§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2806201800323600
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00902
論文名稱(中文) 企業社會責任與公司價值:以2016年美國總統大選為例
論文名稱(英文) Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value:Evidence from the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 財務金融學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Banking and Finance
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 賴婉婷
研究生(英文) Wan-Ting Lai
學號 606530888
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-06-30
論文頁數 52頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 陳鴻崑
委員 - 胡星陽
委員 - 王衍智
委員 - 陳鴻崑
關鍵字(中) 企業社會責任
公司價值
利害關係人
事件研究法
關鍵字(英) Corporate social responsibility
firm value
shareholder
event study
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
美國總統川普在競選期間曾提出許多與企業社會責任相違的政見,使得2016年美國總統大選選舉結果成為一個影響企業社會責任活動的外生衝擊事件。本文藉由檢驗不同企業社會責任分數的公司對於2016年美國總統大選結果的市場反應,探討企業社會責任與公司價值之間的關係。研究結果發現,相較於企業社會責任分數低的公司而言,企業社會責任分數高的公司擁有比較差的市場反應,顯示企業社會責任分數與公司價值呈現顯著負向關係。實證結果支持股東費用假說:公司從事企業社會責任沒有得到利害關係人的支持,但所衍生的費用卻由股東承擔,進而減損公司的價值。
英文摘要
As the U.S. President Trump proposed several policies, which are against corporate social responsibility (CSR), the result of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election becomes an event of exogenous shock about CSR activities. By taking advantage of the exogenous shock, this study examines the relationship between CSR score and market reaction to the election result. Empirical result shows that firms with high CSR score tend to have lower market reaction than those with low CSR score, indicating that there is a significantly negative relationship between CSR and firm value. Such result is consistent with the shareholder expense hypothesis that CSR activities are beneficial to stakeholders but are at expense of shareholders.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
謝辭	I
中文摘要	II
英文摘要	III
表目錄	VI
第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究背景與動機	1
第二節	研究目的	4
第三節	研究架構	6
第二章	文獻回顧與研究假說	7
第一節	企業社會責任相關文獻	7
第二節	企業政治關聯性與企業社會責任	13
第三節 研究假說	15
第三章	研究樣本與研究方法	17
第一節	研究樣本	17
第二節	研究方法	21
第四章	實證結果	26
第一節	樣本敍述統計分析	26
第二節	迴歸分析	30
第三節	額外測試	40
第五章	結論與建議	46
第一節	結論	46
第二節	研究限制與建議	47
參考文獻	48
一、	中文文獻	48
二、	英文文獻	49


表目錄
表1樣本敍述統計量(N = 1,613)	27
表2樣本平均數分析-按美國產業標準分類碼(SIC code)前1碼分類	28
表3樣本平均數/中位數分析-按低、高企業社會責任分數分組	29
表4企業社會責任與2016年美國總統大選結果市場反應之迴歸分析-市場指數調整模式	32
表5企業社會責任與2016年美國總統大選結果市場反應之迴歸分析-市場模式	35
表6企業社會責任與2016年美國總統大選結果市場反應之迴歸分析-三因子模式	37
表7企業社會責任與2016年美國總統大選結果市場反應之迴歸分析-四因子模式	39
表8企業社會責任與川普總統宣佈移民禁令市場反應之迴歸分析	41
表9企業社會責任與川普總統退出巴黎氣候條約市場反應之迴歸分析	44
參考文獻
一、中文文獻
1.池祥萱、繆文娟、莊瀅臻,(2014),「企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球500大公司的證據」,管理學報,第31期第1卷,頁1-19。


二、英文文獻
1. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J., (2010), “Individual and corporate social responsibility,” Economica, Vol. 77, No. 305, pp.1-19.
2. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S., (2004), “Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives,” California Management Review, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp.9-24.
3. Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S., (2006), “Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp.435-455.
4. Carhart, M. M. (1997), “On persistence in mutual fund performance,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp.57-82.
5. Cheng, I. H., Hong, H., & Shue, K. (2013), “Do managers do good with other people's money?,” No. w19432, National Bureau of Economic Research.
6. Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2014), “Corporate social responsibility and its impact on financial performance: Investigation of US commercial banks,” Unpublished manuscript.
7. Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013), “Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 110, No. 1, pp.87-109.
8. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011), “Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting,” The accounting review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp.59-100.
9. Di Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014), “Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 111, No. 1, pp.158-180.
10. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011), “Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp.2388-2406.
11. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993), “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp.3-56.
12. Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015), “Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.59, pp.182-192.
13. Gillan, S., Hartzell, J. C., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2010), “Firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) choices, performance and managerial motivation,” Unpublished working paper.
14. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011), “The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp.1794-1810.
15. Hong, H., & Kostovetsky, L. (2012), “Red and blue investing: Values and finance,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp.1-19.
16. Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012), “Financial constraints on corporate goodness,” No. w18476. National Bureau of Economic Research.
17. Hutton, I., Jiang, D., & Kumar, A. (2014), “Corporate policies of Republican managers,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 49, No. 5-6, pp.1279-1310.
18. Jiao, Y. (2010), “Stakeholder welfare and firm value,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp.2549-2561.
19. Karnani, A. (2010), “The case against corporate social responsibility,” Wall Street Journal, Vol. 23, No. 14, pp.1-5.
20. Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014), “Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 43, pp.1-13.
21. Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012), “Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility?,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp.761-796.
22. Krüger, P. (2015), “Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth,” Journal of financial economics, Vol. 115, No. 2, pp.304-329.
23. Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017), “Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp.1785-1824.
24. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009), “Does it pay to be good... and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance.”
25. Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2014), “Agency problems of corporate philanthropy,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp.592-636.
26. Newey, W. K., & K. D. West, (1987), “A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix,” Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp.703-708.
27. Sabherwal, S., Sarkar, S. K., & Uddin, M. R. (2017), “Political party affiliation of the president, majority in congress, and sin stock returns,” Financial Management, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp.3-31.
28. Wu, M. W., & Shen, C. H. (2013), “Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp.3529-3547.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信