§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2805200701233000
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2007.00903
論文名稱(中文) 升降單位、市場品質與股價跳躍—台灣市場之實證研究
論文名稱(英文) Tick Size, Market Quality and Information-Induced Jumps — Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 財務金融學系博士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Banking and Finance
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 95
學期 2
出版年 96
研究生(中文) 吳佩珊
研究生(英文) Pei-Shan Wu
學號 892490011
學位類別 博士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2007-05-20
論文頁數 105頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 邱建良
指導教授 - 李命志
委員 - 張倉耀
委員 - 王凱立
委員 - 聶建中
委員 - 俞海琴
委員 - 李命志
委員 - 謝文良
關鍵字(中) 買賣升降單位
純委託單驅動市場
限價單交易者
股價波動性
股價跳躍行為
關鍵字(英) Tick-Size
Pure-Order Driven Market
Limit-Order trader
Stock Price Volatility
Jump Behavior of Stock Price
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本論文探討台灣證券交易所於2005年3月1日縮小買賣升降單位後,對市場造成的影響,共包含兩篇,第一篇為「縮小買賣升降單位對限價單交易者行為的影響」,第二篇為「股價日內跳躍行為之探討」。
第一篇主要目的是檢視縮小買賣升降單位後對市場交易成本、深度與交易量的影響,並深入探討主要提供市場流動性的限價單投資者(limit order trader)在買賣升降單位縮小後,是否提升買賣委託的價格競爭,而加強市場價格發現能力;此外,並檢視此政策是否有強化市場價格優先機制,而使限價單交易會透過價格優先來獲取市場利潤,使日內時段的市場深度有所變化,以了解升降單位在提供流動性過程中所扮演的角色與其政策效益。實證結果發現買賣降單位縮小會使整體市場交易成本降低、整體市場深度變小,而整體市場交易量則無顯著性影響。此外,買賣升降單位縮小確實具有強化價格優先的特性,能提升整體市場的價格發現能力,且交易者能更積極在盤中流動性較高的時段透過價格優先來獲取市場利潤,使盤中市場深度減少效果較大。
第二篇是透過ARJI (Autoregressive Conditional Jump Intensity)模型,來研究台灣股票市場日內個股價格因受私有信息與資訊不對稱問題而產生跳躍行為的變化,透過觀察日內個股價格波動與價格調整過程,以進一步了解私有信息如何反應和被逐漸吸收到個股價格中。實證結果發現ARJI模型其誤差項應設定為Skewed-t分配,以能更適切捕捉股價的日內波動性。此外,樣本公司股價報酬總變異的日內型態呈現近L型變化,並發現因私有信息所引起股價報酬的跳躍行為是解釋各股股價報酬總變異日內型態的重要原因之一。而樣本公司股價報酬之跳躍序列亦存在近L型的日內型態,更可明確說明為何開盤1小時內各股股價報酬會有較大波動的原因。最後發現買賣升降單位縮小後對各股股價日內波動性並沒有一致性的影響,此可能與各股特性、交易者行為、或其他因素等差異有關。
英文摘要
This dissertation focuses on the market’s response to Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation reducing minimum tick-size on March, 1, 2005. It contains two papers, the first is “The Influence of Limit Order Trader by Reducing Tick Size” and the second is “The Analysis of Intraday Jump Behavior of Stock Price”.
The main study of the first paper is to examine the influence of reducing tick size on trading cost, depth and trading volume. And it studies deeply about the limit order trader who offers market liquidity to see if it can raise the limit orders’ price competition to enforce the market price discovery. Furthermore, it also reviews if the policies can strength the market price priority to let the limit orders trading earn the market profits by price priority. By the variance of intraday market depth, it will help to understand the role that the tick size plays in offering the liquidity process and the policy benefit. The evidence proves that reducing tick size would make the full market trading decline and shortens the depth; however, it has no influence on the market volume. Besides, reducing tick size indeed strength the market price priority and raises the whole market price discovery. The result also finds that the traders would earn market profits actively by price priority in the period of higher liquidity span and enlarge the market depth during the middle trading period.
The second paper is to study the variance of jump behavior which individual stock’s intraday price was made by private information and asymmetric information problem in Taiwan stock market. By surveying the variance and adjustment process of intraday individual stock’s price, we can further understand how private information response and gradually absorb the individual stock’s price. The evidence shows that the error term of ARJI model should be set as Skewed-t distribution to catch the intraday stock price variance. In addition, the intraday pattern of variance of stocks return appears to be “L” shaped, and the jump behaviors of stocks’ price return made by private information are one of the most important reasons to analyze the intraday pattern of stocks’ price variance. The jump series from sample firm stocks’ price also have the “L” shaped intraday pattern, which can explain clearly why individual stock’s price return have higher variance within the first hour opening trading period. Finally, the evidence shows that reducing tick size has no influence on the intraday volatility of stocks; it might be related to the difference of individual stock’s property, trader behavior and other reasons.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
第一篇  縮小買賣升降單位對限價單交易者行為的影響
第一章 前言…………………………………………………………2
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………2
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………5
第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………6
第二章 微結構文獻整理與理論基礎建立…………………………8
第一節 報價驅動(Quote-driven)市場與委託驅動(Order-driven)市場…………8
第二節 資訊不對稱下的限價單交易者行為………………………10
第三節 升降單位大小對市場交易的影響…………………………11
第四節 升降單位對買賣價差的影響………………………………13
第五節 升降單位對交易量與深度的影響…………………………19
第三章 台灣證券市場交易制度……………………………………22
第四章 研究設計……………………………………………………27
第一節 採樣程序……………………………………………………27
第二節 變數整理……………………………………………………28
第三節 顯著性檢定方法……………………………………………30
第五章 資料來源與實證結果………………………………………31
第一節 資料來源與整理……………………………………………31
第二節 買賣升降單位縮小對市場特性(交易成本、深度及交易量)的影響…32
第三節 買賣升降單位縮小對日內價差型態的影響………………35
第四節 買賣升降單位縮小對日內深度型態的影響………………45
第六章 結論…………………………………………………………52
參考文獻………………………………………………………………54
第二篇  股價日內跳躍行為之探討
第一章 前言…………………………………………………………59
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………59
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………61
第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………62
第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………64
第一節 波動性的日內型態…………………………………………64
第二節 買賣升降單位縮小對市場波動性影響……………………67
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………68
第一節 單根檢定……………………………………………………70
第二節 ARCH效果檢定………………………………………………74
第三節 ARJI模型與Skewed-t分配設定……………………………76
第四章 資料來源與實證結果………………………………………81
第一節 資料來源與整理……………………………………………81
第二節 基本統計分析………………………………………………82
第三節  單根檢定與ARCH效果檢定…………………………………84
第四節  ARJI模型配適………………………………………………86
第五節  ARJI-ST模型估計的總變異在日內時間下的變化………90
第六節  擴散-跳躍聯合過程的日內型態分析……………………93
第七節  跳躍序列分析………………………………………………96
第六章 結論…………………………………………………………99
參考文獻………………………………………………………………102
 
表目錄
第一篇  縮小買賣升降單位對限價單交易者行為的影響
表3-1   股票升降單位調整前後對照表……………………………24
表3-2   認購(售)權證升降單位調整前後對照表………………25
表5-1   2005年3月1日台灣證券交易所的買賣升降單位新舊制對照表…32
表5-2   買賣升降單位縮小對市場的總效果分析…………………34
表5-3   對照組日內價差……………………………………………37
表5-4   測試組日內價差……………………………………………38
表5-5   測試組價差變化迴歸估計結果……………………………44
表5-6   對照組日內深度政策前後差異(政策前-政策後)………48
表5-7   測試組日內深度政策前後差異(政策前-政策後)………49
表5-8   測試組深度變化迴歸估計結果……………………………51
第二篇  股價日內跳躍行為之探討
表4-1   2005年3月1日台灣證券交易所的買賣升降單位新舊制對照表…82
表4-2   基本統計分析………………………………………………83
表4-3   單根檢定與ARCH效果檢定…………………………………86
表4-4   ARJI模型估計結果…………………………………………89
表4-4(續) ARJI模型估計結果………………………………………90
表4-5   各股在ARJI模型下估計總變異……………………………92
表4-6   政策前擴散-跳躍聯合過程的基本統計量………………95
表4-7   政策後擴散-跳躍聯合過程的基本統計量………………96
表4-8   政策前跳躍序列統計………………………………………98
表4-9   政策後跳躍序列統計………………………………………99
 
圖目錄
第一篇  縮小買賣升降單位對限價單交易者行為的影響
圖1-1   研究架構圖…………………………………………………7
圖5-1   對照組標準化日內價差金額………………………………40
圖5-2   對照組標準化日內價差百分比……………………………40
圖5-3   對照組標準化日內有效價差………………………………41
圖5-4   測試組標準化日內價差金額………………………………41
圖5-5   測試組標準化日內價差百分比……………………………42
圖5-6   測試組標準化日內有效價差………………………………42
圖5-7   控制組標準化日內深度……………………………………50
圖5-8   測試組標準化日內深度……………………………………50
第二篇  股價日內跳躍行為之探討:台灣市場實證
圖1-1   研究架構圖…………………………………………………63
圖4-1   2827中聯日內成交價………………………………………84
圖4-2   1314中石化日內成交價……………………………………84
圖4-3   2827華映日內成交價………………………………………84
圖4-4   2384勝華日內成交價………………………………………84
圖4-5   2357華碩日內成交價………………………………………84
圖4-6   3034聯詠日內成交價………………………………………84
圖4-7   2498宏達電日內成交價……………………………………84
圖4-8   2827中聯股價總變異日內型態……………………………93
圖4-9   1314中石化股價總變異日內型態…………………………93
圖4-10   2475華映股價總變異日內型態………………………… 93
圖4-11   2384勝華股價總變異日內型態…………………………93
圖4-12   2357華碩股價總變異日內型態…………………………93
圖4-13   3034聯詠股價總變異日內型態…………………………93
圖4-14   2498宏達電股價總變異日內型態………………………93
參考文獻
第一篇  縮小買賣升降單位對限價單交易者行為的影響
Ahn, H. J., Bae, K. H. and Chan, K., 2001, Limit Orders, Depth, and Volatility: Evidence From the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong, Journal of Finance, 56, 769-790.
Ahn, H., Cao, C.Q. and Choe, H., 1996, Tick Size, Spread and Volume, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 5, 2-22. 
Ahn, Hee-Joon, Jun Cai, and Yasushi Hamao, 2001, Changes in Tick Size and Liquidity Provision on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, City University of Hong Kong Working Paper.
Anshuman, V. R. and Kalay, A., 1998, Market Making with Discrete Price, Review of Financial Studies, 11, 81-109.
Bacidore, J., 1997, The Impact of Decimialization on Market Quality: An Empirical Investigation of the Toronto Stock Exhang, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 6, 92-120.
Bernhardt, D. and Hughson, E., 1996, Discrete Pricing and the Design of Dealership Markets, Journal of Economic Theory, 71,148-182.
Bessembinder, H., 2000, Tick Size, Spreads, and Liquidity: An Analysis of Nasdaq Securities Trading near Ten Dollars, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 213-239.
Biais, B., Hillion, P. and C. Spatt, 1995, An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris Bourse, Journal of Finance, 50, 1655-1689.
Bollen, N. P. B. and Whaley, R. E., 1998, Are "teenies " Better ?, Journal of Portfolio Management, 25, 10-24.
Brockman P. and D. Chung, 1998, Inter- and Intra-Day Liquidity Patterns on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong, Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 8, 277-298.
Chakravarty, Sugato, and Craig W. Holden, 1996, An Integrated Model of Market and Limit Orders, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 4, 213-241.
Chan, K. C., and Hwang, C. Y., 2001, The Impact of Tick Size on the Quality of A Pure Order-Driven Market: Evidence From the Stock Exchange of Hong-Kong, Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Christie, W., and R. Huang, 1994, Market structures and liquidity: A Transactions data Study of Exchange Listings, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3, 300-326.
Chung, K. H. and C. Chuwonganant, 2004, Tick Size, Order Handling Rules, and Trading Costs, Financial Management, 33, 47-62.
Chung, K. H. and C. Chuwonganant, and D. T. McCormick, 2004, Order Preferencing and Market Quality on NASDAQ Before and After Decimalization, Journal of Financial Economics, 71, 581-612.
Chung, K. H. and R. Van Ness, 2001 Order Handling Rules, Tick Size, and the Intraday Pattern of Bid-Ask Spreads for NASDAQ Stocks, Journal of Financial Markets, 4, 143-161.
Chung, K. H., B.Van Ness, and R.Van Ness, 2001, Can the Treatment of Limit Orders Reconcile the Difference in Trading Costs Between NYSE and NASDAQ Issues? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36, 267-86.
Chung, Kee H., Bonnie F. Van Ness, and Robert A. Van Ness, 1999, Limit Orders and the Bid-Ask Spread, Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 255-287.
Copeland, T. and D. Galai, 1983, Information Effects of the Bid-Ask Spread, Journal of Finance, 8, 1457-1469.
Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1994, Strategic Trading with Asymmetric Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 499-518.
Foucault, T., 1999, Order Flow Composition and Trading Costs in a Dynamic Limit Order Market, Journal of Financial Markets, 2, 99-134.
Glosten, L., and P. Milgrom, 1985, Bid, Ask, and Transaction Prices in a Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 71-100.
Glosten, L.R., and L.E. Harris, 1988, Estimating the Components of the Bid Ask Spread, Journal of Financial Economics, 21, 123-142.
Goldstein, M.A. and K.A. Kavajecz, 2000, Eighths, Sixteenths, and Market Depth: Changes in Tick Size on Liquidity Provision on the NYSE, Journal of Financial Economics, 56, 125-149.
Griffiths, M., Smith, B., Turnbull, D., and White, R.W., 2000, The Costs and the Determinants of Order Aggressiveness, Journal of Financial Economics, 56, 65-88.
Handa, P., and Schwartz, R. A., 1996, Limit Order Trading, Journal of Finance, 51, 1835-1860.
Harris, L., 1996, Does a Large Minimum Price Variation Encourage Order Exposure? New York Stock Exchange and University of Southern California Working Paper.
Harris, L. and Hasbrouck, J., 1996, Market versus Limit Orders: the SuperDOT Evidence on Order Submission Strategy, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 213-231.
Harris, L., 1991, Stock Price Clustering and Discreteness, Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), 389-415. 
Harris, L.,1994, Minimum Price Variations, Discrete Bid -ask Spreads, and Quotation Sizes, Review of Financial Studies, 7, 149-178.
Hasbrouck, J. and R. Schwartz, 1988, Liquidity and Execution Costs in Equity Markets, Journal of Portfolio Management, 14, 10-16.
Hasbrouck, J., 1991, The Summary Informativeness of Stock Trades, an Econometric Analysis, Review of Financial Studies, 4, 571-595.
Jones, C.M. and M.L. Lipson, 2001, Sixteenths, Direct Evidence on Institutional Execution Costs, Journal of Financial Economics, 59, 253-278.
Kandel, E. and Marx, L. M., 1997, Nasdaq Market Structure and Spread Patterns, Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 61-89.
Kavajecz, Kenneth A., 1999, A Specialist's Quoted Depth and the Limit Order Book, Journal of Finance, 54, 747-771.
Lau, S. T. and McInish, T. H., 1995, Reducing Tick Size on the Stock Exchange of Singapore, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 3, 485-96.
Lee, Charles M. -C., Belinda Mucklow, and Mark J. Ready, 1993, Spreads, Depths, and the Impact of Earnings Information: An intraday analysis, Reviews of Financial Studies, 6, 345-374.
Mackinnon, G. and Nemiroff, H., 1999, Liquidity and Tick Size: Does Decimalization Matter? Journal of Financial Research, 22(3), 287-299.
Parlour, Christine A., 1998, Price Dynamics in Limit Order Markets, Review of Financial Studies, 11, 789-816.
Porter, D. C. and D. G. Weaver, 1997, Tick Size and Market Quality, Financial Management, 26 (4), 5-26. 
Schwartz, R. A., 1988, Equity Markets: Structure, Trading and Performance, Harper and Row, New York.
Seppi, D. J., 1997, Liquidity Provision with Limit Orders and a Strategies Specialist, Review of Financial Studies, 10, 103-150.
Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A. and S.W. Pruitt, 2000, The Impact of the Reduction in Tick Increments in Major US Markets on Spreads, Depth and Volatility, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15, 153-169.

第二篇  股價日內跳躍行為之探討
Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer, 1988, A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability, Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 3-40.
Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer, 1991, Sunshine Trading and Financial Market Equilibrium, Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), 443-482.
Amihud, Y, and H . Mendelson, 1987, Trading Mechanisms and Stock Returns : An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Finance, 42, 533-553. 
Bessembinder, H., 2000, Tick Size, Spreads, and Liquidity: An Analysis of Nasdaq Securities Trading near Ten Dollars, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 213-239. 
Bollerslev, T., 1986, Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. 
Brock, W and A Kleidon, 1992, Periodic Market Closure and Trading Volume: A Model of Intraday Bids and Asks, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 16(3/4), 451-489.
Chan, W. H. and J. M. Maheu, 2002, Conditional Jump Dynamics in Stock Market Returns, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20, 377-389.
Das, S. R., 1998, Poisson-Gaussian Processes and the Bond Market, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, 6631.
Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A., 1981, Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller, 1979, Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 427-432.
Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger, 1987, Cointegration and Error Correction:   Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrics, 55, 251-276.
Engle, R. and B. Yoo, 1987, Forecasting and Testing in Cointegrated Systems, Journal of Econometrics, 35, 143-159.
Eraker, B., M. S. Johannes and N. G. Polson, 1999, Return Dynamics in Continuous-Time with Jumps to Volatility and Returns, working paper, University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business.
Fama, E. F., 1965, The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices, Journal of Business, 38, 34-105.
Foerster, S. R. and J. J. Schmitz, 1997, The Transmission of U.S. Election Cycles to International Stock Returns, Journal of International Business, 28, 1-27.
Fortune, P., 1999, Are Stock Returns Different Over Weekends? A Jump Diffusion Analysis of the Weekend Effect, New England Economic Review, September/October, 3-19. 
Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold, 1974, Spurious Regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 12, 111-120.
Harris, L., 1986, A Transaction Data Study of Weekly and Intraday Patterns in Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 16(1), 99-117.
Hansen, B.E., 1994, Autoregressive Conditional Density Estimation, International Economic Review, 35(3), 705-730.
Jorion, P., 1988, On Jump Processes in the Foreign Exchange and Stock Markets,  Review of Financial Studies, 1, 427-445.
Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y. and Snell, A., (2003), Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359-379.
Kleidon, A.W., and I. M. Werner, 1996, Round the Clock Trading: Evidence from U.K. Cross-Listed Securities, Review of Financial Studies, 9, 619-664.
Kyle, A., 1985, Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading, Econometrica, 53, 1315-1335.
Lockwood, L. J. and S. C. Linn, 1990, An Examination of Stock Market Return Volatility During Overnight and Intraday Periods 1964-1989, Journal of Banking and Finance, 14, 1243-1253.
McInish, Thomas H. and R. A. Wood, 1990, A Transaction Data Analysis of the Variability of Common Stock Returns During 1980-1984, Journal of Banking and Finance, 14, 99-112.
Nelson, C. R. and C. I. Plosser, 1982, Trends and Random Walk in Macroeconomic Time Series, Journal of Monetary Economics, 85, 139-162.
O'Hara, Maureen, 1995, Market Microstructure Theory, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Phillips, P. and P. Perron, 1988, Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
Porter, D. and D. Weaver, 1997, Decimalization and Market Quality, Financial Management, 26, 5-26.
Ronen, T. and D. Weaver, 1998, Teenies anyone? The case of the American Stock Exchange, Working paper, Baruch College, City University of New York.
Said, S. and D. Dickey, 1984, Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive Moving Average Models of Unknown Order, Biometrica, 71, 599-607.
Shleifor. A, 2000, In Efficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance, Oxford Univ, press.
Stoll, H. R.and Whaley, R. E., 1990, Stock Market Structure and Volatility, Review of Financial Studies, 3, 37-71.
Wang, S., K. G. Lim and C. Chang, 1999, A New Methodology for Studying Intraday Dynamics of Nikkei Index Futures Using Markov Chains, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 9, 247-265.
Wood, C. B., 2000, Tooth Enamel Microstructure in Deltatheridium (Metatheria, Late Cretaceous of Mongolia) with Comparisons to Some Other Mesozoic Mammals, Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, 4, 127-152.
Wood, R. A., T. H. McInish and J. K. Ord, 1985, An Investigation of Transctions Data for NYSE Stock, Journal of Finance, 40, 723-739.
Xin Zhao and Kee H. Chung, 2006, Decimal Pricing and Information-Based Trading: Tick Size and Informational Efficiency of Asset Price, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(5-6), 753-766.
余明芳,2001,台股指數期貨日內交易型態之研究--摩根台指期貨與台灣指數期 貨之比較,管理評論,20(2),31-53。
吳瑞萱,2001,台灣加權股價指數日內動態行為之研究,國立台北大學企業管理學系,研究所碩士論文。
林丙輝、葉仕國,1999,台灣股票價格非連續跳耀變動與條件異質變異之研究,證券市場發展季刊,11(1),61-92。
黃玉娟、徐守德,2000,台股指數現貨與期貨日內交易形態之比較,交大管理學報,20(2),149-171。
黃鼎能,2001,證實台灣個股日內報酬有強烈的負自我相關性的結果相同,國立中央大學財務管理系,研究所碩士論文。
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信