淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-2706201311111400
中文論文名稱 以產業互補性論歐盟與東協雙邊貿易協定之可行性
英文論文名稱 The Feasibilities of an EU-ASEAN FTA through Complementarity Analysis
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 國際企業學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Master's Program, Department Of International Business
學年度 101
學期 2
出版年 102
研究生中文姓名 曾姿菁
研究生英文姓名 Tzu-ching Tseng
學號 600550197
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
口試日期 2013-06-16
論文頁數 81頁
口試委員 指導教授-鮑世亨
委員-蔡政言
委員-陳財家
中文關鍵字 經濟整合  自由貿易協定  貿易互補性  貿易創造效果  貿易移轉效果  顯示性比較利益指數 
英文關鍵字 Economic Integration  FTA  Trade Complementarity  Trade Creation Effect  Trade Diversion Effect  Revealved Comparartive Advantage 
學科別分類
中文摘要 近幾年,受到自由貿易協定風潮及中國大陸崛起的影響,新一波的東亞區域整合態勢興起。在東亞區域整合中,主要以東協(Association of South East Asian
Nations Asean,以下簡稱東協、ASEAN ) 為軸心。各國在這股區域整合推力之下,積極參與自由貿易協定 (FTA)。但在多邊架構下 (如WTO),其談判過程牽涉到多國不同經濟利益與政治考量,這些因素使得多邊協定耗時且推行不易。鑑於雙邊的快速及其彈性與應變能力,許多國加紛紛由「多邊」轉為「雙邊」,積極透過雙邊協定與東協協商以強化其政治及貿易地位。

在這一波雙邊協定熱潮下,歐盟亦改變其貿易政策,由多邊貿易政策調整為雙邊貿易。歐盟向來積極支持多邊貿易體系,但礙於其談判進展有限,使得歐盟不得不將雙邊FTA列為促進貿易自由化的重要手段以強化歐盟產業及競爭力。由於東協有龐大市場機會及發展潛力與高度貿易保護,歐盟將東協列為FTA洽談對象,並於二○○七展開雙邊貿易協商。然而在七次談判後,歐盟與東協於二○○九年同意暫停談判。

本研究旨在研究探討歐盟-東協雙邊貿易協議之可行性。首先,研究者透過福利水準變化來分析FTA為歐盟及東協貿易協定的潛力。其次,研究者透過顯示性比較利益指數(Revealed Comprative Advantage,以下稱為RCA)及貿易互補性指數(Trade Complementarity Index,以下稱為TCI)來衡量產業互補性,以評估FTA的可行性。首先,研究者利用顯示性比較利益指數為歐盟與東協的貿易競爭力進行評比。研究發現兩方各自的產業優勢具有互補性。接著,研究者透過計算出兩國各個產業的TCI來衡量兩方產業結構的互補程度,研究顯示歐盟與東協在三十七個品項上具有互補性。綜合所有分析,本人認為歐盟及東協可藉由強化彼此優勢商品的合作來發揮各自優勢。
英文摘要 Regionalism is not only an issue in the western world, it is also underway in the Asia Pacific region. The rapid development of China and increasing popular of free trade agreements (FTA) are the forces for the wave of integration in the Asia Pacific region, where the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is the leading group to push for integration. The force of integration arouses countries’ interest in FTA for economic, financial, and political and security purposes. However, multilateral trade agreements are time-consuming and inefficient when involving economic and political interests of many countries in the world. In terms of flexibility and efficiency, more and more countries switch their attention from multilateral to bilateral FTAs, and seize the chance to sign a FTA with ASEAN to build political confidence and promote economic development.

The EU was strongly committed to multilateralism in the early years. However, the inefficiency and inflexibility of multilateralism urge the EU to shift to a policy that enter into bilateral FTAs to facilitate the EU’s free market, ensure its competitiveness and reinforce political power. Taking ASEAN’s market potential and protectionism into consideration, the EU launched a FTA talk with ASEAN in 2007. However, the EU-ASEAN FTA was forced to a halt in 2009 after seven rounds of negotiations.

The purpose of this research is to study the feasibilities of an EU-ASEAN FTA. First of all, the researcher applies theory of trade effect to examine the potentialities of a FTA between the EU and ASEAN by observing the likelihood of welfare change. Then, the study moves to complementarity analysis. In this study, Revealved Comparative Advantage (RCA) and Trade Complementarity Index (TCI) are used to appraise the degree of trade complementarity. Firstly, the RCA results show that products the EU and ASEAN specialize in are complementary. Secondly, the computations of TC indices show that complementarity exists in 37 product sectors. To conclude all the findings, the researcher believes that a FTA can be a win-win opportunity if the EU and ASEAN intensify cooperation in these complementary product sectors.
論文目次 I. Introduction 1

1.1 Study Background 1

1.2 Research Project and Motivation 2

1.3 Research Purpose 3

1.4 Research Scope 3

1.5 Research Structure 3

1.6 Research Flow Chart 4

II. Literature Review 5

2.1 The European Union 5

2.2 ASEAN 8

2.3 Economic Integration 10

2.3.1 Five Stages of Economic Integration 10

2.3.1 Trade Effects: Static and Dynamic 13

2.4 EU-ASEAN Relations and Trade Agreements 17

2.4.1 EU-ASEAN Trade and Investment Flow 17

2.4.2 EU-ASEAN Free Trade Agreements 18

2.5 Discussions over the Feasibility of FTAs 20

2.5.1 Discussions through Trade Effect 20

2.5.2 Discussions through RCA Indices 22

2.5.3 Discussions through TCI 24

III. Methodology 26

3.1 Research Design 26

3.2 Method 26

3.2.1 Trade Effects 26

3.2.2 Revealed Comparative Advantage Index 27

3.2.3 Trade Complementarity Index 29

IV. Research Findings 31

4.1 Potential Trade Effects of An EU-ASEAN FTA 31

4.2 Trade Complementarity Between the EU and ASEAN 41

4.2.1 Revealed Comparative Advantage 41

4.2.2 Trade Complementarity Index 54

V. Conclusion 61

5.1 Conclusion 61

5.2 Research Limitations and Implication 62

References 63

Appendix A: Harmonized System Classification at 2-Digits (2002 Version)69
Appendix B: RCA Results Computed at HS 2-Digit 76
Appendix C: RCA Results Computed at HS 2-Digit Commodity (ASEAN) 79

List of Figures

Figure 1-1: Research Flow Chart 4

Figure 2-1: Trade Creation and Trade Diversion 16

Figure 4-1: Case 1 : A>E>W 34

Figure 4-2: Case 1 : A>E>W ( looking at the EU as an exporter) 34

Figure 4-3: Case 2 : A>W>E ( looking at the EU as an exporter) 35

Figure 4-4: Case 3 : E>A>W 36

Figure 4-5: Case 4 : E>W>A 37

Figure 4-6: Case 5 : W>E>A 38

Figure 4-7: Case 6 : W>A>E ( looking at the EU as an exporter) 39

List of Tables

Table 2-1: The EU’s Main Trade Partners and Trade Balance with ASEAN 17

Table 2-2: ASEAN’s Main Trade Partners and Trade Balance with the EU 18

Table 2-3: FDI Inflows into ASEAN Member Countries, 2002-2009 19

Table 4-1: The Likelihood of Trade Effect A FTA Brings to the EU and ASEAN 32

Table 4-2: The EU and ASEAN’s RCA for 16 Product Groups, 2007-2011 42

Table 4-3: A Comparison of the EU and ASEAN RCA at Product Groups Level 47

Table 4-4: A Comparison of the EU and ASEAN RCA at 2-digit HS Level 52

Table 4-5: TCI between the EU and ASEAN at 2-digit HS Code Level 54

Table 4-6: TCI between the EU and ASEAN at 2-digit HS Code Level 58






參考文獻 ASEAN. (2013). Industry Focus. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community/item/industry-focus
Andreosso-O'Callaghan, B., Nicolas, F. (2007). Assessing the complementary between the EU and ASEAN economies. Retrieved May 28, 2013 fromhttp://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/asean_economic_bulletin/v024/24.2ocallaghan.html
Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2013). ASEAN Charter. Retrieved May 26, 2013 from http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-charter
Astuto , M. (2010, October). EU-ASEAN Free trade agreement- negotiations. Retrieved October, 2010 from http://www.ispionline.it/it/documents/Analysis_26_2010.pdf
Balassa B. (1963). The Theory of Economic Integration (pp. 2). Illinois, United States: Richard D. Irwin.
Bilateral Organization, “FTAs”, 2012, available at < http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?rubrique30 >, ccessed 26 May 26, 2013.
Camroux, D. (2008). The European Union and ASEAN: Two to Tango? Paris: Notre Europe. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://www.notre-europe.eu/media/Etude65EU-ASEAN-en.pdf
Chandran, B., P., S. (2010). Trade Compatibility between India and Asean Countries. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/33138/
Cheong, J., Wong, K.Y. (2009). Free Trade Agreement and Welfare: Is Trade Diversion More Detrimental? Retrieved May 27, 2013 from http://www.rcie-cn.org/workshops/1209/papers/cheong-wong.pdf
Cuyvers, L. (1995). The Trade Diversion Effects on ASEAN of the European Union Enlargment with EFTA Countries and the Association Agreements with Eastern Europe. Retrieved May 27, 2013 from http://webhost.ua.ac.be/cas/PDF/CAS04.pdf
Chen, L.J. (2008). The organization and the operation of EU. Taiwan, Wunan Publisher.
European Commission. (2006, May 3). Economic Analysis in Support of Bilateral and Multilateral Trade Negotiation. Retrieved May 26, 2013 from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2007/may/tradoc_134706.pdf
European Commission. (2010, October 26). Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, EEC Treaty. Retrieved May 26, 2013, from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/treaties_eec_en.htm
European Commission. (2012, June 6). The Competitiveness and Sustainable Growth of the Automotive Industry in the European Union. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/automotive/files/cars-21-final-report-2012_en.pdf
European Parliament (April 3, 2003) Report on Regional Free Trade Areas and Trade Strategy in the European Union.
Hernandez, C.G. (May 26, 2013). Institution Building Through An Asean Charter. Retrieved May 26, 2013,from http://www.kas.de/upload/auslandshomepages/singapore/Hernandez_AseanCharta.pdf
Holst, D., R. , Weiss, J. (2004). ASEAN and China: Export Rivals or Partners in Regional Growth? Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://are.berkeley.edu/~dwrh/Docs/RH_Weiss_WorldEconomy05.pdf
Hosein, R., Khadan, J. (2011). Exploring the Potential Benefits of the Proposed
CARICOM-Canada Free Trade Arrangement (FTA). Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://www2.southeastern.edu/orgs/econjournal/index_files/JIGES%20JUNE%202011%20HOSEIN%20KHADAN%205-2-2011.pdf
ISPI. (2010, October). EU-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement Negotiations. Retrieved May 26, 2013 from http://www.ispionline.it/it/documents/Analysis_26_2010.pdf
Kose, M.A., Riezman, R. (1999). Understanding the Welfare Implications of
Preferential Trade Agreements. (CSGR Working Paper No.45) University of Warwick, UK: Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. Retrieved May 27, 2013 from http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/9539/1/Understanding%20the%20Welfare%20Implications%20of%20Preferential%20Trade%20Agreements.pdf?1
Krishna, P. (1998). Preferential Trade Agreements and the World Trade System: A
Multilateralist View. Retrieved May 27, 2013 from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12584.pdf
Nandasiri, K. , Jung, H. (2008). FTA Influence on Trade Creation and Diversion by
Regional Trading Blocs. Retrieved from May 27, 2013 from http://www.akes.or.kr/akes/downfile/5.%20FTA%20and%20RTB%20Final%20Paper%20by%20Nandasiri(8.22).pdf
Nello, S.S. (2005). The European Union : economics, policies and history. Maidenhead, England : McGraw-Hill Education
Pholphiru, P. (2010). Does AFTA Create More Trade for Thailand? An Investigation of Some Key Trade Indicators. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29, 1, 51-78. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/209
Sanglimsuwan, K., Suanmali, S., Niyomsinth, S., Rawisara Thalaengkij, R. (2012). The Export Growth and Revealed Comparative Advantage of Thailand to India’s Construction Industry. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://www.wbiconpro.com/226-Suthathip.pdf
Schott, J. J. (Ed.). (2004). Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economic (pp.117-171). Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://www.petersoninstitute.org/publications/chapters_preview/375/06iie3616.pdf
Serin, V. , Civan, A. (2008). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: A Case Study for Turkey towards the EU. Retrieved May 27, 2013 from http://www.fatih.edu.tr/~jesr/jesr.serin.civan.pdf
Shimizu, K. (2011). The ASEAN Charter and the ASEAN Economic Community. Economic Journal of Hokkaido University, 40, 73-87. Retrieved May 26, 2013 from http://eprints2008.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/47731/1/EJHU_40_73.pdf
Tinbergen J (1954), International Economic Integration, Amsterdam: Elsevier
USITC. (2010). ASEAN: Regional Trends in Economic Integration, Export Competitiveness, and Inbound Investment for Selected Industries. (USITC Publication 4176). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved 26 May, 2013 from http://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4176.pdf
Widodo, T. (2009). Dynamic Comparative Advantages in the ASEAN+3. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.e-jei.org%2Ffunc%2Fdownload.php%3Fpath%3DL2hvbWUvdmlydHVhbC9qZWkvam91cm5hbC91cGxvYWQvMVY4NDE2UTZXVTA2MTM3Mi5wZGY%3D%26filename%3DMVY4NDE2UTZXVTA2MTM3Mi5wZGY%3D&ei=8gykUc6dMNCviQf_wIHwDw&usg=AFQjCNEscOXxMbAxA8S5H2qzdLBrorrufg&sig2=waEUL428DW9s827a0suG-A&bvm=bv.47008514,d.aGc
Woolcock, S. (2007). European Union policy towards Free Trade Agreements ( ECIPE Working Paper No. 3 ). Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for International Political Economy. Retrieved May 26, 2013 from http://www.ecipe.org/publications/european-union-policy-towards-free-trade-agreements/
World Trade Organization (2013) Trade Profile of the EU 27. Retrieved May 26, 2013 from http://stat.wto.org/CountryProfile/WSDBCountryPFView.aspx?Language=E&Country=E27
Van der Geest, W. (2004) An EU-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Sharing Benefits of Globalisation. Retrieved May 26, 2013 from European Institute for Asian Studies Web site: http://www.eias.org/conferences/euaseam4/willem.pdf
Viner, J. (1937) Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers. Retrieved 26 May, 2013 from http://www.econlib.org/library/NPDBooks/Viner/vnSTT8.html#Chapter 8
Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: New York. Retrieved 26 May, 2013 from http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/cmagee/Trade%20Creation,%20Trade%20Diversion%20and%20Endogenous%20Regionalism.pdf
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2013-06-28公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2013-06-28起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信