隨著電子化政府創造更多競爭優勢已成為一股不可抵擋的風潮，並持續向整合的階段繼續發展，因此政府組織也會因此而產生流程改變等相關的現象。由於利益關係人(Stakeholder)在政府組織的複雜且交互影響的環境中，對於擬定策略以管理相關的議題時，所扮演的角色益形重要。因此，本研究以高雄市政府地政處所推動之「台灣ｅ網通個案」為對象，採用利益關係人分析(Stakeholder Analysis)，進行電子化政府利益關係人之辨認，並探討利益關係人之間是如何合作的。最後，尋找出公共利益做為未來推動電子化政府的方向。
研究結果顯示，「台灣ｅ網通個案」在推動電子化政府時所創造的公共利益中，其受重視的指標依序為：「提升系統開發成本效益」、「創造更多營收與價值」、「垂直整合政府資料」。然而，在此過程中，仍有「水平整合政府資料」、「創新系統功能、提供加值服務」、「電子化政府單一窗口」等公共利益被輕忽。由於這些被輕忽的公共利益不但會限制系統的發展與創新，也會阻礙利益關係人之間的合作，導致系統無法提供加值服務，而成為未來電子化政府完全整合的絆腳石。因此，本研究建議可以透過組成利益聯盟的方式，支援這些被輕忽的公共利益，並使之受到重視。
本研究的貢獻在政府組織推動電子化政府時，應先辨認出具重要影響力的利益關係人，將資源集中在關鍵角色上，以協助規劃管理團隊，在此同時，也要瞭解利益關係人之間複雜的關係。此外，也可協助規劃管理團隊瞭解政府組織所背負的使命，並以利益關係人的利益為基礎，建構出一個可實現的願景，作為推動電子化過程中，利益關係人之間動態合作時可以遵循的指引。

According to new information technology (IT), e-government is progress toward integrative direction in contemporary trend. In government organization, the stakeholders is exists in complicated and interactive environment, then their workflow, corporate functions and management strategies was been indeed change by IT.  For this reason, stakeholders play the significant role in the electronic processes.  In light of this, this study use case study and Stakeholder Analysis method to analyze the case--Taiwan e-Net—Department of Land Kaohsiung City Government to investigate: (1) how to identifying the key stakeholders, (2) how they cooperate with each other and (3) figure out the e-government development process in the future.

On the one hand, the top three important common interests of Taiwan e-Net are: help public administrators manage resource effectively, create more gaining and values, and vertical integrate government data.  On the other hand, the top three ignored common interests still need emphasize, there are: horizontal integrate government data, create new information system function and add valued service, and single unit service of e-government.  The development, creation, added value of Taiwan e-Net will be limited and be the stumbling block of e-government in order to these three common interests was been ignored.  For this reason, this study proposes that form a interest coalition to support these ignored issues is possible strategy.

In practically, this study suggests that we should identify the key stakeholders, understand the complicated relationships and focus resources to them, then help management team before development the e-government.  At the same time, base on the interests of stakeholders and help they understanding the mission of government, therefore a practicable vision will be building.  Finally, it can be the e-government guideline of stakeholders’ dynamic cooperation in the future.

目錄
1.	緒論	1
1.1.	研究背景與動機	1
1.2.	研究目的	3
2.	文獻探討	4
2.1.	電子化政府(E-Government)	4
2.2.	政府組織策略管理	8
2.3.	利益關係人理論	11
3.	研究方法	18
3.1.	利益關係人分析	18
3.1.1.	權力與利益矩陣：	18
3.1.2.	利益關係人影響圖：	19
3.1.3.	權力導向利益圖：	19
3.1.4.	公共利益圖：	20
3.1.5.	個別角色利益對應公共利益圖：	21
3.2.	樣本描述及程序	22
3.3.	測量	24
4.	資料分析與探討	26
4.1.	訪談基本資料整理	26
4.2.	資料分析	26
5.	結論與建議	56
圖目錄
圖 1、我國87-89電子化政府計畫	5
圖 2、我國90-93電子化政府推動方案	7
圖 3、我國E-TAIWAN計畫	7
圖 4、權力與利益矩陣	19
圖 5、利益關係人影響圖	19
圖 6、權力導向利益圖	20
圖 7、公共利益圖	21
圖 8、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖	21
圖 9、台灣E網通發展歷史概況	23
圖 10、策略生命循環	25
圖 11、權力與利益矩陣	27
圖 12、權力導向利益圖-高雄地政處	29
圖 13、權力導向利益圖-中華電信	30
圖 14、權力導向利益圖-外部系統使用者	31
圖 15、權力導向利益圖-新竹市地政局	32
圖 16、權力導向利益圖-台南市地政處	34
圖 17、權力導向利益圖-高雄縣地政處	35
圖 18、權力導向利益圖-嘉義市地政處	36
圖 19、權力導向利益圖-嘉義縣地政處	37
圖 20、權力導向利益圖-高雄市都發局	38
圖 21、權力導向利益圖-高雄市工務局	39
圖 22、權力導向利益圖-高雄市新興區地政事務所	40
圖 23、權力導向利益圖-楠梓區地政事務所	42
圖 24、公共利益圖	43
圖 25、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-高雄市地政處	44
圖 26、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-中華電信	45
圖 27、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-外部系統使用者	46
圖 28、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-新竹市地政局	47
圖 29、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-台南市地政處	48
圖 30、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-高雄縣地政處	49
圖 31、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-嘉義市地政處	50
圖 32、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-嘉義縣地政處	51
圖 33、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-高雄市都發局	52
圖 34、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-高雄市工務局	53
圖 35、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-高雄市新興地政事務所	54
圖 36、個別角色利益對應公共利益圖-高雄市楠梓地政事務所	55
表目錄
表 1、相關電子化政府定義	                  4
表 2、電子化政府各階段功能定義	         5
表 3、利益關係人定義整理      	         11
表 4、利益關係人理論內涵整理	         13
表 5、利益關係人與組織之關係矩陣       	16
表 6、本研究受訪者	                           26
表 7、個別角色利益對應公共利益排序表 	58
表 8、個別角色利益與公共利益對應整合重心表	58

黃朝盟，公共組織策略規劃之研究 --- 理論、執行與評估，韋伯文化，2005
莊秀禎，滿足多重目標利害關係人之模式建構與應用，淡江大學，2006
簡守邦，社會科學研究的理論與方法，台北：韋伯，2002
陳淑琪，以利益關係人理論分析罕見疾病基金會的發展：共識、歧異與建議，中正大學，2005
朱斌妤、楊俊宏，電子化/網路化政府政策下行政機關生產力衡量模式與民眾滿意度落差比較，管理評論，19(1)，119-150，2002
Affisco, J. F. and Soliman, K. S., “E-Government：a strategic operations management framework for service delivery”,Business Process Management Journal(12:1)pp.13-21,, 2006
Andersen, K. V. and Henriksen, H. Z., “E-Government maturity models：Extension of the Layne and Lee Model”,Government Inofrmation System(23),pp.236-248 , 2006
Andrews, K.R., The concept of corporate strategy, Nicolai J. Foss ed., Oxford , 1987
Archer, B., “Transformation In Public Organizations”, University of Southern California, 2002
Becker, J., Algermissen, L. and Niehaves, B., “A procedure model for process oriented e-government projects”,Business Process Management Journal(12:1), 2006
Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T.M.1999 “Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship betweenstakeholder management models and firm financial performance.”Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.
Berry, F. S., “Innovation in public management: the adoption of strategic planning”, Public Administration Review, 54, 1994.
Bozeman, B. and Straussman J.D., Public Management Strategies: Guidelines for Managerial Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, 1990
Bryant, J., “The six dilemmas of collaboration : inter-organisational relationships as drama”, John Wiley & Sons , 2003
Bryson, J. M., Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations : a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement, Jossey-Bass, 2004
Bryson, J., Cunningham, G. and Lokkesmoe, K. “What to Do When stakeholders Matter: The Case of Problem Formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County Minnesota”'. Public Administration Review, 62:5 pp568 -84., 2002
Bryson, J.M., “What to do when stakeholders matter－stakeholder identification and analysis techniques.”, Public Management Review(6:1), pp.21-53, 2004
Burn, J. and Robins, G., “Moving towards e-government：a case study of organizational change processes”, Logistics Information Management(16:1), pp.25-35, 2003
Carroll, A.B., “ A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. “ Academy of Management Review, 4: 497-505, 1979
Carroll, G.R., “A sociological perspective on why firms differ.” Strategic Management Journal, 14:237-250, 1993
Chen, Y. C. and Gant, J., “Transforming local e-government service：the use of application service providers”Government Information System(18),pp.343-355, 2001
Clarkson, M.E., “A risk based model of stakeholder theory”, Paper presented at the Society of Business Ethics Conference,Vancouver, British Columbia. 1995 
Clearly, N.Henry and Associates, Managing Public Policy Programs: Balancing Politics, Administration and Public Needs, San Francisco, JosseyBass, 1989
Crosby, B. C. and Bryson, J. M., “Leadership for the common Good 2nd”, Jossey-Bass, 2005
Crosby, B.C. and , Bryson, J.M., “Leadership for the common good: tackling public problems in a shared-power world 2nd ”, John Willey, 2005
Danziger, J.N. and Andersen, K.V. “The impact of information technology on public administration: an analysis of empirical research from the “golden age” of transformation” International Journal of Public Administration, Volume 25, Issue 5 April 2002 , pp.591 – 627, 2002
Dension, D., Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness., John Wiley & Son: NEW YORK, 1990.
Dimovski, V. and Skerlavaj, M., “A Stakeholder theory approach to the organizational performance and influence of Information-communication technology：Model Conceptualisation and testing”,Economic and Business Review for Central and South – Eastern Europe(6:3),pp.245-257, 2004
Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E.,“The Stakeholder Theory of the corporation: Concept, Evidence, and Implications”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 65-91, 1995
Ebrahim, Z. and Irani, Z., “E-Government adoption：architecture and barriers”,Business Process Management Journal(11:5),pp589-611, 2005
Eden, C. and Ackermann, F., Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management, London: Sage Publications., 1998.
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R.E., “ A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie(Eds.), Ethical theory and business:75-93., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall., 1988
Ezzamel, M. and Watson, R. “Wearing two hats: The conflicting control and management roles of non-executive directors.” Corporate governance, Pg54-79. Oxford:Oxford University Press., 1997
Feldman, M. and Khademian, A., 2002 “TO Manage Is to Govern” Public Administration Review, 62:5 pp541-54.
Feldman, M. and Khademian, A.2002 “TO Manage Is to Govern” Public Administration Review, 62:5 pp541-54.
Fireman, B., & Gamson, W.A., “ Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective. In J.D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald(Eds.),” The dynamics of social movements:Resource mobilization, social control and tactics: 8-44. Cambridge: Winthrop., 1979
Flak, L. S. and Rose, J., “Stakeholder Governance：Adapting Stakeholder Theory to E-Government”,Communications of the Association for Information System(16),pp.642-664, 2005
Freeman, R. E., Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman, 1984
Freeman, R. E.,“A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation”, ,1994 
Friedman , A. L. and Miles, S.,  “Stakeholders：Theory and Practice”, OXFORD University Press, 2006
Friedman, A.L., & Miles, S.2002 “Developing stakeholder theory.” Journal of Management Studies,39(1),1-21.
Frooman, J., “ Stakeholder influence strategies.” Academy of Management Review,
Gavey, G. and Swan, P. “The economics of corporate governance.” Journal of Corporate Finance,(1), Pg.139-174, 1994.
Gil-Garcia, J. R. and Martinez-Moyano, I. J., “Understanding the evolution of e-government：The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics”,Government Information System(24) , pp.266-290, 2007
Goodpaster, K., “Business and stakeholder analysis.”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 1:53-74, 1991
Goodstein, L.D., Nolan T.M., Pfeiffer, J.W., Applied Strategic Planning: A Comprehensive Guide, McGraw-Hill Professional, 1993.
Hart, O. “Corporate governance: Some theory and implications.” Economic Journal, (105), Pg.678-689., 1995.
Heeks, Richard and Bailur, Savita, “Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice”, Government Information System(24), pp243 – 265, 2007
Ho, A. T., “Reinventing local governments and the e-government Initiative.”, Public Administration Review, 62(4), pp.410 – 420, 2002
Hughes, M., Scott, M. and Golden, W., “The rolde of business process redesign in creating e-government in Ireland”,Nusiness Process Management Journal(12:1),pp.76-87 , 2006
Hughes, O.E., Public Management and Administration: An Introduction 3rd, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003
Huxham, C. ed.“Creating collaborative advantage”, SAGE , 1996
Jones, G.R. “Organizational Theory: Text and Cases”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1995
Kaplan and Norton, Strategy Map:Converting Intangible Asset Into Tangible Outcomes。Harvard Business School Press, 2003
Kawalek, P. and Wawstall, D., “Pursuing Radical Transformation in Information Age Governmenr：Case Studies Using the SPRINT Methodlogy”,  Journal of Global Information Management(13:1) , 2005
Kay, J. and Silberston. A. “Corporate governance.” National Institute Economic Review, (3), Pg.84-97, 1995.
Koh, C. E., Prybutok, V. R., Ryan, S. and Ibragimova, B., “The importance of strategic readiness in an emerging e-government enviornment”, Business Process management Journal(12:1),pp.22-33, 2006
Langtry, B., “Stakeholders and the moral responsibility of business.”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4:431-443. 1994.
Layne, K. and Lee, J., “Developing fully functional E-Government：A four stage model”,Government Information Quarterly(18),pp.122-136, 2001
Lincoln, Y., Guba, E. Naturalistic inquiry, Newbury Park: Sage. 1985
Loader, B.D.(ed), The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring,N.Y,:Routledge,1997
McCaffery, J. ‘Making the Most of Strategic Planning and Management’ in R.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D. J., “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts”, The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pg. 853, 1997.
Moore, M, Creating Public Value, Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press., 1995
Norris, D.F. and Kraemer, K.L., “Mainframe and PC computing in America Cities: Myths and Realities”, Public Administration Review, 56, 1996
Nutt, P.C. and Backoff, R.W., Strategic Management of Public and Third Sector Organizations: A Handbook for Leaders, Jossey-Bass, 1992.
Pestoff, V. A.“Control and Multi-Stakeholder Organizational. Beyond the Market and State： Social enterparises and civil democracy in a welfare society”, Pg.106-127, 1998
Reddick, C. G., “Empirical Models of E-Government Growth in Local Governments”, E-Service Journal(3:2),pp.59-84 , 2004
Richard Heeks and Savita Nailur,“Analyzing e-government research：Perspectives, Philosophies, theories, methods, and practice”, Government Information Quarterly(24), pp.243-265, 2007
Rowley, T.J. and Moldoveanu, M. “When will stakeholder groups act? an interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization.” Academy of Management Review,
Rowley, T.J., “Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences”, Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pp. 887-910, 1997
Scholl, H. J., “Applying Stakeholder theory to E-Government Benefits and Limits”,working paper, 2001.
Scholl, H. J., “Current Practices in E-Government-induced Business Process Change(BPC)”working paper, 2005.
Scholl, H. J., “E-Government：A special Case of ICT-Enabled Business Change”,working paper, 2002
Scholl, H. J., “Electronic Government: Scope and scale of process change”, EGOV2004, 2004
Scholl, H. J., “Electronic government：Information management capacity, organizational capabilities, and the sourcing mix”,Government Information Quarterly(23), pp.73-96, 2006
Schorr, H. and Stolfo, S.J., “A digital government for the 21st century”, Communications of the ACM, 41(11), 1998
Steiss, A.W., Strategic management for public and nonprofit organizations, CRC Press, 2003
Stemberger, M. I. and Jaklic, J., “Towards E-Government by business process change-A Methodlogy for public sector”,International Journal of Information management(27),pp.221-232, 2007
Sundberg, H. P. and Sandberg, K. W., “Towards e-government：a survey of problems in organizational processes”, Business Process Management Journal(12:2),pp.149-161, 2006
Tan, C. W. , Pan, S. L and Lim, E. T.K. , “Manageing Stakeholder interests in e-Government Implementation：lessons Learned from a Singapore e-Fovernment Project”, Journal of Global Information Management(13:1), pp.31-53, 2005
Tan, C. W. and Pan, S. L ,“Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS)” European Journal of Information Systems(12),pp.269-281 , 2003
Tapscott, D., The Digital Economy, New York: McGraw Hill. 1996
Torres, L., Pina, V. and Acerete, B., “E-Government developments on delivering public services among EU cities”,Government Inofrmation System(22),pp.217-238, 2005
Wescott, C.G., “E-government to combat corruption in Asia Pacific Region.”Paper presented at the 11th International Anti-corruption conference, pp.1-7. Seoul, Republic of Korea. May 25-28., 2003
Wheelen, T.L. and Hunger, J. D., Strategic Management and Business Policy: Concepts and Cases, Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007
Yang, Kaifeng and Meltiski, James ”Competing and Complementary values in Information Technology Strategic Planning”, Public Performance & Management Review(30), NO 3., pp. 426 – 452, 2007