本研究主要目的為探討wiki資源被學術著作引用的狀況。網路資源與維基百科因存活狀況不定的問題通常避免作為學術研究之參考，但近年的研究顯示網路資源及維基百科被引用的情況日益增加，但尚未深入了解研究者如何引用此類資源。台灣棒球維基館是以台灣棒球為主題的wiki，已蒐集大量資料且擁有超過4億次的瀏覽量，先前針對不同的使用族群進行分析，本研究則針對引用者的引用方式及被引用資料的變動深入探討。
本研究利用引用文獻分析台灣棒球維基館自成立十年間引用台灣棒球維基館的學術著作。研究對象為261篇學術著作的460筆參考文獻，藉此觀察作者的參考文獻著錄情況、引用方式及被引用頁面的變動狀況與趨勢。
研究結果顯示，參考文獻正確率與完整度方面，參考文獻應著錄的頁面作者名稱、頁面標題、檢索日期、網站名稱、最後更新日期及網址這六項資訊，84.03%筆參考文獻著錄至少三項資訊，本研究認為頁面標題與網址應為引用此類資源之必備資訊。460筆參考文獻中，僅28筆（6.09）參考文獻完整著錄六項資訊，152筆（35.19%）筆參考文獻同時遺漏兩項資訊的狀況為最多，其中又以遺漏網站名稱及最後更新日期為最多。正確率部分，19.51%筆參考文獻將頁面作者名稱誤植為頁面最近編輯作者或相關組織名稱、37.64%筆參考文獻將網站名稱誤植為維基百科相關或組織的網站名稱。參考文獻中作者名稱的資訊應填入「TwBsBall編者」，而網站應為「台灣棒球維基館」為正確資訊。被引用位置主要集中於研究結果、文獻探討與緒論等三個位置，可能原因是部分學位論文結構分界不明，使得研究結果篇幅較多，而參考文獻於文中對應的引用文獻數以1或2個為主，無對應引用文獻可能是作者對於不同的資源抱持不同的態度，而未確實撰寫引用文獻。引用主題集中在人物、事件、台灣棒球維基館相關、聯盟與組織、歷史、賽事與球隊等主題，受該研究主題影響而集中於不同位置，其中碩士論文部分以教育、民生及傳播學門領域系所引用較多，共占62.96%的引用次數。被引用頁面方面，台灣棒球維基館被引用頁面存活狀況良好，97.82%被引用頁面仍存活，被引用頁面通常僅被引用1或2次且內容相對完整，如大事記及歷史。台灣棒球維基館首頁共被引用109次，可能是作者取巧僅以引用首頁的而非引用確切的頁面。被引用頁面標題變動相對穩定，被引用頁面內容過半數變動幅度不超過25%，但變動幅度可能隨時間增加。如針對wiki語法進行更動，雖不影響內容，但仍會使HTML原始碼產生變動。人物、賽事、組織、術語、球隊及事件等六個分類的頁面被引用最多，通常為涵蓋多人或多年的資訊、當時社會所關注或具研究價值的頁面。被引用頁面的編輯趨勢可能與頁面所承載的資訊類別有關，但頁面是否熱門可能為主要因素。
根據研究結果提出的建議有以下三點：學術研究者撰寫引用文獻及參考文獻時應盡責，以免後續研究者無法查證引用資料或相關研究者無法蒐集正確且完整的資料，甚至違反學術倫理。引用格式規範針對wiki資源的引用給予適度規範，或是針對wiki資源的特性給予特別的指引，現僅APA格式指引作者以線上參考工具書引用維基百科。台灣棒球維基館頁面資訊應避免呈現容易使作者混淆之資訊，嵌入頁面應提醒作者其內容更新時間，另外應推廣wiki本身的「引用此頁」功能。

This study is aimed to study how wiki resources were cited in academic works. Online resources and Wikipedia were not recommended to be cited due to the unstable accessibility. However, in recent studies it shows that there are more and more citations from web resources and Wikipedia. The reason why and how the authors cited these resources as references were unknown. Take TaiwanBaseballWiki for example. It is a wiki page with baseball-related knowledge of Taiwan and it has collected mass data and accumulated more than 400 million page views. The focus of a previous study was on different user groups and this study is aimed to study how the authors cited TaiwanBaseballWiki and how the cited pages have changed.
This study investigated how academic works citing TaiwanBaseballWiki and the changes in the cited pages. A total of 460 references cited from TaiwanBaseballWiki used in theses, journal articles, conference papers and books were gathered for analysis. This study is focusing on reference accuracy and completeness, citation locations, citation topics, the changes of cited pages, the types of changes, and the trend in edits.
The results of the study revealed that:
(1)	Six kinds of information which are the name of the page author, the page title, the site name, the access date, the date of the latest update, and the URL should be included in reference and 84.03% of the 460 references had at least three of them. We considered that the page title and the URL should be necessary. Only 28 (6.09%) references had all the information. 152 (35.19%) of the 460 references were lack of 2 kinds of the information at the same time, among which the combination of missing site names and missing dates of last update was the most. Two kinds of information that the authors couldn’t handle well were the names of the page authors and the names of the cited sites. 19.51% citations misused recent author names of the pages or other related organizations names for page author names; 37.64% citations misused the names of other sites also built by wiki or other official website names of related organizations. The correct page author name should have been “TwBsBall contributors”; and the correct site name should have been “TaiwanBaseballWiki” or “Wiki Baseball”.
(2)	Most of the citations were used in the following sections: the research results, the literature review and the introduction. Some boundaries of IMRaD structure were not clear. Each reference could mainly relate to 1 or 2 citations in the content, and while some of them had no corresponding citations, the possible reason for which was that the authors might hold different attitude toward wiki resources. Some of the authors would write the citations improperly.
(3)	Citation topics were mainly used in figures, events, TaiwanBaseballWiki related information, organizations, history, games, and teams. The research subject would affect the locations of citations. Theses and dissertations of disciplines of teacher training and education science, personal services, and journalism and information were cited the most, a total of 62.96% citations.
(4)	The cited pages in TaiwanBaseballWiki are usually cited 1 or 2 times. Most of them are in good condition, and the contents of them are more complete, such as the memorabilia or the history. The homepage has been cited 109 times and the possible reason was that author trickily cited the site instead of the page used.
(5)	Most of the titles of cited pages remained unchanged and the change in the page content was less than 25%. However, it might increase as time goes by. Some changes were made due to wording or layout issues, such as the changes in the HTML codes.
(6)	The six categories cited the most were figures, games, organizations, terminology, teams, and events, in which there are usually information of multiple people, multiple years, topics attracting much attention from the society or those worthwhile researching at that time. The trend in edits of cited pages might be related to the category of the page. Nonetheless, popularity might be the major factor behind the increasing edits from contributors and it may be more obvious than the trend. 
The suggestions based on the findings of this study are as followed:
(1)	Researchers should be responsible for writing reference and citations correctly and completely. Do not hold different attitudes towards various citation resources. If your reference and citations are incorrect, the researchers in the future could not retrieve the literature they need, nor will they obtain the correct data, which might violate the academic ethics.
(2)	Citation style guides or manuals should provide instruction on how to cite wiki resources, especially for the specific features of wiki. For now, only Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association provided a specific instruction on how to cite Wikipedia as an online reference.
(3)	TaiwanBaseballWiki should improve the information provided, reduce the chance of confusing authors, such as recent authors of the page, and the edits should be contributed to “TwBsBall contributors”. Besides, wiki provides the special function called “cite this page” but it seems that author don’t know it. TaiwanBaseballWiki should promote this function more.

第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究背景與動機	1
第二節	研究目的與問題	4
第三節	研究範圍與限制	5
第四節	名詞解釋	6
第二章	文獻探討	9
第一節	協同寫作	9
第二節	引用文獻分析	16
第三節	網路資源被引用情況分析	22
第三章	研究方法與設計	35
第一節	研究方法與對象	35
第二節	資料處理	37
第三節	研究步驟與實施程序	49
第四章	研究結果與分析	51
第一節	參考文獻著錄及引用情形	51
第二節	被引用頁面變動狀況	62
第三節	被引用頁面資訊類別與編輯趨勢	72
第五章	結論與建議	79
第一節	結論	79
第二節	建議	85
第三節	未來研究建議	87
參考文獻		89

表1 wikiFactor指數100以上網站最新wikiFactor數值	37
表2各資料庫檢索策略及結果彙整表	38
表3各分析項目之分析樣本數	51
表4參考文獻中資訊遺漏項目與次數分布	53
表5參考文獻著錄之頁面作者名稱	54
表6參考文獻著錄之網站名稱	56
表7引用位置分布	57
表8引用主題分布	60
表9引用主題位置分布	61
表10各學門引用主題分布	62
表11被引用頁面與被引用次數比率	64
表12頁面標題相似度分布	64
表13頁面標題相似度與時間差之分布	66
表14頁面內容變動幅度分布	67
表15變動類型分布	68
表16各變動類型的變動多寡情況	69
表17各分類之頁面數及被引用次數	72
表18頁面分類與引用主題分布	74
表19 各類別之頁面變動趨勢	77

圖1頁面版本擷取流程圖	42
圖2被移動頁面編輯紀錄示意圖	43
圖3被引用頁面版本擷取流程圖	44
圖4空頁面示意圖	47
圖5網頁標題相似度比對示意圖	48
圖6比較修訂版本差異頁面示意圖	48
圖7研究步驟圖	50
圖8頁面最近作者資訊	54
圖9頁面所有作者資訊	55
圖10論文結構－特例	57
圖11參考文獻對應內文之引用位置數	58
圖12由重定向機制導向最新頁面訊息	65
圖13台灣棒球大事記頁面	69
圖14台灣棒球大事記頁面wiki原始碼	70
圖15台灣省棒球委員會－編輯紀錄	71
圖16編輯趨勢－前期	75
圖17編輯趨勢－中期	75
圖18編輯趨勢－後期	76
圖19編輯趨勢－持續變動	76
圖20賽事類型編輯趨勢	78

Ahrens, Frank. “Death by Wikipedia: The Kenneth Lay Chronicles.” The Washington Post, accessed July 9, 2006, Technology. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/08/AR2006070800135.html.
American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 6th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association, 2010.
Anderson, Monica, Paul Hitlin, and Michelle Atkinson. “Wikipedia at 15: Millions of readers in scores of languages.” Pew Research Center, January 14, 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/01/14/wikipedia-at-15/.
Barger, Jorn. “Robot Wisdom weblog for February 1999 (waning).” Robot Wisdom Weblog. Accessed February 18, 2017. http://www.robotwisdom.com/log1999m02.html.
Barnett-Ellis, Paula, and Yingqi Tang. “User-Centered Collection Development: A Citation Analysis of Graduate Biology Theses.” Collection Management 41, no. 1 (January 2, 2016): 3–22. doi:10.1080/01462679.2016.1145088.
Beck, E. E. “A Survey of Experiences of Collaborative Writing.” in Computer Supported Collaborative Writing, edit by Mike Sharples BSc, 87–112. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer London, 1993.
Becker, Deborah A., and Elisha R. T. Chiware. “Citation Analysis of Masters’ Theses and Doctoral Dissertations: Balancing Library Collections With Students’ Research Information Needs.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, no. 5 (September, 2015): 613–20. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.022.
Black, Erik W. “Wikipedia and academic peer review: Wikipedia as a recognised medium for scholarly publication?.” Online Information Review 32, no. 1 (February 22, 2008): 73–88. doi:10.1108/14684520810865994.
Bould, M. Dylan, Emily S. Hladkowicz, Ashlee-Ann E. Pigford, Lee-Anne Ufholz, Tatyana Postonogova, Eunkyung Shin, and Sylvain Boet. “References That Anyone Can Edit: Review of Wikipedia Citations in Peer Reviewed Health Science Literature.” The BMJ 348 (March 6, 2014): g1585. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1585.
Brazzeal, Bradley. “Citations to Wikipedia in Chemistry Journals: A Preliminary Study.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (2011/Fall). doi:10.5062/F4057CV7.
Chen, Chuanfu, Bo Luo, Kuei Chiu, Ruihan Zhao, and Ping Wang. “The preferences of authors of Chinese library and information science journal articles in citing Internet sources.” Library & Information Science Research 36, no. 3–4 (October, 2014): 163–70. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2014.01.002.
Chen, Chuanfu, Kai Sun, Gang Wu, Qiong Tang, Jian Qin, Kuei Chiu, Yushuang Fu, Xiaofang Wang, and Jing Liu. “The Impact of Internet Resources on Scholarly Communication: A Citation Analysis.” Scientometrics 81, no. 2 (April 16, 2009): 459–74. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2180-y.
Condic, Kristine S. “Citation Analysis of Student Dissertations and Faculty Publications in Reading and Educational Leadership at Oakland University.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, no. 5 (September, 2015): 548–57. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.007.
Dellavalle, Robert P., Eric J. Hester, Lauren F. Heilig, Amanda L. Drake, Jeff W. Kuntzman, Marla Graber, Lisa M. Schilling. “Information Science. Going, Going, Gone: Lost Internet References.” Science, 302, no. 5646 (October 31, 2003): 787–88. doi:10.1126/science.1088234.
Denehy, Janice. “Web Resources: The Vanishing Act.” The Journal of School Nursing 21, no. 5 (October 1, 2005): 253–55. doi:10.1177/10598405050210050101.
Ding, Ying, Xiaozhong Liu, Chun Guo, and Blaise Cronin. “The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis.” Journal of Informetrics 7, no. 3 (July, 2013): 583–92. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.003.
Ede, Professor Lisa, and Andrea Lunsford. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992.
Fleck, Fiona. “WHO | Online encyclopedia provides free health info for all.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, no. 1(January, 2013): , http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/91/1/13-030113/en/.
Ganesan, Prasanna . “Random Ratiocination: Is Wikipedia criticism justified?.” RANDAM RATIOCINATION, July 10, 2006, accessed March 26, 2016, http://randomratio.blogspot.tw/2006/07/is-wikipedia-criticism-justified.html.
Garfield, Eugene. “Can Citation Indexing Be Automated?,” 269, 1964. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220017562_Can_Citation_Indexing_Be_Automated.
Gross, P. L. K., and E. M. Gross. “College Libraries and Chemical Education.” Science 66, no. 1713 (October 28, 1927): 385–89. doi:10.1126/science.66.1713.385.
Gul, Sumeer, Mahajan, Iram and Ali, Asifa. “The growth and decay of URLs citation: A case of an online Library & Information Science journal.” Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 19, no. 3(2014): 27-39.
Jones, Shawn M., Herbert Van de Sompel, Harihar Shankar, Martin Klein, Richard Tobin, and Claire Grover. “Scholarly Context Adrift: Three out of Four URI References Lead to Changed Content”. PLOS ONE 11, no. 12 (December 2, 2016): e0167475. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167475.
Kathy West, and Janet Williamson. “Wikipedia: friend or foe?.” Reference Services Review 37, no. 3 (August 14, 2009): 260–71. doi:10.1108/00907320910982758.
Klein, Martin, Herbert Van de Sompel, Robert Sanderson, Harihar Shankar, Lyudmila Balakireva, Ke Zhou, and Richard Tobin. “Scholarly Context Not Found: One in Five Articles Suffers from Reference Rot.” PLOS ONE 9, no. 12 (December 26, 2014): e115253. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115253.
Koehler, Wallace. “Web Page Change and persistence—A Four-Year Longitudinal Study.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, no. 2 (November 28, 2001): 162–71. doi:10.1002/asi.10018.
Kousha, Kayvan, and Mike Thelwall. “Are Wikipedia Citations Important Evidence of the Impact of Scholarly Articles and Books?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, no. 3 (March 1, 2017): 762–79. doi:10.1002/asi.23694.
Krishnan, Thiyaga, Victoria A Cartwright, and Charles NJ McGhee. “Citation Analysis of the Most- and Least-Cited Articles in Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology: 2000–2013.” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 43, no. 3 (April 29, 2015): 282–85. doi:10.1111/ceo.12409.
Kuruppu, Pali, and Debra Moore. “Information Use by PhD Students in Agriculture and Biology: A Dissertation Citation Analysis.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 8 , no.4 (October 1, 2008): 387–405. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0024.
LeFevre, Karen Burke. Invention as a Social Act. 1st edition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986.
Leiding, Reba. “Using Citation Checking of Undergraduate Honors Thesis Bibliographies to Evaluate Library Collections.” College & Research Libraries 66, no. 5 (September 1, 2005): 417–29. doi:10.5860/crl.66.5.417.
Leuf, Bo and Ward Cunningham. The Wiki way: quick collaboration on the Web. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2001.
Lowry, Paul Benjamin, Aaron Curtis, and Michelle René Lowry. “Building a Taxonomy and Nomenclature of Collaborative Writing to Improve Interdisciplinary Research and Practice.” Journal of Business Communication 41, no. 1 (January 1, 2004): 66–99. doi:10.1177/0021943603259363.
Marashi, Sayed-Amir, Seyed Mohammad Amin Hosseini-Nami, Khadijeh Alishah, Mahdieh Hadi, Ali Karimi, Saeedeh Hosseinian, Rouhallah Ramezani Fard, Reihaneh Sadat Mirhassani, Zhaleh Hosseini, and Zahra Shojaie. “Impact of Wikipedia on citation trends.” EXCLI Journal 12 (January 15, 2013): 15–19.
McBride, Carl. “wikiFactor: a measure of the importance of a wiki site”. arXiv:0902.3439 [physics], February 19, 2009. http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3439.
Nielsen, Finn Arup. “Scientific citations in Wikipedia”. First Monday 12, no. 8 (August 6, 2007). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1997.
Nielson, Jokab. “Fighting Linkrot.” Nielsen Norman Group, June 14, 1998. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/fighting-linkrot/.
Noruzi, Alireza. “Editorial: Wikipedia Popularity from a Citation Analysis Point of View.” Webology 6, no. 2. accessed October 13, 2016. http://www.webology.org/2009/v6n2/editorial20.html.
Park, Taemin Kim. “The Visibility of Wikipedia in Scholarly Publications.” First Monday 16, no. 8 (July 24, 2011). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3492.
Peritz, Bluma C. “A Classification of Citation Roles for the Social Sciences and Related Fields.” Scientometrics 5, no 5 (September 1, 1983): 303–12. doi:10.1007/BF02147226.
Perkel, Jeffrey M. “The trouble with reference rot.” Nature 521, no. 7550 (May 7, 2015): 111. doi:10.1038/521111a.
Rasberry, Lane. “Citing Wikipedia.” The BMJ 348 (March 6, 2014): g1819. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1819.
Rice, R. P., and J. T. Huguley. “Describing collaborative forms: a profile of the team-writing process.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 37, no. 3 (September, 1994): 163–70. doi:10.1109/47.317482.
Riehle, D., J. Ellenberger, T. Menahem, B. Mikhailovski, Y. Natchetoi, B. Naveh, and T. Odenwald. “Open Collaboration within Corporations Using Software Forges.” IEEE Software 26, no. 2 (March, 2009): 52–58. doi:10.1109/MS.2009.44.
Rimmershaw, Rachel. “Collaborative Writing Practices and Writing Support Technologies.” Instructional Science 21, no. 1/3 (1992): 15–28. doi:10.1007/BF00119653.
Rosenberg, Zila. “Citation Analysis of M.A. Theses and Ph.D. Dissertations in Sociology and Anthropology: An Assessment of Library Resource Usage.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, no. 5 (September, 2015): 680–88. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.010.
Rumsey, Mary. “Runaway Train: Problems of Permanence, Accessibility, and Stability in the Use of Web Sources in Law Review Citations.” Law Library Journal 94, no. 1 (2002): 27–39.
Sadat‐Moosavi, Ali, Alireza Isfandyari‐Moghaddam, and Oranus Tajeddini. “Accessibility of online resources cited in scholarly LIS journals: A study of Emerald ISI‐ranked journals.” Aslib Proceedings 64, no. 2 (March 16, 2012): 178–92. doi:10.1108/00012531211215196.
Sharples, M. “Adding a Little Structure to Collaborative Writing.” in CSCW in Practice: An Introduction and Case Studies, edit by Dan Diaper, and Colston Sanger, 51–67. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer London, 1993. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4471-2009-4_5.
Smith, Linda C. “Citation analysis.” Library Trends 30, no. 1 (1981): 83–106.
Smyth, Joanne B., and Joanne B. Smyth. “Tracking Trends: Students’ Information Use in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 1995-2008.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 11, no. 1 (January, 2011): 551–73..
Teplitskiy, Misha, Grace Lu, and Eamon Duede. “Amplifying the Impact of Open Access: Wikipedia and the Diffusion of Science.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, (October 13, 2016), 1–12. doi:10.1002/asi.23687.
The PHP Group. “PHP: similar_text - Manual. accessed February 18, 2017. http://php.net/manual/en/function.similar-text.php.
Thorne, Frederick C. “The Citation Index: Another Case of Spurious Validity.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 33, no. 4 (October, 1977): 1157–61. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:43.0.CO;2-B.
Tohidinasab, Fariba, and Hamid R. Jamali. “Why and Where Wikipedia Is Cited in Journal Articles?.“ Journal of Scientometric Research 2, no. 3 (September, 2013). http://www.jscires.org/article/90.
Tomaszewski, Robert, and Karen I. MacDonald. “A Study of Citations to Wikipedia in Scholarly Publications.” Science & Technology Libraries 35, no. 3 (August 2, 2016): 246–61. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2016.1206052.
Verma, Anjali , Sharad Kumar Sonker, and Vibha Gupta. “A Citation Analysis of the E-Journal, Library Philosophy and Practice (2005-2014).” Library Philosophy & Practice 1358 (January, 2016), 1–10.
Wass, Joe. “Where do DOI clicks come from? – Crossref Blog.” Crossref Blog. May 19, 2016. accessed August 9, 2016. http://blog.crossref.org/2016/05/where-do-doi-clicks-come-from.html.
Weiss, Aaron. “The Power of Collective Intelligence.” netWorker 9, no. 3 (September, 2005): 16–23. doi:10.1145/1086762.1086763.
WikiIndex. “Category:Wikis with wikiFactor between 100 and 199.” WikiIndex. Last modified September 26, 2011. Accessed Novembre 22, 2016. http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:Wikis_with_wikiFactor_between_100_and_199&oldid=87800
WikiIndex. “Category:Wikis with wikiFactor greater or equal to 200.” WikiIndex. Last modified September 26, 2011. Accessed November 11, 2016. http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:Wikis_with_wikiFactor_greater_or_equal_to_200&oldid=87799.
WikiIndex. “Template:Size - WikiIndex.” WikiIndex. Last modified March 11, 2016, accessed March 30, 2016, http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Template:Size&oldid=191724.
WikiIndex. “WikiEngineTree - WikiIndex.” WikiIndex. Last modified March 19, 2013, accessed July 25, 2016. http://wikiindex.org/WikiEngineTree.
Wikipedia contributors. “History of Wikipedia.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.last modified April 13, 2016, accessed April 20, 2016, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Wikipedia&oldid=715030769.
Wikipedia contributors. “History of Wikis.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.last modified April 15, 2016, accessed April 20, 2016, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_wikis&oldid=715319511.
Wikipedia contributors. “Link Rot.” Wikipedia, last accessed February 9, 2017, accessed February 17, 2017, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Link_rot&oldid=764507867.
Wikipedia contributors. “Statistics.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, accessed July 7, 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics.
Wikipedia contributors. “Wikipedia:About. ”Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.last modified April 23, 2016, accessed April 30, 2016, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:About&oldid=716776032.
Wikipedia contributors. “Wikipedia:General Disclaimer.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, last modified December 17, 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:General_disclaimer&oldid=695632457.
Wikipedia contributors. “Wikipedia:Your First Article.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.last modified March 24, 2016, accessed March 31, 2016, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Your_first_article&direction=next&oldid=709802134.
Xiao, Lu, and Nicole Askin . “Wikipedia for academic publishing: advantages and challenges.” Online Information Review 36, no. 3 (June 15, 2012): 359–73. doi:10.1108/14684521211241396.
Yang, Siluo, Ruizhen Han,  Jingda Ding, and Yanfei Song. “The distribution of Web citations.” Information Processing & Management 48, no. 4 (July, 2012): 779–90. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2011.10.002.
Zittrain, Jonathan L., Kendra Albert,  and  Lawrence Lessig . “Perma: Scoping and Addressing the Problem of Link and Reference Rot in Legal Citations.” Harvard Public Law Working Paper, no. 13-42 (October 1, 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2329161.Ahrens, Frank. “Death by Wikipedia: The Kenneth Lay Chronicles.” The Washington Post, accessed July 9, 2006, Technology. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/08/AR2006070800135.html.
TwBsBall編者。「MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown」。台灣棒球維基館。（最後更新於）2016年2月10日，檢索於2016年3月20日，http://twbsball.dils.tku.edu.tw/wiki/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown&oldid=814662。
TwBsBall編者。「TwBsBall:關於本站/網站日誌」。台灣棒球維基館。（最後更新於）2015年4月9日，檢索於2016年03月26日，http://twbsball.dils.tku.edu.tw/wiki/index.php?title=TwBsBall:關於本站/網站日誌&oldid=757848。
TwBsBall編者。「台灣棒球維基館」。台灣棒球維基館。（最後更新於）2015年1月21日，檢索於2015年7月29日，http://twbsball.dils.tku.edu.tw/wiki/index.php?title=台灣棒球維基館&oldid=746679。
官欣瑩。「Wiki資訊架構之可用性評估：以台灣棒球維基館為例」。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士班，2008，http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/66460783163856834522。
林信成、李易昶、林雯瑤。「從引用文獻的視角探討台灣棒球維基館之使用」。論文發表於TANET2015 台灣網際網路研討會，南投縣，2015，10月21-23日。
林信成、林瑜嫻。「台灣棒球維基館網站推展成效探討」。教育資料與圖書館學，45卷，2期（2007年12月／冬季號）：199–232。
林信成、洪銘禪。「布萊德福與洛卡定律於Wiki網站計量分析之應用」。教育資料與圖書館學，48卷，3期（2011年4月／春季號）：325–46。
林信成、洪銘禪。「應用Google Analytics於數位典藏網站計量分析」。教育資料與圖書館學，47卷，3期（2010年4月／春季號）：343–70。
張保隆、謝寶煖。學術論文寫作：APA規範。臺北市：華泰文化事業公司，民95。
張淑芬。「中文社會科學學術期刊之網路資源引用研究」。圖書與資訊學刊，67卷（2008年11月）：88-108。
張瀚文。「臺灣地區新聞學研究所博碩士論文引用網路資源分析」。圖書與資訊學刊，56卷（2006年）：74-95。
陳瑩潔。「Wiki協作系統之可用性研究：以台灣棒球維基館為例」。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士班，2009，http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/64900601000150008845。
圖拉賓（Turabian, Kate L.）。Chicago論文寫作格式：Turabian 手冊。邱炯友及林雯瑤譯。臺北市：書林出版有限公司出版，2015。
維基百科編者。「Wiki」。維基百科，自由的百科全書。最後更新於2016年3月23日，檢索於2016年3月26日，https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&oldid=36523209。
維基百科編者。「Wikipedia:引用維基百科」。維基百科，自由的百科全書。（最後更新於）2013年6月9日，檢索於2016年1月28日，https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:引用維基百科&oldid=26824074。
維基百科編者。「Wikipedia:關於」。維基百科，自由的百科全書。（最後更新於）2016年3月18日，檢索於2016年3月26日，https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:關於&oldid=39418954。
蔡明月、邱琦茹。「臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究」。教育資料與圖書館學，51眷，3期（2014年4月／春季號）：337-346。
蔡明月。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館，2003。
羅思嘉。「引用文獻分析與學術傳播研究」。中華圖書館學會會報，66期（2001年6月）。