§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2306201610205300
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2016.00739
論文名稱(中文) 主從交換關係與倫理氣候對服務破壞與工作績效之影響—以服務業員工福利滿意度為調節變項
論文名稱(英文) The Impact of Leader-member Exchange Relationship and Ethical Climate on Employees’ Service Sabotage and Job Performance: The Moderating Effect of Benefit Satisfaction in Service Industry
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 彭柏脩
研究生(英文) Po-Hsiu Peng
學號 603610634
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2016-05-24
論文頁數 111頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 洪英正
委員 - 徐達光
委員 - 張雍昇
關鍵字(中) 主從交換關係
倫理氣候
服務破壞
福利滿意度
工作績效
關鍵字(英) leader- member- exchange
ethical climate
service sabotage
benefit satisfaction
job performance
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
領導者對於下屬的表現佔有相當重大的影響效果。House, Hartog, Hanges, and Ruiz(1999)提到領導是指領導者透過自己的能力,並且影響員工,讓員工可以有效率地努力達到目標。在工作場所中組織賦予領導者支配的角色使得領導成為一個主要的情境因素,如此一來將會影響員工績效的表現。企業倫理和企業的經營管理的關係,日益密切。Schneider (1975) 認為「倫理氣候」指的是組織員工在實際執行企業內部相關的倫理標準行為,以及推行公司政策的步驟與程序上,具有主觀經驗與共同認知。其中有關企業內部的倫理氣候如何影響組織成員行為,進而對企業營運績效產生衝擊,也是近年學者所逐漸重視的議題。
Harris and Ogbonna (2002, 2006)指出在面對許多內在和外在的因素,都有可能造成服務人員違背組織企業所訂定的準則與規範,私下或公開性的蓄意破壞或干擾其服務傳遞過程。本研究觀察到一個現象,以往的研究大部分是針對第一線工作人員與顧客的互動來分析,因此將加入主從交換關係與倫理氣候兩個組織內部因素,並以員工對公司的福利滿意度來當作調節因素,找出其在主從交換關係、倫理氣候對服務破壞影響上之調節作用。

本研究探討在員工對公司的福利滿意度在主從交換關係及倫理氣候對服務破壞間之影響,以提供企業在降低員工服務破壞行為之建議。

本研究根據理論基礎建立研究架構與假設,採取便利抽樣與滾雪球抽樣進行問卷調查,共回收 157 份有效問卷,經由迴歸分析、層級迴歸分析 和變異數分析等統計方法來驗證各研究假設,研究結果顯示如下:

1.	主從交換關係對服務破壞無顯著負向影響。
2.	倫理氣候對服務破壞有顯著負向影響。
3.	服務破壞在主從交換關係對工作績效間無中介效果。
4.	服務破壞在倫理氣候對工作績效間有部分中介效果。

關鍵字:主從交換關係、倫理氣候、服務破壞、福利滿意度、工作績效
英文摘要
As leader plays a key role in the employee performance. House, Hartog, Hanges and Ruiz(1999) in-dicated that leadership means leader affects his employees through their abilities, so that employees can efficiently reaching their goals. Organization empowers leaders a dominating role in the workplace. It makes leadership a major situational factor which results in better employee’s performance. For now re-lationship between enterprise ethics and enterprise management has become closer. Schneider (1975) indicated that "ethical climate" refers to employees in the practical implementation of relevant ethical standards within the enterprise, as well as on the steps and procedures of implementing company poli-cies, with subjective experiences and common knowledge. Ethical climate affects corporate internal or-ganization members and enterprise performance, and in recent years has the growing importance of topics.

Harris and Ogbonna (2002, 2006) point out that facing of many external and internal factors what are likely to cause the employees breach of the enterprise standards and norms, private or public acts of sabotage or interfere with the service delivery process. This study observed a phenomenon, in the past most of the research is aimed at analyzing front-line staff’s interactions, so we will join the leader-ship-member-exchange and ethical climate as the two organizations internal factor, and employee bene-fit satisfaction as the moderating variable, and try to find the leader-member- exchange、ethics climate on the impact of the service sabotage.

This study investigated the moderating effect of employee benefit satisfaction on the influence of the service sabotage by leader-member- exchange and ethical climate impact, and by the result to pro-vide enterprises in reducing staff rigged behaviors.

This paper set up the conceptual framework and hypotheses based on the theory and used conven-ience sampling and snowball sampling method. There are 157 valid questionnaires are return totally. By implementing the regression analysis, hierarchical regression and one way ANOVA to verify each hy-pothesis. The results of this study can be concluded as the following:
			
1.	There is no negative significant influence on service sabotage by leader-member-exchange.
2.	There is negative significant influence on service sabotage by ethical climate.
3.	There is no significant mediating effect of service sabotage on the influence coming from lead-er-member-exchange to job performance.
4.	There is a partial mediating effect of Service sabotage on the influence coming from ethics climate to job performance 
5.	There is no moderating effect of benefit satisfaction on the influence coming from lead-er-member-exchange and ethical climate to service sabotage.

The results confirmed that the service sabotage got partial mediating effects, which means that en-terprises can reduce the staff vandalism by strengthening ethical climate.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
目錄	I
表目錄	II
圖目錄	III
第一章 緒論	1
第一節	研究背景與動機	1
第二節	研究目的	6
第三節	研究流程	6
第二章 文獻探討	9
第一節	領導相關理論	9
第二節	倫理氣候	12
第三節	服務破壞	15
第四節	工作績效	22
第五節	福利滿意度	26
第六節	各變項間之相互關係與假設	29
第三章 研究方法	36
第一節	研究架構	36
第二節	研究假設	37
第三節	問卷設計	38
第四節	研究對象與範圍	45
第五節	資料分析與方法	45
第四章 研究結果	50
第一節	問卷發放與回收資料分析	50
第二節	項目分析	54
第三節	信度與因素分析	56
第四節	研究假設驗證	63
第五節	不同人口統計變項在各變項之差異分析	71
第六節	假設驗證結果驗證	81
第五章 結論、討論及建議	82
第一節	研究結論與討論	82
第二節	管理意涵	86
第三節	研究限制與未來研究之建議	88
參考文獻	90
附錄 問卷	106

 
表目錄
表1倫理氣候類型	14
表2國內外學者對工作績效定義	23
表3各學者對工作績效衡量構面	25
表3- 1主從交換關係量表	39
表3- 2倫理氣候量表	40
表3- 3服務破壞量表	41
表3- 4福利滿意度量表	42
表3- 5工作績效量表	43
表3- 6脈絡績效量表	44
表4- 1各構面之 Cronbach’s α 值	  51
表4- 2樣本基本資料之次數分配表	52
表4- 3各構面之項目分析表	55
表4- 4各構面之 Cronbach’s α值	57
表4- 5各構面之 KMO值與 Bartlett球形檢定	59
表4- 6主從交換關係之因素分析與信度分析	60
表4- 7倫理氣候之因素分析與信度分析	61
表4- 8服務破壞之因素分析與信度分析	62
表4- 9福利滿意度之因素分析與信度分析	62
表4- 10工作績效之因素分析與信度分析	63
表4- 11各變項之相關係數表	64
表4- 12 人口變項與服務破壞之相關係數表	65
表4- 13主從交換關係對服務破壞之迴歸分析	65
表4- 14倫理氣候對服務破壞之迴歸分析	66
表4- 15 服務破壞對工作績效之迴歸分析	67
表4- 16服務破壞在主從交換關係對工作績效之階層迴歸分析表	68
表4- 17服務破壞在倫理氣候對工作績效之階層迴歸分析表	68
表4- 18福利滿意度在主從交換關係對服務破壞之階層迴歸	70
表4- 19福利滿意度在倫理氣候對服務破壞之階層迴歸	71
表4- 20性別在各構面之差異分析	73
表4- 21年齡在各構面之差異分析	74
表4- 22教育程度在各構面之差異分析	75
表4- 23職業類別在各構面之差異分析	77
表4- 24個人平均月所得在各構面之差異分析	78
表4- 25工作年資在各構面之差異分析	80
表4- 26假設驗證結果彙整表	81
         

圖目錄
圖1研究流程圖	8
圖2服務破壞影響因素圖	20
圖3研究架構圖	36
參考文獻
一 中文文獻
行政院主計處(2014) http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
商業服務業資訊網 http://ciis.cdri.org.tw/
聯合新聞網-不滿公司決策,電信員工破壞光纜 http://udn.com/news/story/2/1217833-%E4%B8%8D%E6%BB%BF%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E6%B1%BA%E7%AD%96-%E9%9B%BB%E4%BF%A1%E5%93%A1%E5%B7%A5%E7%A0%B4%E5%A3%9E%E5%85%89%E7%BA%9C%E9%81%AD%E8%A8%B4
李其芳、吳秉恩(1999)。「企業倫理政策、倫理氣候與組織績效關係之研究」。管理學報,第2期,頁201-230。
鄧依純(1993)。員工對於企業實施之福利制度的滿意程度與士氣、組織承諾之關係─以台北市金融業、保險業員工為研究對象。淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文
林合懋(1995)。學校主管與企業主管轉型領導之比較研究。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文
黃英忠(1997) 。現代人力資源管理。台北:華泰書局。
黃英忠(1998)。人力資源管理。台北:華泰書局。
曾柔鶯(1999)。「領導型態、企業文化與企業績效關係之研究-以企業倫理氣候為 中介變項」。臺灣土地金融季刊,第4期,頁35-58。
許怡靜(2000)。LMX關係品質研究。中正大學企業管力研究所碩士論文。
蔡得雄(2001)。工作認知與激勵因素對工作績效之相關研究-以高雄市區公所里幹事為例。義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
張銘宗(2001)。以實驗設計法探討員工福利制度資訊揭漏對員工認知及態度的影響。潮陽科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
朱明謙(2001)。高科技產業從業人員休閒行為、工作壓力與工作績效之研究。義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
劉盈纖(2002)。員工分紅入股滿意度對工作績效與離職傾向之影響--以竹科積體電路製造業之基層員工為例。立德管理學院科技管理研究所碩士論文。
楊文昌(2002)。台商兩岸三地員工激勵制度滿意度影響個人工作績效之研究-以電子零件通路商Y公司為例影響。朝陽科技大學企研所未出版碩士論文。
卓靜怡(2003)。報社激勵制度滿意度與員工工作績效關係之研究-以中國時報、自由時報、聯合報為例。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
林宜宏(2003)。股票選擇權及分紅入股制對員工工作滿意、組織承諾與工作績效影響 之比較研究—以台灣高科技公司為例。彰化師範大學工業教育學系。
馬淯惠(2006)。主管異動頻率、領導權力及員工專業化程度對領導者與部屬交換關係之影響-以航空產業員工為例。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班論文。
王中梅(2007)。勞工福利、工作滿意度與工作績效之探討-以工作特性為干擾變項。中正大學勞工所碩士論文。
林麗玲(2007)。薪酬滿意、工作投入與工作績效關係之研究─以中部地區郵局為例。台中技術學院事業經營研究所碩士論文。
林勝聰(2010)。臺北市國民小學兼任行政教師知識管理與工作績效之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所學校行政碩士論文,。
楊非凡(2010)。餐飲業服務氣候, 倫理氣候, 倫理道德觀, 服務破壞與服務導向組織公民行為關係之探討。銘傳大學觀光事業學系碩士在職專班論文。
高鳳薇(2010)。第一線服務業員工服務破壞行為前因後果之研究-以飯店業為例。東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
羅麗婉(2008)。研發人員福利需求與滿意度之研究-以高科技產業為例。中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
林南耀 (2008)。PZB品質模式與顧客滿意度實證研究-大型診斷醫療設備售後服務為例。成功大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
黃于庭(2009)。組織倫理氣候認知、工作滿意度、組織承諾及工作績效之關連性研究—以會計人員為例。淡江大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
蕭瑤冠(2009)。組織結構對員工創新行為與主從交換關係之影響-以幽默領導為中介變項。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班論文。
陳海鳴(1999)。管理概論-理論與台灣實證。台北市:華泰。
孫明慧(2011)。交易領導轉型領導及工作士氣關係之研究以桃竹苗三縣市軍訓主管為例。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林瑜珊(2011)。餐飲業正職服務員服務破壞前因與行為研究。高雄餐旅大學餐旅管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡建章(2012)專案團隊領導效能對新產品績效的影響-團隊成員互動的中介效果。義守大學管理學院碩士在職專班論文。
劉明德等譯(1993)。管理學:競爭優勢。臺北市:桂冠。(Edmund R. Gray&Larry R.Smeltzer)
蘇義祥(1999)。中華電信專戶服務部門領導型態與工作績效關係之研究:服務人員特質及成熟度的調節作用。中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文文獻
Antelo, A., Henderson, R. L., & St Clair, N. (2010). Understanding the process model of leadership: Follower attribute design and as-sessment. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7(4), 9-14.
Ackroyd, S. and Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational Misbehaviour. London: Sage.
Anantatmula, V. (2010), "Project manager leadership role in improving project performance", Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 13-22.
Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J., 1990, Manual for the Multifactor Lead-ership
Bass, B. M., 1985, Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M., 1990, Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research,and Managerial Applications, New York: Free Press.
Beam B., and McFadden J.(1988).” Employee Benefits (2nd ed)” Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin. 
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349.
Questionnaire, Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Babin, B. J., Boles, J. S. and Robin, D. (2000), Representing the Per-ceived Ethical Work Climate among Marketing Employees
Beauchamp, T.L., & Bowie, N.E. (2004). Ethical Theory and Business, (7THed.).Upper Saddler River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Burns, J. M., 1978, Leadership, New York: Harper & Row.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidl, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of context performance. Personnel Se-lection in Organization, pp.71-98.
Bolino MC, Turnley WH (2009) Relative deprivation among employ-ees in lower-quality leader–member exchange relationships. Lead-ersh Q 20:276–286
Brouther, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost in-fluences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of Inter-national Business studies, 33(2),203-223.
Browning, V. (2008). An exploratory study into deviant behaviour in the service encounter: How and why front-line employees engage in deviant behaviour.65 Journal of Management and Organization, 14(4), 451-471.
Chen, Z Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K. M., Sucharski , I . L ., & Aselage, J . (2009).Perceived organizational support and extra-role per-formance: Which leads to which?Journal of Soci al Psychology, 149( 1 ) , 119-124.
Dessler ,G. 1991, Personnel Management, 5 thed., Prentice-Hall In-ternational, Inc.Deshpande, S. P., George, E. & Joseph, J. (2000). Ethical climates and managerial success in Russian organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 211-217.
Dansereau, Graen, & Haga (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 618-634.
Dalton, Spendolini, Todor, W.D., Porter, L.W. & Fielding, G. J.(1980).
Fox S, Spector PE (1999) A model of work frustration–aggression. J Organ Behav 20:915–931
DeConinck, J. B. (2010). The influence of ethical climate on marketing employees’ job attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Re-search, 63(4), 384-391.
Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M (1995) Development of leader–member ex-change (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q 6:219–247
Graen, G. B., & Cashman, J.(1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L.L. Larson(Eds.), Leadership frontiers, 143-166. Kent, Kent State University Press.
Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial Behavior inrgan-izations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Griffin, R. W., O'Leary-Kelly, A., and Collins, J. (1998). Dysfunctional work behaviors in organizations. Trends in Organizational Be-havior, 5, 65-82.
Harris, L. C., and Ogbonna, E. (2002). Exploring service sabotage: The antecedents,types and consequences of frontline, deviant, anti-service behaviors. Journal ofService Research, 4(3), 163-183.
Heneman, H. G., & Schwab, D. P.(1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multi-dimensional nature and measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 20(2): 129-141.
Harris, L. C., and Ogbonna, E. (2006). Service sabotage: A study of antecedents andconsequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 543-558.
Harris, L. C., and Ogbonna, E. (2009). Service sabotage: The dark side of servicedynamics. Business Horizons, 52, 325-335.
Hui C, Law KS, Chen ZX (1999) A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader–member exchange, and per-ceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance: a Chi-nese case. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 77:3–21
John A. Lust (1990).The Determinants of Employee Fringe Benefit Satisfaction: A Replication and Revision Benefits Quarterly; Sec-ond Quarter1990, 6, 2, ABI/INFORM Global, 89.
Jaramillo, F., J. P. Mulki, and P. Solomon. (2006). The role of ethical climate on salesperson’s role stress, job attitudes, turnover Inten-tion, and job performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(3), 271-282.
Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organiza-tions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Koontz, H. & Weihrich, H., 1990, Essentials of Management, 5th Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lau VCS, Au WT, Ho JMC (2003) A qualitative and quantitative re-view of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organizations. J Bus Psycol 18:73–99
Lee, Y. D., Lain, J. W. & Chen, C. Y. (1999). A Study on the Meas-urement of Productivityfor White-Collar Employees-A Case of Electronic Industry in Taiwan. The ChineseMilitary Academy Journal, 345-361.
Liden, R.C., & Wayne, S. J. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differ-entiation and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 723-746.
Luria, G., Yagil, D., 2008. Procedural justice, ethical climate and ser-vice outcomes in restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management 27(2),276-283.
Mount M, Ilies R, Johnson E (2006) Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of job satisfaction. Pers Psycol 59:591–622
Martin, K. D. and J. B. Cullen. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175-194.
Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad Manag J 43:738–748
Miceli, M. P., & Lane, M. C. (1991). Antecedents of pay satisfaction: A review and extension. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 9,235-309.
McCaffery, R. M. 1992, Employee Benefit Programs:A Total Com-pensation Perpective, (2nded.)..
Milkovich, G.T. and J.M.Newman. (1993). “Compensation(4thed.):, Boston: Irwin.406-417 
Stogdill, R. M.(1956).The Organizational Man. New York:Simon andSchuster.
Sprouse, M. (1992), Sabotage in the American Workplace: Anecdotes of Dissatisfaction, Mischief and Revenge. San Francisco: Press Drop.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H.(1974). Leadership Behavior Pre-scription,Personnel Research Board, Ohio State University.
Robbins, S. P.(1990). Organizational Theory(3nd ed.). NY:Prentice Hall
Robinson, S. L. & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant work-place behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
House, R. J., Hartog, D. N. D., Hanges, P. J., & Ruiz-Quintanilla, A.(1999).Culture Specific and Cross-culturally Generalizable Im-plicit LeadershipTheories : Are Attributes of Charis-matic/Transformational LeadershipUniversally Endorsed? Lead-ership Quarterly,10(2), 219-256.
Bohn, J. G. & Grafton, D., 2002, “The relationship of perceives lead-ership behaviorsto organizational efficacy,” Journal of Leadership&Organizational Studies,9(2), pp.65-79.
Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: amultidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational behavior. NY: Prentice Hall Inc., 72.
Rotundo M, Sackett PR (2002) The relative importance of task, citi-zenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. J Appl Psycol 87:66–80
Robbins, and Judge (2010). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Pren-tice Hall Inc.
Schneider, B. (1975), Organizational Climate - An Essay, Personnel Psychology
Schermerhorn, J. R. (1996). Management. New York:John Wiley & Sons.,Inc.
Setton RP, Bennett N, Liden RC (1996) Social exchange in organiza-tions: perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. J Appl Psycol 81:219–227
Taylor, F. W. (1947). Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Row. (Original work published (1911)
Taylor, P. W., (1975), Principles of Ethics - An Introduction, California: Dickerson.
Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A 64 person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.
Turnipseed, David (1988). An integrated, interactive model of organ-izational climate, culture, and effectiveness. Leadership and Or-ganization Development Journal, 9(5), 7-21.
Trevino, L.K., Butterfield, K.D. & McCabe, D.L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8 (3), 447-476.
Victor, B. & Cullen, J. B.,Ò1987Ó, A Theory and Measure Ethical Climate in Organizations, Research in Corporate Social Perfor-mance and Policy,
Wimbush J. C. & J. M. Shepard. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethics behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 637-647.
Williams, M. L., Malos, S. B., & Palmer, D. K. (2002). Benefit system and benefit level satisfaction: An expanded model of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 28(2), 195-215.
Wayne SJ, Shore LM, Liden RC (1997) Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: a social exchange perspec-tive. Acad Manag Rev 40:82–111
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organization ( 5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc..
Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D., & Bass, B. M., 1994, ”Trans-formational leadership and performance: a longitudinal investiga-tion.” Leadership Quarterly,4(1), pp. 81-102.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信