||Based on the 1970s as an intermediary modern poetry debate, analysis and Su Shao-lien, Mr Joshua Law into poetry, how to compare the two poems and literary event of this dialogue. Su Shao-lien from that poem, and a lot of debate on the expectations of modern poetry; comparison, Mr Law has more poetry into the thick atmosphere in an attempt to go beyond the polemics guidance, does not meet, but do not fall into polemics criticized defect .
This paper not to discuss the poet's self-expectations or self-evaluation, or even other people's evaluation, analysis, and starting from the poetry itself, to mining, such polemic works of their own point of view and shrouded the horizon, will receive more exposition. This attempt to expectations in previous research, access to some of the more innovative views.
The author will be Su Shao-lien, respectively, Mr Law into the poems, according to the order of the creative sort, Yi Shoushou Appreciation for the summary. In addition to master each poem in the wonderful, but also from the work, with the polemics of opinion can find an opportunity to dialogue.
Sections of the distribution, a comprehensive comparison of the two poems way. The first to explore the issue into two categories, one category at the second chapter, "Poetry Art Millions", Su Shao-lien of four poems and two of the Prose Poem, narrative poems and poets in the image of the two operators, language operation, Themes such as the content changes, and so on, then concluded, and modern poetry polemic dialogue results.
Another place in the third chapter, "Poetry of the territory," the poet in the first two modern poems, or the same or different focus of concern for the Analysis of; contrast to the two poems, the start of their background knowledge, cultural background. Then compare that with the debate, the two poets to demonstrate the creativity, in the past 30 years to the development of modern poetry, by significance.
Chapter IV of the two poems in the dialogue and debate, and three of the latest collection of poems, for evaluation.