姬蘭．德賽《繼承失落的人》描述相交且受迫於後殖民與全球化影響的葛倫堡居住者面對廓爾康族國族主義初興，所面臨之困境與希望。位於珠穆朗瑪峰南側，葛倫堡的空間政治挑戰是不分性別與族群，尤以法官所代表的世代，演繹受英國殖民文化影響者和當地少數族群的摩擦。遠於紐約的青年畢久也以另一種求生法則，穿梭於各個地下室，受困於非法移工的身分，法官與畢久在跨國經驗下對空間的衝擊遠超於他們想像。
緊接於空間的討論之後，第二章將探討其文化可信度的作用，及行使生活型態以及文化認同。法官與畢久面對的共同問題為如何在生活場域實行自身所堅信的行為法則。
小說中最年輕角色，賽伊以批判的角度，重新評估八零年代後的西方殖民遺跡與葛倫堡當地地景，以近似於旁觀者分析，自身與家教蓋安間背景的相異與身分政治，差別性成為賽伊離開的契機，以期發掘空間，因此她的身份認同成為本章的著墨點。
總結以上的討論得知空間與身份認同的互相影響，錯綜的世代相處與跨國經驗，何處為家各角色必須面對的命題。

This paper will discuss two motifs in The Inheritance of Loss. First, space and sense of space are perceived differently by characters. For those living under English imperialism, they assume a lifestyle of superiority. However, globalization offers residents with movement across countries and continents. Indians who live under modernized advancement understand space in ways that sometimes contradicts what used to be people’s belief in the past. As the concept of space changes, the definition of home no longer stays consistent. Especially for people who are not in India, they strive for an authentic India that cultural and religious traditions would offer. The authenticity of Indian belief is challenged and diasporic subjects struggle to stay loyal to the original concept, which even hinders Indians overseas to mingle with other nationals. In the late twentieth century, Kalimpong, India becomes the site where Gorkha movement takes place. Unjust treatment of Gorkhas sparks their protests in both economic and political aspects. The unrest starts to affect locals’ daily life. Youngsters of that time experience diverse yet contradictory effects of globalization and nationalism. Their sense of “not-to-be-home” is heightened; thus, their concept of space and identities are in flux.

Introduction-----1
Chapter One
Postcolonial and Diasporic Space: Kalimpong and New York-----12
Chapter Two
Imagined Homeland: Unhomely Being and Authenticity----31
Chapter Three
Identification in Flux: Sai’s Local Space-----46
Conclusion-----64
Works Cited-----68

Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. 
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994. 
---. “Culture’s In-Between.” Questions of Cultural Identity. Ed. Paul du Gay. London: Sage Publications, 1996, 2003. 53-60. 
Brah, Avtar. Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge, 2005. 
Braziel, Jana Evans, Anita Mannur. Eds. Theorizing Diaspora: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. 
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 2000. 
Clifford, James. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1997. 
Cohen, Robin. Global Diaspora: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2008. Print.
Crane, Ralph. Radhika Mohanram. Imperialism as Diapora. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 2013. 
Cresswell, Tim. “The Production of Mobilities: An Interpretive Framework.” On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Routledge, 2006. 
Desai, Kiran. The Inheritance of Loss. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006. 
Didur, Jill. “Cultivating Community: Counterlandscaping in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss.” Postcolonial Ecologies: Literatures of the Environment. Ed. Elizabeth DeLoughrey, George B. Handley. New York: Oxford UP, 2011. 43-61. 
Gikandi, Simon. “Globalization and the Claims of Postcoloniality.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 110.3 (2001): 627-58. 
Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London: Verso, 1993. 
Hall, Stuart. “Avtar Brah’s Cartographies: Moment, Method, Meaning.” Feminist Review 100 (2012): 27-38 
---. “Who Needs ‘Identity’?” Questions of Cultural Identity. Ed. Paul du Gay. London: Sage Publications, 1996, 2003. 1-17. 
Harvey, David. Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development: Hettner-Lecture 2004. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2005. 
Jervis, John. “Uncanny Presences.” Uncanny Modernity: Cultural Theories, Modern Anxieties. Ed. Jo Collins and John Jervis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 10-50.
Liu, Yu-yen. “Transnational Hybridity and Re-(b)ordering Cultural Reality in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss.” Tamkang Review 40.1 (2009): 97-117. 
Massey, Doreen. Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. 
Mishra, Sudesh. Diaspora Criticism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. 
Mishra, Vijay. The Literature of the Indian Diaspora: Theorizing the Diasporic Imaginary. Oxon: Routledge, 2007. 
Pan, Si-lin. Negotiating the Non-negotiable: Life Aporias in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss. M.A. thesis. Taiwan: National Cheng Kung University, 2012. 
Jay, Paul. Global Matters: The Transnational Turn in Literary Studies. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2010
Ranasinha, Ruvani. “Globalisation, Labour, Narrative and Representation in Arundhati Roy, Monica Ali and Kiran Desai.” Contemporary Diasporic South Asian Women’s Fiction: Gender, Narration and Globalisation. London: Macmillan Publishers, 2016. 49-92.
Rey, Chow. Writing Diaspora: Tactics of Intervention in Contemporary Cultural Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993. 
Sabo, Oana. “Disjunctures and Diaspora in Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature 47.3 (2012): 375-92. 
Scanlan, Margaret. “Migration from Terror: The Postcolonial Novel after September 11.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 46.3-4 (2010): 266-78. 
Sinha, Sunita, Bryan Reynolds, eds. Critical Responses to Kiran Desai. New Delhi, India: Atlantic, 2009. 
Spivak, Gayatri Charkravorty. Death of A Discipline. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. 
---. An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization. Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 2012. 
---. The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Ed. Donna Landry, Gerald MacLean. London: Routledge, 1996. 
Varughese, Emma Dawson. “India: Emerging Economy, Emerging Literature.” Beyond the Postcolonial. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 195-220.