§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2406201814010700
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2018.00724
論文名稱(中文) 金融業設置審計委員會之必要性?兼論審計委員會之特性影響
論文名稱(英文) Does the Financial Industry Need Audit Committees? Discussions on the Special Characteristics of Audit Committees.
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 會計學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Accounting
外國學位學校名稱 Faculty of Business, Economics & Law
外國學位學院名稱 University of Queensland
外國學位研究所名稱 Master of Commerce in the field of Applied Finance
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 張懷源
研究生(英文) Huai-Yuan Chang
學號 605600013
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-06-08
論文頁數 49頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 張瑀珊
委員 - 薛敏正
委員 - 江家瑜
關鍵字(中) 金融業
審計委員會
盈餘反應係數
獨立董事
關鍵字(英) Financial Industry
Audit Committee
Earnings Response Coefficient
Independent Director
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
台灣於2014年強制金融業設置審計委員會,本文旨在探討金融業自願及強制設置審計委員會之差別,以確實釐清強制或自願設置審計委員會及其特性對於金融業之影響。本研究以2007年至2016年之台灣金融業上市櫃公司為研究樣本,探討公司是否設置審計委員會與其特性與金融業公司之盈餘反應係數之關聯,其中特性包括審計委員會之規模、成員兼任公司數及開會次數等三項指標,以了解相較於自願設置,強制設置是否真的能夠產生增額之影響。實證結果顯示,在強制金融業設置審計委員會之期間內(2014年至2016年),自願設置審計委員會之公司與盈餘反應係數在單尾檢定之下呈現顯著正相關;而其餘審計委員會之特性與盈餘反應係數,不論公司為自願或是強制設置,結果大致相同,審計委員會之規模及成員兼任公司數對於盈餘反應係數有正向之關聯性,審計委員會開會次數與審計產業專家對盈餘反應係數則有顯著負向影響。希冀透過本文之實證結果,提供主管機關及企業對於未來審計委員會政策規範及設置之參考依據。
英文摘要
In 2014, the government in Taiwan mandated companies in Taiwan’s financial industry to install audit committees. This study investigated the differences between voluntary and compulsory audit committees in Taiwan’s financial industry in order to explore the special characteristics and impact of each type of audit committee. The research sample comprised data of listed companies in Taiwan’s financial industry between 2007 and 2016. The study looked to see if there were correlations between a company’s installation of an audit committee, the special characteristics of an audit committee, and the company’s earnings response coefficient. The special characteristics of an audit committee include the following three indices: the size of the audit committee, the number of memberships in different companies’ audit committees held by a member, and the frequency of meetings. The results were analyzed to determine whether compulsory audit committees would be better able than voluntary audit committees to increase earnings.
In this empirical study, a one-tailed test revealed a significant positive correlation between companies with voluntary audit committees and their earnings response coefficient during the compulsory period between 2014 and 2016. The results were basically the same for the relationship between an audit committee’s special characteristics and the earnings response coefficient regardless of whether the audit committee was voluntary or compulsory. The audit committee size and the number of memberships in different companies’ audit committees held by a member were seen to have positive correlations with the earnings response coefficient.  However, the frequency of meetings and auditor industry specialization were seen to have a significant negative correlation with the earnings response coefficient. 
The researcher hopes that the results of this empirical study will serve as informative reference material for competent authorities and companies when they are installing and formulating policies about audit committees.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
第壹章 緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究目的	5
第三節 研究架構與流程	6
第貳章 文獻探討與假說建立	8
第一節 我國設置獨立董事、審計委員會之沿革及規範與功能	8
第二節 獨立董事之相關文獻	11
第三節 審計委員會之相關文獻	14
第參章 研究方法	19
第一節 研究模型	19
第二節 變數定義	20
第三節 資料來源與樣本選取	24
第肆章 實證結果與分析	26
第一節 敘述性統計	26
第二節 相關係數分析	31
第三節 迴歸分析	33
第四節 敏感性分析	37
第伍章 結論與建議	41
參考文獻	43

圖 目錄
圖 1-1 研究流程圖 7

表目錄
表 3-1 金融業分布表 ................................ .................................... 25
表 3-2 金融業各年度成立審計委員會之情形 ................................ ........ 25
表 4-1 敘述性統計 ................................ ................................ ... 29
表 4-2 各變數相關係表 ................................ .................................. 32
表 4-3 強制以前已自願設置審計委員會及其特性對標準化累積異常報酬之迴歸 結果影響 ........ 35
表 4-4 強制設置審計委員會及其特性對於標準化累積異常報酬之迴歸結果影響 ....... 36
表 4-5 強制以前已自願設置審計委員會及其特性對累積異常報酬之敏感分析 ..... 39
表 4-6 強制設置審計委員會及其特性對於累積異常報酬之敏感分析................. 40
參考文獻
中文文獻
丁秀儀與翁天龍,2013,忙碌獨立董事可以降低公司績效波動性嗎?,證券市場發展季刊,第25卷第2期,161-194。
丁秀儀與陳于欣,2010,公司獨立董事為何忙碌,管理學報,第27卷第3期:291-318。
朱博湧、林裕淩與王筠傑,2015,獨立董事多樣性對於公司價值之研究,管理資訊計算,第4卷第2期:65-82。
朱博湧、林裕淩與林峻宇,2015,獨立董事組成、資訊透明度與組織績效-以2008全球金融風暴為例,評價學報,第9期:1-20。
吳淑鈴,2015,審計委員會成員薪酬結構及其獨立性,會計研究月刊,第356期: 16-18。
李合龍與戴凱平,2014,審計委員會特性與企業價值之關聯性,商業現代化學刊,第7卷第4期:319-336。
李建然、廖秀梅與蔡佳育,2016,上市櫃公司自願設置審計委員會及審計委員會品質之決定因素,當代會計,第17卷第1期:1-34。
李建然與陳信吉,2012,會計師任期與審計品質認知—股市投資人的觀點,中山管理評論,第20卷第3期:879-905。
林仁光,2006,董事會功能性分工之法制課題-經營權功能之強化與內部監控機制之設計,臺大法學論叢,第35卷第1期:157-266。
徐仲秋,2002,葛斯納的五大革新,商業週刊,第787期。
張元與葉清雄,2014,忙碌董事、風險承擔與債務資金成本,兩岸金融季刊,第2卷第3期:1-54。
許文馨,2014,審計委員會是否較監察人更能提升盈餘品質,臺大管理論叢,第24卷第S1期:203-232。
郭大維,2012,我國公開發行公司獨立董事報酬之規範及實證研究,東吳法律學報,第24卷第2期:1-34。
陳宜伶與林宛瑩,2013,獨立董監之設置決策與績效,管理與系統,第20卷第4期:697-725。
曾玉琦,2014,獨立董監、內部稽核與產業專家會計師對企業財務報導之影響,台灣管理學刊,第14卷第2期:21-49。
楊君仁,2015,董事會法制變革的問題與對策,法令月刊,第66卷第5期:38-61。
葉信誠,2011,淺談獨立董事之設置及應遵循事項,證券暨期貨月刊,第29卷第6期:5-13。
葉銀華,2004,沒有獨立董事的遺憾!會計研究月刊,第220期:89-101。
葉銀華與林志豪,2014,上市櫃公司要設置審計委員會?審計委員會與盈餘管理之研究,輔仁管理評論,第21卷第3期:1-22。
劉連煜,2010,現行上市上櫃公司獨立董事制度之檢討暨改進方案-從實證面出發,政大法學評論,第114期:53-156。
蔡昌憲,2015,省思公司治理下之內部監督機制—以獨立資訊管道的強化為核心,政大法學評論,第141期:197-276。
鄭宏哲、蘇淑慧與呂倩如,2013,董事會特性暨會計師產業專精於權益資金成本之研究,會計審計論叢,第3卷第2期:27-59。
賴英照,2007,賴英照說法:從內線交易到企業社會責任,聯經出版公司。
中華民國九十五年三月二十八日行政院金融監督管理委員會金管證一字第0950001615號令訂定發布全文13條。
金管會新聞稿,2013年2月7日,強制設置審計委員會之適用範圍。
金管會新聞稿,2013年12月17日,擴大強制設置獨立董事及審計委員會之適用範圍。
王端鎂,2011,台灣依證券交易法設置審計委員會制度實證研究,國立交通大學管理學院科技法律學程碩士論文。
李姵萱,2013,監察人與審計委員會於公司治理之角色,臺灣大學法律學研究所學位論文。
邱威喬,2015,論公開發行公司之內部監控制度,中原大學財經法律學系碩士學位論文。
許芹榛,2014,審計委員會及資訊揭露之關聯性,中原大學會計學系碩士學位論文。
許博渝,2007,公司治理機制與資訊揭露透明度,中原大學會計學系碩士學位論文。
郭潤宗,2016,設置審計委員會對盈餘宣告資訊內涵影響之探討,臺灣大學會計學研究所學位論文。
曾乾豪,2014,審計委員會特性與會計師特性之關聯性研究,國立臺北大學會計學系博士論文。
黃齡慧,2005,我國上櫃公司設置審計委員會決定因素之探討,淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
蔣中瑋,2013,審計委員會開會次數與盈餘反應係數之關聯性研究,國立臺北大學會計學系碩士論文。
網路資料
台灣證券交易所法規分享知識:http://twse-regulation.twse.com.tw/TW
全國法規資料庫:http://law.moj.gov.tw
金融監督管理委員會:http://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/index.jsp
證券暨期貨法令判解查詢系統:http://www.selaw.com.tw/Home.aspx
經濟部工商行政法規:http://gcis.nat.gov.tw/elaw/index.jsp
英文文獻
Abbott, L. J. and S. Parker. 2000. Auditor Selection and Audit Committee Characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (2): 47-66.
Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23 (1): 69-87.
Abbott, L. J., Y. Park, and S. Parker. 2000. The Effects of Audit Committee Activity and Independence on Corporate Fraud. Managerial Finance 26 (11): 55-67.
Agrawal, A. and C. R. Knoeber. 1996. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31 (3): 377-397.
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and R. LaFond. 2006. The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firms’ Credit Ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (1-2): 203-243.
Baxter, P. 2010. Factors Associated with the Quality of Audit Committees. Pacific Accounting Review 22 (1): 57-74.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 443-465.
Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earning Management. Contemporary Accounting Research.15 (spring): 1-24.
Bhagat, S. and B. Black. 2002. The Non-correlation between Board Independence and Long-term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law 27 (2): 231-273.
Bradbury, M. E., Y. T. Mak, and S. M. Tan. 2006. Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals. Pacific Accounting Review 18 (2): 47-68.
Carcello, J. V. and T. L. Neal, 2003. Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals Following "New" Going-Concern reports. The Accounting Review 78 (1): 95-117.
Chaari, M., M. Hamberg, and D. Johanson. 2011. Economic Determinants of Audit Committee Quality. The 6th EAR Net Symposium, Norwegian School of Economics.
Chen, C. J. P. and B. Jaggi. 2000. Association between Independent Non-executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 19 (4-5): 285-310.
Chen, J., R. Duh, and F. N. Shiue. 2008. The Effect of Audit Committees on Earnings-return Association: Evidence from Foreign Registrants in The United States. Corporate Governance. An International Review 16 (1): 32-40.
Chen, K. Y. and J. Zhou. 2007. Audit Committee, Board Characteristics and Auditor Switch Decisions by Andersen’s Clients. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (4): 1085-1117.
Collier, P. and A. Gregory. 1999. Audit Committee Activity and Agency Costs. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 18 (4-5): 311-332.
Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, and A. E. Ellstrand. 1999. Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42 (6): 674-686.
Dhaliwal, D., V. Naiker, and F. Navissi. 2010. The Association between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 787-827.
Dunn, K., and B. Mayhew. 2004. Audit Firm Industry Specialization and Client Disclosure Quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (1): 35–58.
Eng, L. L. and Y. T. Mak. 2003. Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 22 (4): 325-345.
Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency Problem and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2): 288-307.
Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law & Economics 26 (2): 301-325.
Felo, A. J., S. Krishnamurthy, and S. A. Solieri. 2003. Audit Committee Characteristics and the Perceived Quality of Financial Reporting: An Empirical Analysis. Working Paper.
Freeman, R. 1987. The Association between Accounting Earnings and Security Returns for Large and Small Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9 (2): 195-228.
Gul, F. A. and S. Leung. 2004. Board Leadership, Outside Directors’ Expertise and Voluntary Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 23 (5): 351-379.
Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach. 2003. Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 9 (April): 7-26.
Hoitash, R., and U. Hoitash. 2009. The Role of Audit Committees in Managing Relationships with External Auditors after SOX: Evidence from the USA. Managerial Auditing Journal 24 (4): 368-397.
Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. 1976 Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
Karamanou, I. and N, Vafeas. 2005. The Association between Corporate Boards Audit Committee, Management Earning Forecast: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (3): 453-486.
Kelton, A. S. and Y. W. Yang. 2008. The Impact of Corporate Governance on Internet Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 27 (1): 62-87.
Klein, A. 1998. Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure. Journal of Law and Economics 41 (1): 275-303.
Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 375-400.
Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 649-675.
Krishnan, J., Y. Wen, and W. Zhao. 2011. Legal Expertise on Corporate Audit Committees and Financial Reporting Quality. The Accounting Review 86 (6): 2099-2130.
Lama, T. 2011. Mandatory Audit Committees in Australia: Are there Economic Justifications? e-Journal of Social & Behavioural Research in Business 2 (1):8-23.
Laux, C., and V. Laux. 2009. Board Committees, CEO Compensation, and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 869-891.
Ohlson, J. 1983. Price-Earnings Ratios and Earnings Capitalization Under Uncertainty. Journal of Accounting Research 21(1): 141-154.
Patell, J. 1976. Corporate Forecasts of Earnings per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Tests. Journal of Accounting Research 14 (2): 246-276.
Rainsbury, E. A., M. E. Bradbury, and S. F. Cahan. 2008. Firm Characteristics and Audit Committees Complying with “Best Practice” Membership Guidelines. Accounting and Business Research 38 (5): 393-408.
Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings Management through Real Activities Manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (3): 335-370.
Sharma, V., V. Naiker and B. Lee. 2009. Determinants of Audit Committee Meeting Frequency:Evidence from A Voluntary Governance System. Accounting Horizons 23 (3): 245-263.
Smaili, N. and R. Labelle. 2016. Corporate Governance and Accounting Irregularities: Canadian Evidence. Journal of Management & Governance 20 (3): 625-653.
Stewart, J., and L. Munro. 2007. The Impact of Audit Committee Existence and Audit Committee Meeting Frequency on the External Audit: Perceptions of Australian Auditors. International Journal of Auditing 11(1): 51-69.
Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside Directors and CEO Turnover. Journal of Financial and Economics 20 (4): 431-460.
Willekens, M., H. V. Bauwhede, and A. Gaeremynck. 2004. Voluntary Audit Committee Formation and Practices Among Belgian Listed Companies. International Journal of Auditing 8 (3): 207-222.
Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Roles of the Board and the Audit Committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (3): 295-316.
Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan. International Review of Finance 2 (1-2): 21-48.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信