§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2506201419450600
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2014.01027
論文名稱(中文) 虛擬社群參與價值認知對組織公民行為影響之研究
論文名稱(英文) Value perception from participating in virtual communities and the impact on organizational citizenship behavior
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 管理科學學系博士班
系所名稱(英文) Doctoral Program, Department of Management Sciences
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生(中文) 周菡苹
研究生(英文) Han-Ping Chou
學號 894560027
學位類別 博士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2014-06-08
論文頁數 109頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 李培齊(100679@mail.tku.edu.tw)
指導教授 - 婁國仁(109880@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 方世榮(srfang@mail.hust.edu.tw)
委員 - 賴奎魁(laikk@yuntech.edu.tw)
委員 - 陳水蓮(slchen@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 李旭華(hxl120@hotmail.com.tw)
委員 - 吳玫瑩(meiying@chu.edu.tw)
委員 - 施雅月(moonshih@mail.ncyu.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 虛擬社群
組織公民行為
維基人
關鍵字(英) Virtual community
Organizational citizenship behavior
Wikipedian
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究主要目的是藉由網際網路參與者在網際網路的參與過程中所認知的激勵價值建構出網際網路組織公民行為的架構。我們藉由激勵理論、組織公民行為來觀察網際網路參與者的行為,並進一步了解團隊凝聚力對於不同參與者所認知的激勵價值,是否會影響其網際網路參與及組織公民行為。本研究透過212位維基人(Wikipedian)作為問卷對象,除透過因素分析、結構方程模式証明本研究架構之外,此研究架構亦進一步利用模糊化聚集法強化驗證結果。研究結果証實: (1) 本研究提出之衡量網際網路參與者的認知激勵價值所建構出網際網路組織公民行為之模式具有實際可行性,且網際網路參與者的參與度對網際網路組織公民行為具有正向的影響。(2) 對於功利價值認知(utilitarian-value perception)的參與者,團隊凝聚力並不影響其網際網路參與行為;然而,對於享樂價值認知(hedonic-value perception)的參與者而言,團隊凝聚力對其網際網路參與行為則具有相當的影響性,當團隊凝聚力愈高,則其對於網際網路參與程度愈高,並顯著協助提升參與者的組織公民行為;一旦團隊凝聚力低,則會減低其對於網際網路的參與程度。
英文摘要
For this study, we constructed a framework to examine organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) from the individual motives (utilitarian value perception / hedonic value perception) of participating in virtual communities through virtual community participation. We collected data from 212 Wikipedians by using structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy clustering, and demonstrated that group cohesiveness has a moderating influence on the relationships among participants with the hedonic value perception and virtual community participation towards virtual community OCB. Although group cohesiveness did not moderate the relationship between the utilitarian value perception and virtual community participation towards virtual community OCB, the relationship between utilitarian value perception participants and virtual community participation towards OCB was notably strong, regardless of the level of group cohesiveness. Group cohesiveness is more crucial for hedonic value perception participants than utilitarian value perception participants in influencing participation on virtual community OCB.
By considering the influence of group cohesiveness in virtual community participants, we incorporated group-level motivation, which has received little attention in the virtual community literature. Our findings revealed that information regarding group-level motivation is scant, and that understanding it can advance virtual community participation to evoke OCB in virtual communities.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
中文論文提要	i
Abstract	ii
Table of Content	iii
List of Figures	iv
List of Tables	v
Chapter 1 Introduction	1
1.1 Background and Motivation	1
1.2 Objectives	2
1.3 Research Procedure	3
1.4 Outline of the Dissertation	5
Chapter 2	Literature Review	7
2.1 Motivation Theory	7
2.2 Wikipedia       15
2.3 Virtual Community	19
2.4 Group Cohesiveness	22
2.5 Organizational Citizenship Behavior	28
Chapter 3	Research Methodology	36
3.1 Research Design	36
3.2 Operational Definition of Structural Factors	40
3.3 Analysis Methods	48
Chapter 4	Research Analysis and Result	62
4.1 Descriptive Statistics	63
4.2 The Measurement Model	64
4.3 Clustering Result	78
Chapter 5	Conclusion	83
5.1 Research Results	83
5.2 Implication	87
5.3 Limitations and Future Research	89
Reference	92
Appendix A: Questionnaire Item Sources	105
Appendix B: Questionnaire (Chinese)	107

List of Figures

Figure 1-1 The Outline of This Dissertation	6
Figure 2-1 Maslow hierarchy of needs theory	8
Figure 2-2 Herzberg’s two-factor theory	9
Figure 2-3 Expectancy theory	11
Figure 2-4 Research framework	35
Figure 3-1 A two-step process of PLS path model assessment	53
Figure 3-2 Clustering result under different membership grade 	59
Figure 3-3 The fuzzy clustering flowhcart of research data analysis.	61
Figure 4-1 Results of path analysis of utilitarian value perception.	76
Figure 4-2 Results of path analysis of hedonic value perception.	76


List of Tables
Table 2-1 Definition of virtual communities	21
Table 2-2 Literatures of OCB in virtual community	31
Table 3-1 Definitions and measurements methods – utilitarian/hedonic value perception	42
Table 3-2 Definitions and measurements methods – group cohesiveness	43
Table 3-3 Definitions and measurements methods – virtual community participation	45
Table 3-4 Definitions and measurements methods – OCB	47
Table 4-1 Demographics of the study subjects	63
Table 4-2 Descriptive statistics (Means and SD.)	64
Table 4-3 Reliability analysis of the formal questionnaires	66
Table 4-4 Reliability Statistics - Organizational Citizenship Behavior	68
Table 4-5 Split-half reliability results – organizational citizenship behavior	68
Table 4-6 Reliability statistics - participation	69
Table 4-7 Split-half reliability results – participation	69
Table 4-8 Reliability statistics – group cohesiveness	69
Table 4-9 Split-half reliability results – group cohesiveness	69
Table 4-10 Reliability statistics – utilitarian value perception	70
Table 4-11 Split-half reliability results – utilitarian value perception	70
Table 4-12 Reliability statistics – hedonic value perception	71
Table 4-13 Split-half reliability results – hedonic value perception	71
Table 4-14 Validity analysis of the formal questionnaires	72
Table 4-15 Correlations of latent variables – utilitarian value perception	73
Table 4-16 Correlations of latent variables – hedonic value perception	73
Table 4-17 Inter-construct correlations	73
Table 4-18 Hypotheses testing results	77
Table 4-19 Summaries of results and relevant hypotheses	78
Table 4-20: α-cut value and its corresponding clustering result in Step1   79
Table 4-21: α-cut value and its corresponding clustering result for features of utilitarian value perception   80
Table 4-22: α-cut value and its corresponding clustering result for features of hedonic value perception.	80
Table 4-23: α-cut value and its corresponding clustering result for eliminating outliers in U.	81
Table 4-24: α-cut value and its corresponding clustering result for eliminating outliers in H.	82
參考文獻
Reference
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage.
Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.4, no.2, pp.142-175.
Allen, T. D., Ruch, M.C. (1998). The Effects of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Performance Judgments: A Filed Study and a Laboratory Experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.83, pp.247-260.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: a Review and Recommended Two-step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, vol.103, no.3, p.411.
Andrews, D. C. (2002). Audience-Specific Online Community Design, Communications of the ACM, vol.45, no.4, pp.64-68. 
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-sharing Communities of Practice, Journal of Knowledge Management; vol.7, no.1.
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. J. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Model, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, vol.16 (Spring), pp.74-94.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional Social Action in Virtual Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol.16, no.2, pp.2-21.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1989). Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement. MIS Quarterly, vol.13, no.1, pp.53-63.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1994). Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude. MIS Quarterly, vol.18, no.1, pp.59-82.
Batra, R., Ahtola, O.T. (1991). Measuring The Hedonic And Utilitarian Sources of Customer Attitudes, Marketing Letters, vol.12, no.2, pp.159–170. 
Bettencout, L. A., Gwinner, K. P., Meuter, M. L. (2002). A Comparison of Attitude, Personality, and Knowledge Predictors of Service-oriented Organizational Citizensip Bahaviors, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.87,no.2, pp.255-267.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as A Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological bulletin, vol.117, no.3, p.497.
Baytiyeh, H., & Pfaffman, J. (2010). Volunteers in Wikipedia: Why the Community Matters. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol.13, no.2, pp.128-140.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W. Kim, Y. G. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate, MIS Quarterly vol.29, no.1, pp.87–111.
Brockman, B. K., Morgan, R. M. (2006). The Moderating Effect of Organizational Cohesiveness in Knowledge Use and New Product Development, Academy of Marketing Science Journal; vol.34, no.3., pp.295-307.
Bryant, S.L., Forte, A., Bruckman A. (2005). Becoming Wikipedian : Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia, In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 1-10, 2005.
Burke, S. M., Carron, A.V. ,Patterson, M. M., Estabrroks, P. A., Hill, J. L., Loughead, T. M., Rosenkranz, S. R., Spink, K. S. (2003). Cohesiveness As Shared Beliefs in Exercise Classes, Small Group Research, vol.36, no.3, pp.267–288.
Butler, B. S., & Sproull, L. L., Kiesler, S. and Kraut, R.(2002) Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why. Leadership At A Distance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations and Considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology.
Carron, A.V., Widmeyer, W.N., & Brawley, L.R. (1985). The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, vol.7, pp.244-266.
Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The Measurement of Cohesiveness in Sport Groups. Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement, pp.213-226.
Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Small Group Research, vol.31, no.1, pp.89-106.
Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., Eys, M. A., Bray, S., Dorsch, K., Estabrooks, P. & Terry, P. C. (2003). Do Individual Perceptions of Group Cohesion Reflect Shared Beliefs? An Empirical Analysis. Small Group Research, vol.34, no.4, pp.468-496.
Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and Performance in Sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol.24, pp.168-188.
Carron, A. V., & Hausenblas, H. A. (1998). Group dynamics in sport. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Cartwright, D. (1968). The Nature of Group Cohesiveness. Group dynamics: Research and Theory, vol.91, p.109.
Chan, C.M.L., Bhandar, M. (2004). Recognition and Participation in a Virtual Community, In Proceeding of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 10-20.
Chin, W., Marcolin, B., & Newsted, P. (1996). A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results From a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/adoption Study.
Chin, W. W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs. ACM SigMIS Database, vol.26, no.2-3, pp.42-64.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. Methodology for Business and Management. pp.295-336.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, vol.22, no.1, pp.7-16.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results From a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-mail Emotion/adoption Study. Information Systems Research, vol.14, no.2, pp.189-217.
Chien, M. (2004). The Relationship Between Self-directed Learning Readiness and Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of American Academy of Business, vol.4, no.1/2, p.285.
Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M. H., Wang, T.G.. (2006). Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories, Decision Support Systems, vol.42, iss.3, pp.1872–1888.
Chiu, C.M., Wang, T.G., Fang, Y. H. (2009). Antecedetns of Citizenship Behaviors in Open Professional Virtual Communities, In Proceeding of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Hyderabad.
Cho, H., Chen, M., & Chung, S. (2010). Testing an Integrative Theoretical Model of Knowledge‐sharing Vehavior in the Context of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.61, no.6, pp.1198-1212.
Churchill, S. D., Wertz, F. J. (1985). An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychological for Consumer Research: Historical, Conceptual, and Methodological Foundations. Advances in consumer research, vol. 12, no. 1. pp. 21-42.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS quarterly, vol.19, no.2, pp.189-211.
Constant, D., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S. (1996). The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice, Organization Science. vol.7, no.2, pp.119-135.
Cook, C.W., Hunsaker, P. L. (1997). Management and Organizational Behavior, Mcgraw-hill Companies, INC., p.190.
Cottet, Patricet, Lichtle, M.C. , Plichon, V. (2006). The Role of Value in Services: a Study in a Retail Environment, Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol.23, no.4, pp.219-227.
Craig, T. Y., & Kelly, J. R. (1999). Group Cohesiveness and Creative Performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol.3, no.4, p.243.
Dholakia,U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., Pearo L. K. (2004). A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-group-based Virtual Communities, International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol.21, no.3, pp.241–263
Dion, K. L. (2000). Group Cohesion: From" Field of Forces" to Multidimensional Construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol.4, no.1, p.7.
Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W. (1993). Consumer Behavior, Dryden Press, U.S.A., 
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for Action: A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society. Administrative science quarterly, vol.42, pp.421-444.
Festinger, L., Back, K. W., & Schachter, S. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (No.3). Stanford University Press.
Flew, T. (2005). New media: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.18, no.1, pp.39-50 
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics.  Journal of Marketing Research, vol.18, no.3, pp.382-388.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, vol.19, no.4, pp.440-452.
Freeman, R. B., & Kleiner, M. M. (2000). Who Benefits Most from Employee Involvement: Firms or Workers?. American Economic Review, vol.90, no.2, pp.219-223.
George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding Prosocial Behavior, Sales Performance, and Turnover: A Group-level Analysis in a Service Context. Journal of applied Psychology, vol.75, no.6, p.698.
Goby, V. P. (2011). Psychological Underpinnings of Intrafamilial Computer-Mediated Communication: A Preliminary Exploration of CMC Uptake with Parents and Siblings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol.14, no.6, pp. 365-370.
Green, S. G., Taber, T. D. (1980). The Effects of Three Social Decision Schemes on Decision Group Process, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.25, pp. 97-106.
Gross, E. (1954). Primary Functions of the Small Hroup. American Journal of Sociology, vol.60, no.1, pp.24-29.
Gross, N. (1999). Building Global Communitie: How Business Is Partnering with Sites That Draw Together Like-minded Consumers, Business Week Online.
Groth, M. (2005). Customers as Good Soldiers: Examining Citizenship Behaviors in Internet Service Deliveries. Journal of Management, vol.31, no.1, pp.7-27.
Gruen, T. W., Summers, J. O., & Acito, F. (2000). Relationship Marketing Activities, Commitment, and Membership Behaviors in Professional Associations. The Journal of Marketing, vol.60, no.3, pp.34-49.
Gu, J. C., Fan, L., Shu, F. Y., Lee, S. C. (2010). Comparing Utilitarian and Hedonic Usefulness to User Intention in Multipurpose Information Systems, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. vol.13, no.3, pp.287-297.
Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. Black.(1992). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, pp.223-253.
Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 5th ed, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
Hars, A., Ou, S. (2002). Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol.6, no.3, pp.25-39
Hartman, J. B., Samra, Y. M. (2008). Impact of Personal Values and Innovativeness on Hedonic and Utilitarian Aspects of Web Use: An Empirical Study among United States Teenagers, International Journal of Management, vol.25, iss,1, pp.77-94.
Hartwick, J., Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use, Management Science; vol.40, no.4, pp. 440-465.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing, Advances in International Marketing, vol. 20, iss.1, pp. 277-319.
Herring,S. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, vol.4, no.4, pp. 2022.
Hertel, G., Niedner, S., Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Project : An Internet-based Survey of Contributors to The Linux Kernel, Research Policy, vol.32, no.7, pp.1159-1177.
Hirschman, E.C., Holbrook, M.B. (1982). Hedonic Consumption : Emerging Concept, Methods And Propositions, Journal of Marketing, vol.46, no.2, pp.92-101.
Hitt, M.A. & Black, J.S. (2009). Management, 2nd edition, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Ho, S. C., Ting, P. H. (2011). Knowledge-Sharing Intention in a Virtual Community: A Study of Participants in the Chinese Wikipedia, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol.14, no.9, pp.541-545.
Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of Blog Usage: The Roles of Technology Acceptance, Social Influence and Knowledge Sharing Motivation. Information & Management, vol.45, no.1, pp.65-74.
Hsu, S. H. (2003). Essays on Creating Value through Knowledge Management (Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University).
Hutchinson, J. P. (2011). A Theoretical Approach to Legitimizing Collaboratively Constructed Knowledge: A Content Analysis of Wikipedia Science Articles Based on Accidental Collaboration (Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado).
Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Creating Community with Media: History, Theories and Scientific Investigations. Lievrouw, Leah A./Sonia Livingstone (Hg.): The Handbook of New Media. Updated Student Edition. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage, pp.55-74.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU press.
Jennifer, G. M., Gareth, J. R. (1999). Understanding and managing organizational behavior. Addison Wesley, 2nd ed.
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology, in M.D. Dunnette and L. M. Housh, eds., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol, 1 (Palo Alto, Calif.:Consulting Psychologists Press, pp, 75-170).
Kang, I., Lee, K. C., Lee, S., Choi, J. (2007). Investigation of Online Community Voluntary Behavior Using Cognitive Map, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.23, no.1, pp.111-126.
Kang, M., Kim, B., Gloor, P., & Bock, G. W. (2011). Understanding the Effect of Social Networks on User Behaviors in Community‐Driven Knowledge Services. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.62, no.6, pp.1066-1074.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: an Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, vol. 29, no.1, pp.113-143.
Kaiser, M. O. (1974). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure for Identity Correlation Matrix.
Keyton, J., & Springston, J. (1990). Redefining Cohesiveness in Groups. Small Group Research, vol.21, no.2, pp.234-254.
Kim, J.W., Choi, J., Han, Kim. (2004). Relationship Support Acitivites, Community, Commitment, and Voluntary Behaviour in Online Communities, International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, vol.1, no.4, pp.431-449.
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic (pp.487-499). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Koh, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2004). Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: an E-business Perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, vol.26, no.2, pp.155-166.
Koh, J., Kim, Y.G. (2007). Encouraging Participation in Virtual Communities, Communications of the ACM, vol.50, no.2, pp.60-73.
Kudaravalli, S., Faraj, S. (2008). The Structure of Collaboration in Electronic Networks, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol.9, iss.10, pp. 706-726.
Lakhani, K., E. von Hippel, (2000). How Open Source Software Woks: “Free” User-to-User Assistance, The 3rd Intangibles Conference, Knowledg: Management, Measurement and Organization, Stem School of Business, NYU
Lee, F.S.L., Vogel, D., Limayem, M.(2003). Virtual Community Informatics: A Review and Research Agenda, The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), vol.5, no.1, pp. 47-61.
Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts; Selected Papers on Group Dynamics.
Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. T. (2001). Internet-based E-shopping and Consumer Attitudes: an Empirical Study. Information & Management, vol.38, no.5, pp.299-306.
Lih, A. (2004). Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for Evaluating Collaborative Media as a News Resource. Nature.
Livingstone, Randall (2012). Network of Knowledge: Wikipedia as a Sociotechnical System of Intelligence, Journalism and Communication Theses and Dissertations, UO Graduate School
Lohmoller, J. B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group Cohesiveness as Interpersonal Attraction: a Review of Relationships with Antecedent and Consequent Variables. Psychological bulletin, vol.64, no.4, pp.259.
Manrique-de-Lara, P. Z. (2013). Does Discretionary Internet-based Behavior of Instructors Contribute to Student Satisfaction?: An Empirical Study on ‘Cybercivism’.International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), vol.3, no.1,pp 50-66.
Ma, Meng, Agarwal, R.(2007). Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities, Information Systems Research, vol.18, no.1, pp.42–67.
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., Fetter, R. (1993). Impact of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Evaluations of Salesperson Performance, Journal of Marketing, vol.57, no.1, pp.70-80.
McQuail, D., Golding, P., & De Bens, E. (Eds.). (2005). Communication theory and research. Sage.
Moon, J., Sproull, L. (2001). Turning Love Into Money: How Some Firms May Profit From Voluntary Electronic Customer Communities. In The E-Business Handbook, P. Lowry, J. Cherrington and R. Watson, eds. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
Muniz, A., Jr., O’guinn, T.C. (2000). Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, vol.27, no.4, pp.412-432.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, vol.23, no.2, pp.242-266.
Nov, O. (2007). What Motivates Wikipedians?, Communications of the ACM, vol.50, no.11, pp.60-64.
Okoli, Chitu., Oh, Wonseok.(2007). Investigating Recognition-based Performance in an Open Content Community: A Social Capital Perspective, Information & Management, vol.44, no.3, pp.240–252. 
Oreg, S., Nov, O. (2008). Exploring Motivations for Contributing to Open Source Initiatives: The Roles of Contribution Context and Personal Values, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, no.5, pp.2055–2073.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Organ, D.W. (1997). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It’s Construct Clean-Up Time: Human Performance, Human Performance, vol.10, no.2, pp.85-98.
Organ, D.W., Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive Versus Affective Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.74, no.1, pp. 157–164.
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Paridon, T. J. (2006). The Income Effect in Personal Shopping Value, Consumer Self-confidence, and Information Sharing (Word of Mouth Communication) Research, Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, vol.10, no.2, pp.107-124
Petersen, A., (1999). Some Places To Go When You Want to Feel Right at Home: Communities Focus on People Who Need People, The Wall Street Journal.
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, vol.31, no.3, pp.351–363.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., Bommer, W.H. (1996). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership As Determinants of Employee Satisfaction Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Management, vol.22, no.2, pp.259-298.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of management, vol.26, no.3, pp.513-563.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, vol.6, no.1, pp.65-78.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized World, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA
Rheingold, H. (2000). Community Development in the Cybersociety of the Future. Retrieved Nov, 2.
Ridings, C., Genfen, D., Arinze, B. (2002). Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol.11, no.3-4, pp.271-295
Roberts, J. A. , Hann, I. H, Salughter, S. A. (2006). Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: a longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects, Management Science, vol.52, no.7, pp.984-999. 
Robbins, S. P. (2013). Fundamentals of Management, 18 ed., Pearson.
Rogers, R. (2009). The End of the Virtual: Digital Methods. Amsterdam University Press.
Royal, C., & Kapila, D. (2009). What's on Wikipedia, and What's Not...? Assessing Completeness of Information. Social Science Computer Review, vol.27, no.1, pp. 138-148.
Smith, K. W., & Sasaki, M. S. (1979). Decreasing Multicollinearity A Method for Models with Multiplicative Functions. Sociological Methods & Research, vol.8, no.1, pp.35-56.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.68, no.4, pp. 655–663.
Settoon, R. P., Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship Quality and Relationship Context as Antecedents of Person-and Task-Focused Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.87, no.2, pp.255-267.
Shadur, M. A., Kienzle, R., & Rodwell, J. J. (1999). The Relationship Between Organizational Climate and Employee Perceptions of Involvement The Importance of Support. Group & Organization Management, vol.24, no.4, pp.479-503.
Shi, J., Chen, Z., & Tian, M. (2011). Internet Self-efficacy, the Need for Cognition, and Sensation Seeking as Predictors of Problematic Use of the Internet. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol.14, no.4, pp.231-234.
Shin, H. K., Kim, K. K., (2010). Examining Identity and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in Computer-mediated Communication, Journal of Information Science, vol.36, no.1, pp.114-126.
Silva, J. M., Rahman, M., Saddik, E. A. (2008, October). Web 3.0: a Vision for Bridging the Gap Between Real and Virtual. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Communicability Design and Evaluation in Cultural and Ecological Multimedia System, ACM,Vancouver, British Columbia, pp.9-14. 
Soucy, McCrone, S. M., & Martin, T. S. (2004). Assessing High School Students’ Understanding of Geometric Proof. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, vol.4, no.2, pp.223-242.
Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory Processes/paradoxical Practices Communication and the Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, vol.14, no.3, pp.349-407.
Strube, M., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2006, July). WikiRelate! Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia. In American Association for Artificial Intelligence, vol.2, pp.1419-1424.
Tagliaventi, M. R., Mattarelli, E. (2006). The Role of Networks of Practice, Value Sharing, and Operational Proximity in Knowledge Flows Between Professional Groups, Human Relations; vol.59, no.3., pp.291-319.
Taylor, E. Z., Murthy U. S. Murthy (2009). Knowledge Sharing among Accounting Academics in an Electronic Network of Practice, Accounting Horizons, vol.23, no.2, pp.151-179. 
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global Goodness-of-fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modelling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting pp. 739-742.
Teo, Thompson S.H., Lim, Vivien K. G., Lai, Raye Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage, Omega, vol.27, no.1, pp.25–37.
To, P.L., Liao, C., Lin, Tzu. (2007). Shopping Motivation On Internet: A Study Based On Utilitarian And Hedonic Value, Technovation, vol.27, no.12, pp.774-787.
Typaldos, C. (2000). Shared Knowledge and a Common Purpose: Using the 12 Principles of Civilization to Build Web Communities.
Venkateswaran, C., & Nivetha, N. (2014). Altruistic Behavior of Social Media Workers. International Journal of Logistics & Supply Chain Management Perspectives, vol.2, no.4, pp.687-690.
Vallerand, R. J.; Fortier, M. S. Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and Persistence in a Real-life Setting: Toward a Motivational Model of High School Dropout, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.72, no.5, pp.1161-1176.
Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Contingent Workers in Singapore. Academy of management Journal, vol.41, no.6, pp. 692-703.
Vroom, V. H. (1964), Work and Motivation, New York, Wiley.
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. (2006). Leadership, Procedural Justice Climate, Work attitudes, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. In Academy of Management Proceedings, Academy of Management. vol. 2006, no.1, pp.C1-C6. 
Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. (2008). Contingent Reward Transactional Leadership, Work Attitudes, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Procedural Justice Climate Perceptions and Strength. The Leadership Quarterly, vol.19, no.3, pp.251-265.
Wang, Y., Yu, Q., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2002). Defining the Virtual Tourist Community: Iimplications for Tourism Marketing. Tourism Management, vol.23, no.4, pp.407-417.
Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams, Decision Sciences, vol.28, no.4, pp.975-996
Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S. (2000). It Is What One Does: Why People Participate And Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol.9, no.2-3, pp.155-173.
Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S., Teigland, R. (2004). Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice, Journal of the Association for Information System, vol.5, no.11-12, pp.493-513.
Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examing Socail Capital and Knolwedge Contribution in Electronic Netowkrs of Practice, MIS Quarterly, vol.29, no.1, pp.35-57
Wasko, M. M., Teigland R. (2009). The Provision of Online Public Goods: Examining Social Structure in an Eectronic Network of Practice, Decision Support Systems, vol.47, no.3, pp.254-265.
Whitaker, V. M., Parker, C. M. (2000). The Factors Enabling and Inhibiting the Development of Agricultural Internet Virtual Communities: An Australian Case Study, White Paper.
Williams, L. J., Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-role Behaviors, Journal of Management, vol.17, no.3, pp. 601–617.
Williams, E. A., Duray, R. (2006). Teamwork Orientation, Group Cohesiveness, and Student Learning: A Study of the Use of Teams in Online Distance Education, Journal of Management Education, vol.30, no.4, pp.592-616.
Williams, A. D, Tapscott, D. (2008). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Penguin. com.
Wold, H.(1982). Systems Under Indirect Observations Using PLS. In: C. Fornell (ed.), A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, vol.1, pp.325-347, New York: Praeger.
Wold, H. (1985). Partial Least Squares. In: Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol.6, pp.581-591. New York: Wiley. 
Wold, H. (1986). Factors Influencing the Outcome of Economic Sanctions. In: P. Ibarrda (ed.), Sixto Rios Honorary Volume, pp.325-338. Madrid: Conejo Superior de Investigaciences Cientificas.
Wold, H. (1989). Introduction to the Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis. In: H. Wold (ed.), Theoretical empiricism, VII-XL. New York: Paragon House.
Wu, T. Y., & Yu, M. Y. (2003). Reliability and Validity of the Mammography Screening Beliefs Questionnaire Among Chinese American women. Cancer Nursing, vol.26, no.2, pp.131-142.
Xu, B., Jones, D. R., & Shao, B. (2009). Volunteers’ Involvement in Online Community Based Software Development. Information & Management, vol.46, no.3, pp.151-158.
Yang, H. L., Lai, C. Y. (2010). Motivations of Wikipedia Content Contributors, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.26, no.6, pp.1377-1383.
Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus. MIS Quarterly, vol.25, no.3, pp.371-390.
Yoo, W. S., Suh, K. S., & Lee, M. B. (2002). Exploring the Factors Enhancing Member Participation in Virtual Communities. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), vol.10, no.3, pp,55-71.
Yoon, C., & Wang, Z. W. (2011). The Role of Citizenship Behaviors and Social Capital in Virtual Communities. Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol.52, no.1, pp.106-115.
Yu, C. P., Chu, T. H. (2007). Exploring Knowledge Contribution From an OCB Perspective, Information and Management, vol.44, no.3, pp.321-331.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信