§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2707200718260500
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2007.00888
論文名稱(中文) 通往詭辯之路:論美國法律中平等觀念之轉變
論文名稱(英文) The Road to Sophistry: The Recent Transformation of the Legal Precept of Equality In American Jurisprudence
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 美國研究所博士班
系所名稱(英文) Graduate Institute of American Studies
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 95
學期 2
出版年 96
研究生(中文) 汝明麗
研究生(英文) Elma Ming-li Ju
學號 887220019
學位類別 博士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2007-06-22
論文頁數 252頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 崔馬吉
委員 - 魏良才
委員 - 趙國材
委員 - 黃介正
委員 - 徐鵬飛
關鍵字(中) 平等
文化辯護
自由放任主義
種族優待措施
關鍵字(英) Equality
Cultural Defense
Libertarianism
Affirmative Action
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
美國於內戰結束後,通過憲法第14條修正案,其中之平等保護條款將平等概念首度納入美國憲法,而美國司法部門則自此承擔起詮釋平等作為一法律概念之責任。本篇論文從自由放任主義的角度,檢視美國法庭是否做到對個人法律權利之保障,確使個人的平等權利免於遭受其他個人、團體或政府之不當干預。
	本篇論文認為美國法庭在此方面之判決與論述前後不一,充斥詭辯狡詞。舉例而言,美國最高法院堅持所謂政治/公民與社會平等之分野,對於非裔美人之天賦人權於19世紀末至20世紀上半頁遭受侵害之情事視若無睹。而自Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)樹立之「隔離但平等」的法律原則,更是直到Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 才被判定違反憲法平等保護的原則。
	美國司法部門在做出反隔離判決後,終於回歸前述自由放任主義所認定之平等原則。惟最高法院旋即在處理種族優待措施案件時,再度展開言詞詭辯。在只問目的,不論手段的情況下,美國法庭以平等之名,核可了種族差別待遇。
	然而平等做為一法律概念之轉變,係於1980年代開始邁向另一巔峰。若干美國法庭開始接受刑事案件中被告援引「文化辯護」之概念,強調個人行為深受其文化背景形塑的影響,故於外國文化中成長之個人即便在美國境內違反美國法律,亦不應要求其擔負全責。「文化辯護」支持者認為,依據平等保護原則,法庭於審理此等案件時,應將個人隸屬之特定文化族群視為關鍵因素,列入考量。
	本篇論文藉由對平等保護判例與「文化辯護」案件之審視與分析,證明了美國法律中的平等觀念確實已經出現轉變,且對於美國民族特性與凝聚力帶來深遠之負面衝擊。
英文摘要
The rhetoric of equality was formally incorporated into the United States Constitution following the end of the Civil War (1861-1865), specifically manifested in the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  The judiciary has since then taken up the responsibility of interpreting the concept of equality as a legal precept.  This dissertation has chosen to examine the American judiciary’s performance in this regard through a libertarian lens.  The inquiry focuses on whether the American courts have protected individual rights guaranteed by law, and ensured that such equality for individuals remain free from undue interferences from other individuals, groups, or government.  
	The dissertation has found American courts’ performance to be marked by inconsistency and sophistry.  For example, by insisting on the distinction between political/civil, and social equality, the Federal Supreme Court turned a blind eye to violations of black Americans’ rights to life, liberty and property during the late 19th century and the first half of the 20th century.  The doctrine of separate but equal, set forth in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), stood effective until Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ruled that racial segregation was a denial of the equal protection of the laws.
	The desegregation decision put the American judiciary back to the right track of promoting the aforesaid libertarian conception of equality, but before long the Supreme Court deviated again to exercises of sophistry when dealing with affirmative action cases.  In the name of equality, the judiciary endorsed racial classifications, believing that the noble end justified the suspect means.
	However, the transformation of the legal precept of equality was not completely consummated until some of the American courts began to accept the invocation of cultural defense in the 1980s.  Cultural defense claims that a person’s behavior is dictated by his or her cultural background to such an extent that those brought up in a foreign culture should not be held fully accountable for their actions which are found to violate American laws.  Such group membership is seen as a critical factor that must be taken into consideration if the principles of equality and individualized justice are to be honored.
	This dissertation, through reviews and analyses of equal protection jurisprudence and cultural defense cases, has demonstrated that the transformation, subtle as it is, has indeed been taking place, and has already brought about adverse, far-reaching impact on both American character and American unity.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CASES
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………........1
I.	BACKGROUND OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM……………………………..........1
II.	STATEMENT OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM………………………………….......6
III.	SINGIFICANCE OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM………………………………....14
IV.	LIMITATIONS AND DELIMITATIONS………………………………………….......17
V.	SYNOPSES OF CHAPTERS……………………………………………………….....21
CHAPTER ONE  EQUAL PROTECTION AND CULTURAL RIGHTS……………....26
I.	THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE………………………………………....28
II.	THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.......................................................................................... 30
III.	THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT............................................................................31
IV.	CULTURE AND RIGHTS..............................................................................................49
V.	LIBERTARIAN CRITIQUES OF EQUAL PROTECTION AND 
CULTURAL RIGHTS.....................................................................................................67
CHAPTER TWO  THE BATTLE IN THE COURTROOM………………………….........80
I.	EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE..................................................................81
II.	BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION (1954)...............................................................110
III.	AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION................................................121
IV.	A PROGRESSION OF CHANGE.................................................................................133
CHAPTER THREE  CULTURAL DEFENSE IN AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW….139
I.	CULTURAL DEFENSE IN CRIMINAL CASES.........................................................143
II.	RATIONALE FOR CULTURAL DEFENSE................................................................145
III.	CULTURAL DEFENSE CASES INVOLING FOREIGNERS OR IMMIGRANTS...151
IV.	CULTURAL DEFENSE CASES INVOLVING NON-IMMIGRANTS.......................161
V.	INCREASING UBIQUITY OF CULTURAL DEFENSE.............................................167
VI.	IMPLICATIONS OF CULTURAL DEFENSE CASES................................................170
CHAPTER FOUR  SHIFTING WIND………………………………………………….........180
I.	SOCIAL/CULTURAL EQUALITY OF GROUP RIGHTS OVER LEGAL EQUALITY OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS..........................................................................................189
II.	THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS...........................................................................195
III.	IMPLICATIONS OF THE LEGAL TRANSFORMATION.........................................198
IV.	ANY HOPE?.................................................................................................................211
V.	SUMMARY...................................................................................................................216
CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………….....220
BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………………235
INDEX................................................................................................................................................247
參考文獻
BIBLIOGRAPHY

ENGLISH PART
A.	Public Documents
Note. “The Cultural Defense in the Criminal Law,” Harvard Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 6 (1986): 1293-1311. 
People v. Aphaylath, 502 N. E. 2d 998 (1986).  Retrieved 1 May 2007 from LexisNexis™ on the World Wide Web: http://web.lexis-nexis.com.ezp2.
harvard.edu/universe.printdoc
United State of America v. Jeremy Fish, 388 F. 3d 284 (2004).  Retrieved 20 April 2007 from LexisNexis™ on the World Wide Web: http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
ezp1.harvard.edu/universe.printdoc

B. Books
Antieau, Chester James. The Intended Significance of the Fourteenth Amendment. New York: William S. Hein & Co., 1997.
Armstrong, Chris. Rethinking Equality: The Challenge of Equal Citizenship. New York: Manchester University Press, 2006.
Baghramian, Maria and Attracta Ingram, eds. Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Barry, Brian. Culture & Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Beckwith, Francis J., and Todd E. Jones, eds. Affirmative Action: Social Justice or Reverse Discrimination. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997.
Benhabib, Seyla. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Berger, Morroe. Equality by Statute: The Revolution in Civil Rights. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1967.
Bernstein, Richard. Dictatorship of Virtue. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
Blum, Deborah. Bad Karma: A True Story of Obsession and Murder. New York: Jove Books, 1986.
Boaz, David. Libertarianism: A Primer. New York: Free Press, 1997. 
________, ed. The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Writings from Lao-tzu to Milton Friedman.  New York: Free Press, 1997.
Bork, Robert H. Slouching Toward Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline. New York: ReganBooks, 1996.
Bovard, James. Lost Rights. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1995.
Brinkley, Alan and Ellen Fitzpatrick. America in Modern Times: Since 1941. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1997.
Brooks, Roy L. Integration or Separation? A Strategy for Racial Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Cohen, Joshua and Matthew Howard, Martha C. Nussbaum, eds. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?  Susan Moller Okin with Respondents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Cowan, Jane K., Marie-Benedicte Dembour, and Richard A. Wilson, eds. Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Cury, George E., ed. The Affirmative Action Debate. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1997.
    Davis, Abraham L. and Barbara Luck Graham, The Supreme Court, Race, and Civil Rights. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1995.
D’Souza, Dinesh. Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus. New York: The Free Press, 1991.
Deveaux, Monique. Cultural Pluralism and Dilemmas of Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 2000.
Devins, Neal and Davison M. Douglas, eds. Redefining Equality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.
Epps, Garrett. Democracy Reborn. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2006.
Fried, Charles.  Modern Liberty and the Limits of Government. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2007.
Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom, with the assistance of Rose D. Friedman and a new preface by the author. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, 1982. 
Fullinwider, Robert K. and Claudia Mills, eds. The Moral Foundations of Civil Rights. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1986.
Glazer, Nathan. We Are All Multiculturalists Now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.
Glazer, Nathan and Ken Young, eds. Ethnic Pluralism and Public Policy: Achieving Equality in the United States and Britain. London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1983.
Gutmann, Amy, ed. Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Haddock, Bruce and Peter Sutch, eds. Multiculturalism, Identity and Rights. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Hall, Kermit L. ed. Freedom and Equality: Discrimination and the Supreme Court. New York: Garland Publishing, 2000.
Hochschild, Jennifer L. Thirty Years after Brown. Washington D.C.: Joint Center for Political Studies, 1985.
Hochschild, Jennifer L. and Nathan Scovronick. The American Dream and the Public Schools. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Holzer, Henry Mark. Sweet Land of Liberty: The Supreme Court and Individual   Rights. Costa Mesa, CA: Common Sense Press, 1983.
Howard, John R. The Shifting Wind: The Supreme Court and Civil Rights from Reconstruction to Brown. New York: State of New York University Press, 1999.
Joppke, Christian and Steven Lukes, eds. Multicultural Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Kelly, Paul ed. Multiculturalism Reconsidered: Culture and Equality and its Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
Kymlicka, Will, and Wayne Norman, eds. Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Kymlicka, Will. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
________. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
________. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
La Belle, T. J. and C. R. Ward. Multiculturalism and Education: Diversity and Its Impact on Schools and Society. Albany, NY: University of New York Press, 1994.
Lee, Francis Graham. Equal Protection: Rights and Liberties under the Law. Denver, CO: ABC-CLIO, 2003.
Levinson, Sanford.  Wrestling with Diversity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
Machan, Tibor R. The Libertarian Reader. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1982.
Maltz, Earl M. The Fourteenth Amendment and the Law of the Constitution. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2003.
Melzer, Arthur M., Jerry Weinberger and M. Richard Zinman, eds. Multiculturalism and American Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1998.
Minow, Martha. Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Mithaug, Dennis E. Equal Opportunity Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1996.
Nagel, Robert F. Judicial Power and American Character: Censoring Ourselves in an Anxious Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Narveson, Jan. The Libertarian Idea. Philadelphia, PN: Temple University Press, 1988.
Nelson, William E. The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Newman, Roger K. ed. The Constitution and Its Amendments. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 1999.
Norgren, Jill and Serena Nanda. American Cultural Pluralism and Law. 2nd ed. Westport, CN: Praeger, 1996.
________. American Cultural Pluralism and Law. 3rd ed. Westport, CN: Praeger, 2006.
Parekh, Bhikhu. Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Patterson, Orlando. The Ordeal of Integration: Progress and Resentment in America’s “Racial” Crisis. New York: Basic Civitas, 1998.
Perry, Michael J. Morality, Politics and Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
________. We the People: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Pojman, Louis P. and Robert Westmoreland, eds. Equality: Selected Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Pole, J.R. The Pursuit of Equality in American History. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
Rand, Ayn. The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism.  With additional articles by Nathaniel Branden.  New York: American Library, 1964.
Renteln, Alison Dundes. The Cultural Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Rotunda, Ronald D. Constitutional Law: Principles and Cases. New York: West Publishing Company, 1987.
Sarat, Austin, ed. Race, Law and Culture: Reflections on Brown v. Board of Education. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Sarat, Austin and Thomas R. Kearns, eds. Cultural Pluralism, Identity Politics, and the Law.  Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1999.
Schlesinger, Jr., Arthur. The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society. New York: Norton, 1992.
Schwartz, Bernard, ed. The Fourteenth Amendment: A Century in American Law and Life. New York: New York University Press, 1970.
_________. Behind Bakke: Affirmative Action and the Supreme Court. New York: New York University Press, 1988.
________. A History of the Supreme Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Seidman, Louis Michael. Constitutional Law: Equal Protection of the Laws. New York: Foundation Press, 2003.
Shachar, Ayelet. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Shweder, Richard, Martha Minow, and Hazel Rose Markus, eds. Engaging Cultural Differences: The Multicultural Challenge in Liberal Democracies. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002.
Siegel, David J. The Call for Diversity: Pressure, Expectation, and Organizational Response in the Postsecondary Setting. New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2003.
Sturgess, H. A. C., and Arthur R. Hewitt, A Dictionary of Legal Terms and Citations. London: Sir Issac Pitman & Sons, Ltd., 1934.
Sykes, Charles J. A Nation of Victims: The Decay of American Character. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
Taylor, Charles. Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.
TenBroek, Jacobus. Equal Under Law. New York: Collins Books, 1965.
Tindall, George Brown, and David E. Shi, America: A Narrative History, Vol. 1, brief 4th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.
________, America: A Narrative History, Vol. 2, brief 4th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America, Vol. II. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963.
Todorov, Tzvetan. On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought, translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke, And Equality: Christian Foundations of John Locke’s Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Wilkinson III, J H. From Brown to Bakke: The Supreme Court and School Integration: 1954-1978. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.
Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.


C. Theses/Dissertations
Ho, Edward Tze-Lu. Libertarian Natural Autonomy As Justice. Ph.D. diss. Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003.
Song, Sarah Seong-Sim. Culture, Gender and Equality.  Ph.D. diss. Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America, 2004.

D. Journals, Articles, and Other Sources
Adams, Samuel. “The Rights of the Colonists,” the Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting in 1772, retrieved 6 February 2007 on the World Wide Web: http://www.constitution.org/bcp/right_col.htm
“Asian Students Punished Most Severely for Cheating: Lawyer,” The China Post, Vol. XLI, No. 18,5611, Taipei, Taiwan (24 May 2007): 5.
Berger, Randall R. and Jeremy Hein. “Immigrants, Culture, and American Courts: A Typology of Legal Strategies and Issues in Cases Involving Vietnamese and Hmong Litigants,” Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Spring 2001): 38-61.
Chiu, Daina C. “The Cultural Defense: Beyond Exclusion, Assimilation and Guilty Liberalism,” California Law Review, Vol. 82 (July 1994): 1053-1125.
Choi, Carolyn. “Application of a Cultural Defense in Criminal Proceedings.” 8 UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 80 (1990): 80-90. 
Clinton, Olabisi L. “Cultural Differences and Sentencing Departures.” Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 5, No. 6 (May/June 1993): 348-352.
Coleman, Doriane Lambelet. “Individualizing Justice through Multiculturalism: The Liberals’ Dilemma.” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 96. No. 5 (1996): 1093-1167.
DeBenedictis, Don J. “Judges Debate Cultural Defense.” A.B.A. J. (December 1992): 28-29.
Deiser, George F. “The Jurisdic Person. I,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, Vol. 57, No. 3, Vol. 48 New Series. (December 1908): 131-142.
D’Souza, Dinesh. “What’s So Great About America?” Speech delivered on 23 February 2006 at The Heritage Foundation.  Retrieved 24 February 2007 on the World Wide Web: http://www.heritage.org/Research/PoliticalPhilosophy/
fp1.cfm?renderforprint=1
Dworkin, Ronald. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 14, No. 3 (1985): 223-251.
Fiss, Owen M. “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Winter 1976): 107-177.
Frank, John P. and Robert F. Munro, “The Original Understanding of ‘Equal Protection of the Laws,’” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 2 (Feb. 1950): 131-169.
Freedman, Ann E. “Sex Equality, Sex Differences, and the Supreme Court,” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 92, No. 6 (May 1983): 913-968
Johnson, James. “Why Respect Culture?” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, No. 3 (2000): 405-419.
Klarman, Michael J. “The Supreme Court and Black Disenfranchisement,” University of Virginia Law School: Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series (2005), retrieved 14 May 2007 from The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) on the World Wide Web: http://law.bepress.com/uvalwps/uva_publiclaw/art25.
Kukathas, Chandran.  “Are There Any Cultural Rights?” Political Theory, Vol. 20 (1992): 105-139.
Lam, Anh T. “Culture As a Defense: Preventing Judicial Bias Against Asians and Pacific Islanders,” Asian American Pacific Islands Law Journal, Vol. 1 (Feb. 1993): 49-68.
Levin, Michael E. “Equality of Opportunity,” The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 123 (April 1981): 110-125.
Levy, Jacob T. “Classifying Cultural Rights,” Ethnicity and Group Rights, ed. Ian Shapiro and Will Kymlicka (New York: New York University Press, 1997): 22-66.
Lyman, John C. “Notes: Cultural Defense: Viable Doctrine or Wishful Thinking?” Criminal Justice Journal, Vol. 9 (1986): 87-117.
Margalit, Avishai and Joseph Raz. “National Self-Determination,” Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 87, No. 9 (1990): 439-461.
Magnarella, Paul J. “Justice in a Culturally Pluralistic Society: The Cultural Defense on Trial,” Journal of Ethnic Studies, Vol. 19 (1991): 65-84.
Margalit, Avishai, and Mosha Halbertal, “Liberalism and the Right to Culture,” Social Research, Vol. 61 (1994): 501-506
Mason, George. “The Virginia Bill of Rights,” Documents Illustrative of American History: 1606-1863. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons (1886): 206-207.
Naverson, Jan, “On Dworkinian Equality,” Social Philosophy & Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn 1983): 1-23.
O’Brien, Sharon. “Cultural Rights in the United States: A Conflict of Values,” Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 2 (July 1987): 267-358.
Oliver, Myrna. “Cultural-Defense -- A Legal Tactic,” L.A. Times (15 July 1988): 1.
Renteln, Alison Dundes. “A Justification of the Cultural Defense as Partial Excuse,” Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, Vol. 2 (Spring 1993): 437-526.
Sager, Lawrence G.  “The Free Exercise of Culture: Some Doubts and Distinctions,” The End of Tolerance: Engaging Cultural Differences, Daedalus, Vol. 129, No. 4 (2000): 193-208.
Sams, Julia P. Comment, “The Availability of the ‘Cultural Defense’ as an Excuse for Criminal Behavior,” Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 16 (1986): 335-354.
Sarat, Austin and Roger Berkowitz. “Disorderly Difference: Recognition, Accommodation, and American Law,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, Vol. 6 (Summer 1994): 285-314.
Scheffler, Samuel. “What is Egalitarianism?” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 31, No. 1 (2003): 5-39.
Sherman, Spencer. “When Cultures Collide,” California Lawyer (January 1986): 33-36, 60-61.
Sing, James. “Culture as Sameness: Toward a Synthetic View of Provocation and Culture in the Criminal Law,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108 (1999): 1845-1884.
Spatz, Melissa. “A ‘Lesser’ Crime: A Comparative Study of Legal Defenses for Men Who Kill Their Wives,” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, Vol. 24 (1991): 597-638.
Trevison, Catherine. “Note” Changing Sexual Assault Law and the Hmong,” Indiana Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 2 (1993): 393-414.
Trimarchi, Anthony. “US Judge Refuses to Jail Wife-Killer,” Asian Outlook (May-June 1989): 29-30.
Van Dyke, Vernon. “Justice as Fairness: For Groups?” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, No. 2 (June 1975): 607-614.
_________. “The Individual, the State, and Ethnic Communities in Political Theory,” World Politics, Vol. 29, No. 3 (April 1977): 343-369.
_________. “Collective Entities and Moral Rights: Problems in Liberal-Democratic Thought,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 44, No. 1 (February 1982): 21-40.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternatives,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 25, No. 3 & 4 (Spring and Summer 1992): 751-793.
Yen, Marianne. “Refusal to Jail Immigrant Who Killed Wife Stirs Outrage; Judge Ordered Probation for Chinese Man, Citing his “Cultural Background,” Washington Post (10 April 1989): A3. 

CHINESE PART
王玉葉[Wang, Lydia Yu-yeh],〈美國高等教育優惠待遇何去何從 -- 美國最高法院 拒絕審理Hopwood v. Texas〉 [“What is the Future of the Affirmative Action Programs in U.S. Higher Education? -- The Impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Certiorari Denial of Hopwood v. Texas”],收錄於歐美研究第34卷第3期 [EurAmerica: A Journal of European and American Studies, Vol. 34, No. 3]。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所,民國93年9月[Taipei: Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, September, 2004]: 457-509.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信