淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-2108200917252400
中文論文名稱 保羅•奧斯特《紐約三部曲》中的自我轉變
英文論文名稱 Self-Transformation in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 英文學系碩士班
系所名稱(英) Department of English
學年度 97
學期 2
出版年 98
研究生中文姓名 蔡秀君
研究生英文姓名 Hsiu-chun Tsai
學號 693010281
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
口試日期 2009-07-21
論文頁數 83頁
口試委員 指導教授-陳佩筠
委員-劉建基
委員-蔡振興
中文關鍵字 拉岡  鏡像階段  自我與他者〈互為主體性〉  匱乏  欲望 
英文關鍵字 Jacques Lacan  the mirror stage  the self and the other(intersubjectivity)  lack  desire 
學科別分類 學科別人文學語言文學
中文摘要 本文嘗試透過拉岡的「鏡像階段」理論來詮釋保羅•奧斯特《紐約三部曲》中自我與他者(the other)以及主體性形塑的議題。文本中三位主角之匱乏、欲望、與他者間相互依賴的關係均為本文焦點。以下各章分別論述三位主角不同的自我轉變,藉以突顯《紐約三部曲》中主體性形塑的潛在發展。第一章藉由拉岡的「鏡像階段」來探討《玻璃城市》中昆恩的自我轉變。昆恩試著經由認同他者來定義自我,但他的一切努力終究白費。第二章利用拉岡的「鏡像階段」與佛洛伊德理論中鬼魅性的「詭異」(the uncanny)概念,對《鬼靈》中藍與黑相互依存的分身關係加以分析。正因為藍與黑的關係密不可分,當藍殺死黑時,他也招致自我毀滅。第三章討論《禁鎖的房間》中敘事者與童年好友范修間糾葛的認同關係。不同於文本中前兩位主角,《禁鎖的房間》之敘事者不但存活下來,並且在追尋范修下落的過程中重新認識自我,進而化解雙方衝突。同時,令敘事者苦惱許久的問題─與范修間糾纏不清的關係─也在范修自殺後消弭於無形。對於《紐約三部曲》三位主角而言,他者的存在扮演極重要的角色。儘管主角們都因他者無預警的介入而更認識自我,但也同時對他者產生又愛又恨的矛盾情懷;於是,《紐約三部曲》中主體與他者間合諧共處、相互依存的關係漸生變化,以致於出現彼此懷有敵意、互相競爭的行為。然而,所有內心的衝突與掙扎都在《禁鎖的房間》一一劃下句點。若將《紐約三部曲》視為奧斯特角色之發展進程,可知主體性形塑和自我質疑雖始於一連串挫敗,卻終於自我認知的重新建構。《禁鎖的房間》之結局,似乎對奧斯特關注的身分認同與認識自我問題,透露出一絲曙光,也賦予《紐約三部曲》主體性形塑的可能性。
英文摘要 This thesis attempts to explore issues of the self and the other and subjectivity in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy in light of Lacan’s notion of the mirror stage. The three protagonists’ lack, desire and their dependent relation with their counterparts are my main focuses. The following chapters examine three distinct developments of Auster’s protagonists’ self-transformation in The New York Trilogy. The first chapter discusses Daniel Quinn’s self-transformation in City of Glass with Lacan’s theory of the mirror stage. His endeavors to identify with the other and quest for his subjectivity fail in the end. In Chapter Two, I focus on the doubling relationship between Blue and Black in Ghosts by virtue of Lacan’s notion of the mirror stage and Freud’s idea of the uncanny. In fact, Blue can’t know himself and exist without Black. When Blue annihilates Black, he also brings about his self-destruction. In Chapter Three, the entangled relation between the narrator and his childhood friend, Fanshawe, in The Locked Room is the central concern. Different from the other protagonists, the narrator not only possesses self-understanding but also reconciles his conflicts with Fanshawe and breaks off their doubling relationship which always haunts the narrator. In The New York Trilogy, the other plays an important role for the three protagonists to get closer to their inner psyche and to know themselves. So to speak, the intrusion of the other leads protagonists to discover who they are and who they aren’t and at the same time three protagonists tend to develop ambivalence and emotional tension toward their doubles. From the first to the last story in The New York Trilogy, relations between the subject and the other change from reliance and harmony to aggressive and violent competition. However, physical conflict and mental struggle are all solved in The Locked Room. If we see The New York Trilogy as a whole, the formation of Auster’s protagonists’ subjectivity and quest for the self are frustrated in the beginning but somehow achieved through self-understanding in the end. The Locked Room, which can be considered a potential solution, seems to convey a positive attitude toward the problem of identity and self-knowledge and the possibility to construct subjectivity in The New York Trilogy.
論文目次 Introduction (1)
I. Literature Review (3)
II.Theoretical Frameworks (7)

Chapter One: A Failed Quest for Subjectivity in City of Glass (14)
I. Traumatic Memories and Broken Selves (15)
II.The Similarity between Quinn and Peter Stillman, Jr. (19)
III.The Journey of Self-Quest (21)

Chapter Two: Persecuted by the Double in Ghosts (34)
I. Mirroring the Double Trouble (37)
II.Aggressivity against Itself (42)

Chapter Three: Haunting and the Haunted in The Locked Room (51)
I. Seeking Identification and Usurping the Desired Other (54)
II.Transgression to Approach Jouissance and Disillusion (63)

Conclusion (73)

Works Cited (79)
參考文獻 Alford, Steven E. “Mirrors of Madness: Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy.” Critique 37.1 (1995): 17-33.
Auster, Paul. “Interview with Joseph Mallia.” “Interview with Larry McCaffery and Sinda Gregory.” The Art of Hunger: Essays, Prefaces, Interviews. Los Angeles: Sun and Moon Press, 1992. 256-312.
---. The New York Trilogy. New York: Penguin USA, 2006.
Barone, Dennis, ed. “Introduction: Paul Auster and the Postmodern American Novel.” Beyond the Red Notebook: Essays on Paul Auster. By Barone. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1995. 1-26.
Berlatsky, Eric. “‘Everything in the World Has Its Own Color’: Detecting Race and Identity in Paul Auster’s Ghosts.” Arizona Quarterly 64.3 (2008): 109-142.
Bernstein, Stephen. “Auster’s Sublime Closure: The Locked Room.” Beyond the Red Notebook: Essays on Paul Auster. Ed. Dennis Barone. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1995. 88-106.
---. “‘The Question is the Story Itself.’ Postmodernism and Intertextuality in Auster’s New York Trilogy.” Detecting Texts: The Metaphysical Detective Story from Poe to Postmodernism. Ed. Patricia Merivale and Susan Elizabeth Sweeney. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1999. 134-53.
Boothby, Richard. “Lacanian Reflections on Narcissism.’” Death and Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan’s Return to Freud. New York: Routledge, 1991. 21-45.
Coats, Karen. “Introduction.” Looking Glasses and Neverlands: Lacan, Desire, and Subjectivity in Children’s Literature. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 2004. 1-11.
Derrida, Jacques. Positions. Trans. Alan Bass. London: Athlone, 2002. 39-96.
Dimovitz, Scott A. “Public Personae and the Private I: De-compositional Ontology in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy.” Modern Fiction Studies 52.3 (2006): 613-33.
Dolar, Mladen. “‘I Shall Be with You on Your Wedding-Night’: Lacan and the Uncanny.” October 58 (1991): 5-23.
Elliott, Anthony. “The Language of Desire. Lacan and the Specular Structure of the Self.” Social Theory and Psychoanalysis in Transition. 2 ed. London: Free Association Books, 1999. 110-18.
Ellmann, Maud. “Gynophagy.” The Hunger Artists: Starving, Writing, and Imprisonment. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993. 29-57.
Evans, Dylan. “From Kantian Ethics to Mystical Experience: An Exploration of Jouissance.” Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Ed. Dany Nobus. New York: Other Press, 1998. 1-28.
Feldstein, Richard. “The Mirror of Manufactured Cultural Relations.” Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud. Eds. Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink and Maire Jaanus. Albany: SUNY, 1996. 133-37.
Fredman, Stephen. “‘How to Get Out of the Room That Is the Book? Paul Auster and the Consequences of Confinement.” Bloom’s Modern Critical Views. Paul Auster. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 2004. 7-41.
Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. New York: Norton, 1989.
---. “The Ego and the Super-Ego (Ego Ideal).” The Ego and The Id. Trans. Joan Riviere. Ed. James Strachey. New York: Norton, 1989. 22-36.
---. “Identification.” Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Trans. James Strachey. New York: Norton, 1989. 46-53.
---. “On Narcissism: An Introduction.” Sigmund Freud. Collected Papers. Ed. Ernest Jones. Trans. Joan Riviere. New York: Basic Books, 1959.
---. “The Uncanny.” Writings on Art and Literature. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997. 193-233.
Gallop, Jane. “Where to Begin?” “The Dream of the Dead Author.” Reading Lacan. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 74-92. 157-85.
Glowinski, Huguette. “Alienation and Separation.” A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Ed. Huguette Glowinski, Zita M. Marks and Sara Murphy. New York: Free Association Books, 2001. 9-13.
Homer, Sean. “The Imaginary.” Jacques Lacan. New York: Routledge, 2005. 17-31.
Lacan, Jacques. “Aggressiveness in Psychoanalysis.” “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience.” Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton, 2006. 75-81. 82-101.
---. “The Split between the Eye and the Gaze.” The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Norton, 1978. 67-78.
---. “The Other and Psychosis.” The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book III: The Psychoses 1955-1956. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. New York: Norton, 1993. 29-43.
---. “The Death of God.” The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. 1959-1960. Book VII. Trans. Dennis Porter. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. New York: Norton, 1997. 167-178.
Little, William G. “Nothing to Go On: Paul Auster’s City of Glass.” Contemporary Literature 38.1 (1997): 133-63.
Lydenberg, Robin. “Freud’s Uncanny Narratives.” PMLA 112.5 (1997): 1072-1086.
Mansfield, Nick. “Lacan: The Subject is Language.” Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway. New York: U of New York P, 2000. 38-50.
Martin, Brendan. “Dislocation, Ambiguity, Indeterminacy: The Postmodernity of The New York Trilogy.” Paul Auster’s Postmodernity. New York: Routledge, 2007. 103-44.
Millard, Kenneth. “Language and Power.” Contemporary American Fiction. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000. 180-85.
Parkin-Gounelas, Ruth. “The Mirror Stage and the Image.” Literature and Psychoanalysis: Intertextual Reading. New York: Palgrave, 6-10.
Poe, Edgar Allan. “William Wilson.” Selected Tales. Penguin, 1994. 96-117.
Van Pelt, Tamise. “The Master in the Mirror.” The Other Side of Desire: Lacan’s Theory of the Registers. New York: SUNY, 2000. 21-43.
Quinet, Antonio. “The Gaze as an Object.” Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Eds. Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink and Maire Jaanus. Albany: SUNY, 1995. 139-47.
Rubenstein, Roberta. “Doubling, Intertextuality, and the Postmodern Uncanny: Paul Auster’s New Work Trilogy.” Literature Interpretation Theory 9.3 (1998): 245-62.
Russell, Alison. “Deconstructing The New York Trilogy: Paul Auster’s Anti-Detective Fiction.” Critique 31.2 (1990): 71-84.
Shiloh, Ilana. Paul Auster and Postmodern Quest: On the Road to Nowhere. New York: Peter Lang, 2002.
Sorapure, Madeleine. “The Detective and the Author: City of Glass.” Beyond the Red Notebook: Essays on Paul Auster. Ed. Dennis Barone. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1995. 71-87.
Springer, Carsten. “The Popular Novels.” Crises: The Works of Paul Auster. New York: Peter Lang, 2000. 97-133.
Thurschwell, Pamela. “Freud’s Maps of the Mind.” Sigmund Freud. New York: Routledge, 2000. 79-93.
Weber, Samuel. “Mistaken Identity: Lacan’s Theory of the Mirror Stage.” Return to Freud: Jacques Lacan’s Dislocation of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Michael Levine. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991. 7-19.
Woods, Tim. “The Music of Chance: Aleatorical (Dis)harmonies Within ‘The City of the World.’” Beyond the Red Notebook: Essays on Paul Auster. Ed. Dennis Barone. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1995. 143-45.
Zilcosky, John. “The Revenge of the Author: Paul Auster’s Challenge to Theory.” Critique 39.3 (1998): 195-206.
Žižek, Slavoj. “Why Does a Letter Always Arrive at its Destination?” Enjoy Your Symptom!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. New York: Routledge, 2008. 11-32.
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2010-08-24公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2010-08-24起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信