淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-2506201910435300
中文論文名稱 MSG-3與MSG-2之差異探討-以某航空公司機型為例
英文論文名稱 The study of the difference between MSG-3 and MSG-2-the case of an airline in Taiwan
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 航空太空工程學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Department of Aerospace Engineering
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生中文姓名 江佳璐
研究生英文姓名 Chia-Lu Chiang
學號 704430023
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2019-06-16
論文頁數 61頁
口試委員 指導教授-陳步偉
委員-湯敬民
委員-馬德明
中文關鍵字 MSG  飛機修護  MPD 
英文關鍵字 MSG  Aircraft maintenance  MPD 
學科別分類
中文摘要 飛機修護是維持飛航安全的重要環節之一,而飛機修護的最基本是以MSG邏輯來發展,MSG為飛機修護的主要精髓,我們必須了解MSG以確保對飛機修護內容有正確的觀念,以維持飛航安全。由於邏輯分析觀念隨時間進步,檢查計畫也更趨嚴密,其發展背景與目的為我們所需了解的。此研究的目的在於了解MSG-2及MSG-3的差異,對於飛機修護作業的影響。
本研究分為五章,第一章為簡介,介紹飛機維護的基本概念,以及飛機維護計畫的製作及相關文件之關係;第二章為維修指導小組之介紹,包含MSG之發展概況及介紹,並針對MSG-3進行詳細介紹,比較MSG-3及MSG-2邏輯之差異;第三章為維護計畫文件及飛機維護計畫之概述,以國內某航空公司之飛機維護計畫為例;第四章為MSG-2與MSG-3之比較,以某航空公司MD-80機隊為例,以不同MSG發展之MPD進行分析比較。最後第五章結論與建議,說明MSG-2及MSG-3對於飛機修護作業的差異,提供建議以供航空公司參考運用。
研究方式以收集MSG相關文件以及飛機原廠提供的相關資料,進行匯整,以了解MSG及飛機修護計畫之關係並進而分析MSG-2及MSG-3之差異,以某航空公司MD-80機隊為例,分析其差異之影響。
英文摘要 Aircraft maintenance is one of the important issue of maintaining flight safety. The most basic aspect of aircraft maintenance is the development of MSG (Maintenance Steering Group) logic. MSG is the main essence of aircraft maintenance. We need to understand MSG to ensure the correct concept of aircraft maintenance, in order to maintain flight safety. As the concept of analysis keeping pace with time, the inspection plan become more rigorous. Its developing background and purpose are what we need to understand. The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of differences between MSG-2 and MSG-3 on aircraft maintenance operations.
The study is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction of the basic concepts of aircraft maintenance, as well as the relationship between the aircraft maintenance plans and related documents. The second chapter is the introduction of the maintenance steering group, including the development of MSG, and the differences between the MSG-3 and MSG-2 logics. The third chapter is an overview of the Maintenance Planning Document and the Aircraft Maintenance Program, taking a case of the Aircraft Maintenance Program of an airline in Taiwan as an example. The fourth chapter is the comparison of MSG-2 and MSG-3, taking a MD-80 fleet in the airline as an example, compared and analyzed the different of the MPDs developed by different MSGs. The final chapter is the conclusions and recommendations, explain the differences between MSG-2 and MSG-3 for aircraft maintenance operations and provide recommendations for airline reference.
The research method is to collect MSG related documents and relevant data provided by the aircraft manufacturer, to understand the relationship between MSG and Aircraft Maintenance Program and analyze the differences between MSG-2 and MSG-3. A certain airline’s MD-80 fleet is taken as an example to analyze the impact of the differences.
論文目次 目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 簡介 1
1.1飛機維護簡介 1
1.2飛機維護之目的 2
1.3飛機維護之執行 4
1.4定期維修目標 5
1.5飛機維護計劃之關係 7
1.6研究目的與流程 10
第二章 維修指導小組(Maintenance Steering Group, MSG) 11
2.1簡介 11
2.2 MSG的發展概況 11
2.3 MSG-3介紹 14
2.4 MSG邏輯之差異 19
2.5 MSG-2及MSG-3之比較 21
2.6 重要維護項目 27
第三章 維護計畫文件及飛機維護計劃 30
3.1 維護計畫文件概述 30
3.2 飛機維護計劃概述 30
第四章 MD MPD現有MSG-2與MSG-3之比較 42
4.1 MD-80系列MPD發展概況 42
4.2 ATA 21空調系之比較 42
4.3 ATA 23通訊系之比較 46
第五章 結論與建議 49
5.1 結論 49
5.2 建議 49
參考資料 51
附錄一 53

圖目錄
圖1-1飛機維護計劃發展流程 9
圖2-1 MSG-3決策邏輯第一層 16
圖2-2 MSG-3系統決策邏輯第一、二層(1/2) 17
圖2-3 MSG-3系統決策邏輯第一、二層(2/2) 18
圖2-4 MSG-1之決策邏輯 19
圖2-5 MSG-2之決策邏輯 20
圖2-6 MSG-2及MSG-3之邏輯比較 23
圖3-1 飛機維護計劃來源 33
圖3-2 某航空公司之MD82/83飛機維護計畫目錄 34
圖3-3 某航空公司之MD82/83飛機維護計畫第四章之節錄 40
圖4-1 ATA 21系之MSG-2及MSG-3時距項目數比較 46
圖4-2 ATA 23系之MSG-2及MSG-3時距項目數比較 48

表目錄
表2-1 MSG-2及MSG-3任務之比較 22
表2-2西北航空使用MSG-3前後之定期檢查人力工時差異比較 26
表2-3波音公司針對747使用MSG-3前後定檢時距之比較 27
表4-1 ATA 21系之MSG-2及MSG-3發展維護計畫項目比較 43
表4-2 ATA 23系之MSG-2及MSG-3發展維護計畫項目比較 47
參考文獻 [1] 民用航空法07-02A第139條,交通部民用航空局。
[2]「飛安新思維」, 科學月刊346期, 1998年10月。
[3] “Maintenance Steering Group (MSG-3) Analysis Overview”, Workshop by Boeing Company, 2015.
[4] Amaury Bris, “Scheduled Maintenance Programs Training- Scheduled Maintenance ”, Philotech Academy, October 2017.
[5] 姜國權,「MSG-3 維修理念在維修工程管理中的應用」,航空維修與工程2005/2。
[6] Amaury Bris, “Scheduled Maintenance Programs Training- MSG-3”, Philotech Academy, October 2017.
[7] Jeremy Haines, “MSG-3 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS”, Fleet Maintenance Seminars by Boeing Company, October 2000.
[8] ATA MSG-3 Operator/Manufacturer Scheduled Maintenance Development Revision 2002.1, Air Transport Association of America, Inc., 2002.
[9] Shannon P. Ackert, “Basics of Aircraft Maintenance Programs for Financiers” , 2010
[10] Charlotte Adams, “Understanding MSG-3”, Aviation Maintenance Magazine , 2009
[11] “Maintenance Programs Engineering Training”, Boeing Company, October 2015.
[12] “MSG-3-based Maintenance and PBP&L Programs” , Intergraph Corporation﹐2016.
[13] “Maintenance Steering Group -3 Overview”, Workshop by Boeing Company, October 2002.
[14] “AC 25.1529-1A - Instructions for Continued airworthiness”,
[15] “MD 82/83 飛機維護計畫”,2016/12/30。
[16]“MD-80 MAINTENANCE PLANNING DOCUMENT”, Boeing Company, 2013.
[17] “MD-80 On-Aircraft Maintenance Planning”, McDonnell Douglas, August 1993.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2019-07-02公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2019-07-02起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2486 或 來信