本研究旨在探討實施Wh-Questions問題分類法、搜尋技巧策略及摘要策略理論對國小五年級學生網路資料提取的正確性與完整性之學習成效。研究對象為臺北市某國小五年級四個班級學生，研究設計採等組前後測準實驗研究，將參與研究的四個班級隨機分派兩班為「實驗組」、另兩班為「控制組」。資料處理主要以共變數分析來了解實驗組與控制組前後測差異之顯著性，及卡方檢定來了解兩組關鍵字運用變化的情形。
主要研究結果如下：
一、就關鍵字運用的情形而言，經卡方檢定分析，實驗組經教學後改變使用關鍵字的方式是顯著的。且實驗組由原本70%以上慣用句子做為關鍵字的比率，降低到20.8%的比率，轉為有31.3%使用語詞、4.7%使用轉換焦點、30.7%使用布林值、12.5%同時使用布林值與轉換焦點。
二、就搜尋問題答題率表現而言，實驗組的總平均上傳率為87.9%，相較於前測的72.79%，上傳率提升了15.11%，顯示經教學後近九成的實驗組學生能在時間內找到問題的答案並上傳。
三、就資料搜尋的正確性表現而言，經獨立樣本單因子共變數分析，「教學與否」對「後測成績」有顯著影響。
四、就「不具固定字數答案」題型而言，經獨立樣本單因子共變數分析，「教學有無」對提取資料摘要分數的「後測成績」是顯著的。

The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of Wh-Questions classification, searching skill and summarization strategy on fifth-grade students’ performances of the Internet information searching and extraction. A quasi-experimental design was used in this study. Four classes students were assigned to experimental and control group. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect significant difference between two groups and Chi-square test was used to examine the changes of keywords utilization. 
The result of the study were:
    In regard to the performance of the use of keywords strategy, analysis of Chi-square test showed that there were group differences. The rate of using sentences as keywords strategy of experimental group has reduced from 70% to 20.8%. Phrases strategy, focus changing strategy, Boolean strategy, and using Boolean and focus changing strategy simultaneously accounted for about 31.3%, 4.7%, 30.7% and 12.5% respectively of strategy use.
    The average upload rate of question searching has risen from 72.79% to 87.9（improving rate 15.11%）. Results indicated that 90﹪students in the experimental group could find the answer and upload it in time.
    The result of the independent one-way analysis of covariance showed that searching strategy instruction has a significant effect on performance of answering question on posttest.
    With regard to the performance of unfixed words answer of questions, analysis of independent one-way covariance revealed that a significant effect of searching strategy instruction.

中文摘要…………………………………………………………..I
英文摘要………………………………………………………… II
目次……………………………………………………………….Ⅲ
表目次……………………………………………………………..V
圖目次……………………………………………………………..Ⅶ

第壹章、緒論	1
第一節 研究背景與動機	1
第二節 研究問題	4
第三節 名詞釋義	4
第四節 研究範圍與限制	5
第貳章、文獻分析	7
第一節 國內外國小學生網路資料搜尋現況分析	7
第二節 問題的分類型態	10
第三節 摘要策略理論	16
第四節 資訊搜尋之相關研究	27
第叁章、研究設計與方法	41
第一節 研究樣本	42
第二節 研究設計	44
第三節 研究假設	46
第四節 研究工具	47
第五節 研究程序	62
第六節 資料處理	77
第肆章 結果與討論	79
第一節 結果	79
第二節 討論	96
第伍章 結論與建議	105
第一節 結論	105
第二節 建議	109
參考文獻	113
中文部分	113
西文部分	116
附件一 全國各國小網路查資料比賽試題篩選表	122
附件二 全國各國小網路查資料比賽試題與關鍵字驗證彙整表	127

中文部分
王亭雅 (2003)。網頁搜尋引擎問答。國立中正大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
方金雅、鍾易達、邱上真(1998)。國小學童閱讀摘要能力評定規範之發展。載於國小教學評量的反省與前瞻，123-137頁。台南：台南師院測驗發展中心。
古豪坤（1999）。網路學習課程與資源分類系統之研究。國立台南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
何榮桂（2002）。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展—兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育，87，22-48。
沈中偉(2004)。科技與學習-理論與實務。台北：心理。
李坤霖(1999)。網際網路FAQ檢索中意圖萃取及語意比對之研究。國立成功大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
呂雪惠(2004)。新一代以語意為基礎的Wiki系統Development of a New Semantic-based Wiki System。國立台灣科技大學資訊工程系碩士班論文。
官美媛(1999)。國小學生摘取文章大意策略之教學研究－以五年級說明文為例。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林天祐(2003)。校務發展策略與 SWOT 分析。臺北市教師研習中心主編：九十二年度教師專業成長精緻學校經營研習班講義彙編，15-16。
林秀貞(1997)。國小六年級學童社會科閱讀理解研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
洪蘭、曾志朗(2001)。兒童閱讀的理念－認知神經心理學的觀點。教育資料與研究，38，1-4。
翁婉真(2002)。國小高年級學生網路資訊尋求行為之研究。國立台灣大學圖書資訊研究所碩士論文。
翁婉真、黃慕萱(2004)。國小高年級學生網路資訊行為之研究。大學圖書館 8(1)，92-106。
教育部全球資訊網(2007)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。民96年5月22日，取自：http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/MOECC/EDU7892001/information/itpo/itprojects/itmasterplan.htm
陳正昌(2004)。SPSS行為及社會科學統計學統計軟體應用。台北：巨流。
陳昭男(2003)。網頁之型態、時間、與關鍵詞偵測。國立中正大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
陳琇玲譯(2006)。John．Battle著。The Search搜尋未來。台北：商周。
陳景揆(1999)。探勘中文新聞文件中的概念關聯及趨勢。國立雲林科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
陳建明(1997)。閱讀理解策略教學效果之個案研究--以花蓮縣安通部落阿美族國 小學生為例。國立花蓮師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
許晴佩(2005)。QAR「問題－答案關係」閱讀理解策略教學對國小四年級學童閱讀理解成效之研究。臺中師範學院語文教育學系碩士班論文。
陳文安(2006)。國小學生摘要策略之教學研究---以六年級為例。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
郭生玉(1995)。心理與教育研究法。精華：台北。
黃怡如(1999)。終端使用者與系統互動前後檢索問題、檢索概念與檢索詞彙變化之研究。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。
黃嶸生(2002)。整合式閱讀理解策略輔助系統對國小學童閱讀能力和策略運用的效果。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
黃瓊儀(2004)。不同閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀理解障礙學生教學成效之研究。國立台北師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
資策會網站(2006)。資策會FIND 網站 -- Focus Internet News and Data。2007年5月5日，取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many &id=165。
張雅萍(2000)。摘要策略對網路化學習成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
張莉珍(2003)。故事構策略與摘要策略對增進國小六年級低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解之比較研究。私立中原大學教育研究所碩士論文。
潘俊帆(2001)。以貝氏網路為基礎的個人差異化知識處理機制。東海大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
盧建勳(2003)。資訊科技融入社會科主題式教學之行動研究。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文。
劉玲吟(1994)。後設認知閱讀策略的教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀效果之研究。台灣彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
謝政燿(2003)。Big 6技能融入主題式學習網路化教學研究。國立中山大學教育研究所在職專班碩士論文。
謝寶煖(2000)。網站搜尋E網打盡---當滑鼠遇上知更鳥。臺北：科博館。
顏龍源、沈秉毅、江志鵬、溫勝雄、徐憲文(2001)。『搜尋引擎』大搜查。2001資訊與教育雜誌特刊，293-301。
魏靜雯(2004)。心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
蘇嘉穎(2006)。文章摘要策略教學系統的設計與應用－以自然類說明文為例。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
賴麗珍譯(2006)。Wormeli著。教學生如何做摘要。台北：心理。
Gove，P.B.(1986).《Webster's third new international》，台北市，新月。
Howard Gardner (2006). 哈佛商業評論中文版，第53期，28，臺灣英語雜誌社。
TESEC國教專業社群網(2007)。九年一貫課程與教學網。2007年5月22日，取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/ 9CC/fields/2003/language01-source.php

西文部分
Ackermann, E., & Hartman, K. (2005). Searching and researching on the internet and the world wide web (4rd ed.). Wilsonville, OR: Franklin Beedle & Assoc.
Anderson, Valerie, Hidi, Suzanne. (1988). Teaching students to summarize. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 26-28.
Bates, Marcia J. (1979). Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(4), 205-214.
Beck, Joseph E., Jack Mostow, Andrew Cuneo, Juliet Bey (2002). Can automated questioning help comprehension. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~listen/pdfs/AIED2003_helping_
comprehension_with_automated_questions.pdf
Bensoussan, M., & Kreindler, I.(1990). Improving advanced reading comprehension in a foreign language: Summaries vs. short-answer questions. Journal of Research in Reading, 13(1), 55-68.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts:The development of exerperties. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14. 
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
Choo, Chun Wei, Brian Detlor and Don Turnbull.(2000). "Web Work: Information Seeking and Knowledge Management on the World Wide Web." Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cooke, Alison (1999). Neal-Schuman authoritative guide to evaluating information on the Internet Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc. New York, NY, USA.
Dillon, J.T. (1984). The Classification of Research Questions, Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 327-361. 
Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G, Roehler, L.R., & Pearson, P. D.(1991). Moving from the old to the new : Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D.(2002). Effective practice for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. J. Samuels (Eds.) What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.205-242).Newark, DE : International Reading Association.
Eleanor B. Howe (2002). The goals and mechanics of teaching a short course in electronic search skills to high school students. Knowledge Quest, 30(4), 38-41.
Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 65-74.
Environics Research Groups.(2001). Young Canadians in a wired world: The students’ view. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from the World Wide Web: http://www.media- awareness.ca/english/research/YCWW/phaseI/students.cfm
Fidel, R. (1984). Online searching styles: A case-study-based model of searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(4), 211-221. 
Fidel, R. (1991). Searchers' selection of search keys: I. The selection routine. II. Controlled vocabulary or free-text searching. III. Searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(7), 490-527.
Foos, P. W., ＆ Fisher, R. P. (1988). Using tests as learning opportunities. Journal of Education Psychology, 80, 179-183.
Friend, R. (2000). Teaching summarization as a content area strategy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44 (4), 320-329.
Gajria, M., & Salvia, J.(1992).The effect of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Expcetional Children, 58(6),508-516.
Garner, R. (1982). Efficient text summarization: Costs and benefits. Journal of Educational Research, 75(5), 275-279.
Graesser, A.C., Murachver, T. (1985). Symbolic procedures of question answering. In A.C. Graesser, J.B. Black (Eds.), The psychology of questions. Lawrence Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 15-88.
Gunn, Holly (2002). Seaching the web. Teacher Librarian, 30(1), 52.
Hidi, S., & Anderson V. (1986). Producting written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 473-493. 
Hare, V. C., & Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 62-78. 
Hare, V. C., Rabinowitz, M., Schieble, K. M. (1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 72-88. 
Head, M. H., Readence, J. E., & Buss, R. R.(1989). An examination of summary writing as a measure of reading comprehension. Reading research and instruction, 28(4), 1-11.
Henk J. Voorbij(1999). Searching scientific information on the Internet: A Dutch academic user survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(7), 598-615.
Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users and real information needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the Web. Information Processing & Management, 36(2), 207-227.
Jonassen, D. H.(2000).Computers as mindtools for schools. Prentice Hall, Inc., New      Jersey.
Keyes, J. G. (1996). Using Conceptual Categories of Questions to Measure Differences in Retrieval Performance. Paper presented at the ASIS 1996 Annual Meeting: Global Complexity: Information, Chaos and Control, Baltimore, MD. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from the World Wide Web: http://www.asis.org /annual-96/ElectronicProceedings/keyes.html
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
Lehnert, W.G. (1978). The process of question answering: A computer simulation of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lytinen, Steven and Noriko Tomuro (2002). “The use of question types to match questions in FAQFinder,” Proceedings of the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium on Mining Answers from Texts and Knowledge Bases, 46-53.
Malone, L. D. & Mastropieri, M. A.(1992). Reading comprehension instruction :Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Expectional Children, 58(3), 270-279.
Marchionini, Gary (1995). Information-Seeking Perspective and Framework.  Retrieved May 22, 2007, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ils.unc.edu /~march/isee_book/Chapter_3.pdf
Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21,121-143.
Netcraft（2007）. Netcraft: May 2007 Web Server Survey. Retrieved May 5, 2007, from the World Wide Web: http://news.netcraft.com/.
Nist, S.L., & Simpson, M. (2002). College studying. Reading Online, 5(8).Retrieved May 29, 2004, from the World Wide Web :http://www.readingonline.org/ articles/art_index.asp?HREF=handbook/nist/index.html.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L.(1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175. 
Pharo, N. & Järvelin, K. (2006) “Irrational” searchers and IR-rational researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 222–232.
Pomerantz, J. (2005). A Linguistic Analysis of Question Taxonomies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 715-728.
Robinson, W. P., & Rackstraw, S. J. (1972). A question of answers(Vol. I). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Raya Fidel (1985). Moves in online searching. Online Review 9(1), 61-74.
Radev., D. R., Hovy., E. & McKeown., K. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on summarization. Computational Linguistics, 28(4), 399-408.
Raphael, Taffy E., Kathy Highfield, and Kathryn H.Au (2006). QAR Now: Question Answer Relationships(Eds.), New York: Scholastic.
Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G.(1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-438.
Schacter, John, Chung, Gregory K. W. & Forr, Aimee (1998). Children’s Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(9), 840.
Selinger, B., Huston, B., & Fortune, J.(1993). Starting at the top: Using hierarchicalstructure to train college students to summarize. (Eric Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 364 296).
Spink, A. and Ozmutlu, H.C. (2002). Characteristics of question format web queries: an exploratory study. Information Processing and Management, 38(4), 453-471.
Steven L. Lytinen, Noriko Tomuro(2002). The use of question types to match questions in FAQFinder. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from the World Wide Web: http://condor.depaul.edu/~ntomuro/papers/spring02.pdf
Thomas Andre(1979). Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 280-318.
Taffy E. Raphael (1985). Increasing students’awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 217-235.
Vakkari P.(2001).Changes in Search Tactics and Relevance Judgements when Preparing a Research Proposal A Summary of the Findings of a Longitudinal Study. Information Retrieval, V(4), 295-310.
Wallace, R. & Kupperman, J. (1997). Online search in the science classroom: Benefits and possibilities. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from the World Wide Web: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/ papers/cs/23597/http:zSzzSzwww.msu.eduzSz~ ravenmwzSzpubszSzonline_search.pdf / wallace97line.pdf
Washington, Eugene(1977). Wh-Questions in teaching composition: Staffroom interchange. College Composition and Communication, 28(1), 54-56.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learnign strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers' meatcomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disibilities, 6, 117-136.