淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-2306201211204000
中文論文名稱 授權策略與財務結構
英文論文名稱 Licensing strategy and financial structure
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 產業經濟學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Industrial Economics
學年度 100
學期 2
出版年 101
研究生中文姓名 蔡銘哲
研究生英文姓名 Ming-Che Tsai
學號 699540380
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2012-06-12
論文頁數 63頁
口試委員 指導教授-麥朝成
委員-梁文榮
委員-楊秉訓
中文關鍵字 固定權利金授權  單位權利金授權  混合授權  財務結構 
英文關鍵字 Fixed-fee Licensing  Royalty Licensing  Mix Licensing  Financial Structure 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學經濟學
中文摘要 本文分別探討若兩家廠商在市場上進行同質產品數量競爭或異質產品價格競爭並且可以使用財務策略的情況下,產業外授權廠商的最適授權策略為何。當市場上兩家廠商進行為同質產品數量競爭下,本文得到下列結論:(1) 當技術創新程度較小時,產業外授權廠商將選擇單位權利金 (royalties) 授權。(2) 當技術創新程度較大時,產業外授權廠商授權給兩家廠商將使用混合策略授權 (mixed licensing)。當市場上兩家廠商進行為異質產品價格競爭下,本文得到下列結論:(1) 當技術創新程度較小且廠商產品趨近完全同質時,則產業外授權廠商將選擇單位權利金授權。(2) 技術創新程度較大且廠商產品趨近完全同質時,則產業外授權廠商使用單位權利金授權和獨家固定權利金授權(Fixed fee licensing),授權廠商的預期利潤是相同的。在上述本論文的結論中,尤以同質產品數量競爭下的結論最為重要。
英文摘要 This paper discusses homogeneous products quantity competition or heterogeneity products price competition in two firms in the market and financial strategy, optimal licensing strategy of outside licensing patentee. When the two firms on the market proceed homogeneous products quantity competition, the following conclusions: (1) Technological innovation to a lesser extent, outside licensing patentee will choice royalties licensing. (2) Technological innovation to a larger extent, outside licensing patentee license to give two firms to use a mixed licensing. When the two firms on the market proceed heterogeneity products price competition, the following conclusions: (1) When technological innovation to a lesser extent and products closer to a completely homogeneous, outside licensing patentee will choice royalties licensing. (2) When technological innovation to a larger extent and products closer to a completely homogeneous, outside licensing patentee choice royalties licensing and fixed fee licensing of single firm, the expected profit of the patentee are the same. In conclusion of this paper, the most important conclusion is homogeneous products quantity competition.
論文目次 目 錄-----------------------------------------------------I
第一章 緒論------------------------------------------------1
第二章 文獻回顧---------------------------------------------3
2.1 財務結構文獻------------------------------------3
2.2 產業外授權文------------------------------------5
第三章 數量競爭下最適授權策略與財務決策--------------------------9
3.1 基本模型---------------------------------------9
3.2 獨家授權--------------------------------------14
3.3 非獨家授權------------------------------------19
3.4 授權廠商的最適授權策略---------------------------24
第四章 價格競爭下最適授權策略與財務決策-------------------------28
4.1 基本模型--------------------------------------28
4.2 獨家授權--------------------------------------31
4.2.1 兩家廠商同時並存-------------------------31
4.2.2 被授權廠商以阻卻價格訂價------------------34
4.2.3 被授權廠商形成獨占-----------------------38
4.3 非獨家授權------------------------------------41
4.4 授權廠商的最適授權策略---------------------------44
第五章 結論-----------------------------------------------47
參考文獻---------------------------------------------------49
數學附錄---------------------------------------------------51

參考文獻 Brander, J. A. and T. R. Lewis, 1986, ‘‘Oligopoly and Financial Structure: The Limited Liability Effect ,’’ American Economic Review, 76, 956–970.
Brander, J. A. and T. R. Lewis, 1988, ‘‘Bankruptcy Costs and the Theory of Oligopoly ,’’ Canadian Journal of Economics, 21, 221–243.
Damania, R., 1999, ‘‘Financial structure and the effectiveness of pollution control in an oligopolistic industry ,’’ Resource and Energy Economics , 22, 21–36.
Din, H.R. and W.J. Liang, 2012, “Patent Licensing in a Leadership Structure: Comment ,” The Manchester School , forthcoming.
Hughes, J.S. , J.L. Kao, and A. Mukherji , 1998, ‘‘Oligopoly, Financial Structure, and Resolution of Uncertainty ,’’ Journal of Economics & Management Strategy , 7, 67–88.
Kabiraj, T., 2004, “Patent Licensing in a Leadership Structure,” The Manchester School 72, 188-205.
Kamien, M., S. S. Oren, and Y. Tauman, 1992, “Optimal Licensing of Cost-reducing Innovation,” Journal of Mathematical Economics 21, 483-508.
Kamien, M., and Y. Tauman, 1986, “Fees versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 471-491.
Muto, S., 1993, “On licensing policies in Bertrand competition,” Games and Economic Behavior , 5, 257-267 .
Poitevin, M., 1989, ‘‘Collusion and the Banking Structure of a Duopoly ,’’ Canadian Journal of Economics, 22, 263–277.
Poddar, S. and U.B. Sinha, 2004, “On Patent Licensing in Spatial Competition ,” Economic Record, 80, 208-218.
Rostoker, M., 1984, “A Survey of Corporate Licensing,” Journal of Law and Technology 24, 59-92.
Ross, S.A. , R.W. Westerfield , B.D. Jordan, 2009, Fundamentals of corporate finance (9th ed). Boston Burr Ridge ,IL: Dubuque.
Showalter, D.M., 1995, ‘‘Oligopoly and Financial Structure: Comment ,’’ American Economic Review, 85, 647–653.
Wang, X. H., and B. Yang, 2004, “On Technology Transfer to an Asymmetric Cournot Duopoly,” Economics Bulletin , 4(14), 1-6.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2012-06-27公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2012-06-27起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信