§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2706201823283000
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00881
論文名稱(中文) 低價股的幻覺:以不同國家文化差異的證據為例
論文名稱(英文) Illusion of Low-priced Stocks: Evidence from Culture Differences around the World
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 財務金融學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Banking and Finance
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 林韋伶
研究生(英文) Wei-Ling Lin
學號 606530862
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-06-30
論文頁數 46頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 陳鴻崑
委員 - 胡星陽
委員 - 王衍智
委員 - 陳鴻崑
關鍵字(中) 低價股溢酬
Hofstede文化維度理論
個人主義指數
不確定性規避指數
關鍵字(英) Low-priced premium
Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory
Individualism index
Uncertainty avoidance index
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究利用Hofstede (1980, 2010)文化維度理論作為衡量國家文化之指標,探討不同國家的文化差異是否能解釋股票市場低價股與高價股未來股票報酬率之間的差異。本文參考Chui, Titman, and Wei (2010)的研究方法,採用重複期間(overlapping)的方式來建構低價股、高價股投資組合,並且以1985年至2017年之間全球40個國家主要股票交易所中所有的普通股股票為研究對象,檢驗Hofstede個人主義指數與不確定性規避指數對低價股與高價股投資組合溢酬之影響。研究結果發現,在個人主義指數較高的國家或不確定性規避指數較低的國家,低價股與高價股投資組合的(負)溢酬差距較大,溢酬效果較明顯;反之,在個人主義指數較低的國家或在不確定性規避指數較高的國家,低價股與高價股投資組合的(負)溢酬差距較小,溢酬效果較不明顯。整體而言,低價股、高價股溢酬與個人主義指數呈現負向關係;低價股、高價股溢酬與不確定性規避指數呈現正向關係,唯後者在Fama and MacBeth (1973)橫斷面迴歸分析中並不顯著。
英文摘要
This study examines whether the differences in cultural dimensions such as individualism and uncertainty avoidance can explain the premium between low-priced stocks and high-priced stocks across countries. Using two cultural indices constructed by Hofstede (1980, 2010) and common stock returns in 40 countries over the period between 1985 and 2017, we find that the premium between low-priced stocks and high-priced stocks is higher for countries with high individualism index or countries with low uncertainty avoidance index. On the contrary, the premium between low-priced stocks and high-priced stocks is not that high for countries with low individualism index or countries with high uncertainty avoidance index. Overall, the evidence in this paper indicates that low-priced premium can be partially explained by different culture around the world.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
謝辭	I
中文摘要	II
英文摘要	III
表目錄	VI
第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究動機與背景	1
第二節	研究目的	4
第三節	研究架構	6
第二章	文獻回顧與研究假說	8
第一節	投資人偏好低價股的原因	8
第二節	Hofstede的文化維度理論	11
第三節	文化維度的差異在財務上的應用	13
第四節	Hofstede文化維度理論如何影響低價股效應	16
第三章	研究樣本與研究方法	19
第一節	研究資料	19
第二節	研究方法	20
第四章	實證結果	23
第一節	各國樣本資料期間概況	23
第二節	全球股市低價股與高價股投資組合溢酬	26
第三節	Hofstede國家文化指數與低價股、高價股投資組合溢酬關聯性分析	30
第四節	Fama and MacBeth (1973)橫斷面迴歸分析	37
第五章	結論	40
參考文獻	42


表目錄
表 1樣本資料期間概況	24
表 2低價股與高價股投資組合溢酬	27
表 3 Hofstede個人主義指數與低價股、高價股投資組合溢酬關聯性分析	31
表 4 Hofstede不確定性規避指數與低價股、高價股投資組合溢酬關聯性分析	33
表 5穩健性測試-重新檢驗低價股與高價股投資組合溢酬	35
表 6 Fama-MacBeth橫斷面迴歸分析-Hofstede個人主義指數、不確定性規避指數與低價股、高價股投資組合溢酬之關聯性分析	38
表 7 Fama-MacBeth橫斷面迴歸分析-Hofstede個人主義指數、不確定性規避指數與低價股、高價股投資組合溢酬之關聯性再分析	39
參考文獻
1. Aggarwal, R., Kearney, C., & Lucey, B., (2009, January), ‘‘Is gravity a cultural artefact? Culture and distance in foreign portfolio investment,’’ In Manuscript, FMA Annual Meeting.
2. Baker, M., Greenwood, R., & Wurgler, J., (2009), ‘‘Catering through nominal share prices,’’ Journal of Finance, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp.2559-2590.
3. Bali, T. G., & Murray, S., (2013), ‘‘Does risk-neutral skewness predict the cross-section of equity option portfolio returns?,’’ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp.1145-1171.
4. Barberis, N., & Huang, M., (2008), ‘‘Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices,’’ American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 5, pp.2066-2100.
5. Barberis, N., Mukherjee, A., & Wang, B., (2016), ‘‘Prospect theory and stock returns: an empirical test,’’ Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 29, No. 11, pp.3068-3107.
6. Biais, B., Hilton, D., Mazurier, K., & Pouget, S., (2005), ‘‘Judgemental overconfidence, self-monitoring, and trading performance in an experimental financial market,’’ Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp.287-312.
7. Birru, J., & Wang, B., (2015), ‘‘The Nominal Price Premium,’’ working paper.
8. Birru, J., & Wang, B., (2016), ‘‘Nominal price illusion,’’ Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp.578-598.
9. Bond, M. H., (1991), ‘‘Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology,’’ Oxford University Press, USA.
10. Boyer, B. H., & Vorkink, K., (2014), ‘‘Stock options as lotteries,’’ Journal of Finance, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp.1485-1527.
11. Boyer, B., Mitton, T., & Vorkink, K., (2010), ‘‘Expected idiosyncratic skewness,’’ Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.169-202.
12. Bryan, S., Nash, R., & Patel, A., (2015), ‘‘The effect of cultural distance on contracting decisions: The case of executive compensation,’’ Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 33, pp.180-195.
13. Chui, A. C., Titman, S., & Wei, K. J., (2010), ‘‘Individualism and momentum around the world,’’ Journal of Finance, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp.361-392.
14. Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Del Prado, A. M., Ortiz, F. A., Mastor, K. A., Harumi, Y., ... & Miramontes, L. G., (2006), ‘‘Implicit theories and self-perceptions of traitedness across cultures: Toward integration of cultural and trait psychology perspectives,’’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp.694-716.
15. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A., (1998), ‘‘Investor psychology and security market under and overreactions,’’ Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp.1839-1885.
16. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R., (1992), ‘‘The cross‐section of expected stock returns,’’ Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.427-465.
17. Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D., (1973), ‘‘Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests,’’ Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp.607-636.
18. Fidrmuc, J. P., & Jacob, M., (2008), ‘‘A cultural explanation of agency model of dividends,’’ Working Paper (available from SSRN).
19. Green, T. C., & Hwang, B. H., (2009), ‘‘Price-based return comovement,’’ Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp.37-50.
20. Hofstede, G., (1980), ‘‘Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values,’’ Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
21. Hofstede, G., (1983), ‘‘The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories,’’ Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.75-89.
22. Hofstede, G., (1984), ‘‘Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values,’’ Vol. 5, SAGE Publications Inc.
23. Hofstede, G., (2001), ‘‘Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations,’’ 2nd edn, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
24. Hofstede, G., Hofstede G. J., & Minkov, M., (2010), ‘‘Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind,’’ Revised and Expanded 3rd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Hong, D., Lee, C., & Swaminathan, B., (2003), ‘‘Earnings momentum in international markets,’’ Cornell University working paper.
26. Kagitcibasi, C., (1997), ‘‘Individualism and collectivism,’’ Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 3, pp.1-49.
27. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A., (1979), ‘‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,’’ Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp.263-291.
28. Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B., (2006), ‘‘A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework,’’ Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.285-320.
29. Kogut, B., & Singh, H., (1988), ‘‘The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode,’’ Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp.411-432.
30. Kumar, A., (2009), ‘‘Who gambles in the stock market?,’’ Journal of Finance, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp.1889-1933.
31. Kwok, C. C., & Tadesse, S., (2006), ‘‘National culture and financial systems,’’ Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp.227-247.
32. Li, K., Griffin, D., Yue, H., & Zhao, L., (2013), ‘‘How does culture influence corporate risk-taking?,’’ Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 23, pp.1-22.
33. Markowitz, H., (1952), ‘‘The utility of wealth,’’ Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp.151-158.
34. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S., (1991), ‘‘Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation,’’ Psychological Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp.224.
35. Minkov, M., (2007), ‘‘What makes us different and similar: a new interpretation of the world values and other cross-cultural data,’’ Sofia, Bulgaria: Klasika i Stil Publishing House.
36. Mitton, T., & Vorkink, K., (2007), ‘‘Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness,’’ Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.1255-1288.
37. Newey, W. K., & West, K. D., (1987), ‘‘A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix,’’ Econometrica, Vol. 55, pp.703–708.
38. Ramirez, A., & Tadesse, S. A., (2007), ‘‘Corporate cash holdings, national culture, and multinationality,’’ Working Paper: William Davidson Institute No. 876, Ann Arbor.
39. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D., (1992), ‘‘Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty,’’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.297-323.
40. Weld, W. C., Michaely, R., Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S., (2009), ‘‘The nominal share price puzzle,’’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp.121-42.
41. Zuckerman, M., (1979), ‘‘Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory,’’ Journal of Personality, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.245-287.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信