§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2806201600052400
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2016.00965
論文名稱(中文) 獨立董事與管理階層之社會性連結對董事監督及諮詢角色之影響
論文名稱(英文) The Effects of Social Ties Between Independent Directors and Executive Officers on the Board Effectiveness
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 張凱婷
研究生(英文) Kai-Ting Chang
學號 603600072
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2016-06-20
論文頁數 53頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 孔繁華
委員 - 賴丞坡
委員 - 丁誌魰
關鍵字(中) 公司治理
獨立董事
社會性連結
董事會功能
關鍵字(英) Corporate governance
Independent directors
Social ties
Board effectiveness
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究以獨立董事是否實質獨立為探討主題,深入了解獨立董事與管理階層間的社會性連結是否會影響獨立董事執行職務之效能。獨立性乃企業設立獨立董事之最主要關鍵,兩者間存在社會性連結時,獨立董事執行監督角色時,可能因為彼此有關聯性或是情誼上的連結,造成監督之缺失;又公司能利用獨立董事之專業性,透過獨立董事與管理者的情誼或關係,更促進兩者的溝通及瞭解,藉此更清楚企業的內部作業,提供專業適合企業的建議,發揮其諮詢功能。本研究以 2013 至 2014 年國內上市櫃公司為樣本,並針對已設置獨立董事公司之獨立董事與管理者間之社會性連結資料,以人工方式進行判讀。本研究結果顯示,使用裁決性應計項目及查核報告意見書所測試之獨立董事監督效果係存在的,可以看出兩者具有經歷社會性連結有利於董事會監督效能;另外使用資產報酬率測試獨立董事諮詢之效果時會發現獨立董事與總經理具有社會性連結時會呈顯著負相關,表示兩者間具有關係時不存在諮詢效果。而使用股東權益報酬率衡量諮詢效果時,表示兩者間具有社會性連結對董事會諮詢職能具有顯著幫助。額外測試部分,本研究以總經理任期之內選任獨立董事來衡量其代表具有社會性連結,結果顯示在總經理任期之內選任之獨立董事確實會對董事會監督職能造成負面影響;諮詢部分則以股東權益報酬率呈現顯著正相關,表示在總經理任期之內選任之獨立董事確實會對董事會諮詢職能有幫助。本研究將社會性連結以獨立董事與該公司查核之事務所作為衡量基礎,監督效果部分,查核報告意見書所衡量之監督效果呈現顯著負相關,諮詢部分為顯著正相關,表示其兩者間具有事務所之連結,對董事會之諮詢及監督功能是有幫助的。綜合上述結果,我們發現整體獨立董事的連結性並不會造成太大的影響, 但將其連結性進一步分析後發現獨立董事的連結性對於其諮詢及監督角色確實會造成影響。
英文摘要
The objective of this study is to investigate the independence of independent directors, deeply understanding of whether the social ties between independence directors and executive officers will affect the monitoring and advising roles of boards of directors. Independence is the most important key enterprises to set up independent directors. When the company exists social ties, independent directors to perform oversight role probably cannot actual independence to oversight the company because there is another association link cause of the lack of supervision. But the company can take independent directors’ advantage of professional, independent directors through friendship or relationship with the manager, but also to promote communication and understanding between independent directors and managers, thereby more clearly the company's internal operations to provide professional recommendations for the enterprise, to play its advisory function. In this study, the sample is from listed and OTC companies is all collected by hands from 2013 to 2014 in Taiwan. The results showed that independent directors with social ties belongs to the department of supervised effect, CEO represents the link with the independent directors of the advisory function does not exist, it may cause a negative effect on the company. But after additional testing also found that if CEO within the term of office of independent directors elected, CEO of the effect of supervision is non-existent, and advisory role with the general manager in Taiwan presented a positive effect. And we change CEO to CFO, the result founds no effect to supervision and advisory role. Finally we check the link of independent directors and the firm, the result shows the link will let the supervision and advisory function get better.
Based on the results, we found that the overall link between independent directors and will not cause much impact, but further analyze the link between independent directors with social ties will affect its advisory and oversight role.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
中文摘要	I
Abstract	II
目錄	III
表目錄	IV
圖目錄	V
第壹章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的	3
第三節 研究架構與流程	4
第貳章  文獻回顧與假說建立	6
第一節 社會性連結	6
第二節 獨立董事	10
第三節 社會性連結對獨立董事角色之影響	13
第參章 研究設計	17
第一章 樣本及資料來源	17
第二章 研究方法與變數衡量	18
第肆章 實證結果與分析	23
第一節 樣本敘述統計量	23
第二節 相關性分析	25
第三節 實證結果分析	27
第四節 額外測試	33
第伍章 結論與建議	40
第一節 研究結論	40
第二節 研究貢獻	41
第三節 研究限制及建議	42
參考文獻	44
中文文獻	44
英文文獻	45

表目錄
表3-1:上市櫃公司存有社會性連結之結果	17
表4-1:敘述性統計表	24
表4-2:相關係數表	26
表4-3:上市公司總經理與獨立董事對監督之影響	29
表4-4:上市公司總經理與獨立董事對諮詢之影響	30
表4-5:上櫃公司總經理與獨立董事對監督之影響	31
表4-6:上櫃公司總經理與獨立董事對諮詢之影響	32
表4-7:總經理任期內選任之獨立董事對公司之影響	36
表4-8:財務長與獨立董事對監督之影響	37
表4-9:財務長與獨立董事對諮詢之影響	38
表4-10:獨立董事與查核會計師事務所之連結對公司之影響	39

圖目錄
圖1-1:研究流程圖	5
參考文獻
中文文獻
王中天,2003,社會資本(Social Capital):概念、源起、及現況,問題與研究,42(5): 139-163。
王瀟,2015,淺析獨立董事在上市公司中的角色及其角色扮演,經濟論叢: 168-172。
吳祥福,2003,財務報表重編與董監獨立性/專業性之研究,政治大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
李宜勉,2010,會計師審計品質與㈶財務報表重編之關聯性,中山管理評論,18(2): 407-445。
李華驎、鄭佳綾,2014,公司的品格:22個案例,了解公司治理和上市櫃公司的財務陷阱,先覺出版社。 
沈仰斌、黃志仁,2001,子公司操作母公司股票:資料特性與操作行為,中國財務學刊,9(3):53~70。
高岩,2007,獨立董事獨立性之判斷-以甲骨文公司派生訴訟案為視角,董事會雜誌,第一期,88-89。
陳牡丹,1999,上市公司財務報表重編次數、重編方向與操縱損益盈餘動機之關聯性研究,台中商專學報,31: ,193-214。
詹玉霞,2003,盈餘管理與公司治理對財務報告重編影響之研究,私立東吳大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
劉夏,2007,論獨立董事功能之發揮,時代經貿: 下旬,第5卷75期,77-78。
劉浩、,堂松、,樓俊,2012,獨立董事:監督還是諮詢?-銀行背景獨立董事對企業信貸融資影響,管理世界,1: 141-169。
鄭鈞介,2006,董監事會特性及審計品質對財務報表重編之影響,私立中國文化大學會計學研究所未出版論文。
薛敏正、林嬋娟、林秀鳳,2008,董事會特性與財務報告重編,Chiao Da Management Review 28(2): 73-103.
英文文獻
Abbott, L. J., Parker S. Parker S., Peters G. F. Peters and K. Raghunandan K. 2003a. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(2): 17-32. 
Abbott, L. J., Parker S., Peters G. F. and Raghunandan K. Abbott, L.J., S. Parker, G.F. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003b. An empirical investigation of audit fees, nonaudit fees, and audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 20(2): 215-234.
Adams, R. B., Ferreira, D., 2007. A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance 62: 217–250
Agrawal, A. and Knoeber, C. R. 2001. Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role?, Journal of Law and Economics, 44: 179-198.
Agrawal, A. and Knoeber, C. R. 1996. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders, Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 31: 377-397. 
Alderfer, C. P. 1986. The invisible director on corporate boards. Harvard Rusiness Review, 64: 38-52.,
Alexander, F. and Josef S. 2007. Knowledge mobilization through social ties: The cost-benefit analysis. Journal of transaction cost, SBR (60) : 99-117.
Baliga, B. R., Moyer, N. C. and Rao, R. S. 1996. CEO duality and firm performance: What’s the fuss? Strategic Management Journal, 17: 41-53.
Baysinger, B. and Butler, H, N. 1985. Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1: 101-124.,
Baysinger, B. D. and Hoskisson R. E. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: effects on corporate strategy, Acadeny of Management Review, 15: 72-87.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71 (4): 443-465. 
Bebchuk, L. A. and Friedand J. M. 2004. Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J. and Subramanyam, K. R. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1): 1-24.
Benkel, M., Mather, P. and Ramsay, A. 2006. The association between corporate governance and earnings management: The role of independent role. Corporate Ownership and Control 3: 65-75.
Berry, L. L. and Parasuraman, A. 1991. Marketing Service-Competing Through Quality. NY: The Free Press.
Boyd, B. K. 1994. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15: 335-344.
Brian, G. M., Charles, A. and O'reilly, W. J. 1995. The CEO, the Board of Directors and Executive Compensation: Economic and Psychological Perspectives. Ind Corp Change 4(12): 293-332.
Burt, R. S. 2000. The Network Structure of Social Capital, in Robert I. Sutton and Barry M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 345-423.
Byrd, D. T. and Mizruchi, M. S. 2005. Bankers on the Board and the Debt Ratio of Firms Journal of Corporate Finance, 11: 129-173.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal Hermanson, T. L. and Riley, R. A. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(3) :  365-384
Carter, B. C. and Lorsch, J. W. 2004. Back to the drawing board designing corporate boards for a complex world. Harvard Business School Press
Charles, A. and O’Reilly III, B. G. M. 2010. Economic and psychological perspectives on CEO compensation: a review and synthesis. Ind Corp Change 19(3): 675-712.
Chatman, J. A. and Brown, R. A. 1995. It takes two to tango: Understanding the personal and situational antecedents of friendship at the individual and dyadic levels. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver.
Cohen, J. G., Krishnamoorthy, G. and Wright, A. 2007. Form Vs substance: the implications for practice and research of alternative perspective on corporate governance. Working paper, Boston College. 
Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., Wright, A. and Cohen, J. 2007. The impact of roles of the board on auditors' risk assessments and program planning decisions Auditing:  A Journal of Practice & Theory 26:  91-112.
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A. and Malloy, C. J. 2008a. The small world of investing: board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy 116: 951–979.
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A. and Malloy, C. J. 2008b. Sell side school ties. Unpublished working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology 1: 95-120.
Core, J. E., Holthausen, R.W. and Larcker, D. F. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406.
Core, J. E. and Guay, W. R. 1999. The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28: 151-184. 
Cotter, J. F., Shivdasani, A. and Zenner, M. 1997. Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics 43: 195-218.
Cross, R. and Sproull, L. 2004. More Than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge, Organization Science 15(4): 446-462.
Crosse, C. and Hocking, B. 2004. Social rehabilitation: what are the issues? In: DVA National Rehabilitation Conference, Canberra, Australia.
Daily, G. M. 1996. Governance patterns in bankruptcy reorganizations. Strategic Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal 17: 355-375.,
Daily, G. M. and Dalton, D. R. 1994. Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal , 37: 1603-1617.
Brass, D. J., Labianca, B. and Iuseppe, G. L. 1999. Social Capital, Social Liabilities, and Social Resources Management, Corporate Social Capital and Liability: 323-338.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G. and Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management: The accounting review 70 (2): 145-176.
DeFond, M. L. and Jiambalvo, J. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economic 17 (1-2): 145-176.
Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. and Ozbas, O. 2010. When are outside directors effective? J. Financ. Econ. 96: 195–214.
Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M.G. 1983. The separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
Fang, C. J., Lee, H. Y. and Long, C. L. 2008. The effect of independent director and supervisor on firm   performance and earning quality-The moderating effect of controlling shareholder. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance 5(1): 55-80.
Fink, R. A. 2006. Social ties in the boardroom: Changing the definition of director independence to eliminate “Rubber-Stamping” board. Working paper .79 S. Cal. L. Rev: 455-496
Fredrickson, J. W., Hambrick, D. C. and Baumrin, S. 1988. A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review 13: 255-70.
Friedman, M. J. 2005. Veterans’ mental health in the wake of war. New England Journal of Medicine 352: 1287–1290.
Giuseppe, L., Daniel, J., Brass B. and Barbara G. 1998. Social Networks and Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties, Academy of Management Journal, 41: 55-57.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R. and Balkin, D. B. 1992. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 921-955.
Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology 6,:  1360-1380. 
Granovetter, M. S. 1982. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited., in Peter V. Marsden and Nan Lin (eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications: 105-130.
Hermalin, B. E. and Weisbach, M. S. 1988. The Determinants of Board Composition. The RAND Journal of Economics 19(4): 589-606. 
Hill, C. A. and McDonnell, B. H. 2007. Disney, good faith, and structural bias. Journal of Corporation Law, 32: 833-864.
Hwang, B. and Kim, S. 2009. It pays to have friends. J. Finance. Econ . 93: 138–158.
Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29(2): 193-228.
Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 375-400.
Kroszner, R. S. and Strahan, P. E. 2001. Bankers on Boards: Monitoring Conflicts of Interest and Lender Liability., Journal of Financial Economics, 62: 415-452.
Levin, D. Z. and Robert, C. 2004. The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer, Management Science 11: 1477-1490. 
Lin, N. 1999. Social Networks and Status Attainment, Annual Review of Sociology 25: 467-487.
Lin, N. 2001. Social capital: A theory of social: Structure and action. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Marquardt, C. and Wiedman, C. 2004. The effect of earning management on the value relevance of accounting information. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting , 31: 297-332.
Marsden, P. V., Reed, J. S., Kennedy, M. D. and Stinson, K. M. 1982. American regional cultures and differences in leisure time activities. Social Forces 60: 1023–1049
McPherson, M., Lynn, S. and Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology , 27: 415–444.
Mejia, L. G. and Wiseman, R. M. 1997. Reframing Execufive Compensation: An Assessment and Outlook. Journal of Management 23(3): 291-374.
Northcraft, G. B. 1992. Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression-management in feedback-seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53(3): 310-334.
O'Reilly, C. A. and Main, B. G. 2005. Setting the CEO's pay: economic and psychological perspectives. Working paper, Stanford University
Peasnell, K. V., Pope P. F. and Young, S. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32(7-8): 1311-1346.
Peter P. L. 2007. Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific J Manage 24: 227-246. 
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
Podolny, J. M. and James, N. B. 1997. Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace, American Sociological Review 62: 673-693.
Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 1–24.
Pri, P. S. and Karen, A. J. 1993. Do friends perform better than acquaintances?  The  interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation: 149-165.
Rechner, P. R. 1991. CEO duality and organization performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal , 12(2): 155-260.
Reed, J. S. 2003. Do southerners prefer one another’s company? Southern Cultures 9: 84–90.
Reynolds, J. K. and Francis, J. R. 2000. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decision. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3): 375-400.
Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt, J. G. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26(2): 175-191.
Sharma, V. D. 2004. “Board of Director Characteristics, Institutional Ownership, and Fraud: Evidence from Australia. ,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2): 105-117.
Stanton-Salazar, R. 1997. A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review , 67: 1-40.
Teoh, S. H., Wong T. J. and Rao, G. R. 1998. Are Accruals during Initial Public Offerings Opportunistic?, Review of Accounting Studies 3: 175-208.
Udi, H. 2011. Should Independent Board Members with Social Ties to Management Disqualify Themselves from Serving on the Board? Journal of Business Ethics 99(3): 399-423.
Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61: 674–698.
Wall Street Journal June 6: Bl. 1993. Less-than-watchful eyes didn't oversee expenses of a utility's chairman. 
Walsh, J. P. and Seward, J. K. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms.
Weir, C. and Laing, D. 2000. The Performance-Governance Relationship: The ffects of Cadbury Compliance on UK Quoted Companies. Journal of ManagemEent and Governance 4: 265-281.
Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal 42: 7–24.
Whisler, T. L. 1984. The rules of the game: Inside the corporate board room. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones Irwin.
Williamson, O. E. 1999. Strategy Research: Governance and Governance and Competence Perspectives. Competence, Governance and Entrepreneurship: 21-30.
Xie, B., Davidson W. N. and DaDalt, P. J. 2003. Earning management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9: 295-316 .
Yermack, D. 1996. Higher valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-212.
Yu, H. L. 2010. How public regulation change corporate governance practice? The corporate board reform in Taiwan, The Corporate Governance Symposium: 1-26 
Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, J. A. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management , 15: 291-334.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信