§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2406201620181600
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2016.00796
論文名稱(中文) 接受與拒絕併購之因素探討─以行動APP創業家為例
論文名稱(英文) Why to accept or reject merger and acquisition? A case-study of APP entrepreneurs
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 韋師勛
研究生(英文) Shih-Hsun Wei
學號 603610378
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2016-05-31
論文頁數 64頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 文馨瑩
委員 - 張瑋倫
委員 - 鄭鈞云
關鍵字(中) 併購
創業家
行動APP產業
關鍵字(英) M&A
entrepreneurs
applications industry
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
在行動APP(Application)產業,這樣一個競爭激烈且汰換速度快的環境中,多數創業家因自有資金不足而選擇接受併購,本研究相信仍有少數創業家拒絕被併購,如文中所提及 Snapchat創辦人Evan Spiegel拒絕Facebook、WhatsApp拒絕Google以及Twitch創辦人Kevin Lin拒絕Youtube卻接受Amazon等案例,可見價格並非考量接受或拒絕併購之唯一因素。
本研究採被併方創業家觀點,利用個案研究法、次級資料分析以及專家訪談探討本研究三個個案:Gogolook走著瞧、Snapchat以及Cardinal Blue之創辦人們創業動機,以及接受與拒絕併購之考量因素。經本研究整理所蒐集到的次級資料及訪談紀錄後,歸納出三項行動APP創業家接受併購之因素包括:(1)自有資金不足;(2)另創新業;(3)主併方適配性高。並歸納得出兩項行動APP創業家拒絕併購之因素,包括:(1)堅持創業動機;(2)主併方配適性低。其中配適性包含經營能力、產品範圍及組織文化等構面。
根據上述研究內容,本研究得出結論有二:首先,價格之外的策略因素更為關鍵;除了尚未有行動APP創業家表示價格是考量併購之主要因素,甚至有創業家基於雙方配適性較高而選出價較低的主並方。其次,本研究歸納出創業家考量接受或拒絕併購決策之兩種立場:創業家立場及公司立場;而行動APP創業家們可能會因為立場轉換而改變決策。本研究主要的管理意涵,除了一次性交易的買賣金額高低之外,併購策略應審慎考量主併方與被併方雙方的多元配適性,才能提升長期競爭優勢。
英文摘要
In the competitive and fast-growing environment, such as the application industry, most entrepreneurs accept the M&A offers because their financial resources are insufficient. However, there were few entrepreneurs, such as Evan Spiegel from Snapchat, Kevin Lin from Twitch, refused to being merged by the higher-price bidder.
From the view of the entrepreneurs of the acquired companies, I conducted a multiple case study, secondary data analyses and expert interviews on three cases of Gogolook, Snapchat, and Cardinal Blue, to discuss their reasons to accept or refuse and M&A offer. This research found three reasons of the entrepreneurs to accept an M&A offer: i) insufficient financial resource; ii) other venture opportunities; iii) the higher fitness between the acquiring company and the acquired company. Contrastingly, two reasons to refuse and M&A offer were identified: i) persistence of the entrepreneurial motivations, likes achievement; ii) the lower fitness between the acquiring company and the acquired company, including three dimensions of management capabilities, product scope, and organizational culture.
This research has drawn two major conclusions. First, entrepreneurs tend to consider other strategic factors than the bidding price; none of the entrepreneurs in this research claimed that price is the main reason to accept or refuse M&A offers. Second, entrepreneurs may change their decision to accept or reject based on their strategic position, either entrepreneurs or company position. In addition to the one-time price of M&A, it is recommended for both of the acquiring company and the acquired company to consider their strategic fitness in order to enhance their long-term competitive advantage.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄                                                                                                                                   VI
圖目錄                                                                                                                              VII
表目錄                                                                                                                             VIII
附錄目錄                                                                                                                           IX
第一章緒論                                                                                                                      1
第一節研究背景與動機                                        2
第二節研究目的                                              4
第三節研究流程                                              6
第二章 文獻探討                                                                                                               8
第一節全球化微型企業                                        8
第二節併購理論                                             10
第三節創業家人格特質                                       14
第三章研究方法                                                                                                            17
第一節多個案研究法                                         17
第二節次級資料分析法                                       18
第三節專家訪談                                             20
第四章個案分析                                                                                                            22
第一節行動APP產業背景                                     22
第二節Gogolook走著瞧                                      24
第三節Snapchat                                             27
第四節Cardinal Blue                                        30
第五章研究發現                                                                                                            33
第一節行動APP個案歸納併購因素                             33
第二節創業家接受併購之因素探討                             36
第三節創業家拒絕併購之因素探討                             37
第六章結論與建議                                                                                                        39
第一節結論                                                 39
第二節研究限制                                             40
第三節管理意涵                                             41
參考文獻                                                     42
次級資料來源                                                 48
圖目錄
圖1-1台灣行動APP團隊人數規模                                                                      3
圖1-2本研究研究流程                                                                                            7
圖2-1併購種類圖                                                                                                  11
圖3-1次級資料研究的步驟                                                                                  19
圖4-1行動應用程式2017預估產值                                                                    23
圖4-2 2014年12月App商店的營收國家排行                                                  24
表目錄
表2-1併購類型                                                                                                      12
表2-2 Weston,Chung and Hoag(1990)七項併購理論                                        13
表2-3 Dubini (1989) 28個問項                                                                             15
表3-1個案受訪者基本資料                                                                                  21
表4-1 Gogolook走著瞧團隊創辦人資料整理                                                     25
表4-2 Gogolook走著瞧接受韓國NHN併購之觀點整理                                  26
表4-3 Snapchat創辦人資料整理                                                                          27
表4-4 Snapchat拒絕Facebook併購之觀點整理                                                29
表4-5 Cardinal Blue團隊創辦人資料整理                                                           30
表4-6 Cardinal Blue尚未有正式的併購提案之觀點整理                                  32
表5-1行動APP創業家接受併購之案例整理                                                    34
表5-2行動APP創業家拒絕併購之案例整理                                                    35
表5-3接受併購之原因與立場                                                                              36
表5-4拒絕併購之原因與立場                                                                              37
參考文獻
Lin, D. (2014). 拒絕併入Youtube? Twitch以9.7億美金花落亞馬遜. 天下雜誌
方琬庭. (2014). 科技業併購潮來襲,誰是下一個WhatsApp, 自由時報. 
吳慧玲. (2007). 全球化下影響企業跨國併購成敗的文化因素─以Yahoo!併購Kimo與BenQ併購Siemens之個案比較研究為例. 銘傳大學.   
李美華, 孔祥明, 林嘉娟, & 王婷玉譯. (1998) 社會科學研究方法. 台北:時英. 原書 Earl Babbie (1998). The Practice of Scial Research.
李青芬, 李雅婷, & 趙慕芬譯. (1994). 組織行為學. 台北:華泰. 原書 Stephen P. Robbins (1992). Organizational Behaviour.
林哲群, & 王純真. (2003). 外國公部門及非營利組織有關婦女創業與微型企業之輔導制度與作法之研究.
林源祥. (2013). 以知識創造SECI模式探討App開發者運用知識管理於開發過程之研究. 清華大學.
姚蕙芸. (2011). 企業併購類型、評價方法及綜效之探討. 台北商技學報.
陳奕安. (2013). 併購企業之無形資產與經營績效之關聯性探討. 國立交通大學.
陳雪如, 施光訓, & 葉兆晏. (2004). 企業合併與收購決策之策略分析與實證研究. 華人經濟研究, 2(1), 132-158.
柳宗佑. (2014). 技術創新如何影響動態能力之發展:艾斯摩爾(ASML)公司之個案研究. 國立臺南大學.
周維忠. (2016). 邁向數位企業的挑戰與契機. 產業情報研究所.
杜英宗. (2015). 用併購讓經營更卓越:就算爬窗也要聽的熱門課. 天下雜誌.
翁書婷. (2015). 全球併購潮襲來,獨缺台灣?. 數位時代.
馬祥芝. (2015). 導覽結構設計對高齡使用者認知負荷之影響:以行動應用程式為例. 元智大學.
黃光玉, 劉念夏, & 陳清文譯. (2004). 媒介與傳播研究方法:質化與量化研究途徑. 臺北:風雲論壇. 原書Arthur A. Berger (2000). Media and Communication Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approache.
黃瓊瑤. (2012) 公司治理與併購績效關聯性之探討. 長庚大學.
楊惠如. (2014). 文化衝突對企業跨國併購的影響研究. 東吳大學.   
康惠如. (2005). 企業重組與併購─兼論台灣近五年十大併購案之併購行為與績效分析. 台灣大學.   
許文志. (1995). 邁向21世紀台灣中小企業經營策略 (Vol. 1): 揚智文化事業股份有限公司.
郭正漢. (2011). 併購動機、併購對象之選擇與併購後之整合階段分析─以O公司併購L公司為例. 國立中央大學.   
郭芝榕. (2015). Gogolook收購競爭對手小熊來電通知,獨佔香港市場. 數位時代.
畢恆達. (1996). 詮釋學與質性研究. 胡幼慧(編)質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例. 台北:巨流.
蔡易靜. (2011). 2011年台灣行動應用軟體市場發展最新概況. Forseeing Innovative New Didiservies.
趙碧華, & 朱美珍編譯. (1995). 研究方法-社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用. 臺北:雙業書廊. 原書 Allen Rubin, Earl Babbie (1993). Research Methods for Social W
郭芝榕. (2015). 創業投資熱!台灣9大法人募資15億,成立本誠創投基金. 數位時代.
陳浩榮. (2014). 企業動態能力的快速測量. 國立交通大學.
曾炫章. (2006). 國內入口網站選擇海外上市與被併購決策的探討─以個案為例. 東吳大學.
蔡金宏. (2013). 如何為螞蟻雄兵築巢?. 經濟部全球台商e焦點電子報. 
鄭志凱. (2014). 願「微型企業」遍地開花. 天下雜誌.
袁方 (編). (2002). 社會研究方法. 臺北:五南
賴怡旨. (2009). 網路拍賣創業者之創業動機、創業機會與創業導向對創業績效之影響─以環境不確定性為干擾變數. 國立高雄應用科技大學.   
謝良傑. (2012). 內湖科技園區周邊微型企業創業績效之研究. 中國科技大學.   
羅之盈. (2015). 台灣app團隊三億出嫁中國. 天下雜誌.
Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2), 209-231.
Babbie, E. R. (2002). The basics of social research: Wadsworth Group.
Bergh, D. D., & Lim, E. N-K. (2008). Learning how to restructure: Absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 593-616. 
Burgman, J. B. (1986). Issues And Advance in Mergers Research, Journal of Financial Research.
Caves, R. E. (1989). Mergers, takeovers and economic efficiency: Foresight vs. hindsight. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7(1), 151-174. 
Cavusgil, S. T. (1980). On the internationalisation precess of firms. European Research, 8(6), 273-281. 
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five tradtition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and ritual of corporate life. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Dubini, P. (1989). The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(1), 11-226. 
Eccles, R. G., & Nohria, N. (1992a). Beyond the hype: Rediscovering the essence of management: MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Eccles, R. G., & Nohria, N. (1992b). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action: Harvard Business School Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from casse study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504-529. 
Fowler, K. L., & Schmidt, D. R. (1989). Determinants of tender offer post-acquistion financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 339-350. 
Gilad, B., & Levine, P. (1986). A behavioral model entrepreneurial supply. Journal of small business management, 24(4), 45-53.
Graebner, M. S. (2009). Caveat venditor: Trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 435-472. 
Hamel, J., Dufour, S., & Fortin (1993). Case Study methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, M. A., Davison, C., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquistions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469-502. 
Jensen, M. C. (1988). Takeovers: Their casuses and consequences. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 21-48. 
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). Internationalization process of firm – model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.
Kaplan, R. (1988). One cost system is not enough. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 61-66. 
Kaplan, S. (1988). Some principles the handbook left out: Notes to the neophyte researcher interested in changing the world. Journal Of Environmental Psychology, 8, 165-166. 
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1996). The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalisation theory: Greenwich, Conn.
Kummer, C., & Steger, U. (2008). Why merger and acquisition (M&A) waves reoccur: The vicious circle from pressure to failure. Strategy Management Review, 2(1), 44-63.
Lichtenberg, F. R., & Seigel, D. (1987). Productivity and changes in ownership of manufacturing plants. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 18(3), 643-684. 
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative ovservation and analysis: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. (1997). Internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6(6), 561-583.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society: Martino Fine Books.
Mcdougall, P. P. & Oviatt, B. M. (1996) New venture internationalization, strategic change and performance: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 23-42.
McGuckin, R. H., & Nguyen, S. V. (1995). On productivity and plant ownership change: New evidence from the longitudinal research database. RAND Journal of Economics, 26(2), 257-276. 
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative: MA: Harvard University Press.
Nocke, V., & Whinston, M. D. (2013). Merger policy with merger choice. American Econamic Review, 103(2), 1006-1033. 
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods: CA: Sage.
Pilsbury, S., Meaney, A., & Muller, S. (2010). Are horizontal mergers and vertical integration a problem? : OECD/ITF.
Rasmussen, E. S., & Madsen, T. K. (2002). The born global concept. 28th EIBA conderence. Athens: Athens University of Economics and Business. Retrieved May 9, 2005 from http://www.sam.sdu.dk/~era/EIBA%20Rasmussen%202002%20.pdf
Ravenscraft, D. J., & Scherer, F. M. (1989). The profitability of mergers. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7(1), 101-116. 
Rennie, M. W. (1993). Global competitiveness: Born global. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45-52. 
Sahlman, W. A., Stevenson, H., Roberts, M. J. & Bhide, A. V. (1999). The Entrepreneurial Venture. 2nd ed. Harvard Business School Press.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tayor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: Wilsy.
Stake, R. E. (1995). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weston, J. F., Chung, K. S., & Hoag, S. E. (1990), Mergers, resturcturing, and corporate control, Prentice-Hall Press, New Jersey.
Wu, C. W., Reuer, J. J., & Ragozzino, R. (2013). Insights of singnaling theory for acquisitions research. Adcances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 12, 173-191. 
Yin, R. K. (1994a). Case study research: Design and methods: CA: Sage Publicaions.
Yin, R. K. (1994b). Case study research: Design and methods, applied social research: CA: Sage.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信