在實驗室先前的研究發現在BJ2168菌株中過度表現ADH3p會使得粒線體型態產生分裂的狀況，但是BJ2168為蛋白酶缺陷菌株，為了驗證在一般菌株亦有一樣效果，本實驗使用BY4742和ΔADH3（BY4741）菌株過度表現ADH3p來驗證此結果，最後發現在BY4742菌株中亦有同樣結果，但是在ΔADH3菌株中，可能因為ADH3p表現量不足，導致粒線體型態呈現融合的狀態。

In previous studies, we found that overexpression ADH3p in BJ2168 will let mitochondria fission. BJ2168 is protease-deficient stain. In order to verify the result in BY4742 and ΔADH3(BY4741) strain, we did the same experiments to verify the results. Finally, in BY4742 strain, it had the same result. But in ADH3Δstrain, it looked different. It might be due to insufficient amount ADH3p.

目錄
謝誌I
中文摘要	II
英文摘要	III
圖目錄	VI
表目錄	VII
ADH3p的表現在酵母菌BY4742和ΔADH3（BY4741）中對粒線體型態的影響	1
第一章	緒論	1
1.1	前言	1
1.2	文獻回顧	2
1.3	研究動機	3
第二章	材料與方法	4
2.1	實驗材料	4
2.1.1	菌株	4
2.1.2	實驗藥品器材	4
2.1.3	實驗儀器	5
2.2	實驗方法	5
2.2.1	E. coli 質體抽取	6
2.2.2	S. cerevisiae 勝任細胞製備	6
2.2.3	S. cerevisiae transformation（heat shock method）	7
2.2.4	菌種保存	8
2.2.5	粒線體型態觀察	9
2.2.6	SDS-PAGE分析	10
第三章	實驗結果	11
3.1	粒線體型態觀察	11
3.2	SDS-PAGE分析	13
第四章	討論	16
附錄	17
一、	酵母菌隨機突變	17
二、	常用藥品組成	44
LB（Solid）	44
LB（Liquid）	44
Phosphate-buffered saline（PBS）	44
SC-dropout（Liquid）	45
dropout（Solid）	45
SDS running buffer	45
Separating gel（SDS-page下層膠）	46
Stacking gel（SDS-page上層膠）	46
YPD medium	46
YPD plate	47
三、	載體	47
1.	pGEMR-T Easy Vector（Promega）[41]	47
參考資料	48

圖目錄
第一部分ADH3p的表現在酵母菌BY4742和ΔADH3（BY4741）中對粒線體型態的影響
圖1 粒線體氧化磷酸化示意圖	1
圖2 實驗流程	6
圖3 過度誘導ADH3p一天於BY4742的粒線體型態分裂比例	11
圖4 過度誘導ADH3p一天於BY4742的粒線體型態	12
圖5 過度誘導ADH3p三天於ΔADH3（BY4741）的粒線體型態分裂比例	12
圖6 過度誘導ADH3p 三天於ΔADH3（BY4741）的粒線體型態	13
圖7過度誘導ADH3p的SDS-page(菌株：BY4742、誘導時間:1天、電泳條件：120V 2.5小時、ADH3-GFP 分子量: 67.27 kDa)	14
圖8過度誘導ADH3p的SDS-page(菌株：ΔADH3(BY4741)、誘導時間:3天、電泳條件：200V 1小時、ADH3-GFP 分子量: 67.27 kDa)	15

表目錄
ADH3p的表現在酵母菌BY4742和ΔADH3(BY4741)中對粒線體型態的影響
表1  TE/LiOAc/DTT buffer配方	7
表2  PTLAD配方	8

參考資料
1.	Bereiter-Hahn, J. and M. VOTH, Metabolie Control of Shape and Strueture of Mitoehondria in situ. Biol Cell, 1983. 47: p. 309-22.
2.	Green, D.R., Apoptotic Pathways: The Roads to Ruin. Cell, 1998. 94(6): p. 695-98.
3.	Haslbrunner, E., H. Tuppy, and G. Schatz, Deoxyribonucleic acid associated with yeast mitochondria. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1964. 15(2): p. 127-32.
4.	Man, P.Y.W., D.M. Turnbull, and P.F. Chinnery, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. J Med Genet, 2002. 39: p. 162-8.
5.	Gomes, A.P., et al., Declining NAD(+) Induces a Pseudohypoxic State Disrupting Nuclear-Mitochondrial Communication during Aging. Cell, 2013. 155(7): p. 1624-38.
6.	Nobelprize.org. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2009. Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2009/.
7.	Madiraju, A.K., et al., Metformin suppresses gluconeogenesis by inhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase. Nature, 2014. 510(7506): p. 542-6.
8.	Otsuga, D., et al., The dynamin-related GTPase, Dnm1p, controls mitochondrial morphology in yeast. J Cell Biol, 1998. 143(2): p. 333-49.
9.	Bleazard, W., et al., The dynamin-related GTPase Dnm1 regulates mitochondrial fission in yeast. Nat Cell Biol, 1999. 1(5): p. 298-304.
10.	Westermann, B., Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2010. 11(12): p. 872-84.
11.	Frank, S., et al., The role of dynamin-related protein 1, a mediator of mitochondrial fission, in apoptosis. Dev Cell, 2001. 1(4): p. 515-25.
12.	Karbowski, M., et al., Spatial and temporal association of Bax with mitochondrial fission sites, Drp1, and Mfn2 during apoptosis. J Cell Biol, 2002. 159(6): p. 931-8.
13.	Olichon, A., et al., Loss of OPA1 perturbates the mitochondrial inner membrane structure and integrity, leading to cytochrome c release and apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 2003. 278(10): p. 7743-6.
14.	Gottlieb, E., OPA1 and PARL keep a lid on apoptosis. Cell, 2006. 126(1): p. 27-9.
15.	Wu, S., et al., Mitochondrial oxidative stress causes mitochondrial fragmentation via differential modulation of mitochondrial fission-fusion proteins. FEBS J, 2011. 278(6): p. 941-54.
16.	Cooper, K.F., et al., Stress-induced nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation of cyclin C promotes mitochondrial fission in yeast. Dev Cell, 2014. 28(2): p. 161-73.
17.	Breckenridge, D.G., et al., Caspase cleavage product of BAP31 induces mitochondrial fission through endoplasmic reticulum calcium signals, enhancing cytochrome c release to the cytosol. J Cell Biol, 2003. 160(7): p. 1115-27.
18.	Bakker, B.M., et al., The mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase Adh3p is involved in a redox shuttle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol, 2000. 182(17): p. 4730-7.
19.	Bakker, B.M., et al., Stoichiometry and compartmentation of NADH metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2001. 25(1): p. 15-37.
20.	陳宏仁 淡江大學化學研究所碩士論文. 2010.
21.	呂毓鴻 淡江大學化學研究所碩士論文. 2013.
22.	高翊傑 淡江大學化學研究所碩士論文. 2013.
23.	Ozcan, U., Mitofusins: Mighty Regulators of Metabolism. Cell, 2013. 155(1): p. 17-8.
24.	邱明諄, 啤酒酵母菌醇類去氫酶3 與4之選殖、過度表現、純化及動力學分析. 2005.
25.	古佳弘, 過度表現ADH3p對啤酒酵母粒線體形態上的影響. 2010.
26.	Qian, S.B., et al., mTORC1 links protein quality and quantity control by sensing chaperone availability. J Biol Chem, 2010. 285(35): p. 27385-95.
27.	Wei, Y. and X.F. Zheng, Nutritional control of cell growth via TOR signaling in budding yeast. Methods Mol Biol, 2011. 759: p. 307-19.
28.	Sopko, R., et al., Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell, 2006. 21(3): p. 319-30.
29.	McGovern, P.E., et al., Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004. 101(51): p. 17593-17598.
30.	Hodgson, P.E., Nuclear Power and the Energy Crisis. Modern Age, 2008. 50(3): p. 238-246.
31.	Ikehata, H. and T. Ono, The mechanisms of UV mutagenesis. J Radiat Res, 2011. 52(2): p. 115-25.
32.	Alper, H., et al., Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production. Science, 2006. 314: p. 1565-1568.
33.	Lin, Y., et al., Factors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012. 47: p. 395-401.
34.	Novo, M., et al., Improved fermentation kinetics by wine yeast strains evolved under ethanol stress. LWT - Food Science and Technology, September 2014. 58(1): p. 166-72.
35.	Essen, L.O., Photolyases and cryptochromes: common mechanisms of DNA repair and light-driven signaling? Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2006. 16(1): p. 51-9.
36.	Essen, L.O. and T. Klar, Light-driven DNA repair by photolyases. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2006. 63(11): p. 1266-77.
37.	Faraji, S. and A. Dreuw, Physicochemical mechanism of light-driven DNA repair by (6-4) photolyases. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 2014. 65: p. 275-92.
38.	Castellari, M.V., A.; Spinabelli, U.; Galassi, S.; Amati, A., An improved HPLC method for the analysis of organic acids, carbohydrates, and alcohols in grape musts and wines. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 2000. 23(13): p. 2047-56.
39.	Gerchman, Y., et al., A simple rapid gas-chromatography flame-ionization-detector (GC-FID) method for the determination ofethanol from fermentation processes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2012. 11(15): p. 3612-16.
40.	Williams, M.B. and H.D. Reese, Colorimetric Determination of Ethyl Alcohol. Analytical Chemistry, 1950. 22(12): p. 1556-61.
41.	pGEMR-T and pGEMR-T Easy Vector Systems. Promega.