§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2607201201385900
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2012.01133
論文名稱(中文) 價格折扣與限制性促銷對知覺品質和購買意願之影響
論文名稱(英文) The influence of price discount and restricted promotion on perceivedquality and purchase intention,
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 國際企業學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Master's Program, Department Of International Business
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 100
學期 2
出版年 101
研究生(中文) 朱冠宇
研究生(英文) Guan-Yu Chu
學號 699550470
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2012-06-15
論文頁數 115頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 曾忠蕙(136466@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 黃哲盛(jsh373@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 劉怡媛(yyliu@mail.oit.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 促銷活動
限制性促銷
人格特質
知覺品質
購買意願
關鍵字(英) Promotion
Restricted Promotion
Personality
Perceivedquality
Purchase Intention
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
隨著時代的演進,促銷的手法也不斷地推陳出新,市面上有許許多多的促銷活動,在仔細比對之後,不難發現有些促銷活動是很類似的,本研究特地從常見的促銷活動中選出「打五折」與「加一元多一件」來探討,並且將「限時促銷」和「限量促銷」也納入考量範圍當中,以「人格特質-嚴謹性」及「產品購買頻率」為干擾變數,衡量消費者對商品的「知覺品質」、「購買件數」會否有顯著的差異。
    本研究的受試者為台北某大專院校大學部及研究所學生,經問卷前測後,選取日常生活中較常見的洗面乳與髮膠為實驗產品,而後將正式問卷設計成八組,分別具備兩種的促銷活動,再將問卷打散,分發予受測者進行實驗,用以判斷該受測者之人格特質-嚴謹性傾向,以及對產品的知覺品質,和商品的購買件數。
    經後續假設驗證,發現消費者面對「加一元多一件」的促銷活動時,其知覺品質與購買件數與「打五折」的促銷活動有顯著差異,而「限制性促銷」在此處的效果並不明顯,「人格特質-嚴謹性」和「產品種類」在打五折與加一元多一件時對商品的購買件數具有干擾的效果,但在知覺品質方面並不具有顯著地差異。
英文摘要
With the evolution of marketing strategies, the way of promotion keeps constantly innovative. Although some promotional activities in market are similar, it is not sure whether their effects are the same. In order to discuss this topic, this study specifically chooses two promotional types-- “fifty % off” and “one more dollar, get another piece” from the common promotional activities. In addition, “limited-time promotion” and “limit-quality promotion” are also included into consideration. Moreover, “personality traits – conscientiousness” and “purchase frequency” are the moderators of the study to measure if there are significant difference in “perceived-quality” or “purchase intention”.
  Subjects of this study are undergraduate and graduate collage students in Taipei. By the pre-test, we select two product as the experimental products—cleaner and hair gel. The formal experiment is designed into eight groups respectively with 2 (promotional type) x 2 (limit-time or limit-quality) x 2 (purchase frequency). The formal questionnaire was designed to measure “personality traits – conscientiousness” , “perceive-quality” and “purchase intention”.  
  After the hypothesis testing, we found promotional type (ie.“one more dollar, get another piece” and “fifty % off”) showed a significant different effect on perceive-quality” and “purchase intention.”  But, there was no difference in the effect of “limited-time promotion” and “limit-quality promotion”. Even “personality traits – conscientiousness” and “purchase frequency” both showed moderating effect between promotional type (ie. “one more dollar, get another piece” and “fifty % off”) and purchase intention.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
謝辭………………………………………………………………………I
目錄………………………………………………………………………V
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………VII
表目錄…………………………………………………………………VIII
第一章	緒論…………………………………………………………1
第一節	研究動機……………………………………………………1
第二節	研究目的……………………………………………………3
第三節	研究流程……………………………………………………4
第二章	文獻探討……………………………………………………5
第一節	促銷的定義與工具…………………………………………5
第二節	促銷的效果…………………………………………………15
第三節	限制性促銷定義及影響……………………………………18
第四節	人格特質之意涵……………………………………………23
第五節	產品種類之定義與相關文獻………………………………30
第六節	知覺品質與購買意願之定義與相關研究…………………35
第三章	研究方法……………………………………………………41
第一節	觀念性架構…………………………………………………41
第二節	研究假設……………………………………………………43
第三節	研究變數定義與衡量………………………………………50
第四節	問卷前測……………………………………………………53
第五節	正式問卷設計………………………………………………56
第六節	統計分析方法………………………………………………59
第四章	研究結果分析………………………………………………60
第一節	初步資料分析………………………………………………60
第二節	假設驗證……………………………………………………65
第三節	討論…………………………………………………………71
第五章	研究結論與建議……………………………………………78
第一節	研究結論……………………………………………………78
第二節	研究貢獻……………………………………………………81
第三節	研究限制……………………………………………………85
第四節	後續研究的建議……………………………………………86
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………87
附錄一  前測問卷………………………………………………………94
附錄二  正式問卷………………………………………………………96

圖目錄
圖1-1 本研究之研究流程.............................................................................................................4
圖2-1 知覺品質在消費者決策過程扮演的角色..............................................................35
圖2-2 知覺品質的組成…………………………………………………………………………….…36
圖2-3 消費者購買決策過程…………………………………………………...…………………...38
圖3-1 本研究之觀念性架構………………………………………...…...…………………………41

表目錄
表2-1 學者對促銷的定義……………………………………………………………………………6
表2-2 學者對促銷的分類……………………………………………………………………………10
表2-3 促銷工具的分類……………………………………………………………………………….13
表2-4 時間限制、資訊處理動機及價格水準對知覺品質與貨幣犧牲的影響….20
表2-5 人格特質五因素規準表…………………………………………………………………….27
表2-6 NEO-PI-R 人格特質五因素的組成與構面內容……………………………………28
表3-1 假說彙整………………………………………………………………………………………….48
表3-2 商品購買頻率問卷……………………………………………………………………………52
表3-3 商品購買頻率問卷之性別分析………………………………………………………….53
表3-4 商品購買頻率問卷分析-敘述統計……………………………………………………..53
表3-5 商品購買頻率問卷分析-T 檢定…………………………………………………………54
表3-6 本研究問卷的廣告文案…………………………………………………………………….55
表3-7 本研究問卷的田答問項設計……………………………………………………………..56
表3-8 可能購買件數的衡量題項…………………………………………………………………57
表3-9 知覺品質的衡量題項………………………………………………………………………...57
表3-10 人格特質-嚴謹性分析的衡量題項……………………………………………………..58
表4-1 本研究各組有效樣本結構彙整表………………………………………………………59
表4-2 本研究問卷信度分析結果…………………………………………………………………60
表4-3 因素分析-知覺品質………………………………………………………………………......60
表4-4 因素分析-人格特質嚴謹性………………………………………………………………..61
表4-5 KMO 與Bartlett 檢定………………………………………………………………………...61
表4-6 商品購買頻率、促銷活動與限制性促銷下的知覺品質………………………62
表4-7 商品購買頻率、促銷活動與限制性促銷下的商品購買件數……………….63
表4-8 促銷活動和限制性促銷之交互作用對知覺品質與商品購買件數的影響
(一般線性模式-多變亮分析)…………………………………………………………….65
表4-9 促銷活動透過人格特質-嚴謹性(低/高)對知覺品質與商品購買件數的干
擾作用(一般線性模式-多變量分析)………………………………….…………....67
表4-10 限制性促銷透過人格特質-嚴謹性(低/高)對知覺品質與商品購買件數
的干擾作用(一般線性模式-多變量分析)………………………………………...68
表4-11 促銷活動透過商品購買頻率(低/高)對知覺品質與商品購買件數的干擾
作用(一般線性模式-多變量分析)……………………………………...……………70
表4-12 限制性促銷透過商品購買頻率(低/高)對知覺品質與商品購買件數的干
擾作用(一般線性模式-多變量分析)………………………………………………..70
表4-13 本研究假說檢定結果表…………………………………………………………………….71
參考文獻
【中文部分】

王又鵬(1996)。促銷活動對消費者購買行為影響之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。

王志剛、陳正男(民76),行銷學原理第三版,華泰書局。

李佳勳 (2004)。網路觀點之國際知識移轉的實證研究-以組織學習能力為干擾變數。長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。

沈聰益(民92),人格五因素模式預測保險業務員銷售績效的效度-NEO-PI-R量表之跨文化檢驗與人際特質架構之實證探討,國立交通大學經營管理研究所,博士論文。

林依琳 (民96),影響消費者對於促銷產品或服務之選擇因素研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。

林晉戎(民94),社區領導人之社區林業計畫認知程度對於計畫執行成效之研究,國立屏東科技大學森林系,碩士論文。

林建煌(民91),消費者行為,智勝文化事業有限公司。

吳子輝(1975)。內外控取向與自由選擇對閱讀測驗成績的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所研究生論文,未出版,台北市。

徐怡盈(民89)。品牌知名度,參考價格來源,產品特徵與產品知識對消費者購買意願及產品品牌評出的影響,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

黃志文(1993)。行銷管理。台北:華泰書局。

黃堅厚(民88),人格心理學,心理出版社

【英文部分】

Aaker D., (1973),“ Toward a normative model of promotional decision  Maketing,“ Management Service,Vol.19(6),pp593-603.

Aaker D., (1996) “Measuring brand equity across products and markets,”California Management Review.Vol.38, pp102-120.

Allport G.,(1961),“Pattern and Growth in Personality,”New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Armstrong G., and Kolter P., (2000),“Marketing: An induction,”5th ed, pp.305-307. 

Banks J., and Moorthy S., (1999),“A Model of Price Promotions with Consumer Search,”International Journal of Industrial Organization,Vol. 17(3).pp371-372. 

Beem D., and Shaffer R.,(1981),“ Triggers to Customer Action: Some Elements in a Theory of Promotional Inducement,”pp81-106.

Biswas A., and Blair A.,(1991), “ Contextual Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisement,” Journal of Marketing. Vol.55. pp1-12.

Bitta J., Monroe B., and  McGinnis J., (1981), “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisement,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18.pp 416-427.

Blatberg G., and Neslin A, (1990),“ Sales Promotion – Concepts, Methods  and Strategies,” Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs.

Boorman D.,and Scott R.,(1975),“A combinatorial optimization model for transmission of job information through contact networks,” Journal of Economics. Vol.6(1).pp216-249.

Brock C.,(1968),“Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change,”in Greenwald, A.G.,Brock,T,C. and Ostrom,T,M.,eds, Psychological Foundation of Attitudes, New York Academic Press.

Carter H.,Theresa M., Judge G.,(2002),“Undergraduate 
Econometrics,”JOHN WILEY and SONGS INC.

Costa P., and McCrae R.,(1985), ”The NEO Personality Inventory Manual Odessa,” FL:Psychological Assessment Resource. 

David J., and Richard W.,(1989),“Brand Choice and Deep Price Discounts,”Psycology and Marketing, Vol.6,No.3,pp181-196.

Davis et al.,(1992),“Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.22(14). pp1111-1132.

Dodds B., and Monroe B.,(1984),“ The effects of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations,”Advances in Consumer Research.Vol.12.pp85-90. 

Dommernuth P., (1989),“ Promotion: Analysis, Creativity and Strategy,”2th ed. Mass: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.

Engel J., Blackwell B., and Miniard P., (1995),“ Consumer Behavior (The Dryden Press Series in Marketing),” 8th ed. Dryden Press Florida. pp143-164.

Enis B., and Poering J.,(1980),“Product Classification Taxonoments: Synthesis and Consumer Implications,”Theretical Developments in Marketing, Chicago: American Marketing Association,pp186-189. 

Fishbein M., and Ajzen I.,(1975), “Belief, Attutude, Intention, and Behavior: An introduction to Theory and Research,”Addison-Wesley 
Reading , MA,.

Fornell C., Anderson W.,and Lehmann R., (1994),“Customer 
satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden,”Journal of Marketing.Vol. 58(3).pp 53-66. 

Fromkin L., and Snyder C., (1977), "Abnormality as a Positive Characteristic: The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Need for Uniqueness," Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Vol.86(5).pp518-527.

Fry W., (2003),“Toward a theory of spiritual leadership,”The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.14pp 693–727.

Holbrook P.. (1996), “Customer value - A framework for analysis and research. In K.P. Corfman and J. G. Lynch, Eds., Advances in consumer research, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research,pp138-142.

Howard, J., and Sheth N.,(1969),“The Theory of Buyer  Behavior,”New York: John Wiley.  

Inman J.,and McAlister L., (1994),“ Do coupon expiration dates affect consumer behavior?”Journal of Marketing 
Research.Vol.31(3).pp423-428.

Inman J., Jeffrey P., Anil C. and Raghubir P.,(1997),“Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value,”Journal of Consumer Research,Vol.24(1),pp.68-76 

Kitchen M.,and Lewin D., (1994),“Interconnect,the Key to Effective Competition,” Ovum Limited.

Kolter P., and Philip A.,(1988),“Marketing Management,”6th ed.New  Jersey: Prentice-Hall Internationally.pp209-211.

Kolter P.,“Marketing Management,”11th ed., N.J.:Prentice-Hall International Inc.,2003.

Lichtenstein R,.and Bearden O.,(1989),“ Contextual Inferences on Perceptions of <erchant Supplied Reference Price,” Journal of Consumer Research .15(September), pp 55-66.

Luick D., and Zeigler L., (1968),“ Sales Promotion and Modern Merchandising,” New York: McGraw-Hill Company.

Miller S.,and Lefcourt M.,(1982),“ The assessment of social intimacy,” Journal of Personality Assessment.Vol.46(5).pp514-518.

Marion O., (1987),“ A Delphi Analysis of a Definition of Sales Promotion, ” Doctoral Dissertation, Memphis State University.

McCarthy E.,(1964),“Basic Marketing,”A Managerial Approach,IL: Richard D, Irwin.

McCarthy,E., and Perreault D.,(2002),“Basic Marketing”,Von Hoffmann Press, 14th ed.Irwin. 

Mela F., Gupta S., and Lehmann D.,(1997),“The Long-Tern Im-pact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34.pp 248-261.

Narasimhan C., Neslin A., and Sen S., (1996),“ Promotional 
elasticities and category characteristics. ” Journal of Retailing, Vol 60(2),pp17-33.

Pervin A., Cervone D., and John P.,(2005), ” Personality:Theory and Research,” 9th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp 251-252.

Peter J.,and Olson J.,(1993),“Consumer behavior and Marketing strategy,”3rd ed.Chicago: American Marting Association.

Quelch P.,(1989),“ Sales promotion management,“Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-hall

Raghbir P., and Corfman K., (1999),“ When do price promotions affect pretrial brand evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.36 (2).pp 211–222.

Schultz F.,and Robinson C.,(1982), "Market Opportunities Endowments, and the Intrafamily Allocation of Resources: Rural India," American Economic Review, Vol.74(4). pp215-235.

Schultz F.,and Robinson C.,(1993),“ Integrated marketing communications,” Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Publishing Group.

Shimp A., (1997),“ Advertising, Promotion and Supplemental Aspects of Integrated Communication Marketing,”4th ed, Chicago: The Drryden Press.

Stanley K.,(1982),“Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today,”Journal of Common Market Studies,Vol:21(1).pp21-38.

Stecher M., and Davis W., (1987),“ How to Focus on Evaluation, Thousand Oaks,”CA: Sage.

Steenkamp T., ( 1990 ) ,“Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process,” Journal of Business Research.Vol.21,pp309-333.

Suri R.,and Monroe K.,(2003),“The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers’ Judgments of Prices and Products.” Journal of Consumer Research.Vol30(June).pp95.

Terracciano A.,(2003), ”The Italian version of the NEO PI-R:conceptual and empirical support for the use of targeted rotation“, Personality and Individual Differences. Vol.35,pp1859-1872.

Thaler R., (1980),“Toward A Positive Theory Of Consumer Choice,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,Vol.1,pp39-60.

Urbany E., and William O., (1989), “Reference Price Effects on Perceptions of Perceived Offer Value, Normal Prices, and Transaction Utility,” Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing, Paul Bloom et al., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association.pp 45-49.

Webster K., (1965),“The“Deal-Prone”Consumer,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.2, pp.186-189.

Zeithaml A., ( 1988 ) ,“Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value : A Means-End Model and Aynthesis of Evidence.” Journal of Marketing.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信