§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2402201514243400
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2015.00766
論文名稱(中文) 透過認知寫作過程來提升學生寫作態度、讀者意識以及寫作品質
論文名稱(英文) Improving EFL University Students’ Writing Attitudes, Audience Awareness and Writing Quality through Cognitive Writing Process
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 英文學系博士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of English
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 103
學期 1
出版年 104
研究生(中文) 梁興皇
研究生(英文) Hsing-Huang Liang
學號 899110166
學位類別 博士
語言別 英文
第二語言別
口試日期 2015-01-08
論文頁數 195頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 王藹玲
委員 - 車蓓群
委員 - 施佑芝
委員 - 林怡弟
委員 - 林銘輝
關鍵字(中) 認知寫作過程
寫作態度
讀者意識
寫作品質
關鍵字(英) Cognitive writing process
writing attitudes
audience awareness
writing quality
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討施行認知寫作過程在台灣大學生寫作表現之影響。研究對象為六十二位非英語系大一學生。研究期間為每週每堂課兩小時,共計十八週。研究對象在一學期內撰寫六篇寫作以及研究開始與結束需各別填寫一份問卷和進行一次全民英檢寫作模擬測驗以供分析。另外,九名學生則在研究結束後進行訪談。量化分析以成對樣本T檢定來分析寫作測驗以及問卷前後測之差異。質化分析以 ESL Composition Profile和 Audience Awareness Level來分析學生寫作品質和讀者意識,並透過課後訪談歸納出同異點。
  研究結果顯示: (一) 學生的寫作測驗分數在後測均提高,寫作品質之「內容」、「組織」以及「語言運用」稍有提升; (二) 大多數學生對於使用認知寫作過程提升他們寫作動機均持正面肯定態度;(三)大多數學生在書寫論說文時均能提出明確的論點以及考量讀者背景、喜好以及興趣。本研究同時發現,少數學生對於線上寫作資源以及運用讀者意識在寫作上表現不如大多數的學生。綜上所述,本研究指出認知寫作過程可提升學生寫作動機、寫作品質並且強化學生的讀者意識及寫作特色。最後本研究希望提供教師在寫作課程在施行認知寫作過程提出淺見,並建議未來研究方向。
英文摘要
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of implementing the cognitive writing process Taiwanese university students’ writing performance. The participants were 62 freshman from one “Freshman English” course at one private university in New Taipei City. This course consisted of two hours per week for 18 academic weeks. 
  For data collocation, the participants had to complete two Inventory of Processes in College Composition (IPCC) questionnaires, two General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) writing test, and six writing prompts. In addition, nine volunteer participants participated in semi-structured interviews.  For quantitative analysis, statistical significance tests on their writing test scores and questionnaires through paired sample t-tests. For qualitative analysis, the researcher evaluated their writing quality improvement and audience awareness change through ESL Composition Profile and Audience Awareness Level. 
The study results showed that: (a) the participants’ GEPT scores slightly improved and their writing prompt quality improved in terms of content development, organization and language usage; (b) the results of questionnaire showed most of the participants had positive attitudes towards using the cognitive writing process to enhance their writing motivation and (c) most of the participants used explicit statements to support their opinions especially in argumentative writing and considered target readers’ knowledge, needs and interests.  The researcher suggested that teachers could apply the cognitive writing process into their writing instruction to enhance students’ writing motivation, improve their writing quality and strengthen their audience awareness and voice in writing.  The researcher hoped this study can provide EFL teachers with a valuable perspective on writing instruction and provide insights for teachers into implementing the cognitive writing process in higher education.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1 Introduction	1
Statement of the Problem	2
Purpose of the Study	8
Research Questions	9
Significance of the Study	9
Chapter 2 Review of the Literature	
English Writing Instruction Reformation in Taiwan	11
Cognitive Writing Processes Model	13
Cognitive Writing Processes in Taiwan	29
Writing Content and Genre	31
Two Relevant Issues	35
Summary of Chapter Two	44
Chapter 3 Methodology	45
Rationale for the Research Methods	45
Participants	46
Settings	47
Research Design	48
Teaching Materials	49
Instruments	50
Researcher’s Role	54
Typical Classroom Activities	55
Research Procedures	57
Data Collection	61
Data Analysis	63
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion	66
Overall Descriptive Results	68
Positive Responding to IPCC Questionnaire	77
Participants’ Perceptions of Using Voice in Writing	78
Positively Stimulating the Participants’ Strong Voice in Writing	81
Participants’ Perceptions of Doing Writing Discussion	82
Participants’ Reflections on Enhancing Writing Motivation through Overall Writing Activities	85
Participants’ Reflections on Teaching Materials and Teacher Instructions	89
Positive Enhancing the Participants’ Writing Motivation	92
Participants’ Perceptions of Using Self-assessment in Writing	94
Participants’ Perceptions of Using Revising in Writing	95
Participants’ Reflections on Using Peer-assessment in Writing	96
Participants’ Reflections on the Teacher’s Written Feedback	98
Proper Application of Formative Assessment into the Participants’ Writing	99
Hao’s writing performance	104
Irene’s writing performance	112
Ann’s writing performance	118
Obvious Improvement in Students’ Writing Prompts	125
Participants’ Perceptions of Applying Audience Awareness into Writing	126
Participants’ Interviews on Using Audience Awareness in Writing	130
Strengthening the Participants’ Audience Awareness in the Writing Process	134
Participants’ Reflections on Improving Writing Quality through Overall Writing Activities	136
Significant Improvement in the Participants’ Writing Quality	139
The Instructor’s Observation	140
Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations	142
Summary of the Study	142
Conclusions	144
Implications of the Study	144
Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research	146
References	149
Appendices 	175
Appendix A	175
Appendix B	177
Appendix C	182
Appendix D	186
Appendix E	187
Appendix F	188
Appendix G	190
Appendix H	191
Appendix I	193
Appendix J	195
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1	
Summary of the Principal Orientations to L2 Writing Teaching	34
Table 2	
Seven Negative Worded Items	53
Table 3	
Timetable of Data Collection	61
Table 4	
Summary of the Data Analysis	64
Table 5	
Participants’ Background Information to English Proficiency and Learning Period	69
Table 6	
Participants’ Background Information to English Writing Learning	70
Table 7	
Results of Comparison of the Post-test and Pre-test of the IPCC Questionnaire	71
Table 8	
Results of the Participants’ Perceptions on Pre-writing Part	73
Table 9	
Results of the Participants’ Perceptions with Different Genres in the Writing Part	75
Table 10	
Results of the Participants’ Perceptions on Revising in the Post-Writing Part	76
Table 11	
Distribution of the Participants’ Responses to Voice in Writing	78
Table 12	
Three Themes of the Participants’ Responses to Writing Learning	82
Table 13	
Frequency of the Participants’ Perceptions on Overall Writing Activities	86
Table 14	
Summary of the Participants’ Perceptions to Teaching Materials and the Teacher’s Instruction	90
Table 15	
Distribution of the Participants’ Responses to Self-assessment in Writing	94
Table 16	
Summary of the Participants’ Responses to Revising in Writing	96
Table 17	
Results of the Comparison between the Post-test and Pre-test of the GEPT Writing Tests	102

Table 18	
Distribution of the Participants’ Responses to Audience Awareness in Writing	126
Table 19	
Three Themes of the Participants’ Responses to Audience Awareness	128
Table 20	
Distribution of the Participants’ Reflections on Improving Writing Quality	136
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Structure of the Writing Model	14
Figure 2. A mind mapping for brainstorming a writing task	33
Figure 3. Triangulation Design	46
Figure 4. Flowchart of the Research Procedure.	58
Figure 5. Example 1: Hao’s pre-test writing	105
Figure 6. Example 2: Hao’s post-test writing	106
Figure 7. Example 3: Hao’s writing prompt 1-1	107
Figure 8. Example 4: Hao’s writing prompt 1-2	108
Figure 9. Example 5: Hao’s writing prompt 5-1	109
Figure 10. Example 6: Hao’s writing prompt 5-2	110
Figure 11. Example 7: Hao’s writing prompt 6-1	111
Figure 12. Example 8: Hao’s writing prompt 6-2	112
Figure 13. Example 1: Irene’s pre-test writing	113
Figure 14. Example 2: Irene’s post-test writing	114
Figure 15. Example3: Irene’s writing prompt 3-1	115
Figure 16. Example4: Irene’s writing prompt 3-2	116
Figure 17. Example: Irene’s writing prompt 6-1	116
Figure 18. Example: Irene’s writing prompt 6-2	117
Figure 19. Example 1: Ann’s pre-test writing	119
Figure 20. Example 2: Ann’s post-test writing	120
Figure 21. Example 3: Ann’s writing prompt 2-1	121
Figure 22. Example 4: Ann’s writing prompt 2-2	122
Figure 23. Example 5: Ann’s writing prompt 4-1	124
Figure 24. Example 6: Ann’s writing prompt 4-3	125
參考文獻
Alamargot,D.,Caporossi,G., Chesnet,D., & Ros, C.(2011). 
What makes a skilled writer? Working memory and audience awareness during text composition. Learning and Individual Differences,21(5),505-516.
Atkinson, D.(2003).L2 writing in the post-process ear: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing,12(1),3-15. 
Bacha,N.(2001). Writing evaluation: what can analytic  versus holistic essay scoring tell us? System,29(3), 371-383.
Beach,R.,& Friedrich,T.(2008).Response to writing. In C. A. MacArthur,S.Graham,& J.Fitzgerald(Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.222-234). New York, NY:Guilford Press. 
Benson,M.J.(1991). University ESL reading: A content analysis. English for Specific Purposes,10(2),75–88.
Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L.(1994).Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In J.S. Carlson 
(Series Ed.) & E. C. Butterfield (Vol. Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 2. Children writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57-81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 
Berrill, D. P. (1992). Issues of audience: egocentrism revisited.In R. Andres (Ed.), Rebirth of rhetoric: Essays in language, culture and education (pp.81-101). London, UK: Routledge. 
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2),102-118. 
Bitchener,J.,& Knoch,U.(2008). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback.Language Teaching Research,12(3),409-431. 
Bitchener, J.,Young, S.,&  Cameron, D.(2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,14(3),191-205. 
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).(2014). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish
Brown, H. D.(2007).Teaching by principles:An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Castello, M.,Gonzalez,L., & Inseta, A.(2010). Academic writing regulation in doctoral studies: The impact of collaborative revision in texts. Revista Espanola de Pedagogia,247(1),521-537. 
Castello,M.,& Inseta, A.(2012). Texts as artifacts-in-activity: Developing authorial identity and academic voice in writing academic research papers. In M. Castello & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. London,UK: Emerald Group
Publishing Limited. 
Castello, M., Inseta, A., Pardo, M., Liesa, E., & Martinez-Fernandez, R.(2011). Tutoring the end-of-studies dissertation: Helping psychology students find their academic voice. Higher Education,63(1),97-115. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9428-9. 
Chao, T. C.(1998). They all write English: Empowering ESL students’ writing abilities in a whole language classroom. In Y. N. Leung & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). 
The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol.1,173-183. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Chang, C.(2012). A qualitative study of social-cognitive strategies in L2 peer revision. In Y. N. Leung & W. Y. Dai (Eds.). Selected paper on the Twenty-first International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol.1,171-188. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association.
Chen, D. W.(1995). The process-based writing instruction. In Department of English National Kaohsiung Normal University (Ed.). The Proceedings of ROC English Composition Teaching Conference, Vol. 1,197-208.
Chen, D. W. (1997). Understanding the two sources of EFL writing performance as the means to improve EFL writing instruction. In Y. N. Leung & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). Selected paper on the Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching,Vol.1,197-207. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Chen, D. W.(1999). The connections between L1 and L2 writing performances –From the perspective of writing expertise. In Department of English National Changhua University of Education (Ed.). Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China,Vol.1,271-290.
Chen, J. W.(2013). The relationship between student perceptions of teacher written feedback and writing apprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Chung Cheng University, Chia-yi. 
Chen, Y. H.(2009). The effects of peer and teacher feedback on college EFL student writing. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Pingtung University, Pingtung. 
Chen, Y. M.(1998). Peer review and learning styles. In Y. N. Leung & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). Paper selected at the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol.1,289-359. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association.
Chen, Y. M.(2008). Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research,12(2),235-262.
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R.(2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication,18(1),80-98. 
Cherry, R. D. (1988). Ethos versus persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written Communication, 5(3), 251-276. 
Chiang, Y. T.(2006). An action research in EFL writing context: The use of peer feedback and collaborative writing. English Teaching & Culture, 2(1), 111-116. 
Chien, C. H.(2014). Analysis of college EFL students’ written revisions to peer and teacher's written feedback in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Chung Cheng University, Chia-yi. 
Chiu, C. Y.(2008). An investigation of peer evaluation in EFL college writing. In Department of English National Chung Cheng University (Ed.). Paper selected at the 25th International Conference of English Teaching and Learning: 2008 International Conference on English Instruction and Assessment,Vol.1,1-21. 
Chuang, H. C.(2005). Taiwanese students’ perceptions on peer review activity. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ming Chuan University,Taoyuan 
Cohen, A. D.(1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Heinle& Heinle. 
Corpus of Contemporary American English.(2014). Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca
Costino, K. A., & Hyon, S. (2007). “A class for students like me”: Reconsidering relationships among identity labels, residency status, and students’ preferences for mainstream or multilingual composition. Journal of Second Language Writing,16(2),63-81. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.001.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L.(2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crowhurst, M., & Piche, G. L.(1979). Audience and mode of discourse effects syntactic complexity in writing at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English,13(2), 101-109. 
Cumming, A.(1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39(1), 81–141.
De La Paz, S.(2001). Teaching writing to students with attention deficit disorders and specific language impairments. Journal of Educational Research,95(1), 37-47. 
DePalma, M. J., & Jeffrey, M. R.(2011). Toward a theory of adaptive transfer: Expanding disciplinary discussions of “transfer” in second-language writing and composition studies. Journal of Second Language Writing,20(2),134-147. 
Dhieb-Henia, N.(2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of metacognitive strategy training for reading research articles in an ESP context. English for Specific Purposes,22(4),387–417.
Dornyei, Z.(2007). Research methods in applied linguist: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 
Elbow, P.(1973). Writing about teachers. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 
Elbow, P.(1981). Writing with power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Elbow, P.(1994). Introduction. In P. Elbow (Ed.), Landmark essays on voice and writing (pp.xi–xvii). Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press.
Elbow, P.(2007). Voice in writing again: Embracing contraries. College English,70(2),168-188. 
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H.(2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System,36(3),353-371. 
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59-84. doi: 10.1017/S0272263104026130
Faigley, L., & Witte, S.(1984). Measuring the effects of revisions on test structure. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions for teaching (pp. 5-108). Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse. 
Ferris, D. R.(2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. 
Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues(pp.81-104). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 
Ferris, D. R.(2009). Teaching college writing to diverse student populations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R., Brown, J., Liu, H., & Stine, A.(2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. TESOL Quarterly,45(2),207-234. 
Fillmore, W. L., & Snow, C.(2003). What teachers need to know about language. Journal for English as a Second Language,7(3),10-16. 
Flower, L.(1989). Cognition, context and theory building. College Composition and Communication,40(1),282-311. 
Flower, L.(1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J.(1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication,31(1),21-32. 
Flower, L., & Hayes, J.(1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication,32(4), 365-387. 
Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M.(2001). Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 
Galbraith, D., & Trent, O. S.(2009). Cognitive model of writing. Journal of German as Foreign Language,2(3),7-22.
Gearhart, M., & Wolf, S. A.(1997). Issues in portfolio assessment: Assessing writing process from their products. Educational Assessment,4(4),265-296.  
Gee, P. J.(2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London:Routledge.
Gee, P. J.(2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. London: Routledge. 
Halliday, M. A. K.(1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London, UK: Oxford University Press. 
Hamp-Lyons, L.(1990). Second language writing: assessment issues. In Kroll, B. (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp.69–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Harklau, L.,Losey, K.,& Siegal, M.(1999). Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S.-educated learners of ESL. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Harris, L.(2007). Employing formative assessment in the classroom. Improving Schools,10(3),249-260.
Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. J.(2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly,44(1),84-109. 
Hayes, J. R. (2006). New directions in writing theory. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.28-40). New York, NY: Guilford Press. 
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L.(1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamar, & S. A. Walmsey (Eds.), Research on writing (pp.206–220). New York, NY: Longman.
Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Shriver, K. A., Stratman, J. F., & Carey, L.(1987). Cognitive process in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol.2. Reading, writing, and language learning (pp.176–240). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hedge, T.(2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Heigham, J., & Croker, R.A.(2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Press. 
Hsiao, C. Y.(2008). Peer revision via a synchronous CMC mode in an English writing course. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu. 
Hsu, Y. C.(2013). Teacher written feedback, peer feedback, and teacher-student conferencing: Taiwanese EFL students’ attitudes and perspectives. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Chung Cheng University,Chia-yi. 
Huang, T. L.(2012). A genre-based approach to connecting reading to writing in the EFL classroom. In Y. N. Leung & W. T. Lee (Eds.). Selected papers from the Twenty-first International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol. 1, 258-270. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Hung, Y. N., & Chin. C. C.(2008). Exploring science writing theory and practice. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 11(2), 173-192. 
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press. 
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writers. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.(2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S.A., Wormouth, D.R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowely, MA: Newbury House. 
Johns, A.(2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 
Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L., & Acevedo, A.(2012). The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical 
complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing,21(3), 264-282.
Kakh, S. Y., & Monsor, A.(2014). Task-based writing instruction to enhance graduate students’ audience awareness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral 
Sciences,118(1),206-213. 
Karabinar, S.(2013). Learners’ writing approaches in the context of first and second language use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences70(1),1329-1337. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.194
Kellongg, R. T.(2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research,1(1),1-26.
http://neillthew.typepad.com/files/training-writing-skills.pdf
Kepner, C. G.(1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedbackto the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal,75(3), 305–313.
Kibler, A.(2011). “I write it in a way that people can read it”: How teachers and adolescent L2 writers describe content area writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(3),211-226.
Knoblauch, C. H., & Brannon, L.(2006). Introduction: The emperor (still) has no clothes-revising the myth of improvement. In R. Straub (Ed.), Key works on teacher response (pp.1-16). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann. 
Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C.(2008). Task response and text construction across L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 7-29. 
Lavelle, E. (1993). Development and validation of an inventory to assess processes in college composition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 489-499.
Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B.(2000). Student writing in higher education: New contexts.Buckingham, England: Open University Press/SRHE.
Lee, S. Y.(2001). What makes it difficult to write: Theory, research, and implications. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher. 
Lee, Y. H.(2013). A study of college students’ audience awareness-peer review in an English writing course. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Chung Hsing University, Taichung. 
Lee, Y. J.(2006). The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promise and challenges. Journal of Second Writing,15(4),307-330. 
Li, C. C.(2004). Trends in Asia ELT: Theory and practice. In Y. N. Leung & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). The Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching in the Republic of China, Vol. 1, 23-32. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Li, L. T. (2003). The effects of implementing theme cycles on adult EFL writers. Doctoral dissertation. Tamkang University, New Taipei. 
Li, M. M.(2009). Adopting carried feedback modes in the EFL writing class. US-China Foreign Language, 7(1),60-63. 
Liang, H. H.(2010). Evaluating the use of multiple assessment in Kainan University students’ writing performance. Unpublished master’s thesis. Kainan University. Taoyuan.
Liang, Z. Q.(2011). An investigation of EFL college students’ audience awareness in argumentative writing. Unpublished master’s thesis. Tunghai University. Taichung. 
Lin, C. C (1984). An investigation of English instruction through English writing theory. In Y. N. Leung & W. Y. Dai (Eds.). Selected papers from the Twenty-first International Symposium on English Teaching, 383-394. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Lindblom, S.,Pihlajamaki, S. & Kotkas, T.(2006). Self, peer and teacher assessment of student essays, Active Learning in Higher Education,7(1),51-62.
Liu, C. K. (1997). Locations of L1-L2 translation that occur in English writing. In Y. L. Chang & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching,401-416. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Liu, X. L., & Yang, Z. Q.(2006). The effectiveness of self-assessment in EFL classroom. Foreign Language education,27(3),56-58.
Long, M.(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamin. 
Long, M., & Robinson, P.(1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.15-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Longhurt, N., & Norton, L. S.(1997). Self-assessment in coursework essays. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4),319-330. 
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J.(2008). Handbook of writing research. London, UK: The Guilford Press.  
Mateo, M., & Sole, I (2012). Undergraduate students’ conceptions and beliefs about academic writing. In M. Castello & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 53-67). United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Matsuda, P. K.(2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Writing,12(1),65-83.
Matsuda, P. K., Silva, T.(2005). Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Matsuda, P. K., Cox, M., Jordan, J., & Ortmeier-Hooper, C.(2006). Second language writing in the composition classroom. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
McCutchen, D.(1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 431-444. 
McCutchen, D.(2008). Cognitive factors in the development of children’s writing. In Macarthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 115-130). New York: NY: Guilford Press. 
McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 51-68.  
Min, H. T.(2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System,33(2),293-308. 
Min, H. T.(2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118-141. 
Ministry of Education.(2014). Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/
Mohan, B.(1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Myhill, D., & Jones, S.(2007). More than just error correction. Written Communication, 24(4), 323-343. 
Nelson, N., & Castello, M.(2012). Academic writing and authorial voice. In M. Castello, & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp.33-51). United Kingdom, UK: Emerald Group 
Publishing Ltd.
Neuman, W. L.(2012). Understanding research. New York, NY: Pearson Education Inc. 
Nunan, D.(2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region.TESOL Quarterly,37(4),589-613. 
Olson, C. B.(2003). The reading and writing connection: Strategies for teaching and learning in the secondary classroom. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. 
Olson, C, B. & Land, R.(2007). A cognitive strategies approach to reading and writing instruction for English language learners in secondary school. Research in the Teaching of English,41(3),269-303. 
Ong, J. & Zhang, L. J.(2013). Effects of the manipulation of cognitive process on EFL writers’ text quality. TESOL Quarterly,47(2),375-398. 
Orsmond, P.(2004). Implementation of a formative assessment model  incorporating peer and self-assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3),273-290.
Ortmeier-Hooper, C.(2008). English may be my second language—but I’m not “ESL.” College Composition and Communication,59(3),389–419.
Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L.(2008). The process approach to writing instruction: Examining its effectiveness. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.275-290). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Qian, X. X.(2007). Raising learners’ awareness of readership in their EFL writing. US-China Foreign Language,5(11),31-37. 
Quinlan, T., Loncke, M., Leijten, M., & Waes, L. V. (2012). Coordinating the cognitive processes of writing: The role of the monitor, Written Communication,29(3), 345-368. 
Ransdell, S. E., & Levy, C. M.(1994). Writing as process and product: The impact of tool, audience knowledge, and writer expertise. Computer in Human Behavior 10(4),511-527.
Redd-Boyd, T. M., & Slater, W. H.(1989). The effects of audience specification on undergraduates’ attitudes, strategies, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English,23(1),77-108. 
Roberge, M., Siegal, M., & Harklau, L.(2009). Generation 1.5 in college composition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rubin, D. L., & Rafoth, B. A.(1986). Social cognitive abilities as a predictor of quality of expository and persuasive writing among college freshman. Research in the Teaching of English,20(1),9-21. 
Russell Valezy, J., & Spada, N.(2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp.133-164). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
Saito, H.(2008). EFL classroom peer assessment: Training effects on rating and commenting. Language Testing, 25(4), 533-581. 
Saito, H., & Fujita, T.(2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research,8(1),31-54.
Sasaki, M.(2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing,9(3),259–291.
Sasaki, M. (2002). Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49–80). Boston, NY: Kluwer Academic.
Sawyer, R., Graham, S., & Harries, K. R.(1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction, strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3) 340-352. 
Sheen, Y.(2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly,41(2), 255-283. 
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Wingate, L. A.(2005). A self- assessment procedure for use in evaluation training. American Journal of Evaluation,26(4),544-561. 
Taipei Times. (2014). Retrieve from http://www.taipeitimes.com/
Tardy, C. M., & Matsuda, P. K.(2008). Continuing the conversation on voice in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 100-105. 
The Phrase Finder. (2014). Retrieve from http://www.phrases.org.uk 
Truscott, J.(1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes.Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.
Truscott, J.(1999). The case for ‘‘the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes’’: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing,8(2),111–122.
Truscott, J.(2004). Dialogue: evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing,13(4),337–343.
Truscott, J.(2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272.
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305. 
Tseng, C. N.(2013). An action research of improving English writing ability for high school students using peer-assessment via Facebook. Unpublished master’s thesis. National University of Tainan, Tainan.
Tseng, S. D.(1995). Protocol analysis and its pedagogical implications in TEFLwriting instruction in Taiwan. In K. H. Yu, C. C. Cheng, & B. R. Liao (Eds.).Paper selected from Proceedings of ROC English Composition Teaching Conference, 367-378. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association.
Tseng, S. D.(2002). English writing process instruction. Paper presented in English and Writing Workshops. National Yulin University of Science and Technology, Yulin. 
Tseng, W. J.(2007). Using peer feedback in revision: Taiwanese university students’ English writing. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Pingtung University, Pingtung.  
Vu, T. T., & Dall’ Alba, G.(2007). Students’ experience of peer assessment in a professional course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,32(5),541-556. 
Wang, A. L.(1997). Bridging the cultural gap through computer-mediated cross-cultural communications: A case study of Chinese college students in Taiwan. Published PhD thesis, New York University, New York. 
Wang, K. M.(2008). The effects of English writing portfolio on college students in the EFL writing classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis. Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung. 
Wang, S. K.(2010). A study of implementing electronic portfolio assessment in an EFL writing class. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung.
Wang, S. P.(2000). Integrating process and product approaches into a reading/writing project: All are making their own books. In W. Y. Dai & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, Vol. 1, 456-469. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Weir, C. J. (1983). Identifying the language needs of overseas students in tertiary education in the United Kingdom. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, London. 
Williams, J. D.(2003). Preparing to teach writing: Research, theory, and practice (3 rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publisher. 
Wu, Y. H.(2010). Building coherence in academic writing for science technology majors through IWiLL. Unpublished master’s thesis. Tamkang University, New Taipei.
Yao, C. K.(1997). An overview of writing theory and research: From cognitive to social-cognitive view. Journal of Taichung Evening School: National Chung Hsing University, & Joe, S. G.(1999). The role of meta-cognitive theory in L2 writing:Speculations and suggestions. In Y. L. Chang & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). Selected papers from The Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching, 181-192. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association.
You, Y. L.(2000). Composition instruction: A meta-cognitive approach. In Y. L. Chang & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). Selected papers from the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol. 1, 107-117. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher.
You, Y. L.(2002). Skilled writers’ meta-cognitive conditional knowledge and self-regulation. In S. Y. Hwang & K. C. Cheung (Eds.). Selected papers from Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on English Teaching & Learning in the Republic of China, Vol.1,515-528. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publisher & English Teachers’ Association. 
Yu, J. F.(2007). Using process writing approach with implementing writing portfolio assessment. In Language Center of National Central University (Ed.). Selected paper from The Third Chinese/English as a Second Language Conference on Reading and Writing Instruction,Vol.1,1-12.  
Zeng, P.(2007). A study of formative assessment in college English writing teaching. Journal of Qinzhou University, 22(2), 116-118.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信