在企業經營中，如何提昇企業的價值，能快速反應客戶與市場需求的變化。為現代企業在經營策略上的主要目標。本研究係針對企業在資訊科技管理、技術、整合能力使用資源基礎理論進行說明。主要目的在了解企業資訊與事業單位經理人在企業活動中，針對資訊科技：管理能力、技術能力、整合能力對於企業流程敏捷度之影響關係。本研究為實證型研究，以問卷調查法方式針對企業事業單位與資訊單位主管進行，並以結構方程式與迴歸分析驗證模型；總共回收問卷110份。本研究驗證資訊單位中資訊科技管理能力對於資訊科技技術能力、流程敏捷度具有正向相關。資訊科技整合能力在不同單位經理人僅對資訊科技管理能力具干擾效果。期望未來企業在進行相關企業與資訊科技經理人在策略規劃上與資訊科技預算投資進行時能參考本研究之建議分析，妥善進行，以增加企業反應敏捷度並提企業之績效與價值。

At a time in enterprise operated. How to enhance the value of the business and be quickly responsive to changes in customer and market demand. In firms to the development of business strategy and toward the business goals. IT is the key point that the ingredient in a firm’s ability to detect and respond to market. Research has identified the potential for IT to affect firm agility through IT management capabilities or IT technical capabilities or IT business process integrated capabilities. At the same time, 'Resource-Based View' it as a paradigm for our field.
 
In this research, we use on prior conceptual and empirical research to develop and test a model relating managerial, technical and business process integrated IT capabilities to agility. To test the model, we use data from matched surveys of business and IT units in 110 firms executives. After construct validation and data analysis with SEM and Regression Analysis. 
 
From the research results, First positive link between managerial and technical IT capabilities and process agility There was positive relation between. Second, to what extent does business process integrated positively moderate the link between each of these IT capabilities and business process agility? It is not clear to support. we assess our results and their implications for both research and practice. Finally, about the limitations in this study, identify areas for future research, and provide a general conclusion. We hope can help to the IT and Business units in the firms executives, that can refer to the recommendations in business strategic planning and budget for investment in information technology.

目次
論文提要內容：	I
第一章	緒論	1
第一節	研究動機與目的	1
第二節	研究流程	4
第二章	文獻探討	5
第一節	資源基礎理論	5
第二節	資訊科技能力	8
第三節	企業流程敏捷度	18
第三章	研究設計	22
第一節	研究架構	22
第二節	研究假說	23
第三節	問卷設計及抽樣方法	25
第四節	資料分析方法	30
第四章	研究結果與分析	32
第一節	敘述統計分析	32
第二節	信度與效度分析	34
第三節	驗證性因素分析	36
第四節	結構方程模式分析	38
第五章	討論	51
第一節	「資訊科技管理能力」對於「資訊科技技術能力」、「企業流程敏捷」之影響	51
第二節	「資訊科技企業流程整合能力」對於「資訊科技管理能力」、「資訊科技技術能力」、「企業流程敏捷度」之干擾影響關係	53
第六章	結論與建議	55
第一節	研究結論	55
第二節	研究建議及限制	57
參考文獻	59
附錄	65

表目次
表 2 - 1學者定義資訊科技在資源基礎理論定義彙整表	6
表 2 - 2學者定義資訊科技能力彙整表	8
表 2 - 3學者定義資訊科技管理能力彙整表	10
表 2 - 4學者定義資訊科技技術能力彙整表	13
表 2 - 5學者定義資訊科技企業流程整合能力彙整表	16
表 2 - 6學者定義企業流程敏捷度彙整表	20
表 3 - 1研究量表、構面及題數彙整表	26
表 4 - 1施測樣本分佈情形	32
表 4 - 2研究構面之信度分析表	35
表 4 - 3區別效度分析暨變數相關係數表	37
表 4 - 4整體理論模式之衡量分析表	40
表 4 - 5理論結構模式之路徑係數與假說驗證	41
表4 - 6模式之整體配適度評估	43
表4 - 7單樣本模型配適度指標檢核表	46
表4 - 8兩樣本路徑係數恆等性檢驗結果表	48
表4 - 9兩樣本路徑係數恆等性檢驗結果表	49
表4 - 10兩樣本路徑係數恆等性檢驗結果表	50

圖目次
圖 1 - 1 MIC 2011 台灣IT投資概況	2
圖 1 - 2研究流程圖	4
圖 2 - 1企業系統解析圖	16
圖 3 - 1研究架構圖	22

一、	中文文獻
1.	IBM（2010），全球CEO調查報告 IBM。
2.	MIC. (2011). 台灣資通訊產業發展現況 財團法人資訊工業策進會。
3.	申定一（2005），全球化企業資訊策略與資訊科技商業價值探討-以筆記型電腦代工產業為例，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
4.	唐永泰. (2004). 資訊科技投資與流程觀點的 IT 企業價值，國立台北大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
5.	邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析: SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析 (基礎版) 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
6.	吳明隆（2006），SPSS統計應用學習實務 知城電腦圖書。
7.	陳曉萍, 徐淑英, 樊景立, and 鄭伯壎. (2008). 組織與管理研究的實證方法 華泰文化事業公司。
8.	謝凱宇、林舒柔/譯 (2003)，現代策略管理，台北市，科大文化出版。
9.	陳寬裕、 王正華. (2010). 結構方程模型分析實務: AMOS 的運用. 台北市: 五南圖書。


二、	英文文獻
10.	Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
11.	Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
12.	Bharadwaj, A. S., Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R. W. (1999). IT capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 378-385.
13.	Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, , 169-196.
14.	Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology Harvard Business Press.
15.	Brown, C. V., Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R. W. (1999). Repositioning the IT organization to enable business transformation Pinnaflex Education Resources, Inc.
16.	Byrd, T. A. (2001). Information technology, core competencies and sustained competitive advantage. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 14(2), 27-36.
17.	Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., and Carland, J. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, , 354-359.
18.	Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn't matter. Educause Review, 38, 24-38.
19.	Cash, J. I., Earl, M. J., and Morison, R. (2008). Teaming up to crack innovation and enterprise integration. Harvard Business Review, 86(11), 90-100.
20.	Christiaanse, E., and Venkatraman, N. (2002). Beyond sabre: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quarterly, , 15-38.
21.	Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology Harvard Business Press.
22.	Davenport, T. H. (1994). Saving IT. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 119-131.
23.	Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4)
24.	Davenport, T. H., and Short, J. E. (2003). Information technology and business process redesign. Operations Management: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 1, 1-27.
25.	Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. The Journal of Marketing, , 37-52.
26.	DeLone, W. H. (1988). Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. Mis Quarterly, , 51-61.
27.	Dewett, T., and Jones, G. R. (2001). The role of information technology in the organization: A review, model, and assessment. Journal of Management, 27(3), 313-346.
28.	Dove, R. (2001). Response ability: The language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise Wiley.
29.	Fan, S. T., and Edgington, T. S. (1993). Integrin regulation of leukocyte inflammatory functions. CD11b/CD18 enhancement of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha responses of monocytes. The Journal of Immunology, 150(7), 2972.
30.	Feeny, D. F., and Willcocks, L. P. (1998). Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 9-21.
31.	Fichman, R. G. (2004). Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 132-154.
32.	Flyvbjerg, B., and Budzier, A. (2011). Why your IT project may be riskier than you think. Harv Bus Rev, 89(9), 23-25.
33.	Johnson, J. L., Lee, R. P. W., Saini, A., and Grohmann, B. (2003). Market-focused strategic flexibility: Conceptual advances and an integrative model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1), 74.
34.	Keen, P., and Qureshi, S. (2006). Organizational transformation through business models: A framework for business model design. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, , 8. pp. 206b-206b.
35.	Keen, P. G. W. (1993). Information technology and the management difference: A fusion map. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 17-39.
36.	Lee, J., Siau, K., and Hong, S. (2003). Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI. Communications of the ACM, 46(2), 54-60.
37.	Magal, S. R., Carr, H. H., and Watson, H. J. (1988). Critical success factors for information center managers. MIS Quarterly, , 413-425.
38.	Mathiassen, L., and Pries-Heje, J. (2006). Business agility and diffusion of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 116-119.
39.	McAfee, A. (2006). Mastering the three worlds of information technology. Harvard Business Review, 84(11), 141.
40.	McAfee, A. (2011). What every CEO needs to know about the cloud. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 124-132.
41.	Melville, N., Kraemer, K., and Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283-322.
42.	Nadkarni, S., and Narayanan, V. (2007). Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 243-270.
43.	Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
44.	Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in global industries Harvard Business Press.
45.	Powell, T. C., and Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375-405.
46.	Raschke, R. L., and David, J. S. (2005). Business process agility.
47.	Ray, G., Barney, J. B., and Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 23-37.
48.	Rigby, D., and Zook, C. (2002). Open-market innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(10), 80-93.
49.	Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., and Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31-42.
50.	Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., and Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. Mis Quarterly, , 237-263.
51.	Sanchez, R. (1996). Dynamics of competence-based competition: Theory and practice in the new strategic management Elsevier-Pergamon.
52.	Sanchez, R. (1996). Dynamics of competence-based competition: Theory and practice in the new strategic management Elsevier-Pergamon.
53.	Stephan H. Haeckel. (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations Harvard business press.
54.	Tallon, P. P. (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: An information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 21-36.
55.	Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. Mis Quarterly, , 311-334.
56.	Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth Oxford University Press, USA.
57.	Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., and Viehland, D. (2004). Electronic commerce: A managerial perspective 2004 Prentice Hall.
58.	Upton, D. M., and Staats, B. R. (2008). Radically simple IT. Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 118.
59.	Wade, M., and Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. Mis Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
60.	Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
61.	Willcocks, L., Feeny, D., and Olson, N. (2006). Implementing core IS capabilities::: Feeny-willcocks IT governance and management framework revisited. European Management Journal, 24(1), 28-37.
62.	Zahra, S. A., and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, , 185-203.
63.	Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., and Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda*. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955.