系統識別號 | U0002-2207201904003000 |
---|---|
DOI | 10.6846/TKU.2019.00688 |
論文名稱(中文) | 臺灣高等教育對犯罪類型之影響:空間計量方法應用 |
論文名稱(英文) | Effect of Higher Education Expansion on Crime Rates in Taiwan: An Application of Spatial Econometrics |
第三語言論文名稱 | |
校院名稱 | 淡江大學 |
系所名稱(中文) | 產業經濟學系碩士班 |
系所名稱(英文) | Department of Industrial Economics |
外國學位學校名稱 | |
外國學位學院名稱 | |
外國學位研究所名稱 | |
學年度 | 107 |
學期 | 2 |
出版年 | 108 |
研究生(中文) | 李承憲 |
研究生(英文) | Cherng-Hsiann Lee |
學號 | 606540259 |
學位類別 | 碩士 |
語言別 | 繁體中文 |
第二語言別 | |
口試日期 | 2019-06-28 |
論文頁數 | 34頁 |
口試委員 |
指導教授
-
林俊宏(chlin@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 王淳玄 委員 - 蔡明芳 |
關鍵字(中) |
高等教育 犯罪率 空間計量 |
關鍵字(英) |
Higher Education Crime Rates Spatial Econometrics |
第三語言關鍵字 | |
學科別分類 | |
中文摘要 |
近年來,因廣設高中以及大學成為教育政策的核心主軸,使得大學數量迅速擴充,因而導致不少對於大學數量過多的質疑聲浪興起,如升格過度快速,對於學校品質感到疑慮以及資源缺乏效率。此外,與過去大學錄取率相比,目前大學已經不再是高不可攀的教育層級,故雖然學生在學歷上的名目年數增加,但對於實質教育水準卻沒與之成正比,加上過去曾發生不少高知識份子賄選、殺人、業務侵占、挪用公款等案件,以及近期,頻頻發生大學校園情殺案件,如高等學歷學生因感情糾紛而謀殺同學案件層出不窮,社會普遍認為的高知識份子應具備相對道德感等觀念逐漸被打破,造成部分民眾對於高等教育之必要性產生疑慮。因此,本研究使用臺灣本島十九個縣市,期間為2000至2017年共18年的資料並且使用空間計量方法,並加入大專及以上教育程度、前一期平均警政支出、失業率、平均每人每年所得、人口密度以及平均每人社會福利支出作為解釋變數,探討臺灣高等教育對於犯罪率之影響,消除社會大眾對於高等教育之必要性的疑慮以及比較有無考慮空間外溢之估計結果。 研究結果顯示,大專及以上教育程度、前一期平均警政支出,社會福利支出對於犯罪率具有負向關係,失業率及人口密度對於犯罪率則有正向影響,而縣市的犯罪率則有空間群聚的現象,即某縣市之犯罪率上升時,其鄰近縣市之犯罪率亦會受到影響導致上升。最後經由本研究可得知,高等教育的投資並不會對社會產生壞處,而是利大於弊,且能夠有效降低犯罪的發生。 |
英文摘要 |
In recent years, the wide establishment of high schools and universities has already become the core for education policy in Taiwan. With that being said, the number of universities began to increase dramatically over the years and hence, the public were starting to question the lack of resources and doubt the quality of these universities. Apart from that, if one were to pursue higher education in Taiwan, the entry barrier to universities are not high anymore when compared to the standard of higher education decades ago. Although there are many fresh graduates in the society, but the quality and standard of the current higher education were being doubt by the public. Also, the public have no trust and lost their faith in regards with the moral, attitude and ethnicity of these fresh graduates. The reason behind this matter is due to the many incidents of knowledgeable individual committing serious crimes in the past such as bribery, murder, embezzlement, employee theft and so-on. Moreover, various murder case were committed by university students in the recent years and the murder motive of these murder cases were all because of relationship issues. As we can see from this point of view, if an individual is a knowledgeable person and pursued higher education, he or she will think thoroughly before making any act or decision, and thus, will not commit such serious crime in the first place. The selection of data for this study are 19 cities in Taiwan and the data selected are from year 2000 to 2017, with a total of 18 years. As for the method used, this study uses spatial measurement method. The standard of higher education, the average policing expenditure in the previous period, unemployment rate, average annual income per person, population density and the average social welfare expenditure per person are used as independent variable. The aims of the study are to explore the effect of higher education on the expansion of crime rates in Taiwan, eliminate the public doubts regarding on the necessity of higher education and compare the estimated results of spatial spillovers. The results of the study shows that higher education, the average policing expenditure in the previous period, and the social welfare expenditure have negative impact on the crime rates in Taiwan. The unemployment rate and population density will affect the crime rates in a positive way. There is a phenomenon of spatial clustering with crime rate in the cities. To be in detail, when the crime rate of a particular city increases, the crime rate of neighboring cities will also increase. In conclusion, this study shows that investment in higher education does not cause any harm or have any negative impacts to the society. On the contrary, it can also reduce the criminal incidents effectively and efficiently. |
第三語言摘要 | |
論文目次 |
目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 教育程度對犯罪率相關文獻 5 第二節 空間計量相關文獻 7 第三章 資料來源與變數敘述 10 第一節 資料來源 10 第二節 變數設定 10 第三節 變數敘述統計與分析 14 第四章 研究方法與模型 16 第一節 追蹤資料分析法 17 第二節 空間計量分析法 18 第五章 實證結果分析 22 第一節 追蹤迴歸結果與分析 22 第二節 空間自我相關檢定分析 25 第三節 空間自相關模型結果與分析 27 第六章 結論 30 參考文獻 32 |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻 林明仁、劉仲偉 (2006),失業真的會導致犯罪嗎?以臺灣1978年至2003年縣 市資料為例,經濟論文叢刊, 34:4 (2006), 445–483。 劉孟奇、張其祿、盧敬植(2010),警力增加能導致竊盜犯罪率降低嗎?台灣縣市 1998-2007動態追蹤資料之Granger因果分析,公共行政學報第三十四期。 尤仕隆 (2015),影響六都三大犯罪率成因之探討,真理大學經濟學系財經碩士 班碩士論文。 鄭雅文 (2016),經濟景氣、警政、人口結構對犯罪率之影響,以台灣1996年 至2010年的縣市動態資料分析。國立臺灣大學社會科學院經濟學系在職專 班碩士論文。 曾偉君 (2008),影響犯罪率之社會經濟因素實證分析。國立中興大學碩士學位 論文。 李瑞陽、陳勝義 (2010),台中市搶奪犯罪熱點與犯罪區位之空間分析,Journal of Geographical Research No.53:23-48 嚴小兵 (2013),上海市就業市場狀況與城市犯罪的空間計量分析,Human Geography Vol.28.no.3 孟靜 (1985),台灣的犯罪現象與地區環境之空間分析,國立台灣師範大學地理 研究報告第十一期。 溫在弘、劉擇昌、林民浩 (2010),犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用:以1998-2007年台北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例 蘇靜、肖攀、胡宗義 (2018),教育、社會資本與農戶家庭多維貧困轉化,Education and economy Vol.35:17-46 Anselin, L. (1988), “Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models.” Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Anselin, L. (1999), ”Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis,” Geographical Information Systems: Principles and technical issues,253-266 Anselin, L. (1999), ”Spatial econometrics” A companion to theoretical econometrics Anselin, L, Julie Le Gallo, Hubert Jayet. (2008). ”Spatial Panel Econometrics” The econometrics of panel data, Becker, Gary S. (1968). “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy Blackmore, F.L.E. (2003). ”Panel Data Analysis of Crime in South Africa”, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, Volume 6, Number 3, 1 September 2003, pp. 439-458(20) Bernburg, JG., Krohn, MD. (2003). “Labeling, Life Chances, and Adult Crime The Direct and Indirect Effects of Official Intervention In Adolescence on Crime in Early Adulthood,” Criminology , 41(4): 1287–1318. Buonanno, P., Leonida, L. (2006). “Education and Crime: Evidence from Italian Regions ,” Applied Economics Letter , 13: 709–713. Cohen, J., Gorr, WL., Olligschlaeger, AM. (2007). “Leading Indicators and Spatial Interactions: A Crime-Forecasting Model for Proactive Police Deployment.” Geographical Analysis, 39: 105–127 Ehrlich, I. (1972). “The Deterrent Effect of Criminal Law Enforcement,” The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2 , pp. 259-276 Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., Loayza, N. (2000). “What Causes Violent Crime?” European Economic Review.46:1323- 1357. Freeman, RB (1996). “Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it? ” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10: 25–42. Jacob, BA., Lefgren, L. (2003). “Are Idle Hands the Devil’s Workshop? Incapacitation, Concentration, and Juvenile Crime,” American Economic Review Lochner, L (2004). “Education, Work and Crime: A Human Capital Approach.”. Economic Review Volume 45: 811–844. Lochner, L., Moretti, E. (2004). “The Effect Of Education On Crime: Evidence From Prison Inmates, Arrests, And Self-reports,” American economic review, 94: 155–189. Lochner, L. (2010) “Education Policy and Crime.” NBER Working Paper No.15894. Levitt, SD (1997). ”Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effects of police on crime: Reply.” The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 4 (Sep.,2002), pp. 1244-1250 Tin-Chun Lin (2004). “The role of higher education in economic development: an empirical study of Taiwan case.” Journal of Asian Economics, 15:355–371 Takagi, D., Ikeda, K., Kawachi, I. (2012). “ Neighborhood social capital and crime victimization: Comparison of spatial regression analysis and hierarchical regression analysis.” Social Science & Medicine, 75(10), 1895-1902 Pan, M., Widner, B., Enomoto, C. E. (2012). “Spillover Effects of Crimes in Neighboring States of Mexico.” International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3 (14), 14-32. |
論文全文使用權限 |
如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信