§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2201201913250300
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2019.00660
論文名稱(中文) 垂直併購與價值鏈整合關鍵成功因素之研究
論文名稱(英文) The Study of Key Success Factors for Vertical Post-M&A and Value Chain Integration
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 企業管理學系碩士班
系所名稱(英文) Department of Business Administration
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 107
學期 1
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 廖柏皓
研究生(英文) Po-Hao Liao
學號 606610011
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2018-12-18
論文頁數 75頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 陳基祥(140304@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 洪英正(aloha@mail.tku.edu.tw)
委員 - 賴明政(laimc@ntub.edu.tw)
關鍵字(中) 併購整合
綜效
關鍵技術
關鍵字(英) Post-M&A integration
synergy
key technology
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
併購是企業加速產品開發時效及快速增加市場佔有率之關鍵外部成長策略。產品追求創新,產品生命週期越見縮短,產品開發所需技術也越複雜,促使企業尋求外部併購成長來達成其快速成長之策略意圖。全球併購案於近年展現成長趨勢,2015年與2016年併購案件之數量或金額更呈現大幅成長。深入分析併購整合,對企業經營及產業升級有具體貢獻。
本研究採用價值鏈整合觀點,使用個案分析及平衡計分卡衡量併購整合績效。本研究命題結論指出,被併企業為上游供應商並擁有關鍵技術時,財務整合及顧客整合績效大於一般性上游供應商之併購整合;顧客整合績效只有部份成立,但學習成長績效則不成立。再者被併企業為下游通路商時,對「併購之認同程度」與併購之財務、顧客、內部流程、學習與成長等四構面之整合績效均有正向影響。
本研究從個案中得到驗證,併購目的與類型的不同,均會影響併購綜效呈現的方式。本研究將致力於學術理論研究與管理實務,研究成果可提供併購後整合相關理論及管理實務決策之建議。
英文摘要
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is one of major entry strategy to rapid growth. From the recent years, global mergers and acquisitions M&A have shown the growth trend. During 2016 and 2017, the amount of M&A cases have substantially growth and historical high. From the recent successful enterprises globally, such as Apple and Google who concentrate more on product M&A can more likely succeed in the post-M&A integration. 
Value chain integration perspectives, balanced scorecard and case study have been applied in this study. The analysis pointed out that when the acquired company is an upstream supplier and with key technologies, the results demonstrate that post-M&A integration positively impact financial integration and internal process performance. However, it has only with partly positively impact on customers’ integration performances, nevertheless, does not correlate positively with post-M&A learning & growth integration performance. Furthermore, when the acquired company is a downstream sales channel, the results demonstrate that post-M&A integration has a positive impact on financial, customer, internal process and learning & growth integration performance. 
This study provides a framework for managing post-M&A integration and concludes by discussing the theoretical and practical implications of the research findings.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
目錄
目錄	IV
圖目錄	VI
表目錄	VII
第一章、 緒論	1
第一節、 研究動機與背景	1
第二節、 研究方向與目的	10
第三節、 研究流程	12
第二章、 文獻探討與命題	14
第一節、 文獻探討	14
第二節、 研究命題	22
第三節、 研究架構	25
第三章、 研究設計	28
第一節、 研究方法	28
第二節、 訪談分析	32
第三節、 併購整合績效訪談問題	35
第四章、 個案分析	36
第一節、A公司簡介	36
第二節、B公司簡介	37
第三節、網通業2003~2013產業分析	38
第四節、C公司簡介	40
第五節、D公司簡介	42
第五章、 命題分析	44
第一節、 併購上游供應商	44
第二節、 併購下游通路商	53
第六章、 研究結論及限制	60
參考文獻	66



圖目錄
圖1-1 全球併購金額2
圖1-2 全球主要科技集團併購趨勢3
圖1-3 Google併購趨勢分析6
圖1-4 台灣併購數量統計分析9
圖1-5 台灣併購金額統計分析9
圖1-6 研究流程13
圖2-1 Porter價值鏈14
圖2-2 價值鏈整合構面15
圖2-3平衡計分卡四個構面21
圖2-4研究架構27
圖5-1 B公司2003-2013年營業毛利率46
圖5-2 B公司2003-2013年每股盈餘46
圖5-3 B公司2000-2010年售貨天數48
圖5-4 B公司2000-2010年存貨周轉率49
圖5-5 B公司2003-2013年營業毛利51
圖5-6 B公司2003-2013年營業成本52
圖6-1 B公司歷史股價資訊61
圖6-2 B公司2003-2013年營收62
圖6-3 台灣製造業2003-2013年景氣分數63
圖6-4 A公司2003-2013年營收63
圖6-5 C公司2006-2016年營收數據64

 
表目錄
表1-1 鴻海併購一覽表5
表1-2 晶元光電併購一覽表8
表2-1 併購分類18
表3-1 個案研究的定義30
表3-3 價值鏈整合訪談內容34
表3-4 併購整合績效訪談內容35
表4-1 國內主要無線區域網路設備業者營收概況39
表5-1 B公司2005、2006年經營能力指標45
表6-1價值鏈整合與平衡計分卡構面命題分析結果60
參考文獻
參考文獻
一、中文部份
1.彭暄貽 (2006) ,網通廠錢進華南、華東、華南。工商時報 (2006/10/02),第B3版。
2.曾仁凱 (2004) ,B公司獲新力大單有補漲空間。經濟日報 (2004/11/28),第B5版。
3.曾仁凱 (2006),郭先生看上李先生的思科經驗。經濟日報 (2006/07/21),第C3版。
4.曾仁凱 (2005),A公司Linksys供應商,經濟日報(2005/12/09),第A11版。
5.曾仁凱、王純瑞(2006) ,A公司整軍李先生接B公司董座前董座王先生完成階段性任務,象徵B公司A公司初步整合完畢,B公司否認關係生變。經濟日報(2006/07/21),第C3版。
6.	簡永祥 (2011) ,C公司 挑戰新高合併D公司綜效顯現工業電子領域成新動能。經濟日報 (2011/08/01),第C4版。
7.簡永祥(2010) ,「超越聯強C公司通路營收王11月衝抵250億,成長34%;合併D公司與年終海外拉貨效益,本季成績亮眼」,經濟日報(2010/12/10)。
8.吳錦波、蔡崇盛(1997),資管領域研究方法之研究比較。第八屆國際資訊管理學術研討會論文集,405-412。
9.張紹勳,研究方法,pp.20-25,pp.173,pp.302-316,滄海書局,2001年。
10.吳安妮(2004),平衡計分卡在公務機關實施之探討,政府績效評估,第五章,行政院研究發展考核委員會編,台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
11.吳安妮(2003),平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合(上),會計研究月刊,第211期,第45頁。
12.吳安妮(1997),平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動(上),會計研究月刊,第134期,第133-139頁。
13.吳安妮(1997),平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動(中),會計研究月刊,第135期,第102-115頁。
14.吳安妮(1997),平衡計分卡轉換策略為行動(下),會計研究月刊,第136期,第108-117頁。
15.于泳泓(2002),平衡計分卡導入的三大步驟要點與手法,會計研究月刊,第199期,83-92。
16.王泰允,(1991).企業購併實用,遠流出版社。
17.張永煬,陳基祥,(2011).兩岸企業購併後整合與產品開發績效之探討:外部及內部整合之觀.遠景基金會季刊,12卷(2期,第135-182頁。
18.陳基祥,(2013).創業願景與創業績效之關聯性研究.創業管理研究,第8卷3期,第57-84頁。
19.台灣併購與私募股權協會,(2016).併購概要。http://www.mapect.com/knowledge_mna_pra01.php。搜尋日期:2016年11月10日。
20.數位時代,(2016).蘋果、Google、微軟、亞馬遜的4種收購策略。http://www.bnext.com.tw/ext_rss/view/id/589317。搜尋日期:2016年11月14日。
21.A公司(2016).夢寐以求入主夏普,A公司手握6大關鍵技術。http://technews.tw/2016/04/02/sharp-core-technology/。搜尋日期:2016年11月10日。
22.經濟部商業司,(2017).企業併購案統計表。http://gcis.nat.gov.tw/mainNew/subclassNAction.do?method=getFile&pk=126。搜尋日期:2017年12月10日。
23.台灣產經資料庫研究分析報告節錄 (2018) ,https://tie.tier.org.tw/Number_DB/Company/company_ind_stastic.asp?industry=G464201&ind_Type=detailind。搜尋日期:2018年11月10日。
24.台經院產業景氣信號資料庫 (2018) ,https://tie.tier.org.tw/number_db/mci/dbmain.asp。搜尋日期:2018年11月10日。
25.公開資訊觀測站, (2018) , http://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/index。搜尋日期:2018年11月10日。
二、英文部份
1.Adner, R. and Kapoor, R. (2010).Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations.StrategicManagementJournal,31:306-333.
2.Anderson, H., Havila, V., Salmi, A. (2001). Can you buy a business relationship? On the importance of customer and supplier relationships in acquisitions. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(7), 575-586.
3.Andreou, P.C., Louca, C., Panayides, P. M. (2012). Valuation effects of mergers and acquisitions in freight transportation. Transportation Research Part E 48:1221-1234.
4.Baldwin, C. Y., Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules, Vol.1: The power of modularity .MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.125-127.
5.Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., and Mead. M., (1997). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, Vol.11, No.3, pp.369-386.
6.Berns, M., Townend, A., Khayat, Z., Balagopal, B., Reeves, M., Hopkins, M.S., Kruschwitz, N. (2009). The business of sustainability: What it means to managers now. MITS loan Management Review, 51(1), 20-26.
7.Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., Hakanson, l. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(3):395-425.
8.Bordley, R. (2003). Determining the appropriate depth and breadth of a firm’s product portfolio. Journal of Marketing Research, 40:39-53.
9.Brandenburger, A. M., Nalebuff, B. J. (1998).Co-opetition. Bantan Dell Pub Group.18-35.
10.Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen. A., Küpper, D. K. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27:167-184.
11.Chang, W., Ellinger, A. E., Kim, K., Franke, G. R. (2016). Supply chain integration and firm financial performance: A meta analysis of positional advantage mediation and moderating factors. European Management Journal, 34:282-295.
12.Cheung, M. S., Myers, M. B., Mentzer, J. T. (2010). Does relationship-learning lead to relationship value? Across-national supply chain investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 28(6):472-487.
13.Choy, K. L., Lee, W. B., Lau, H. C. W., So, S. C. K. (2004). An enterprise collaborative management system: A case study of supplier selection in new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(2):206-226.
14.Cooper, D. R. and Emory, W. (1995) Business research methods. pp.581.Irwin.
15.Dealogic (2017). Investment Banking Scorecard. Retrieved Dec. 01, 2017, from http://graphics.wsj.com/investment-banking-scorecard/.
16.	Duysters, G., Hagedoorn, J. (2001). Do company strategies and structures converge in global markets? Evidence from the computer industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2):347-356.
17.Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4):271-291.
18.Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
19.Ettlie, J. E., Reza, E. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 34:795-82.
20.Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28:58-71.
21.Frohlich, M. T. and Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19:185-200.
22.Gelhard, C., Delft, S. (2016).The role of organizational capabilities in achieving superior sustainability performance. Journal of Business Research, 69:4632-4642.
23.Goold, M., Campbell, A., Alexander, A. (1994). Corporate-level strategy creating value in the multi business company. New York J. Wiley.
24.Hartley, J. L., Zirger, B. J., Kamath, R. R. (1997). Managing the buyer-supplier interface for on-time performance in product development. Journal of Operations Management, 15(1):57-71.
25.Haspeslagh, P. C., Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal. New York: Free Press.
26.Hill, C. W. L., Jones, G. R. (2004). Strategic management theory: An integrated approach. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, (2004).
27.Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, (1992), “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, p.71-79.
28.Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, (1993), “Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work”, Harvard Business Review, Sep-Oct, p.134-147.
29.Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, (1996a), Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System”, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, p.75-85.
30.Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, (1996b), Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy”, California Management Review, fall, p.53-79.
31.Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, (1996c), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action”, Harvard Business School Press.
32.Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, (2000), The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment”, Harvard Business School Press.
33.Kearney, A. T. (2016). Value Chain Integration. Retrieved Dec. 01, 2016, from https://www.atkearney.com/aerospace-defense/capability/-/asset_publisher/8mI2UDwTgysM/content/value-chain-integrati-1/10192.
34.Kounetas, K., Mourtos, I., Tsekouras, (2009). Efficiency decompositions for heterogeneous technologies. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(1): 209-218.
35.Lai, K. H., Wong, C. W. Y., Cheng, C. E. (2010). Bundling digitized logistics activities and it sperformance implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2): 273-286.
36.	Langerak, F., Hultink, E. J., Robben, H. S. J. (2004). The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(2): 79-94.
37.Larsson, R., and Lubatkin, M. (2001). Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions: An international case survey. Human Relations, 54(12), 1573-1607.
38.Li, T., Calantone, R. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62:13-29.
39.Lohrke, F. T. Frownfelter-Lohrke, C., Ketchen, D. J. (2016). The role of information technology systems in the performance of mergers and acquisitions. Business Horizons, 59, 7-12.
40.Long, C., Vickers-Koch, M. (1995). Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 24(1): 7-21.
41.Maire, S., Collerette, P. (2011). International post-merger integration: Lessons from an integration project in the private banking sector. International Journal of Project Management, 29: 279-294..
42.Marks, M. L., Mirvis, P. H. (2002). Making mergers and acquisitions work: Strategic and psychological preparation. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2): 80-92.
43.Matthews, C. H. and Brueggemann, R. F. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship: A competency Framework. Routledge, Tayloy & Francis Group. NY.
44.Meyer, C. B. (2001). A case in case study methodology. Field Methods, 13(4), 329-352.
45.Mirvis, P. H., Marks, M. L. (1991). Managing the merger: Making it work. Prentice Hall: London.
46.Narasimhan, R., Kim, S. (2002). Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3): 303-323.
47.Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 59: 48–62.
48.Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Ch.1, pp.11-15. The Free Press. New York.
49.Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G. (1994). Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
50.Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., Peterson, K. J. (2002). Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 55(5): 389-400.
51.Reddy, K. S. (2015). The state of case study approach in mergers and acquisitions literature: A bibliometric analysis. Future Business Journal, 1(1/2): 13-34.
52.Richey, R. G. Jr., Kiessling, T. S., Tokman, M., Dalela, V. (2008). Market growth through mergers and acquisitions: The role of the relationship-marketing manager in sustaining performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4): 394-406.
53.Rothenbuecher, J., Hoyningen-Huene, J. V. (2008). The rise of emerging markets in mergers and acquisitions. Chicago, et al: ATK earney.
54.Rouziès, D., Anderson, E., Kohli, A. K., Michaels, R. E., Weitz, B. A., Zoltners, A. A. (2005). Sales and marketing integration: A proposed framework. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25(2): 113-122.
55.Shan, P., Song, M. Ju, X. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: Is innovation speed a missing link? Journal of Business Research, 69: 683-690.
56.Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage.
57.Song, X. M., Parry, M. E. (1997). Across-national comparative study of new product development Processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61(2): 1-18.
58.Stephen, A. T., Coote, L. V. (2007). Inter firm behavior and goal alignment in relational exchanges. Journal of Business Research, 60: 285-295.
59.Swink, M., Song, M. (2007). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage. Journal of Operation Management, 25(1): 203-217.
60.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
61.Teecc, D. J., Rumelt, R. P., Dosi, G., Winter, S. G. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23:1-30.
62.Tessarolo, P. (2007). Is integration enough for fast product development? An empirical investigation of the contextual effects of product vision. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(1): 69-82.
63.Velu, C. (2015). Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms. Technovation, 35, 1-11.
64.Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16:171-174.
65.Zook, C. (20004). Beyond the core: Expanding your market without abandoning your roots. Harvard Business School Press.
66.Schraeder, M., & Self, D. R. (2003). Enhancing the success of mergers and acquisitions: An organizational culture perspective. Management Decision, 41(5), 511-522.
67.Raice, C. (2015). Broken deals rein in a strong M&A market. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 28, 2015, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/broken-deals-rein-in-astrong-m-a-market-1420155330.
68.Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., Wong, C. W. (2011). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations management, 29(6), 604-615.
69.Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage: Newbuty Park CA.
論文全文使用權限
校內
紙本論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文於授權書繳交後5年公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信