隨著知識經濟時代的來臨，培養創新能力及持續學習成為因應全球化變遷的關鍵所在。教育是國家競爭力提升的基石，如何衡量教育組織的創新資本對提升組織績效之影響將為重點所在。本研究以智慧資本的角度切入探討創新資本對於組織績效之影響，進一步探討台灣高等教育機構背景因素，以建構教育創新對組織績效之可能影響。本研究試圖達成下列目的：
一、探討創新資本對組織績效之影響。
二、探討創新資本之技術創新對組織績效之影響。
三、探討創新資本之管理創新對組織績效之影響。
四、嘗試勾劃出創新資本對高等教育機構之未來圖像。
    本研究首先採用文獻分析法，從智慧資本之理論出發，探討創新資本特性，及教育創新之內涵，進而透過問卷調查蒐集資料並加以分析，以獲知創新資本衡量對組織績效之影響。其研究結果如下：
一、創新資本對組織績效之影響為顯著正向影響。
二、創新資本之技術創新在「產品創新」對組織績效之影響為顯著正向影響。
三、創新資本在管理創新著重以「人員創新」對組織績效之影響為顯著正向影響。
    本研究依上述研究結果，分別對後續研究者提出建議。

Abstract:

	With the arrival of the era of knowledge-driven economy, innovation training ability, and continuing-learning became key points of changing in conformity with globalization. Education is the foundation stone in which national competitiveness improves. That is why education will be the key to influence organizational performance on how to measure and teach organized innovation capital. This research through the intelligence capital probes into the innovative capital to influence organizational performance. Therefore, this research will also find out the probable effect in educational organizations in Taiwan higher education institutions.
	The purpose of this research is focus on influential factors of innovative capital that exists in higher education such as, technical innovation, and administrative innovation. The purpose of this research is to also to:
1.	To discuss the influence generated by innovative capital on organizational performance in higher education.
2.	To discuss the influence generated by technical innovation on organizational performance in higher education.
3.	To discuss the influence generated by administrative innovation on organizational performance in higher education.
4.	Try to imagine innovative capital scenarios to create the futures images of the higher educational institution. 
Finally, this research first adopts the literature review, later proceeds to the theory of intelligence capital, probe into the innovative capital characteristic and the intension of educational innovation, to later collect important data through a survey, in order to know that innovative capital is an important factor that influences organizational performance.

目  錄I
表  次II
圖  次V
第一章	緒論	1
第一節  研究動機	1
第二節	研究目的	2
第三節	研究範圍與限制	3
第四節	研究流程	4
第二章	文獻探討	7
第一節	智慧資本	7
第二節	創新資本	14
第三節	組織績效	23
第四節	台灣高等教育之發展	26
第五節	未來圖像	28
第三章	研究方法	33
第一節	觀念性研究架構	33
第二節	研究假說	34
第三節	變數之操作性定義與衡量	37
第四節	研究對象與問卷發放	44
第五節	資料分析方法	46
第四章	資料統計與分析	48
第一節	樣本回收與資料分析	48
第二節	信度與效度分析	56
第三節	相關分析	63
第四節	實證分析	66
第五節	未來圖像之情境分析	73
第五章	結論與建議	77
第一節	研究結論	77
第二節	研究建議	79
第三節	後續研究建議	80
參考文獻	81
中文部分	81
英文部分	84
附錄　預試及研究問卷	91
 
表 次
表2-1智慧資本之定義9
表2-2近代各學者對智慧資本之分類12
表2-3近代各學者對創新意涵之定義15
表2-4創新資本相關文獻之衡量指標17
表2-5近年來各學者創新資本型態之分類18
表2-6近代各學者探討創新資本對組織績效之文獻22
表2-7各學者對教育組織績效之分類24
表2-8情境分析之觀點歸納31
表3-1技術創新之衡量構面與問項38
表3-2管理創新之衡量構面與問項40
表3-3組織績效之衡量構面與問項41
表3-4問卷設計結構42
表3-5基本資料問項43
表4-1資本資料彙整表50
表4-2 技術創新彙52
表4-3人員創新彙整表53
表4-4策略創新彙整表53
表4-5制度創新彙整表54
表4-6台灣高等教育機構組織績效彙整表55
表4-7 研究變數與構面Cronbach α值57
表4-8研究變數與構面之相關係數59
表4-9技術創新、管理創新與組織績效各構面內容61
表4-10創新資本與組織績效之相關分析表63
表4-11技術創新與組織績效之相關分析表64
表4-12管理創新對組織績效之相關分析表65
表4-13創新資本對組織績效之簡單迴歸模式分析表66
表4-14創新資本對組織績效之複迴歸模式分析表67
表4-15技術創新對組織績效之簡單迴歸模式分析表68
表4-16技術創新對組織績效之複迴歸模式分析表69
表4-17管理創新對組織績效之簡單迴歸模式分析表70
表4-18管理創新對組織績效之複迴歸模式分析表70
表4-19研究假說與驗證結果彙整72
 
圖 次
圖1-1研究步驟6
圖2-1 Brooking(1996) 智慧資本架構圖10
圖2-2斯堪地亞智慧資本架構圖11
圖2-3智慧資本之關係架構圖11
圖2-4情境分析之類型30
圖3-1觀念性研究架構33
圖4-1情境分析步驟76

中文部分
王文英、張清福（2004）。智慧資本影響績效模式之探討—我國半導體業之實證研究，會計評論，39，89-117頁。
王美雅（2005）。打開創新黑盒子—不可不知的五大創新理論。經理人月刊，7，	56-64。
王保進（2004）。國家層級大學教育指標系統建構之研究。初等教育學刊，18，25-50。
毛榮敬（2004）。國民小學智慧資本探索性之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中正大學		教育研究所，嘉義縣。
台灣評鑑協會（2008）。淡江大學校務評鑑報告。 台北：淡江大學。
史都華（Stewart, A.）（2003）。知識煉金術：活用智慧資產為企業謀利（The Wealth of Knowledge）（蔣雪芬譯）。台北市：遠流。（原作2001出版）
艾文森（Edvinsson, L.）、馬龍（Malone, S.）（1999）。智慧資本 如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值（Intellectual captial : realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower）（林大容譯）。台北：麥田出版社。（原作1997出版）
吳思華（2002）。從製造臺灣走向知識臺灣--「創意、創新與創業」是知識經濟時代的新	力量。創業創新育成，5，7-9。
吳思華（2001）。知識資本在台灣。 台北：遠流出版社。
吳清山、林天佑（2003）。創新經營。教育資料與研究，53，134-135。
吳清山（2006）。學校創新經營方案之建構。中等教育，56（3），1-27。
吳思華（2002）。從製造台灣到知識台灣。天下文化，創新（哈佛商業評論精選），26-35。
吳雪華（2005）。臺北縣市國民小學教師創新教學能力與教學校能關係之研究。未出版碩士論文，臺北市立教育大學國民教育研究所，台北市。
吳顯東（2005）。SRI情境分析方法。台北市：資訊工業策進會。
李蘭甫（1984）。國際企業論，台北：三民。
李瑞娥（2004）。國民學校終身學習文化、組織學習、組織創新與學校校能關係之研究—
	 學習型學校模式之建構，未出版博士論文，國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所，高
	 雄。
杜拉克（Drucker, F.）（2001）。創新的修練 突破性思考（Harvard business review on breakthrough thinking）（巫宗融譯）。台北：天下遠見。（原作2000出版）
金耀基（2003）。大學之理念，台北：時報文化。
林珈夙（1997）。校長領導風格、教師創意生活經驗、教學創新行為與學校效能之關係。	未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北縣。
科特（Kotter, P.）（2000）。領導與變革（On what leaders really do）（李聖賢譯）。台北：中國生產力中心出版。（原作1999出版）
范熾文（2001）。國民小學校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所，未出版博士論文，台北市。
莊立民（2005）。台灣資訊電子業組織創新力成模式之研究-以六家企業個案為例。商管		科技季刊，6（1），69-62。
張明輝（2002）。學習型學校的挑戰與因應。在潘慧玲編著，學校革新：理念與實踐（頁333-362）。台北市：學富。
張妙琳（2005）。國民小學組織學習與創新經營之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立中正大		學教育研究所，台北市。
克爾（Kerr, C.）（1987）大學的功用（The uses of the university）（張建邦譯）。臺北縣 :
	淡江大學。（原作1963出版）
郭為藩（2004）。轉變中的大學—傳統、議題與前景。台北市：高等教育文化事業有限公
	司。
曾俊堯（2002）。國內銀行業智慧資本之探討與比較。產業金融季刊， (114)， 35-52。
曾俊堯、古永嘉（2003）。智慧資本與公司無形價值關係之研究--以台灣製造業為例，管
	理與系統期刊，11(1)，1-30。
黃家齊（2003）。「人力資本投資系統、創新策略與組織績效－多種契合觀點的驗證」，管理評論，22(1)，99-126。
黃宛華（1999）。資訊服務業智慧資本之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
教育部（2002）。我國加入WTO有關教育服務之衝擊與因應之道。台北市：教育部。
教育部（2004）。94年度至96年度私立大學校院整體發展獎補助審核作業原則。台北市：教育部。
教育部（2006）。教育部私立大學校院整體發展獎助及補助作業手冊。台北市：教育高
	教司。
教育部（2007）。九十六（2007-2008）學年度大專院校統計資料。台北市：教育部統計處。 
蔡啟通（1997）。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。國立台灣大學商學
	研究所博士論文。
劉正田（2000）。企業無形資產價值評估問題之探討，會計研究月刊，170，21-28。
謝長榮（2006）。台南縣國民小學教師應用知識管理於創新教學之現況與問題研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台南大學教育經營管理研究所，台南。
謝慧音（2004）。國小教師對學校智慧資本狀況之知覺研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所。
薛承泰（2004）。台灣地區貧窮女性化現象之探討：以1990 年代為例，人口學刊，29，	95-121。
夏畢洛（Shapiro, M.）（2002）。24 / 7 創新：變動年代的企業求生與致勝藍圖（24/7 
	innovation）（戴至中譯）。台北市：美商麥格羅‧希爾。（原作1996出版）
顏秀如、張明輝（2006）。學校創新經營的意涵與實施計畫，中等教育，56（3），28-53。
 
英文部分
Altbach, P. G., Berdahl Robert O., and Gumport Patricia J. (2005). American higher education in 	the twenty-first century : Social, political, and economic challenges Johns Hopkins Univ Pr.
	Antonelli, C. (1993). Investment and Adoption in Advanced Telecommunications, Journal of 	Economic Behavior & Organization, 20(2), 227-245.
Bassi, L. and Van Buren, M. (1999). Valuing investments in intellectual capital, International 	Journal of Technology Management 18, 14-432.
Barbara, A. (2007). Assessing organizational performance in higher education.Jossey-Bass 	Publishers.
Barney. J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of 	Management, 	17(1), 411-427.
Bear, M. and Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and 	psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational 	Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
Bell, W. (2000). Foundations of futures studies: Human science for a new era, vol. 1: History, 	purposes and knowledge (Third printing ed.). New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Publishers. 
Bontis, N., Keow, W., and Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual Capital and Business 	Performance in Malaysian Industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1) 10-85.
Bosworth, D. and Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An 	empirical 	analysis of large Australian firms, The Economic Record, 77(239), 323-337. 
Boulding, E., and Boulding, K. (1995).The Future: Images and Processes. Sage Publications 	(paperback).
Börjesona, L., Höjera, M., Dreborgb, K., Ekvallc, K.and Finnveden, G. (2006). Scenario types and 	techniques: Towards a user's guide. Futures, 38(7), 723-739. 
Bukh, P., Larsen, H. and Mouritsen, J. (2001). Constructing Intellectual Capital Statements, 	Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17, 87-108.
Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M.(1962). The management of innovation. Tavistock, London. Chen, S., Crepon, G. (1998). Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at 	the 	Firm Level, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 6696.
Cuttance, P. (1990). Perfomance indicators and the management of quality in education. 
Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management 	Journal, 21, 193-210.
Damanpour, F. (1991), Organizational innovation: a meta analysis of effects of determinants and 	moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Damanpour, F., and Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The 	problem of Organizational Lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392-409.
Drucker, P. (1954). The Practice of Management, N.Y.: Harper and Row, 121-127.
Durker P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Duquette, D. and Stowe, A. (1993). A performance measurement model for the office of inspector 	general. Government Accountants, 42(2), 27-50.	
Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The measurement and Management of intellectual capital: an 	introduction, Management Accounting, 78(2), 32-36.
Ellul, T. (1976). Stories and images of the future. In R. Bundy (Ed.), Images of the 	future:　The 	twenty-first century and beyond (pp. 24-34). Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their 	effects on organizations.  Sr. Paul, MN: West Education Publishing Company.
Fitz-Enz, J. (1997). Are your human assets outperforming the market? Management Review, 86: 	62-66.
Gambardella, A. and Torrisi, S. (2000). The Economic Value of Knowledge and Inter-firm 	Technologyical Linnkages: An Investigation of Science-Based Firms, Dynacom TSER 	Projectt(Contract no. SOE1-CT97-1078).
Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). Unraveling the links between dimensions of innovation and 	organizational performance. The Journal of High Technology Managment Research, 11(1), 	137-153. 
Grabowski, H. and Mueller, D. (1978). Industrial research and develop, 	intangible capital stocks, 	and firm profit rates, The Bell Journal of 	Economics, 9, 328-343.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey Journal of Economic 	Literature, 28 (4), 1661-1674.
Griliches, Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, Chicago, 	IL: The aaaaaa	University of Chicago Press.
Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., (2000). Market value and patent citations: A First Look, University of California at Berekeley, Department of Economics Working Paper # 00-277, Berkeley, CA.
Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its 	top 	managers. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 401-418.
Hicks, A. and Holden, C. (1995). Visions of the future: Why we need to teach for tomorrow. London, 	UK: Trentham Books.
Higgins, James M. (1995). Innovation: the core competence. Planning Review, 23, 32-36.
Hitt, M., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. and Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of 	human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: Aresource-based 	perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 13-28.
Hollenstein, H. (1996). A composite indicator of a firm’s innovativeness. An empirical analysis 	based on survey data for Swiss manufacturing. Research Policy, 25, 633-645.
Huselid, M. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover 	productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 	635-674.
Hurley, R. and Hult, M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An 	integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 3, 42-45. 
Inayatullah, S. (1990). Deconstructing and reconstructing the future: Predictive, cutural and critical 	epistemologies. Futures, 22(2), 115-141. 
Johns, G. (1993). Constraints on the adoption of psychology-based personnel practices: 	Lessons 	from organizational innovation. Personnel Psychology, 46, 569-592.
Johnstone, J. (1981). Indicators of education systems. London: Kogan Page Press.
Kast, P. and Rosenzweig, J. (1981). A systems and contingency approach (9th ed.). N. Y.: 	McGraw-Hill. 
Kezar, A. (2001). Providing a common language for understanding organizational 	change. In 	Understanding and Facilitating Organizational Change in the 21st Century: Recent Research 	and Conceptualizations, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28（4）, 11-24.
Knight, D. (1999). Performance Measures for Increasing Intellectual Capital, 	Strategy　& 	Leadership Journal, 10-15, 22-25.
Kimberly, J. R. and Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of 	individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and 	administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
Knight, D. (1999). Performance measures for increasing intellectual capital. Strategy & 	Leadership, 27, 22-27.
Kahn, H. and Weiner, A. (1967). The year 2000：A framework for speculation on the next thirty 	years, Macmillan.
Lau, R. (1998). How does research and development intensity affect business 	performance? South 	Dakota Business Review, Vermillion, Sep.
Lepak, D. and Snell, S. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human 	capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31-48.
Lester, T.（2000）. Globalization: The Product of a Knowledge-Based Economy, The Annals of the 	American Academy, 570, 19-31.
Lin, W. S., Lin, T. M. and Chen, J. S. (2000). A study on Intellectual capital based corporate 	distress diagnosis system: Construct of theory model. Tamsui Oxford Journal of Management 	Science, 16(2000), 1-22.
Liu, M., Chen, J. and Chan, H. (2004). The strategy for raising R&D intensity of Taiwan, paper 	presented at the International Conference on 2004 Industrial Technology Innovation Growth 	Engines of the Innovation-driven Economy, Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Lynch, D.F., Scott, K. B. and Ozment, J. (2000). The Effect of Logistics Capabilities and Strategy 	on 	Firm Performance, Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), 47-68.
Miller, M. (1999), Building the Ultimate Resource. Management Review, 88(1), 	42-45.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development（1969）.The Management of 	Innovation in Education. Paris: OECDCERI.
Organisation for Economic and Co-Operation Development. (2000). Knowledge management in 	the learning society. Paris: author.
Owens, R. (1987). Organizational Behavior in Education, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice 	Hall.
Oxford English Dictionary Online (2007). Retrieved March 11/22, 2007, from 	http://www.oed.com/
Pablos, P. (2002). Evidence of intellectual capital measurement from Asia, Europe and 	Middle 	East. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 287-302.
Parasuraman, A. and Zeren, L. (1983). R&D’s relationship with profits 	and 	sales,Research 	Management.
Polak, F. (1976). Responsibility for the future. In R. Bundy (Ed.), Images of the future: The 	twenty-first century and beyond (pp. 9-15). Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
Roos, J., Roos, G., Leif, E., and Carlo, D., (1998), Intellectual Capital – Navigating in The New 	Business Landscape. New York: New York University Press. 
Sallis, E. and Jones, G. (2002). Knowledge Management in Education. London: Kogan Page.
Schoenecker, T. and Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators of Firm Technological Capability: Validity and 	Performance Implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering 	Management, 49(1), 36-44.
Shostak, A. B. (2005). High schools for futurism: A leap frog advantage. Journal of Futures Studies, 	10(2), 105-111. 
Snell, S. and Dean, J. (1992). Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: A 	human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 	35(3), 476-504.
Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D, The Accounting 	Review, 69(1), 44-68.
Spee, A. and Bormans, R. (1992). Performance indicators in government institutional relations: The 	conceptual framework. Higher Education Management, 4(2), 139-155.
Stewart, T. (1997). Intellectual Capital; The New Wealth of Organizations, New York: Bantam 	Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Stewart, T. (1999). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organization, First Currency 	Paperback Edition. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Subramanian, A. and Nilakanta, S. (1996), Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the 	relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and 	measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631-647.
Sveiby, K, E. (1998a). Intellectual capital and knowledge management. Retrieved January 	13,2001, form http://www.sveiby.com.au/intellectualCapital.html. 
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Toivanen O., Stoneman, P. and Bosworth, D. (2002). Innovation and the market value of UK, 	Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(39), 39-61.
UNESCO and World Bank (2000). Higher education in developing countries: Peril and promise. 	Washington, D. C.: World Bank. 
Williams, K. and Ralston, JR. (1976). Scenarios in Technology Forecasting, Technology 	Forecasting Capability Transferal Project－Lectures on Technology Forecasting 	Methodologies, SRI International, pp.14.
Williams, S. Mitchell (2000). Is a companies intellectual capital performance and intellectual 	capital disclosure practices related? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 	192 - 203.
Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A. and Mavondo, F. (1999). Relationship between generic strategies, 	competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 	19(8), 507-518.
Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A. and Mavondo, F. (1999). Innovation index audits implicationa on 	organizational performance: Astudy of australian manufacturing companies. International 	Journal of Technology Management, 17(5), 495-503.