored the topics related to self-disclosure and immediate concerns in the blog postings.  The preference for certain topics was influenced by the students’ purposes of writing blogs.  Moreover, the students frequently used emoticons to express their feelings and sometimes inserted photographs or pictures in their postings.  The flexibility of expression themselves in the blogs held a fascination of blog writing for most of the students.  Finally, the results of the study showed that blog interaction occurred most frequently in a way of presenting opinions and making suggestions and in the postings written by enthusiastic bloggers.  There is no significant relation between the most popular topics and the topics responded the most.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………	i
	
CHINESE ABSTRACT………………………………………………	ii
	
ENGLISH ABSTRACT………………………………………………	iii
	
TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………	v
	
CHAPTER ONE : INTRODUCTION…………………………………	1
Research Background………………………………………………………	1
Purpose of the Study…………………………………………	3
Research Questions……………………………………………	4
Significance of the Study…………………………………	4
Definition of Terms…………………………………………	5
Organization of the Thesis…………………………………	5
	
CHAPTER TWO : REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE…………………	6
Interaction ……………………………………………………	6
Interaction Theory……………………………………………	6
Research on Interaction in Computer Conferencing……	7
Blogs……………………………………………………………	10
History of Blogs………………………………………………	10
Structure and Functions of Blogs…………………………	12
Features and Merits of blogs………………………………	14
Research on Blogs………………………………………………	15
	
CHAPTER THREE : METHODOLOGY…………………………………	19
Participants……………………………………………………	19
Instrument………………………………………………………	20
Procedure…………………………………………………………  20
Data Collection…………………………………………………  22
Data Analysis……………………………………………………	22
	
CHAPTER FOUR : FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION…………………	26
Findings…………………………………………………………	26
Blog Postings…………………………………………………	26
Family life………………………………………………………	27
Campus life ..…………………………………………………	34
Personal reflection……………………………………………	44
Comments on Postings…………………………………………………………	53
Affective responses……………………………………………	54
Expression of emotions…………………………………………	55
Use of humor……………………………………………………	56
Self-disclosure…………………………………………………	56
Expressing sympathy……………………………………………	57
Interactive responses…………………………………………  58
Quoting and referring…………………………………………	59
Asking questions………………………………………………	60
Complimenting and expressing appreciation………………	60
Expressing agreement and disagreement……………………	61
Giving suggestions and presenting opinions………………	62
Giving encouragement……………………………………………	63
Cohesive responses………………………………………………	64
Vocatives…………………………………………………………	64
Using inclusive pronouns………………………………………	65
Phatics and salutations………………………………………	66
Discussion………………………………………………………   67
Top five topics shared in the blogs………………………	67
Top five postings with more responses……………………	71
Students’reaction toward the project…………………	75
	
CHAPTER FIVE : CONCLUSION, IMPLICATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS……	79
Conclusion………………………………………………………	79
Pedagogical Implications………………………………………	81
Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study…………	82
	
REFERENCES………………………………………………………	84
APPENDIX A……………………………………………………… 	89
APPENDIX B………………………………………………………	92
APPENDIX C………………………………………………………	97
APPENDIX D………………………………………………………	111
參考文獻
Anderson, B. (2006). Writing power into online discussion. Computers and Composition, 23, 108-124. Retrieved Sep 6, 2006, from SDOL database.
Anderson, T., Archer, W., Garrison, R. D., & Liam, R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing [Electronic version]. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
Blood, R. (2000). Weblogs: A history and perspective. Retrieved May 26, 2007, from http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.html
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bretz, R. (1983). Media for interactive communication. London: Sage Punlication.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Brownstein, E., & Klein, R. (2006). Blogs: Applications in science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(6), 18-22. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from ProQuest database.
Burns, T. J. (2001). Being “social”: Expanding our view of social interaction in writing workshops. Language Arts, 78(5), 458-466. Retrieved September 6, 2006, from ProQuest database.
Chou, L. H. (2005). The research of blog user and blog behavior. Master’s thesis: Yuan-Ze University, Republic of China.
Chou, W. C., Chou, S. L., & Chen, H. I. (2006). 網路消費行為與商機模式研究[Online consumer behavior and business model studies report]. Republic of China: Market Intelligence Center. Retrieved March 12, 2006, from MIC-AISP database.
Chung, C. F. (2005). A discourse analysis of e-texts and emotions of Taiwanese students in a sino-American distance learning program. Master’s thesis: National Kaohsiung Normal University, Republic of China.
Comeaux, P., & McKenna-Byington, E. (2003). Computer-mediated communication in online and conventional classrooms: Some implications for instructional design and professional development programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 348-355. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from EBSCOhost database.
Downes, E. J., & McMillan, S. J. (2000). Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society, 2(2), 157-179. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from Communication Studies: ASAGE Full-Text Collection database.
Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 14-26.
Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2005). Exploring the blogsphere: Use of web logs in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 410-421.
Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 244-256. Retrieved August 21, 2006, from Blackwell Synergy database.
Fahlman, S. E. (1982). Smiley lore :-) [On-line]. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sef/sefSmiley.htm
Ferdig, R. E., & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘blogsphere.’ T. H. E Journal, 31(7), 12-20. 
Fernette, D., & Eide, B. (2005). Brain of the blogger. Retrieved March 17, 2007, from http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2005/03/brain-of-blogger.html
Fichter, D., & Cervone, H. F. (2005). Blogs and rss. In N. Courtney (Eds.), Technology for the rest of us: A primer on computer technologies for the low-tech librarian (pp. 55-69). Libraries Unlimited: USA. 
Hara, N., Bonk, C., & Angeli, C. (1998). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152. 
Harper, (Jr) V. B. (2005). The new student-teacher channel. T.H.E. Journal, 33(3), 30-32.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Eds.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp.115-136). New York: Springer.
Herring, S. C., Kouper, I., Paolilo, J. C., Scheidt, L. A., Tyworth, M., Welsch, P., et al. (2005). Conversations in the blogosphere: An analysis "from the bottom up." Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
Herring, S., Scheidt, L. A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Retrieved October 13, 2005, from http://www.blogninja.com/DDGDD04.doc.
Hooey, C. A., & Bailey, T. J. (2005). Journal writing and the development of spatial thinking skills. The Journal of Geography, 104(6): 257-261. Retrieved June 20, 2007 from ProQuest Education Journals.
Hsu, Y. T. (2006, April 14). 部落格大力量 [Blog Power], Business Next, 38-47.
Laning, M., Lavallee-Welch, C., & Smith, M. (2005). Frontiers of effort: Librarians and professional development blogs. Journal of Library Administration, 43(3/4), 161-179.
Lindgren, T. (2005). Blogging places: Locating pedagogy in the whereness of weblogs. Kairos, 10(1). Retrived Aug 29, 2006, from Kairos http://english.ttu.edu.tw/kairos/10.1/binger2.html?coverweb/lindgren/index.htm
Nett, B. (2005). Measuring virtual student-student cooperation: A case study on the evaluation of cooperative learning in a virtual distributed computer and law course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 269-284. 
Online diary. (2007, June 14). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_diary
Oravec, J. A. (2003). Blending by blogging: weblogs in blended learning initiatives. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2/3), 225-233.
Pruitt, C. (2005). The blogging phenomenon: Who? how? why? Retrieved February 14, 2006, from http://www.digitaldivide.net/articles/view.php?ArticleID=86
Quible, Z. K. (2005). Blogs and written business communication courses: A perfect union. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 327-332. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from ProQuest database.
Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Reichardt, R., & Harder, G. (2005). Weblogs: Their use and application in science and technology libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 25(3), 105-116.
Reinhart, J. M., Whicker, A. L., & Juettemeyer, T. (2005). News blogs in distance education programs. Distance Learning, 2(5), 23-28. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from ProQuest database.
Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Walker, S. E. (2006). Journal writing as a teaching technique to promote reflection. Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2), 216-221. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database.
Winer, D. (2003). Weblogs at Harvard Law: What makes a weblog a weblog? Retrieved June 26, 2007, from: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu./whatMakesAWeblogAWeblog
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後1年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後2年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後2年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信