為了改善台灣民眾使用機車所產生的環境汙染與交通安全問題，政府不斷地鼓勵民眾多利用大眾運輸以減少私有運具之使用，而大眾運輸工具之中以公共自行車最為環保。全球目前已有 831 個城市設置公共自行車讓民眾租借，而台北市政府亦希望藉由推行公共自行車租賃系統 YouBike，能有效移轉或減少私有運具之使用。然而根據YouBike 之使用統計數據發現，其平均使用周轉率雖高，但其使用者多是非經常的使用型態，此結果顯示YouBike取代私有運具的成效上是有限。再者，目前機車轉乘族使用YouBike轉乘情況並不普及，且在運具選擇行為方面的文獻較少以計畫行為理論與科技接受模式來探討使用意圖。有鑑於此，本研究欲探討機車轉捷運之轉乘族轉換使用YouBike的行為意圖，並企圖結合計畫行為理論與科技接受模式，加上習慣和環保意識等因素以建構其轉換行為的研究架構，進而驗證之。
    在實證方面，本研究以機車轉乘族為研究對象，最後共計回收 191 份有效樣本。本研究進行樣本資料的敘述統計分析、T 檢定、變異數分析與信效度分析以及模式的檢驗後，驗證本研究的假說皆為成立。而經分析可到下列結果：
一、計畫行為理論之使用態度、社會規範、知覺行為控制會正向影響轉換使用 YouBike的意圖。
二、科技接受模式之認知有用性與認知用性會正向影響轉換意圖。
三、使用機車的習慣則是負向影響轉換意圖。
四、環保意識則是正向影響轉換意圖。
    最後，綜合研究結果提出管理意涵與建議，如欲提昇機車轉乘族轉換使用YouBike 的意圖，建議可加強改善車輛調度以及自行車道的規劃，而政府應該更嚴格管制交通與法規，以降低交通事故的發生率，提高民眾更安全的交通環境。此外，目前機車轉乘族使用機車已是長久以來的習慣，但對於轉換使用 YouBike的意願高，因此，未來欲使民眾使用YouBike 來減少或降低機車的使用是具有可行性的。

To improve environmental pollution and traffic safety related to motorcyclists, the government has continued encouraging people to take use public transit system to replace or reduce the use of private vehicles. Public bicycles are most friendly to the environment. Currently, many cities around the world have set up the public bicycle system, and our government also hopes that the implementation of public bicycle system YouBike can effectively transfer or reduce the use of private transport. However, according to the statistics, the efficacy is limited. Therefore, this study tries to explore the behavioral intention of motorcyclists switching to YouBike. There have been few studies of behavioral intention based on the models of Combined TPB and TAM, so this research has laid emphasis on the mode switching behavior of motorcyclists to YouBike based on Combined TPB and TAM as well as habit and environmental consciousness. 
    Motorcyclists have been selected as the research subjects and 191 valid questionnaires were obtained. Descriptive statistical analysis, T test, variance analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity analysis, and path analysis have been conducted to verify the hypotheses by SPSS and PLS. The results show: First, theories of planned behavior of attitude, social norms, perceived behavioral control positively affect the switching intention. Second, Technology Acceptance Model of usefulness and perceived ease of use positively affect switching intention. Third, the habits negatively affect switching intention. Lastly, environmental consciousness has  been positively related to witching intention. According to the results, the conclusions of this study and management implications were made. To enhance the switching of the motorcycle to YouBike, the cycling paths should be well planned and traffic safety and traffic laws enforced to reduce traffic accidents and provide safer traffic environment.

表目錄	III
	IV
圖目錄	V
第一章	緒論	1
1.1	研究背景與動機	1
1.2	研究目的	4
1.3	研究範疇與對象	5
1.4	研究流程	5
第二章	文獻探討	7
2.1	運具選擇行為	7
2.2	計畫行為理論及延伸理論	8
2.3	結合計畫行為理論與科技接受模式	14
2.4	小結	17
第三章	研究方法	19
3.1	研究架構	19
3.2	研究假說	20
3.3	變項操作型定義與衡量	21
3.4	研究設計	27
第四章	樣本分析與模式驗證	30
4.1	樣本之敘述性統計分析	30
4.2	潛在變數之敘述性統計分析	37
4.3	T檢定與變異數分析	40
4.4	信度與效度分析	47
4.5	結構模式驗證分析	48
4.6	小結	54
第五章	結論與建議	57
5.1	結論	57
5.2	管理意涵	59
5.3	研究貢獻	60
5.4	研究限制與建議	61
參考文獻	62
附錄一：前測問卷	71
附錄二：正式問卷	76
附錄三：未刪除題項之驗證因素分析結果表	81
附錄三：未刪除題項之驗證因素分析結果表(續) 	82

表目錄
表2- 1 應用計畫行為理論於運具選擇行為的相關研究	12
表2- 1 應用計畫行為理論於運具選擇行為的相關研究(續) 	12
表2- 1 應用計畫行為理論於運具選擇行為的相關研究(續) 	14
表3- 1 認知有用性(PU)構面之問項	22
表3- 2 認知易用性(PEU)構面之問項	22
表3- 3 使用態度(AT)構面之問項	23
表3- 4 社會規範(SN)構面之問項	24
表3- 5 知覺行為控制(PBC)構面之問項	25
表3- 6 轉換意願(SI)構面之問項	26
表3- 7 習慣(PH)構面之問項	26
表3- 8 環保意識(EC)構面之問項	27
表4- 1 樣本資料統計	31
表4- 1 樣本資料統計(續)	32
表4- 2 認知有用性構面之分析結果	37
表4- 3 認知易用性構面之分析結果	37
表4- 4 使用態度構面之分析結果	38
表4- 5 社會規範構面之分析結果	38
表4- 6 知覺行為控制構面之分析結果	39
表4- 7 轉換意願構面之分析結果	39
表4- 8 習慣構面之分析結果	40
表4- 9 環保意識構面之分析結果	40
表4- 10 YouBike使用經驗與習慣和轉換意願之T檢定結果表	41
表4- 11 YouBike轉乘頻率與認知有用性、認知易用性、習慣、環保意識和之變異數檢定結果表	42
表4- 11 YouBike轉乘頻率與認知有用性、認知易用性、習慣、環保意識和之變異數檢定結果表(續) 	43
表4- 12 YouBike瞭解程度與認知有用性、認知易用性、社會規範、轉換意願之變異數檢定結果表	44
表4- 12 YouBike瞭解程度與認知有用性、認知易用性、社會規範、轉換意願之變異數檢定結果表(續)	45
表4- 13 性別與習慣之T檢定結果表	46
表4- 14 YouBike使用意願與認知有用性、態度、知覺行為控制、習慣、環保意識之T檢定結果表	46
表4- 14 YouBike使用意願與認知有用性、態度、知覺行為控制、習慣、環保意識之T檢定結果表(續)	47
表4- 15 各個構面與整體量表之信度分析結果	48
表4- 16 本研究之驗證因素分析結果表	50
表4- 17 區別效度分析結果表	52
表4- 18 研究假說檢定結果表	53
表4- 18 研究假說檢定結果表(續)	54
 
圖目錄
圖1- 1 里昂、巴塞隆納及巴黎公共自行車取代各類型交通工具百分比	3
圖1- 2 研究流程圖	6
圖2- 2 科技接受模式	15
圖2- 3 結合計畫行為理論與科技接受模式 	16
圖3- 1 本研究架構	19
圖4- 1 平均每月機車通勤花費的百分比	32
圖4- 2 平均騎乘機車至捷運站所花費時間的百分比	33
圖4- 3 YouBike使用經驗的百分比	33
圖4- 4 使用YouBike轉搭捷運頻率的百分比	34
圖4- 5 機車轉乘族對YouBike瞭解程度的百分比	34
圖4- 6 機車轉乘族接受距離YouBike租借站之路程時間的百分比	35
圖4- 7 YouBike之使用意願的百分比	35
圖4- 8 願意使用YouBike原因的百分比	36
圖4- 9 不願意使用YouBike原因的百分比	36
圖4- 10 研究模式分析結果	53

一、	英文文獻
1.	Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior: Springer.
2.	Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. 
3.	Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 27-58. 
4.	Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. 
5.	Ajzen, I. and Schifter, D. E. (1985), Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843-851. 
6.	Albarrac’ın, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., and Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161.
7.	Amoako-Gyampah, K., and Salam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information and Management, 41(6), 731-745. 
8.	Anable, J., and Gatersleben, B. (2005). All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 163-181.
9.	Armitage, C. J., and Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.
10.	Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. 
11.	Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., and Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and applied social psychology, 25(3), 175-187. 
12.	Bamberg, S., and Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35, 264–285.
13.	Beswick A., (2008). International Conference on Green Transport Development-Green Transport Summit. Taipei International Convention Center .,26-40.
14.	Bierlaire, M., (2002). The network GEV model. In:Proceedings of Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita, March 20–22.
15.	Chen, C. D., Fan, Y. W., and Farn, C. K.(2007) . Predicting electronic toll collection service adoption: An integration of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Transportation Research Part C, 15, 300–311. 
16.	Chin, W. W., and Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares. In Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Rick Hoyle (ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 307-341.
17.	Christopher, H. L. (1987). Marketing Public Transit − A Strategic Approach. Praeger Publisher, Westport, CT, 1987. Chun-hua Hsiao and Chyan Yang, (2010). Predicting the Travel Intention to take High Speed Rail among College Students. Transportation Research Part F, 13, 277-287.
18.	Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340. 
19.	Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
20.	Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50. 
21.	Fujiwara, A., Sugie, Y., and Moriyama, M. (2000). Nested paired combinatorial logit model to analyze recreational touring behaviour. In: Paper presented at the Ninth International Association for Travel Behaviour Research Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
22.	Fujii, S., and Kitamura, R. (2003). What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change. Transportation, 30(1), 81-95.
23.	Fu, J.-R., Farn, C.-K., and Chao, W.-P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information & Management, 43(1), 109-126. 
24.	Garling, T., Fujii, S. and Boe, O. (2001). Empirical tests of a model of determinants of scripted-based driving choice. Transportation Research Part F, 4, 89-102. 
25.	Gardner, D. (2008). Innovative Packaging for the Wine Industry: A Look at Wine Closures: Virginia Tech: Food Science and Technology.
26.	Gefen, D., and Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424. 
27.	Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
28.	Haustein, S. and Hunecke, M. (2007). Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1856-1883.
29.	Hulland, J. S. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 195–204.
30.	Johansson, V., Heldt, T., and Johansson, P., (2006). The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(6), 507-525.
31.	Kang, K. H., Stein, L., Heo, C. Y., and Lee, S. (2012). Consumers’ willingness to pay for green initiatives of the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 564-572. 
32.	Koppelman, F.S. and C.-H. Wen. (2000). The paired combinatorial logit model: Properties, estimation and application, Transportation Research B. (in press)
33.	Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., and Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of consumer marketing, 18(6), 503-520. 
34.	Lois, D., and Lopez-Saez, M., (2009). The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: A structural equation modeling approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 43(9-10), pp. 790-799.
35.	Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., and Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3-9. 
36.	Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173-191. 
37.	McFadden, D. and Train, K., (2000). Mixed MNL Model of Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447-470.
38.	McFadden, D., (2001). Economic choices. American Economic Review, 91(3), 351–378.
39.	Oslon, J.M and Zanna, M.P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change, Annual Rev. Psychol. 44:117-54.
40.	Ouellette, J. A., and Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological bulletin, 124(1), 54.
41.	Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 101-134. 
42.	Pirouz, D. M. (2006). An overview of partial least squares. Available at SSRN 1631359. 
43.	Prillwitz, J., and Barr, S. (2008) Sustainable Travel Behaviour. Working paper 1 for the ProST project, Department of Geography.
44.	Samdahl, D. M., and Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern specification and test of the model. Environment and behavior,21(1),57-81.
45.	Schifter, D. E., and Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(3), 843. 
46.	Shin, D.-H., and Kim, W.-Y. (2008). Forecasting customer switching intention in mobile service: An exploratory study of predictive factors in mobile number portability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6), 854-874. 
47.	Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1317-1338.
48.	Swait, J., Adamowicz, W., and van Bueren, M., (2004). Choice and temporal welfare impacts: incorporating history into discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47, 94–116.
49.	Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176. 
50.	Triandis, H. C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Paper presented at the Nebraska symposium on motivation.
51.	Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342-365. 
52.	Verplanken, B., and Svenson, O. (1997). Personal involvement in human decision making. Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations, 1, 40. 
53.	Zimmer, M. R., Stafford, T. F., and Stafford, M. R. (1994). Green issues: dimensions of environmental concern. Journal of business research, 30(1), 63-74. 

二、	中文文獻
1.	王天佑與黃芳銘(1999)。中大學生環境認知、態度與行為調查研究，中大社會文化學報。
2.	白詩滎(2012)。臺北公共自行車使用行為特性分析與友善環境建構之研究，國立政治大學地政研究所學位論文。
3.	林威成(2005)。旅運者觀點探討態度、涉入程度、群體影響力、行為意向與運具選擇行為的關連性—以台北地區為例」，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所學位論文。
4.	邱家範(2000)。高雄市家戶資源回收行為整合模式研究，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
5.	俞洪亮、蔡義清、莊懿妃(2010)。商管研究資料分析: SPSS 的應用:華泰。
6.	康世鑫(2012)。以計畫行為理論探討溫泉區遊客生態旅遊行為之研究-以關子嶺溫泉區為例，嘉南大學觀光事業管理學(含溫泉所)研究所學位論文。
7.	陳品竹(2014)。臺北市公共自行車使用者意向之研究，臺灣大學土木工程學研究所學位論文。
8.	陳禹任(2014)。應用計畫行為理論探討通勤族以自行車通勤之行為意圖-以台南市為例，成功大學交通管理科學研究所學位論文。
9.	黃俊擇(2015)。公車使用者涉入程度與運具選擇行為意向之研究-台南市實證分析，成功大學交通管理科學系學位論文。
10.	楊淯筑(2012)。自行車轉乘捷運之行為意向研究，臺灣大學土木工程學研究所學位論文。
11.	張晴雯(2013)。以計畫行為理論探討消費者對電動機車之行為意圖，成功大學交通管理科學系學位論文。
12.	游千慧(2014)。低碳綠色城市規劃策略之研析，立法院月刊，第42卷第12期，頁63。
13.	趙韋翔(2009)。結合計畫行為理論、科技接受模式與慣性行為探討運具轉移行為：以涉入程度為干擾變數，成功大學交通管理科學系學位論文。
14.	蔡瀧德(2013)。影響民眾使用公共腳踏車意願之研究-以高雄地區民眾為例，國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
15.	顏立杰(2011)。大學生的機車使用行為與環境意識--以台北縣市大學生為例，臺灣大學土木工程學研究所學位論文。

三、	網路資料
1.	JZTI and Bonnette Consulting(2010)。里昂、巴塞隆納及巴黎公共自行車取代各類型交通工具百分比。
2.	YouBike台北市公共自行車官方網站(2015)。關於YouBike。取自http://taipei.YouBike.com.tw/cht/f31.html
3.	台北大眾捷運股份有限公司(2015)。查詢轉乘停車場。取自 http://www.metro.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=1010367&CtNode=70109&mp=122035.
4.	經濟部能源局(2013)。我國燃料燃燒二氧化碳排放統計，2013年，頁14-17。
5.	交通部統計處(2014)。交通部統計處A1類交通事故變動概況，2014年。取自
http://168.motc.gov.tw/TC/Report.aspx?cid=11&cchk=124d7101-3428-40a1-9b6a-844c7d9d047c
6.	交通部統計處(2015)。機動車輛數，104年6月。取自
http://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&kind=10&type=1&funid=a3301
7.	中華民國交通部(2015)。103年「民眾日常使用運具狀況調查」摘要分析。取自http://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=54&parentpath=0,6.
8.	環境資訊中心(2015)。擺脫「機車島」！綠色交通提案：公共電動機車。取自http://e-info.org.tw/node/100749
9.	臺北市政府交通局(2015)，公共自行車介紹-簡介。取自http://www.dot.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=51418667&ctNode=65043&mp=117001
10.	臺北市政府交通局(2015)。YouBike費率將朝使用者付費原則規劃。取自 http://www.dot.gov.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=95249501&ctNode=12308&mp=117001
11.	中時電子報(2015)。Ubike讚 營運模式將出口。取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150216000328-260114.