系統識別號 | U0002-2606201121400000 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2011.01350 |
論文名稱(中文) | 利害關係人與企業績效對企業網站環境資訊揭露的影響 |
論文名稱(英文) | The Effects of Stakeholders and Corporate Performance on Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Website |
第三語言論文名稱 | 無 |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 會計學系碩士班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Department of Accounting |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 99 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 100 |
研究生(中文) | 林敏涵 |
研究生(英文) | Min-Han Lin |
學號 | 698600367 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 繁體中文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2011-06-10 |
論文頁數 | 79頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
洪雪卿
委員 - 陳維慈 委員 - 孫碧娟 |
關鍵字(中) |
利害關係人 企業績效 企業網站環境資訊揭露性質 企業網站環境資訊揭露程度 |
關鍵字(英) |
Stakeholder Corporate Performance Position of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Website Level of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Website |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
全球環保意識的興起,污染問題為工業化的後果,使企業面臨利害關係人對於環境關注的壓力。企業網站環境資訊揭露即為具便利性及時效性之管道,藉以傳遞企業環境責任的作為,以降低環境資訊不對稱。本研究係以台灣292家製造業作為研究對象,探討利害關係人與企業績效對於企業網站環境資訊揭露程度之影響,其次探討利害關係人對於企業網站環境資訊揭露性質之影響。本研究實證結果發現政府、競爭者、員工及外國法人股東為影響企業環境資訊揭露之關鍵利害關係人;績效差之企業,為美化企業形象及聲譽,將重視環境資訊揭露;此外,企業若具環境敏感性產業、高市場佔有率、員工人數多及外國法人股東持股比例較高之特性者,普遍傾向機會性環境資訊揭露性質。 |
英文摘要 |
With the rise of global environmental awareness and the pollution problems from industrialization, many corporations face pressure from stakeholders regarding environmental issues. The environmental information disclosure on corporate website, which displays corporate environmental policies, activities and results, is a convenient and timely channel, so that the environmental information asymmetry is reduced accordingly. With 292 samples of Taiwanese listed companies in manufacturing industry, we investigate whether stakeholder powers will influence the level of environment information and the position of environment information disclosure on corporate website. We also investigate the relationship between corporate performance and the level of environment information disclosure as well. Our empirical results suggest that major key stakeholders such as government, competitors, employees and foreign institutional investors will positively affect the level of environmental information disclosure. Furthermore, poor performance of the corporations will focus on environmental information disclosure, in order to enhance the corporate image and reputation. In addition, firms with higher environmental sensitivity industry, higher market share ratio, more employees and higher foreign institutional investor holdings tend to reveal the opportunity of the environmental information in general. |
第三語言摘要 | 無 |
論文目次 |
第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究流程 5 第四節 論文架構 6 第貳章 文獻探討 7 第一節 利害關係人理論 7 第二節 利害關係人與環境資訊揭露 10 第三節 企業績效與環境資訊揭露 13 第参章 研究方法 16 第一節 研究架構與假說 16 第二節 研究變數定義與衡量 27 第三節 實證模型 34 第三節 樣本選取與資料來源 35 第四節 統計方法 40 第肆章 實證結果與分析 41 第一節 基本資料分析 41 第二節 假設檢定與鑑定 45 第三節 敏感性測試 56 第伍章 研究結論、限制與建議 62 第一節 研究結果 62 第二節 管理意涵 65 第三節 研究貢獻 66 參考文獻 67 圖目錄 圖1-1 研究流程圖 ..................................................................................................... 5 圖3-1 研究架構 ....................................................................................................... 17 表目錄 表3-1 環境資訊揭露程度之量表 ............................................................................. 31 表3-2 研究變數之衡量 ........................................................................................... 33 表3-3 樣本選取情形 ............................................................................................... 35 表3-4 樣本於各產業分布情形 ............................................................................... 35 表3-5 企業網站環境資訊揭露程度之概況 ........................................................... 37 表3-6 企業網站環境資訊揭露性質之概況 ........................................................... 39 表4-1 敘述性統計 ................................................................................................... 42 表4-2 研究變數間Person相關係數矩陣 .............................................................. 44 表4-3 利害關係人與企業績效變數共線性診斷結果 ........................................... 45 表4-4 利害關係人與企業績效對網站環境資訊揭露程度多元迴歸分析結果 ... 46 表4-5 利害關係人與企業績效對網站環境資訊揭露性質Logistic迴歸分析結果 52 表4-6 不同財務績效群之利害關係人對環境資訊揭露程度多元迴歸分析結果 ..... 56 表4-7 利害關係人與銷貨酬報率交乘項對環境資訊揭露程度多元迴歸分析結果 . 59 表4-8 利害關係人與企業績效對環境資訊揭露性質Probit迴歸分析結果 ....... 61 |
參考文獻 |
中文文獻 池祥麟、陳庭萱,2004,銀行業企業社會責任之探討,金融業務與法制,第5卷第2期:111-127。 祝道松、盧正宗、洪晨桓、 楊秀萍,2008,環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影響,當代會計,第9卷第2期:237-270。 翁霓、蕭運炎,2008,財務報表環境資訊揭露品質影響因素之探討-以國內上市企業為例,東吳經濟商學學報,第61期:237-270。 高明瑞、黃義俊,2000,綠色管理與利害關係人關係之研究:台灣1000大製造業之實證分析,中山管理評論,第8卷第3期:537-565。 許志豪,2007,環境資訊揭露與利害關係人關聯性之研究,淡江大學會計學研究所未出版論文。 陳依蘋,2002,透明度與企業價值,會計研究月刊,第200 期:48-5。 陳冠宙、陳育成、陳雪如,2005,影響上市公司網站資訊透明度因子之實證,會計與公司治理,第2卷第1期:33-59 。 陳瑞斌、許崇源、翁慈青,007,公司治理架構與財務報告透明度之關聯性研究,中華管理評論,第10卷1期:1-41。 黃劭彥、吳東憲、紀怡如,2009,企業網站環境會計資訊揭露影響因素之研究,會計與企業治理,第6卷第1期:1-30。 廖婉鈞、林月雲、虞邦祥,2009,知覺組織利害關係人重要程度與組織績效之關係:企業責任作為之中介效果,管理學報,第26卷第2期:213-232。 英文文獻 Ahmed, K. and J. K. Courtis. 1999. Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: a meta-analysis. The British Accounting Review 31(1): 35–61. Agle, B. R. , R. K. Mitchell and J. A. Sonnenfeld. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. The Academy of Management Journal 42(5):507-525. Alnajjar, F. K., 2000. Determinants of social responsibility disclosures of U.S. Fortune 500 firms: An application of content analysis. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management 1:163-200. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., T. E. Christensen, and K.E. Hughes. 2004.The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (5):447–471. Anderson J. C. and A. W. Frankle. 1980. Voluntary social reporting: an iso-beta portfolio analysis. Accounting Review 55(3):467-479. Barney, J. 1986. Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? The Academy of Management Review 11(3): 656-665. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1):99-120. Barth, M., M. McNichols and G. Wilson. 1997. Factors influencing firms' disclosures about environmental liabilities. Review of Accounting Studies 2(1):35-64. Belkaoui, A. 1976.The impact of the disclosure of the environmental effects of organizational behavior on the market. Financial Management 3(4):26-31. Berelson, B. 1952. Content analysis in communication research. Free Press: New York. Berthelot, S., D. Cormier, and M. Magnan. 2003. Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature 22(1): 1-44. Brammer, S. and S. Pavelin. 2006. Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting:33(7/8):1168–1188. Cheung, Y. L., W. Tan, H. J. Ahn and Z. Zhang. 2010. Does corporate social responsibility matter in Asian emerging markets? Journal of Business Ethics 92(3):401–413 . Cho, C. H. and R. W. Roberts. 2010. Environmental reporting on the internet by America's Toxic 100: Legitimancy and self-presentation. International Journal of Accounting Information System11:1-16. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review 20(1):92-117. Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, and G. D. Richardson. 2004. The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. Accounting Review 79 (2): 329-353. Cormier, D. and M. Magnan. 2003. Environmental reporting management: a continental european perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(1): 43-62. Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 1997. Investors' assessment of implicit environmental liabilities:An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16 (2): 215-241. Cormier, D., M. Magnan and B. Van Velthoven. 2005. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review 14(1):3-39. Da Silva Monteiro, S. and B. Aibar-Guzmán. 2009. Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17(4):185 – 204. Damiano-Teixeira, K. M. and Pompermayer, M. M., 2007.Corporate social responsibility: profile and diagnosis of 797 Programs Developed in Brazil. Business and Society Review 112(3): 343-367. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor independence, low balling and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(2):113-127. Deegan, C. and B. Gordon. 1996. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian Corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26(3):187-199 . Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implication. The Academy of Management Review. 20(1): 65-91. El-Gazzar, S. M. 1998. Predisclosure information and institutional ownership: A cross-sectional examination of market revaluations during earnings announcement periods. Accounting Review 73(1): 119-129. Elijido-Ten, E. 2004. Determinants of environmental disclosures in a developing country : an application of the stakeholder theory. Accepted for Presentation at the Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference. Elijido-Ten, E. 2007. Applying stakeholder theory to analyze corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Australian listed companies. Asian Review of Accounting 15(2):164 – 184. Ferguson, M. J., K. C. K. Lam, and G. M. Lee. 2002. Voluntary disclosure by state-owned enterprises listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 13 (2): 125-152. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman: Boston. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder Influence Strategies. The Academy of Management Review 24 (2):191-205. Gale, B. T. 1972. Market share and rate of return. The Review of Economics & Statistics 54(4): 12–423. Gamerschlag, R., K. Möller and F. Verbeeten. 2010. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 4(3):1-30. Gibbins, M., A. Richardson, and J. Waterhouse. 1990. The management of corporate financial disclosure: opportunism, ritualism, policies, and processes. Journal of Accounting Research 28(1): 121-143. Gray, R., M. Javad, D. M. Power and C. D. Sinclair. 2001. Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting28(3) & (4): 327-356. Gupta, S. and B. Goldar. 2006. Do stock markets penalize environment-unfriendly behaviour? Evidence from India. Ecological Economics 52(1): 81–95. Hackston, D. and M. J. Milne. 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in NewZealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108. Haniffa, R. M. and T. E. Cooke. 2002. Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. ABACUS 38:317-349. Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(3):381-395. Hill, C. W. L. and G. Jones. 1998. Strategic management theory. Houghton Mifflin: Boston. Hill, L. N., and C. White 2000. Public relations practitioners’ perceptions of the World Wide Web as a communications tool. Public Relations Review 26(1): 31-51. Hillman, A. J. and G. D. Keim. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social Issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2):125-139. Holland, L. and Y. B. Foo. 2003. Differences in environmental reporting practices in the UK and the US: the legal and regulatory context. The British Accounting Review 35 (1): 1-18. Huang, L. and F. H. Kung. 2010. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 96:435–451. Hughes, K. E. 2000. The value relevance of nonfinancial measures of air pollution in the electric utility industry. The Accounting Review 75(2): 209-228. Hughes, S. B., A. Anderson, and S. Golden. 2001. Corporate environmental disclosures : are they useful in determining environmental performance? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20 (3): 217-240. Jensen, M. C. 1991. Corporate control and the politics of finance. Journal of Applied corporate Finance 4(2):13-33. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4):305-360. Jones ,T. M., W, Felps and G. A. Bigley. 2007. Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decision: the role of stakeholder culture. The Academy of Management Review 32(1):137–155. Jones, T. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review 20(2): 404-437. Khasharmeh , H. and M. S. Suwaidan. 2010. Social responsibility disclosure in corporate annual reports: evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 6(4): 327 – 345. Konar, S. and M. A. Cohen. 1997. Information as regulation: the effect of community right to know laws in toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1): 109–124. Lang, M. H. and R. J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (4):467-492. Liu, X. and V. Anbumozhi. 2009. Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (6):593–600. Ljungdahl, F. 2004.Factors influencing environmental and social disclosures. Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Resaerch in Accounting Conference. Singapore, pp.5-10. Lungu, C. I., C. Caraiani and C. Dascălu. 2011. Research on corporate social responsibility reporting. The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal 13(29): 117-131. Magness, V. 2006. Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure- an empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19 (4): 540-563. Miller, R. L. and W. F. Lewis. 1991. A stakeholder approach to marketing management using the value exchange models. European Journal of Marketing 25(8)55-68. Mitchell R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review 22(4):853-886. Moneva, J. M., and B. Cuellar. 2009. The value relevance of financial and non-financial environmental reporting. Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (3): 441-456 . Neu, D. , H. Warsame and K. Pedwell. 1998. Managing public impressions: environmental disclosure in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3):265-88. Newman, J. C. and K. M. Breeden. 1992. Managing in the environmental era: lesson from environmental leaders. The Columbia Journal of World Business 27(3/4):210~221. Park, O. 1999. Japanese corporate environmental disclosure. Keizai-Kagaku 47(3): 21–37. Patten, D. M. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (8): 763-773. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row: New York. Prado-Lorenzo, J., L. Rodrı′guez-Domı′nguez, I. Gallego-A′ lvarez and I. Garcı′a-Sa′nchez. 2009. Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world-wide. Management Decision 47(7):1133-1157. Richardson, A. J. and M. Welker. 2001. Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26(7/8):597–616. Roberts, R. W. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6):595-612. Rowley, T.J. and M. Moldoveanu. 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? an interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. The Academy of Management Review 28(2): 204-219. Rubinstein, D. 1989. Social costs that may lead to bankruptcy. CA Magazine 122(11): 26-34. Ruland, W., S. Tung, and N. E. George. 1990. Factors associated with the disclosure of managers'forecasts. The Accounting Review 65 (3): 710-721.. Shyy, G. and V. Vijayravan. 1996. Is a supervisory board valuable? The French Evidence, Manuscript, National Central University. Taiwan. Sirgy, M. J. 2002. Measuring corporate performance by building on the stakeholders model of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 35(3):143-62. Stanwick, S. D. and P. A. Stanwick. 2000b. Corporate social responsiveness: An empirical examination using the environmental disclosure index. International Journal of Commerce & Management 8(3/4):26-40. Stanwick, S. D., and P. A. Stanwick. 2000a. The relationship between environmental disclosures and financial performance: an empirical study of US firms. Eco-Management and Auditing 7 (4):155-164. Suwaida M. S., A. Moh'd Al-omari, R. H. Haddad. 2004. Social responsibility disclosure and corporate characteristics: the case of Jordanian industrial companies. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 1(4): 432 – 447. Trabelsi, S., R. Labelle, and C. Laurin. 2004. The management of financial disclosure on corporate websites: a conceptual model. Canadian Accounting Perspectives 3(2): 235-259. Ullmann, A. A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: a critical examatinaion of the relationshIps among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. The Academy of Management Review 10 (3): 540-557. Wahba, H. 2009. How do institutional shareholders manipulate corporate environmental strategy to protect their equity value? a study of the adoption of ISO 14001 by Egyptian firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(8):495-511. Wang, Y. 2009. Examination on philosophy-based management of contemporary Japanese corporations: philosophy, value orientation and performance. Journal of Business Ethics 85(1):1-12. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信