§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2706201504303700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2015.00953
論文名稱(中文) 風險態度對就業部門期望的實證分析-問卷與實驗調查
論文名稱(英文) Experiments on Risk Attitude and the Preference for Employment Sector
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 經濟學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Economics
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 103
學期 2
出版年 104
研究生(中文) 許雅婷
研究生(英文) Ya-Ting Hsu
學號 602570011
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2015-06-15
論文頁數 52頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 林彥伶(yenling@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 蔡偉德(tsai20121212@gmail.com)
委員 - 江莉莉(lily3@mail.tku.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 風險態度
就業選擇
公部門
兩階段估計
實驗
關鍵字(英) Risk Attitude
Employment Sector
Public Sector
the Two-stage Regression
Experiments
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本文探討形成風險態度的可能因素與對就業部門選擇的影響。人的一生經常要面對選擇,選擇時的風險態度並非與生俱來,會經由許多因素逐漸累積形成,因此本文將從三個面向做探討,分別是個人特徵、家庭因素、與學校因素,再將所形成的風險態度觀察對就業部門選擇的影響。
    本文的資料來源是利用問卷與活動的形式來蒐集,問卷主要蒐集個人、家庭及學校的特徵變數,活動的部分則以遊戲的方式來評估受訪者的風險態度。蒐集對象從小學生到碩士生,共335筆樣本,皆為尚未就業之樣本,修正過去文獻採用就業樣本的缺點。迴歸估計為兩階段分析,第一階段估計影響風險態度的因素,第二階段以第一階段的預測值估計風險態度對就業部門選擇的影響。
    實證結果顯示,女性較男性保守,年齡較大者、獨生子女、都市樣本、與父母同住、在學校有擔任班級幹部、有知心好友、或與老師關係較好等的受訪者會較有較積極的風險態度。而風險態度較保守的人傾向選擇公部門,風險態度較為積極的人偏好私部門就業,此效果特別顯著是高中以上的受訪者,可能與樣本較接近就業階段有關。
英文摘要
This study examines the effects of risk attitude on the choice of employment sector. Risk attitude is not innate on individuals but is formed by their life history. We investigate the formation of risk attitude by considering three dimensions, individual characters, family, and school, and then predict the preference on employment sector. 
All of the observations in this study were collected by questionnaire and games from non-employment observations, and we revised the sampling problems in literature.
The two-stage regression results show that female observations have more negative risk attitudes than male observations, but the observations that were older, the only child, urban, or live with parents have relatively positive risk attitudes.If individuals have better relations with classmates or teachers, they also have positive risk attitudes.
Finally,the people who have relatively negative risk attitudeshave higher probabilities to choose the public sector employment, especially for those observations who were senior high school student sand university students.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
1 研究動機1
2 文獻回顧4
2.1 形成風險態度的因素6
2.2 風險態度對選擇的影響7
2.3 風險態度的衡量 9
3 理論背景11
4 實證分析13
4.1 資料來源及說明13
4.2 實證變數說明 17
4.3 實證模型設定21
5 實證結果分析23
6 結論31
參考文獻33
表目錄38
表1: 實驗變數的敘述統計38
表2: 風險態度的實驗迴歸結果—全體樣本39
表3: 風險態度的實驗迴歸結果—依性別40
表4: 風險態度的實驗迴歸結果—依學籍44
表5: 風險態度的實驗迴歸結果—高中以上樣本48
圖1: 研究流程圖49
圖2: 風險趨避50
圖3: 風險愛好50
附錄一51
參考文獻
參考文獻
中文部分:
王培臻、單驥(2000), 「風險態度與就業選擇」, 經社法制論叢, 26, pp.129-165。
石決(2008), 單親家庭青少年偏差行為成因之研究: 權力控制理論的觀點, 犯罪與
刑事司法研究, 10, pp.51-90。
宋明哲(2007), 現代風險管理, 五南圖書。
林淨英(2012), 風險態度與模糊態度之間的關係, 國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士
論文。
吳統雄(1984), 電話調查理論與方法, 聯經出版社。
許慧琳(2010), 投資人對金融商品的風險態度與投資決策行為: 行為財務學的觀點,
國立高雄第一科技大學管理研究所博士論文。
陳滄河(1985), 我國執業會計師風險態度與情境因素、人格特質關係之研究, 國立
政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
張春雄、林顯達、黃新宗、劉美芳(2003), 風險管理, 吉田出版社。
鄧家駒(1998), 風險管理, 華泰文化。

英文部分:
Adler, A. (1932) What Life Could Mean to You, Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Beck, U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft-Auf DemWeg in Eine Andere Moderne, Suhrkamp,Frankfurt.
Berndt, T. J. (1982) “The Features and Effects of Friendship in Earlyadolescence,”Child Development, 53(6), pp.1447-1460.
Bosch-Domenech, A. and J. Silvestre (1999) “Does Risk Aversion or Attraction
Depend on Income? An Experiment,” Economics Letters, 65(3), pp.265-273.
Byrne, K. (2005) “How Do Consumers Evaluate Risk in Financial Products?,” Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), pp.21-36.
Buurman, M., J. Delfgaauw, R. Dur, and S. Van den Bossche (2012) “Public Sector Employees:Risk Averse and Altruistic?,” Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization, 83(3), pp.279-291.
Calhoun, R. E. and S. L. Hutchison (1981) “DecisionMaking in Old Age:Cautiousness and Rigidity,” International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 13(2),pp.89-98.
Chaubey, N. P. (1974) “Effect of Age on Expectancy of Success and on Risk-Taking Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(6), pp.774-778.
Cohn, L. D., S.Macfarlane, C. Yanez, andW. K. Imai (1995) “Risk-Perception:Differences between Adolescents and Adults,” Health Psychol,14(3),pp.217-22.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) “Coefficient Alpha and The Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Denenberg H. S., Eilers, R. D., Hoffman, G. W., Kline, C. A. Melone, J. J. and Snider, H.W. (1964) “Risk and Insurance Englewood Cliffs,” New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
Drevets, R. K., S. L. Bebton and F. O. Bradley (1996) “Students’ Perceptions of Parents’ Qualities of Interpersonal Relations.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
25(6), pp.787-802.
Donkers, B., B. Melenberg, and A. van Soest (2001) “Estimating Risk Attitudes Using Lotteries : A Large Sample Approach,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,22(2), pp.165-195
Ekelund, J., E. Johansson, M. R. Jarvelin, and D. Lichtermann (2005) “Self Employment and Risk Aversion: Evidence from Psychological Test Data,” Labour
Economics, 12(5), pp.649-659.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge,Mass.:Polity Press.
Graham-Bermann, S. and Gest,S. (1991) Sibling and Peer Relations in Socially Rejected, Average, and Popular Children, ERIC Document Reproduction Service
.NO. ED332822.
Graham, J. A., Cohen, R., and MacDonald, C. (1997) A Longitudinal Study of Awareness of Peer Liking on Children’s Peer Relationships, ERIC Document Reproduction Service .NO.ED414015.
Jorion, P. (1997) Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk,Irwin Professional:Illinois
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47(2), pp.263-291.
Knight, F. H. (1921) “Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit,” Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.
Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (2006) The Construction of Preference, New York:Cambridge University Press.
Okun, A. M. (1976) “Adult Age and Cautiousness in Decision: A Review of the Literature,” Human Development, 19(4), pp.220-233.
Parker, J. G. and Asher, S. R. (1987) “Peer Relations and Later Personal Adjustment: Are Low-Accepted Children at Risk ?” Psychological Bulletin, 102(3),pp.357-389.
Patterson, G. D. (1986) “Performance Models for Antisocial Boys,” American Psychologist, 41(4), pp.432-444.
Pfeifer, C. (2011) “Risk Aversion and Sorting Into Public Sector Employment,”German Economic Review, 12(1), pp.85-99.
Pettigrew,T. F. (1958) “The Measurement and Correlates of Category Width as a Cognitive Variable,” Journal of Personality, 26(4), pp.532-544.
Pissarides, C. A. (1990) Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, London: Basil Blackwell.
Rhodes, J. E. and L. A. Jason(1990) “A Social Stress Model of Substance Abuse.”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(4), pp.395-401.
Said, M. (2011) “Risk Aversion and the Preference for Public Sector Employment:Evidence from Egyptian Labor Survey Data,” International Journal of Economics and Research, 2(5), pp.132-143.
Sitkin, S. B. and A. L. Pablo (1992) “Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior,” Academy of Management Review, 17(1), pp. 9-38.
Sitkin, S. B. and L. R. Weingart (1995) “Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity,”
Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), pp.1573-1582.
Shaw, K. L. (1996) “An Empirical Analysis of Risk Aversion and Income Growth,”
Journal of Labor Economics, 14(4), pp.626-653.
Theil, H. (1964) Optimal Decision Rules for Government and Industry, Amsterdam:North-
Holland.
Thomas, G., M. p. Farrell and G. M. Barnes (1996) “The Effects of Single-Mother Families and Nonresident Fathers on Delinquency and Substance Abuse In Black
and White Adolescents,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(4), pp.884-894.
Trautmann, S. T., F. M. Vieider and P. P. Wakker (2011) “Preference Reversal for Ambiguity Aversion,” Management Science, 57(7), pp.1320-1333.
Von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press.
Wallach, M. A. and N. Kogan (1959) “Sex Differences and Judgment Processes,”Journal of Personality, 27(4), pp.555-564.
Willet, A. H. (1951) “ The Economic Theory of Risk and Insurance,” Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
Zuckerman, M. (1979) Sensation Seeking : Beyond the Optional Level of Arousal.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信