§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
系統識別號 U0002-2406201915233100
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2019.00772
論文名稱(中文) 說服知識及品牌來源國對消費者態度及購買意願之影響-以價格形象為中介效果
論文名稱(英文) The Influence of Persuasion Knowledge and COO Image on Consumer Attitude and Purchase Intention - the Mediating Effect of Pricing Image
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 管理科學學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Master's Program, Department of Management Sciences
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 張嘉雯
研究生(英文) Chia-Wen Chang
學號 606620473
學位類別 碩士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2019-06-14
論文頁數 62頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 陳水蓮(slchen@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 康信鴻
委員 - 曹銳勤
關鍵字(中) 說服知識
原產國
五個價格形象
態度
購買意圖
關鍵字(英) Persuasion knowledge
Country-of-origin
Five Price image
Attitude
Purchase intention
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
國外各大平價服飾品牌業者紛紛來台設立實體通路據點,主打快速,平價,時尚,產品數量較少但多樣化的營銷方法。在虛擬通路盛行的時代,已經有許多廠商瞄準了在網路上購買商品的消費者。服飾廠商之間的競爭非常激烈,販售商品不再侷限於實體通路。平價服飾品牌業者開設實體通路之外,也都陸續在虛擬通路上銷售產品及推廣。服飾業者們需要了解消費者的想法及需求,藉此使用一些訂價手法來吸引消費者的目光。因此本研究以平價服飾品牌來探討消費者對虛擬和實體通路的選擇,以及主觀定價策略說服知識的了解程度。除此之外,平價服飾品牌的原產國以及價格形象,也是消費者選購產品的關鍵因素。
	本研究主要研究調查對象為曾經購買過知名平價服飾的消費者,其有效問卷共529份。本研究使用AMOS 20.0統計軟體進行信度和效度分析,並以結構方程模型進行假設檢定。實證結果顯示如下:一、主觀定價策略說服知識對價格的感知、評估確定性和價格水平感知有顯著影響,但對價格可比性和物有所值的感知沒有顯著影響;二、品牌來源國對價格可比性、價格的感知、物有所值的感知和價格水平有顯著影響,對評估確定性沒有顯著影響;三、價格的感知、評估確定性和價格水平對物有所值的感知有顯著影響,價格可比性對物有所值的感知沒有顯著影響;四、價格的感知、物有所值的感知對態度有顯著影響,價格可比性、評估確定性和價格水平對態度沒有顯著影響;五、價格可比性、價格的感知、物有所值的感知和價格水平對購買意圖有顯著影響,評估確定性對購買意圖沒有顯著影響;六、態度對購買意圖有顯著影響;七、品牌來源國相較於原產地有顯著的干擾效果。最後,本研究綜合研究結果提出管理以及理論意涵,並且對後續研究者提出建議與未來研究方針的參考。
英文摘要
There are many foreign parity apparel brands in Taiwan for their extension points. Their main marketing methods are quick, fashion, parity, and product quantity less but a variety of different design styles. In the era of Internet popularity, virtual channels are rising. Many marketers are targeting consumers who buy products on the Internet. Competition is fierce among apparel manufacturers sell products no longer limited to offline. In addition to the physical channels, the parity apparel brands are selling products and promotions on virtual channels. Apparel manufacturers need to understand the consumers what they want, so as to use some pricing tactics to attract the attention of consumers. Therefore, this study uses the parity apparel brand to explore the consumer's choice of virtual and physical channels, as well as the degree of understanding of subjective pricing tactics persuasion knowledge. Furthermore, the country-of-origin of the apparel brand and price image is also a key factor for consumers to purchase products.
This study focused on the survey of consumers who have purchased well-known parity apparel with a total of 529 valid questionnaires. This study used AMOS 20.0 statistical software for reliability and validity analysis, and the hypotheses test was performed using a structural equation model. The empirical results show the following: First, subjective pricing tactics persuasion knowledge has a significant impact on price perceptibility, evaluation certainty, and price-level perception, but it has no significant impact on price processibility and value-for-money perception; Second, brand country-of-origin has a significant impact on price processibility, price perceptibility, value-for-money perception, and price-level perception, but it has no significant impact on the evaluation certainty; Third, price perceptibility, evaluation certainty, and price-level perception have a significant impact on the value-for-money perception, but price processibility has no significant impact on the value-for-money perception; Fourth, price perceptibility and value-for-money perception has a significant impact on attitude, but price processibility, evaluation certainty and price-level perception have no significant impact on attitude; Fifth, price processibility, price perceptibility, value-for-money perception and price-level perception have significant effects on purchase intention, while evaluation certainty has no significant impact on purchase intention; Sixth, attitudes have a significant impact on purchase intention; Seventh, The brand country-of-origin have significant moderating effects compared with place-of-origin. Finally, this study synthesizes the results and proposes to managerial and theoretical implications, and also the follow-up researchers put forward suggestions and future research guidelines for reference.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
Table of Contents
Table of Contents-VI
List of Tables-VIII
List of Figures-IX
Chapter 1 Introduction-1
1.1 Research background-1
1.2 Research objective-4
1.3 Research Process and Thesis Organization-5
Chapter 2 Literature Review-7
2.1 Subjective Pricing Tactic Persuasion Knowledge (SPTPK)-7
2.2 Brand Country-of-Origin Image (COO)-9
2.3 Five Price Image-10
2.4 Attitude (ATT)-12
2.5 Purchase Intention (PI)-13
2.6 Relationship between SPTPK and Five Price Image-15
2.7 Relationship between COO and Five Price Image-16
2.8 Between Five Price Image Internal Influence-17
2.9 Relationship between Five Price Image and ATT-18
2.10 Relationship between Five Price Image and PI-19
2.11 Relationship between ATT and PI-20
2.12 Moderating effects (Place v.s Country)-21
Chapter 3 Research Methodology-23
3.1 Research Settings-24
3.2 Questionnaire Design, and Pre-testing-24
3.3 Sample and Data Collection-26
3.4 Data Analysis Method-27
3.4.1 Descriptive Statistics Analysis-27
3.4.2 Reliability and Validity Analysis-28
Chapter 4 Data Analysis and Result-29
4.1 Sampling and Respondent Profile-29
4.2 Analysis of Measurement Model-31
4.2.1 CFA and Model Fit-31
4.3 Analysis of Reliability and Validity-32
4.3.1 Reliability Analysis-32
4.3.2 Validity Analysis-34
4.4 Structural Equation Model Analysis-35
4.4.1 Overall Model Validation-35
4.4.2 SEM Evaluation of the Hypothesis Test-36
4.4.3 The Moderating Role of NET and UNIQLO-42
Chapter 5 Conclusions-44
5.1 Discussion-44
5.2 Theoretical Implication-46
5.3 Managerial Implication-47
5.4 Limitation and Future Research-48
References-50
Appendix-59

List of Tables
Table 3. 1 Sources of Measure Items-25
Table 3. 2 Pre-test Result-26
Table 3. 3 Questionnaire and Return-27
Table 4. 1 Demographic Variable of the Participants' profiles-30
Table 4. 2 Analysis of Measurement Accuracy-32
Table 4. 3 Analysis of Reliability and Convergent Validity-33
Table 4. 4 AVE/Correlation and Different of Chi-squared-35
Table 4. 5 Goodness-of-Fit-36
Table 4. 6 Hypothesis Test Analysis-38
Table 4. 7 Direct, Indirect and Total Effects-40
Table 4. 8 Invariance Tests across two brands-43
 
List of Figures
Figure 1. 1 annual sale of cloth and apparel retail-2
Figure 1. 2 Research Process-6
Figure 3. 1 The Research Conceptual Framework-23
Figure 4. 1 Structure Equation Modeling Analyses-39
參考文獻
中文文獻
1.	經濟部統計處(2019)。我國布疋及服飾品零售業年度營業額【線上資料】,取自: https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GMWeb/investigate/InvestigateEA.aspx
 
英文文獻
1.	Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 123-156. 
2.	Andéhn, M., Nordin, F., & Nilsson, M. E. (2016). Facets of country image and brand equity: Revisiting the role of product categories in country‐of‐origin effect research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(3), 225-238. 
3.	Bilkey, W. J., & Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of international business studies, 13(1), 89-100.
4.	Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1998). On the evaluation of structure equation models. acad. Mark.Sci, 16(1), 76-94. 
5.	Bain, R. (1928). An attitude on attitude research. American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 940-957. 
6.	Banks, S. (1950). The relationships between preference and purchase of brands. Journal of Marketing, 15(2), 145-157. 
7.	Beneke, J., & Carter, S. (2015). The development of a consumer value proposition of private label brands and the application thereof in a south african retail context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 25, 22-35. 
8.	Bennett, P. D., & Harrell, G. D. (1975). The role of confidence in understanding and predicting buyers' attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(2), 110-117. 
9.	Bouhlel, O., Mzoughi, N., Ghachem, M. S., & Negra, A. (2010). Online purchase intention: Understanding the blogosphere effect. International Journal of e-Business Management, 4(2), 37. 
10.	Carlson, J. P., Bearden, W. O., & Hardesty, D. M. (2007). Influences on what consumers know and what they think they know regarding marketer pricing tactics. Psychology & Marketing, 24(2), 117-142. 
11.	Chiu, C., Wang, E. T., Fang, Y., & Huang, H. (2014). Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85-114. 
12.	Desai, K. K., & Talukdar, D. (2003). Relationship between product groups' price perceptions, shopper's basket size, and grocery store's overall store price image. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 903-933. 
13.	Downs, P. E., & Haynes, J. B. (1984). Examining retail image before and after a repositioning strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12(4), 1-24. 
14.	Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. 
15.	Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47-55. 
16.	Evans, F. B. (1968). Automobiles and self-imagery: Comment. The Journal of Business, 41, 484-484. 
17.	Fischer, P. M., & Zeugner-Roth, K. P. (2017). Disentangling country-of-origin effects: The interplay of product ethnicity, national identity, and consumer ethnocentrism. Marketing Letters, 28(2), 189-204. 
18.	Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 
19.	Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. 
20.	Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. 
21.	Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R., & Clark, R. A. (2012). Materialistic, brand engaged and status consuming consumers and clothing behaviors. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 102-119. 
22.	Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (vol. 7). 
23.	Ham, C., & Nelson, M. R. (2016). The role of persuasion knowledge, assessment of benefit and harm, and third-person perception in coping with online behavioral advertising. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 689-702. 
24.	Henrie, K. M., & Taylor, D. C. (2009). Use of persuasion knowledge by the millennial generation. Young Consumers, 10(1), 71-81. 
25.	Hightower Jr, R., Brady, M. K., & Baker, T. L. (2002). Investigating the role of the physical environment in hedonic service consumption: An exploratory study of sporting events. Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 697-707. 
26.	Hollebeek, L. (2011). Exploring customer brand engagement: Definition and themes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(7), 555-573. 
27.	Holmes, Y. M., Beitelspacher, L. S., Hochstein, B., & Bolander, W. (2017). “Let's make a deal:” price outcomes and the interaction of customer persuasion knowledge and salesperson negotiation strategies. Journal of Business Research, 78, 81-92. 
28.	Honkanen, P., & Verplanken, B. (2004). Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food: The role of values and attitude strength. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(4), 401-420. 
29.	Isaac, M. S., & Grayson, K. (2017). Beyond skepticism: Can accessing persuasion knowledge bolster credibility? Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 895-912. 
30.	Johnson, Z., Liu, F., & Tian, Y. (2016). Country of origin non-fit: When country of origin non-fit enhances consumer evaluations. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 20(2), 74. 
31.	Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods Scientific Software. 
32.	Jung, N. Y., & Seock, Y. (2016). The impact of corporate reputation on brand attitude and purchase intention. Fashion and Textiles, 3(1), 20. 
33.	Kim, N., Chun, E., & Ko, E. (2017). Country of origin effects on brand image, brand evaluation, and purchase intention: A closer look at seoul, new york, and paris fashion collection. International Marketing Review, 34(2), 254-271. 
34.	Landon Jr, E. L. (1974). Self concept, ideal self concept, and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 44-51. 
35.	Lee, H., Kumar, A., & Kim, Y. (2010). Indian consumers' brand equity toward a US and local apparel brand. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 469-485. 
36.	Liu, F., Li, J., Mizerski, D., & Soh, H. (2012). Self-congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: A study on luxury brands. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 922-937. 
37.	Lu, L., Chang, W., & Chang, H. (2014). Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 258-266. 
38.	Mägi, A. W., Gunnarsson, J., & Rosengren, S. (2017). How do consumers update store price perceptions? Creating marketing magic and innovative future marketing trends (pp. 765-776) Springer. 
39.	Morschett, D., Swoboda, B., & Schramm-Klein, H. (2006). Competitive strategies in retailing—an investigation of the applicability of porter's framework for food retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(4), 275-287. 
40.	Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of japanese and US attitudes toward foreign products. Journal of Marketing, 34(1), 68-74. 
41.	Nath Sanyal, S., & Datta, S. K. (2011). The effect of country of origin on brand equity: An empirical study on generic drugs. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(2), 130-140. 
42.	Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 105-120. 
43.	Nes, E. B. (2018). The role of country images in international marketing: Country-of-origin Effects. Bridging disciplinary perspectives of country image reputation, brand, and identity (pp. 49-64) Routledge. 
44.	Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. 
45.	O'Cass, A., & Siahtiri, V. (2013). In search of status through brands from western and asian origins: Examining the changing face of fashion clothing consumption in chinese young adults. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(6), 505-515. 
46.	Papadopoulos, N., & Heslop, L. (2002). Country equity and country branding: Problems and prospects. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 294-314. 
47.	Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17. 
48.	Park, H. H., Jeon, J. O., & Sullivan, P. (2015). How does visual merchandising in fashion retail stores affect consumers’ brand attitude and purchase intention? The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 25(1), 87-104. 
49.	Pillai, K. G., & Kumar, V. (2012). Differential effects of value consciousness and coupon proneness on consumers’ persuasion knowledge of pricing tactics. Journal of Retailing, 88(1), 20-33. 
50.	Popp, B., & Woratschek, H. (2017). Consumer–brand identification revisited: An integrative framework of brand identification, customer satisfaction, and price image and their role for brand loyalty and word of mouth. Journal of Brand Management, 24(3), 250-270. 
51.	Pradhan, D., Duraipandian, I., & Sethi, D. (2016). Celebrity endorsement: How celebrity–brand–user personality congruence affects brand attitude and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(5), 456-473. 
52.	Rajendran, K. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1994). Contextual and temporal components of reference price. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 22-34. 
53.	Rashid, A., Barnes, L., & Warnaby, G. (2016). Management perspectives on country of origin. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20(2), 230-244. 
54.	Roth, S., Himbert, L., & Zielke, S. (2017). Does unit pricing influence store price image dimensions and shopping intentions for retail stores? European Journal of Marketing, 51(7/8), 1396-1413. 
55.	Schmalfuß, F., Mühl, K., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 47-69. 
56.	Souiden, N., Pons, F., & Mayrand, M. (2011). Marketing high-tech products in emerging markets: The differential impacts of country image and country-of-origin's image. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(5), 356-367. 
57.	Tigert, D. J. (1983). Pushing the hot buttons for a successful retailing strategy. Patronage Behavior and Retail Management, 89-113. 
58.	Wang, X., Yu, C., & Wei, Y. (2012). Social media peer communication and impacts on purchase intentions: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 198-208. 
59.	Zielke, S. (2006). Measurement of retailers' price images with a multiple-item scale. Int.Rev.of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 16(3), 297-316. 
60.	Zielke, S. (2010). How price image dimensions influence shopping intentions for different store formats. European Journal of Marketing, 44(6), 748-770.
61.	Zielke, S. (2018). Effects of price image dimensions on consumer buy intention. European Journal of Marketing, 44(6), 748-770.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信