§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2606201216033200
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2012.01124
論文名稱(中文) 預算赤字、成長率與匯率之研究
論文名稱(英文) Budget deficit, growth rate, and exchange rate
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 國際企業學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Master's Program, Department Of International Business
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 100
學期 2
出版年 101
研究生(中文) 劉逸華
研究生(英文) Yi-Hua Liu
學號 699550181
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2012-06-03
論文頁數 56頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 蔡政言
指導教授 - 蔡明芳
委員 - 鮑世亨
委員 - 張淑惠
委員 - 陳財家
關鍵字(中) 預算赤字
成長率
匯率
關鍵字(英) budget deficit
growth rate
exchange rate
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
受到2008金融海嘯的影響,使得歐美經濟陷於泥淖時,中國大陸卻在此時依然擁有保有高度的經濟成長,儼然成為引領全球經濟成長的重要支柱。但是在2012年的今天,看空中國大陸經濟的情緒越來越高漲,而其中對中國大陸影響最嚴重的,便是地方政府因為預算赤字所產生的地方債務問題。中國大陸的地方政府藉由借新債償舊債的方式來償還即將到期的債務,因此我們將探討利用借新債償舊債的方式償債對於中國大陸的匯率會有什麼影響。
  本文採用Cagan Model和Public Saving的兩個模型來做探討。藉由Cagan Model的預期方式來研究在預期因為預算赤字導致債務累積上升的情況下,對於匯率有什麼樣的影響。同時藉由Public Saving的模型來分析經濟成長對預算赤字的影響,進而探討是否影響其匯率。
  本研究顯示出二個主要結果: (1)當預期一個國家的政府所累積的債務過高時,將會導致匯率的升高(本國貨幣貶值、 外國貨幣升值);(2)政府所累積的債務多寡,會受到該國經濟成長的強度影響,進而影響其匯率水準。
英文摘要
When America and Europe were facing the economic depression in 2008, Mainland China still maintained high economic growth and became the leader of global economic growth. In 2012, budget deficits of local Chinese governments have resulted in serious debt. The problem is that Chinese local governments continue borrowing more money in order to pay back the old debts. The purpose of this study is to explore the affect of the expected debts caused by budget deficit on exchange rate in China. 
This study uses two research models: Cagan Model and Public Saving. First, to explore the affect of expect debts caused by budget deficit on exchange rate by Cagan Model. Second, to use the Public Saving model to explore how economic growth affects budget deficit, and analyses whether it affects the exchange rate.
The results of this study reveal as follows: (1) the exchange rate will appreciate (the domestic currency devaluate, foreign currency appreciate) when one country’s expect debts are too high; (2) Government’s accumulated debts are effect by the strength of economic growth, therefore affecting the exchange rate in China.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
謝辭…………………………………………………………………………………….I
目錄…………………………………………………………………………………..IV
圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………...V
表目錄………………………………………………………………………………..VI
第一章	緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的	2
第三節 研究流程	3
第二章	文獻探討	4
第一節 政府預算之相關文獻	4
第二節  預算赤字相關文獻	9
第三節 經濟成長相關文獻	19
第三章	現行中國大陸債務狀況相關研究	28
第一節 中國大陸地方債成因	29
第二節 中國大陸債務情形	31
第三節 中國大陸債務解決方式與其影響	33
第四章	基本模型	34
第一節 Cagan Model	34
第二節 Public Saving	41
第五章	模型推導	44
第一節 受政府累積債務影響下的Cagan Model	44
第二節 政府累積債務	47
第六章	研究結論	49
參考文獻	50

圖目錄

圖 1-1 論文研究流程圖	3
圖 3-1 2010年中國地方政府性債務規模	31
圖 3-2 2010年中國債務占GDP比重	32
參考文獻
參考文獻
一、	中文部分

1.	于宗先(1986),財政學,台北:聯經出版社。
2.	于宗先(1999),財政平衡與財政改革,台北:中華經濟研究院。
3.	巫俊龍(1995),政府租稅政策與經濟成長之關係-跨國實證研究,清華大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
4.	林明潭(2004),地方立法機關預算審議之研究,私立東海大學公共事務碩士在職專班碩士論文。
5.	林錫俊(2001),地方財政管理要義,台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
6.	林鍾沂(1994),政策分析的理論與實務,台北:瑞興文化公司。
7.	韋端、鄧哲偉、邱靜玉(2003),國家債務高漲與公共支出財源,財團法人國家政策研究基金會研究報告。
8.	師元甲(1983),預算法釋論與實務(二版),台北:三民書局。
9.	徐仁輝(1998),公共財務管理—公共預算與財務行政,台北:智勝文化。
10.	徐仁輝(1999),當代預算改革的制度性研究,台北:智勝文化。
11.	徐仁輝(2001),地方政府支出預算決策之研究,公共行政學報,5,頁2-17。
12.	孫克難(2002),台灣租稅結構、有效稅率與經濟成長,財稅研究,34(3),頁20-32。
13.	郭文娟(1993),地方稅對經濟成長的影響-台灣地區之實證分析,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
14.	黃世鑫(1990),民主政治與國家預算,台北:國家政策研究資料中心。
15.	黃彥斌(2001),政府預算制度與政策的形成—理性或是權力,國立台北大學財務學系研究所碩士論文。
16.	陳俊良(1994),政府平衡預算與地方財政問題,審計季刊,14(2),頁47-54。
17.	葉秋南(1975),試論加值稅之長期經濟效果,經濟論文,第三卷第一期,頁71-83.
18.	賴清棋(1999),近十年來台灣財政的問題、特質與改革內涵,于宗先、孫克難(主編),財政平衡與財政改革(p109-165),台北:中華經濟研究院。
19.	蔡茂寅(2003),地方自治之理論與地方制度法,台北:學林文化事業有限公司。
20.	薄慶玖(2001),地方政府與自治,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
21.	羅子誼(2006),消費稅、資本稅與經濟成長,成功大學政治經濟學研究所碩士論文。
22.	羅時萬(2000),財政收支與經濟成長:台灣的實證分析,政治大學經濟系博士論文。


二、	英文部分

1.	Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson (2001), “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation”, American Economic Review, 91, pp1369-1401.
2.	Alesina, A. & Perotti, R. (1996), “Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment”, European Economic, Review, 40(6),pp1203-1228.
3.	Aschauer, D. A. (1988), “Does Public Capital Crowd Out Private Capital?”, Unpublished Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. 
4.	Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen and Payesteh, Sayeed (1994), “Do Budger Deficits Cause Capital Inflows? Evidence form the United States”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, pp63-74.
5.	Barro, R. j. (1974), “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?”, Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp940-971.
6.	Barro, R. j. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp103-125.
7.	Bleaney, M. F. (1996), “Macroeconomic Stability, Investment and Growth in Developing Countries”, Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), pp461-477.
8.	Brazelton, W. Robert (1994), “An Empirical Note on Deficits, Interest Rates, and International Capital Flows”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, pp113-116.
9.	Buchanan, J. M. & Wagner, R. E. (1977), “Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Keynes”, New York: Academic Press.
10.	Cagan, Phillip (1956), “The monetary dynamics of hyperinflation.” In Milton Friedman, ed., Studies in the quantity theory of money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.	Caiden, N. (1990), “Public Budgeting in the United States: The State of the Discipline”, In Publice Administration, The State of the Disciplin N. Lynn & A. Wildavsky eds. New Jersey: Chatham. 
12.	Devereux, M. B. & D. R. F. Love (1994), “The Effects of Factor Taxation in a Two-Sector Model of Endogenous Growth”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, pp509-536.
13.	Domar, E. (1946), “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment”, Econometrica, 14, pp137-147.
14.	Dotsey, M. (1990), “The Economic Effects of Production Taxes in Stochastic Growth Model”, The American Economic Review, 80, pp1168-1182.
15.	Easterly, W. & Rebelo, S. (1993), “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Monetary Economic, 32(3), pp417-458.
16.	Fischer, S. (1993), “The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), pp485-512.
17.	Grossman, G. M. & Helpman. (1991), “Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy”, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
18.	Gupta, S. P. (1967), “Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Time-Series Analysis”, Public Finance, 22(4), pp35-75.
19.	Hall, R. E. & C. I. Jones(1999), “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, pp83-116.
20.	Harrod, R. F. (1939), “An Essay in Dynamic Theory”, Economic Journal, 49, pp14-33.
21.	Holtz-Eakin, D. (1994), “Public-Sector Capital and the Productivity Puzzle”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, pp12-21.
22.	Ihori, T. (1997), “Taxes on Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 119(3), pp509-522.
23.	Islam, N. (1995), “Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, pp1127-1170.
24.	Landau, D. (1986), “Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in Developed Countries: An Empirical Study for 1960-1980”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 35(1), pp35-75.
25.	Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 21(1), pp3-42.
26.	Mankiw, N. G. (2007), Principles of Economics, Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.
27.	Marshall, Jorge and Schmidt-Hebbel, Klaus (1994), “Chile:Fiscal Adjustment and Successful Performance”, Public Sector Deficit and Macroeconomic Performance, The World Bank, pp167-224.
28.	Martin, R. & Fardmanesh, M. (1990), “Fiscal Variables and Growth: A Cross-sectional Analysis”, Public Choice, 64(3), pp239-251.
29.	McMillin, W. Douglas and Koray, Faik (1990), “Does Government Debt Affect the Exchange Rate? An Empirical Analysis of the U.S.-Canadian Exchange Rate”, Journal of Economics and Business, pp279-288.
30.	Meltzer, A. H. & S. F. (1981), “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government”, Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), pp914-927.
31.	Miller, S. M. & F. S. Russek (1997), “Fiscal Structures and Economic Growth”, Economic Inquiry, Vol35, pp603-613.
32.	Milton, Friedman. (1963), “A monetary History og the United States”, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.	Mundell, Robert A. (1962), “The Appropriate Use of Monetary and Fiscal Policy for Internal and External Stability”, IMF Staff Papers, March, vol. 9, pp70-79.
34.	Munnell, A. H. (1990), “Why Has Productivity Growth Declined? Productivity and Public Investment”, New England Economic Review, Jan/Fed, pp3-22.
35.	Obstfeld & Rogoff(1996), ”Foundations of International Macroeconomics”, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, pp515-528. 
36.	Peacock, A. T. & Wiseman, J. (1961), “The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom”, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
37.	Pecorino, P. (1994), “The Growth Rate Effects of Tax Reform”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol 46, pp492-501.
38.	Ramsey, Frank (1928), “A Mathematical Theory of Saving”, Economic Journal, 38, pp543-559.
39.	Rebelo, Sergio. (1991), “Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), pp500-521.
40.	Romer, P. M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Politicial Economy, 94(5), pp1002-10037.
41.	Romer, P. M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Politicial Economy, 98(5), pp71-102.
42.	Rubin, I. (1996), “Budgeting for accountability: Municipal budgeting for the 1990s”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 16, pp112-132.
43.	Rubin, I. (1996), “The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending Borrowing and Balance”. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers, Inc. 
44.	Sargent, T. J. & N. Wallace (1981), “Some Uppleasant Monetarist Arithmetic”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review.
45.	Shepale, K. & Weingast, B. (1984), “When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?” The Journal of Politics, 46(2), pp206-221.
46.	Skinner, J. (1987), “Taxation and Output Growth: Evidence from Africa ”
47.	Solow, Robert M. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70:1, pp65-94.
48.	Stokey, N. L. (1991), “Human Capital, Product Quality and Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106:2, pp587-617.
49.	Tanzi, V. & Zee, H. H. (1997), “Fiscal Policy and Long-Run Growth”, IMF Staff Papers, 44(2), pp179-209.
50.	Temple, J. R. W. (1999), “The New Growth Evidence”, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, pp112-156.
51.	Tobin, J. (1981), “Money and Finance in the Macro-economic Process”, Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8 December.
52.	Venek, J. (1971), “Economic Growth and International Trade in Pure Theory”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85, pp377-390
53.	Wagner, A. (1877), “Finanzwissenschaft”, Leipzig: C. F. Winter.
54.	Wagner, A. (1976), “Revenue Structure, Fiscal Illusion and Budgetary Choice”, Public Choice, 25(1), pp45-61.
55.	Wang, P. & C. K. Yip (1992), “Taxation and Economic Growth: The Case of Taiwan”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 51, pp317-331.
56.	Wang, P. & C. K. Yip (1995), “Macroeconomic Effects of Factor Taxation with Endogenous Human Capital Evolution: Theory and Evidence”, Southern Economic Journal, 61, pp803-818.
57.	Wildavsky, A. (1961), “Political implication of budgetary reform”, Public Administration review, 21, Autumn.
58.	Wildacsjy, A. (1988), “The New Politics of the Budgetary Process”. Glenview, Illinois Scott, Foresman and Company.
59.	Young, A. (1991), “Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), pp396-406.
60.	Young L. & H. G. Roger (2005), “Tax Structure and Economic Growth”, Journal of Public Economics, 89, pp1027-1043.


三、	網路資料

1.	中華人民共和國審計署,http://www.audit.gov.cn/n1992130/index.html。
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信