§ 瀏覽學位論文書目資料
  
系統識別號 U0002-2106200512330100
DOI 10.6846/TKU.2005.00461
論文名稱(中文) 領導行為及內外控傾向對組織公民行為影響之研究-以台灣電力公司區營業處為例
論文名稱(英文) The Influence of Leadership Behavior and Locus of Control on Organizational Citizenship Behavior-The Case of District Office of Taiwan Power Company
第三語言論文名稱
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中文) 管理科學研究所企業經營碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英文) Executive Master's Program of Business Administration in Management Sciences
外國學位學校名稱
外國學位學院名稱
外國學位研究所名稱
學年度 93
學期 2
出版年 94
研究生(中文) 彭春泉
研究生(英文) Chun-Chuan Peng
學號 789590329
學位類別 碩士
語言別 繁體中文
第二語言別
口試日期 2005-05-31
論文頁數 79頁
口試委員 指導教授 - 王居卿
指導教授 - 吳坤山
委員 - 陳定國
委員 - 徐木蘭
關鍵字(中) 領導行為
轉換型領導
交易型領導
內外控傾向
組織公民行為
關鍵字(英) Leadership Behavior
Transformational Leadership
Transactional Leadership
Locus of Control
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
第三語言關鍵字
學科別分類
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討主管領導行為及員工內外控傾向對組織公民行為之影響;首先,從有關的文獻探討著手,分析領導行為的意涵、理論基礎與構面,內外控傾向意義與差異,以及組織公民行為的起源、意涵與構面,進而再就領導行為、內外控傾向與組織公民行為關係的相關研究進行探討,以作為本研究的理論基礎。
   其次,根據理論基礎建立本研究架構與假設,選用適當的量表為研究工具,包括領導行為、內外控傾向及組織公民行為等量表,採用配額抽樣法進行抽樣,經抽取台電公司員工620人為對象實施問卷調查,實際有效樣本為499人,並將調查所得資料以信度分析、敘述性統計、t檢定及變異數分析、相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行實證分析和討論之後,獲致結論如下:
1.不同個人背景在領導行為的知覺上具有顯著差異。
2.不同個人背景在組織公民行為上具有顯著差異。
3.領導行為與組織公民行為具有顯著相關。
4.內外控傾向與組織公民行為具有顯著相關。
5.領導行為與內外控傾向具有顯著相關。
6.領導行為及內外控傾向對組織公民行為具有顯著影響。
   最後,依據研究結論,對台電公司主管、人力資源部門及未來研究提出具體的建議,以供運用領導行為、內外控傾向以提升組織公民行為之參考。
英文摘要
The purpose of this research was to explore the influence between leadership behavior and locus of control on organizational citizenship behavior. We initially consulted various literature and research materials that analyzed the following: the meaning, theoretical base and components of the various leadership behavior; the concept and the difference of variables of locus of control; the origin, meaning and components of the various organizational citizenship behavior; and further studied and discussed the inter-relationships between leadership behavior, locus of control and organizational citizenship behavior and these shall form the theoretical base of this research.
  The next step is to develop the theoretical framework and hypothesis to base on the theoretical base of this research, to select an appropriate survey questionnaire as a tool of evaluation, which includes surveys on leadership behavior, locus of control and organizational citizenship behavior, the research employed quota sampling, we randomly selected 620 Taipower’s employees, the number of effective sample is 499 samples, after gathering the results of the survey questionnaires, data were analyzed with the method of descriptive and inferential statistics, including reliability, mean, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis and stepwise multiple regression. We derived the statistical data analyzed and discussed the results from which we came to the following conclusions:
1. The employees of different attributes have significant differences in perception of leadership behavior.
2. The employees of different attributes have significant differences in perception of organizational citizenship behavior.
3. The Pearson correlation exits between the leadership behavior and organizational citizenship behavior.
4. The Pearson correlation exits between the locus of control and organizational citizenship behavior.
5. The Pearson correlation exits between the leadership behavior and locus of control.
6. The leadership behavior and locus of control have 
  significant influence on the organizational citizenship behavior.
  Finally, based on the conclusions derived from this research, recommendations are given to practical managers in Taiwan Power Company to promote organizational 
  citizenship behavior and academic scholars to make further research.
第三語言摘要
論文目次
中文摘要................................................I
英文摘要...............................................II
目錄...................................................IV
表目錄.................................................VI
圖目錄...............................................VIII
第一章 緒論.............................................1
第一節	 研究背景......................................1
第二節	 研究動機......................................2
第三節	 研究目的......................................5
第二章 文獻探討.........................................6
第一節	領導行為之相關理論與研究.......................6
第二節	內外控傾向之相關理論與研究....................14
第三節	組織公民行為之相關理論與研究..................17
第四節	領導行為及內外控傾向與組織公民行為之關係......21
第三章 研究設計........................................28
第一節	研究架構......................................28
第二節	研究變項之定義................................29
第三節	研究假設......................................32
第四節	抽樣設計......................................32
第五節	研究工具與變項衡量............................34
第六節	資料分析方法..................................36
第四章 研究結果與討論..................................38
第一節	樣本結構與各變項之敘述性統計分析..............38
第二節	個人背景在各研究變項上之差異分析..............40
第三節	領導行為及內外控傾向與組織公民行為之相關分析..47
第四節	領導行為及內外控傾向對組織公民行為之影響分析..49
第五節	研究假設檢定結果..............................56
第五章 結論與建議......................................58
第一節	研究結論......................................58
第二節	研究貢獻......................................63
第三節	研究限制......................................64
第四節	研究建議......................................65
參考文獻...............................................69
附錄:研究問卷.........................................77
表目錄
表2-1-1 轉換型領導定義彙整表.................................................................8
表2-1-2 交易型領導定義彙整表.................................................................9
表2-1-3 轉換型領導與交易型領導構面表...............................................13
表2-1-4 轉換型領導與交易型領導差異表...............................................14
表2-2-1 內控傾向與外控傾向的差異.......................................................16
表2-3-1 組織公民行為之定義...................................................................18
表2-3-2 組織公民行為構面摘要表...........................................................21
表3-4-1 問卷發放及回收數量統計表.......................................................33
表3-5-1 轉換型領導與交易型領導各構面題數及題號之分配...............34
表3-5-2 組織公民行為各構面題數及題號之分配...................................36
表4-1-1 樣本基本資料統計表...................................................................38
表4-1-2 領導行為、內外控傾向及組織公民行為之敘述性統計分析.....40
表4-2-1 性別在領導行為及組織公民行為上之差異分析.......................41
表4-2-2 年齡在領導行為及組織公民行為上之差異分析.......................42
表4-2-3 婚姻在領導行為及組織公民行為上之差異分析.......................43
表4-2-4 教育程度在領導行為及組織公民行為上之差異分析...............44
表4-2-5 年資在領導行為及組織公民行為上之差異分析.......................45
表4-2-6 職位在領導行為及組織公民行為上之差異分析.......................46
表4-2-7 個人背景在領導行為及組織公民行為上之差異分析結果.......46
表4-3-1 領導行為及內外控傾向與組織公民行為整體相關分析表.......47
表4-3-2 領導行為與組織公民行為各構面相關分析表...........................48
表4-3-3 內外控傾向與組織公民行為各構面相關分析表.......................48
表4-3-4 領導行為與內外控傾向各構面相關分析表...............................49
表4-4-1 領導行為及內外控傾向對整體組織公民行為之迴歸分析.......50
表4-4-2 領導行為及內外控傾向對認同組織之迴歸分析.......................51
表4-4-3 領導行為及內外控傾向對協助同事之迴歸分析.......................52
表4-4-4 領導行為及內外控傾向對不生事爭利之迴歸分析...................52
表4-4-5 領導行為及內外控傾向對公私分明之迴歸分析.......................53
表4-4-6 領導行為及內外控傾向對敬業守法之迴歸分析.......................54
表4-4-7 領導行為及內外控傾向對自我充實之迴歸分析.......................54
表4-4-8 領導行為及內外控傾向對組織公民行為之迴歸分析結果摘要表…..55
表4-5-1 研究假設及實證結果彙總表.......................................................56
圖目錄
圖3-1-1 研究架構....................................................................................28
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1.王佳玉(2000),「轉換型領導與領導效能關聯之研究-以台北市政府為個案分析」,國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
2.朱淑子(2002),「國小校長轉化領導、互易領導與教師工作滿意關係之研究」,國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
3.吳武典(1977),「制握信念與學業成就、自我觀念、社會互動之關係及其改變技術」,師大教育研究所集刊,第19輯,頁1-13。
4.吳秉恩(1986),組織行為學,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
5.吳玲玲譯(2003),組織行為,台北:智勝文化事業公司。
6.李茂興、余伯泉譯(1995),社會心理學,台北:揚智文化事業公司。
7.李衍新(2003),「員工組織政治知覺、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究-以台灣電力公司台南區營業處為例」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8.卓孟珍(2003),「組織變革認知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關係研究-以中央信託局為例」,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
9.周文賢(2002),多變量統計分析,台北:智勝文化事業公司。
10.林孟彥譯(2003),管理學,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
11.林欽榮(2002),組織行為,台北:揚智文化事業公司。
12.林淑姬(1994),「薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究」,管理評論,第十三卷,第二期。
13.林滿祝(2002),「交易式/轉換式領導風格對於員工態度之關聯性研究-以親信關係及員工人格特質為情境變項」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
14.范熾文(2002),「國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究」,國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文。
15.徐木蘭(1999),行為科學與管理,台北:三民書局。
16.秦夢群(1997),教育行政-理論部分,台北:五南出版公司。
17.張春興(1996),現代心理學,台北:東華書局。
18.張潤書(1998),行政學,台北:三民書局。
19.張慶勳(1997),學校組織轉化領導研究,高雄:復文書局。
20.許道然(2002),「公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究」,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
21.陳永明(1999),「台電員工屬性與工作價值觀對民營化組織變革態度之研究」,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
22.陳定國(2003),現代管理通論,台北:三民書局。
23.陳樹(1998),「領導風格與組織文化關聯性之研究」,國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
24.游逸風(2002),「轉換型領導之研究-以成功領導者為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
25.黃堅厚(1979),「國小及國中學生內外控信念之研究」,師大教育心理學報,第12期,頁1-14。
26.黃麗莉、李茂興譯(1991),組織行為—管理心理學理論與實務,台北:揚智文化事業公司。
27.經濟部(1999),電業自由化方案(草案),經濟部能源委員會。
28.廖敏惠(2002),「新進員工訓練、個人特質與個人-組織契合度關係之研究」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
29.廖裕月(1998),「國小校長轉化領導型式與領導效能之研究:以北部四縣市為例」,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
30.廖瓊瑤(1998),「台灣地區各縣市文化中心組織公民行為之研究」,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
31.蔡進雄(2000),轉型領導與學校效能,台北:師大書苑。
32.鄭仁偉、廖瓊瑤(2000),「台灣地區文化中心員工組織公民行為模型之研究」,政大管理評論,第二十卷,第二期。
33.盧明桂(2004),「個人需求與內外控傾向對外派員工公民行為之研究」,大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
34.謝宜哲(2003),「台電公司企業形象之研究」,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
35.羅時宏(2004),「新進人員人格特質、資訊尋找行為與組織社會化之關聯性研究」,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
36.羅耀宗譯(2004),誰說大象不會跳舞,台北:時報出版社。

二、英文部分
1. Avolio, B. J. & Bass, B.M. (1995), “Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership”, Leadership Quarterly, 6, pp. 199-218.
2. Barnard, C. I. (1938), The functions of the executive, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
3. Barney, J. B. (1986), “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy”, Management Science, 31, pp. 1231-1241.
4. Bass, B. M. (1985), Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York: Free Press.
5. Bass,B.M.&Avolio,B.J.(1989),Multifactor leadership questionnaire-rater form , Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
6. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1990), Transformational leadership development: Manual for multifactor leadership questionnaire, Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
7. Bass, B. M. (1999), “Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), pp. 9-32.
8. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1994), Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1995), MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire for research: Permission set, Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
10. Bass, B. M. (1997), “Does the transformational/ transactional leadership transcend organizational and motivational boundaries” ? American Psychologist, 52, pp. 130-139.
11. Bass, B. M. (1998), Transformational leadership: industrial, military, and educational impact, Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
12. Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983), “Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship” , Academy of Management Journal, 26, pp. 587-595.
13. Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985), Leaders: The strategies for taking charge, New York: Harper & Row.
14. Boal, K.B. & Bryson, J. M. (1988), “Charismatic leadership: A phenomenological and structural approach” , In J. G. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, H. P. Dachler, & C. A. Schriesheim(Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 5-28), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
15. Brooks, L. (1999), Organizational behavior, London: Pitman Publishing.
16. Bryman, A. (1992), Charisma and leadership in organizations, London: Sage.
17. Burns, J. M. (1978), Leadership, New York: Harper & Row.
18. Cohen, A. & Vigoda, E. (2000), “Do good citizens make good organizational citizenship”? An empirical examination of the relationship between general citizenship and organizational citizenship behavior in Israel”, Administration & Society, 32(5), pp. 596-624.
19. Conger, J. A. Kanungo, R. N. (1998), Charismatic leadership in organizations, Thousand Oaks, C A: Sage.
20. Dansereau, F., Graen, G. & Hage, W. J. (1975), “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership Within Formal Organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(3), pp. 46-78.
21. Downton, J. V. (1973), Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in a revolutionary process, New York: Free Press.
22. Fuller, J. B., Morrison, R., Jones, L., Bridger, D., & Brown, V. (1999), “The effects of psychological empowerment on transformational leadership and job satisfaction”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(3), pp. 389- 399.
23. Goodwin, V. L., Wofford, J. C., & Whittington, J. L. (2001), “A Theoretical and Empirical Extension to the Transformational Leadership Construct” , Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, pp. 759-774.
24. Graham, J. W. (1986), “An essay on organizational citizenship behavior”, Employee Responsibilities and Right Journal, 4, pp. 249-270.
25. Graham, J. M. (1988), “Transformational leadership: Fostering follower autonomy, not automatic followership”, in J. G. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, H. P. Dachler, & C . A. Schriescheim(Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
26. Graham, J. W. (1995), “Leadership, moral development, and citizenship behavior”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), pp. 43-54.
27. Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003), “Climate as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Leader-member Exchange and Content Specific Citizenship: safety Climate as an Example”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), pp. 170-178.
28. Hollander, E. P. & Julian, J. W. (1969), “Cotemporary trends in the analysis of leadership process”, Psychological Bulletin, 71, pp. 378-379.
29. House, R. J. (1971), “A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, pp. 321-338.
30. Judge, T. A. & Joyce , E. B. (2001), “Relationship of core self- evaluation, self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, emotional stability-with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta- analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), pp. 88-92.
31. Katz, D. (1964), “The motivational basis of organizational behavior”, Behavior Science, 9, pp. 131-146.
32. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1966), The social psychology of organizations, New York: John Willy & Sons.
33. Kimmons, G. & Greenhaus, J. H. (1976), “Relationship between locus control and reactions of employees to work characteristics”, psychological Reports, 39, pp. 815-820.
34. Koh, W. L., Richard, M. & Terberg, J.R. (1995), “The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, p.16.
35. Konovsky, M. A. & Organ, D. W. (1996), “Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, pp. 253-266.
36. Konovsky, M.A. & Pugh, S.D. (1994), “Citizenship behavior and social exchange”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp. 656-669.
37. Lefcourt, H. M. (1972), “Internal versus external control of reinforcement revisited : Recent developments”, In B.A. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research, New York : Academic Press. 
38. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980), “Generalize ability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership”, Academy of Management Journal, 23, pp. 451-465.
39. Liu,Y., Ellen, L. & Andris, J. (2002), Effect of online instruction on locus of control and achievement motivation, AREA Annual Conference.
40. Mitchell, T. R., Smyser, C. M. & Weed, S. E. (1975), “Locus of control: supervision and work satisfaction”, Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), pp. 623-631.
41. Mitchell, T. R. (1979), “Organizational behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology, 22, pp. 426-435.
42. Morrison , E. W. (1996), “Organizational citizenship behavior as a critical link between HRM practices and service quality”, Human Resource Management, 35, pp. 493-512.
43. Nanus, B. (1992), Visionary leadership, San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
44. Organ, D. W. (1988), Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome, Lexington , MA: Lexington Books.
45. Organ, D. W. & Konovsky, M. A. (1989), “Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), pp. 157-164.
46. Organ, D. W. (1990), “The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior”, in B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings(Eds.),  Research in organizational behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 12, pp. 43-72. 
47. Owens, R. G. (1998), Organizational behavior in education, 6th ed., Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996), “Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors”, Journal of Management, 22(2), pp. 259-298.
49. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990), “Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors”, Leadership Quarterly, 1, pp. 107-142.
50. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000), “Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Further Research”, Journal of Management, 26(3), pp. 513-563.
51. Reitz, H. J., & Jewell, L. N. (1979), “Sex, locus of control, and job involvement: A six-country investigation”, Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), pp. 72-80.
52. Robinson, S. L. & Morrison, E. W. (1995), “Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civil virtue behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, pp. 289-298.
53. Robbins, S. P. (1996), Organization behavior, Eaglewood Cliffs, N. J.: A Simon & Schuster Company.
54. Robbins, S. P. (1998), Organizational behavior, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
55. Rotter, J. B. (1954), Social learning and clinical psychology, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
56. Rotter, J. B. (1966), “Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement”, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), pp. 1-27.
57. Schnake, M., Cochran, D. & Dumler, M. (1995), “Encouraging oganizational citizenship: The effects of job satisfaction, perceived equity and leadership”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 7(2), pp. 209-221.
58. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992), Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. Smith, C. A, Organ, D. W. & Near, J. P. (1983), “Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), pp. 653-663.
60. Spector, P. E. (1982), “Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control”, Psychological Bulletin, 3, pp. 482-497.
61. Turner, N., Barling, J., Epitropaki, O., Butcher, V. & Milner, C. (2002), “Transformational leadership and moral reasoning”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), pp. 304-311.
62. Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. G. & Dienesch, R. M. (1994), “Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, operationalization, and validation”, Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 765-802.
63. Wayne, S. J. , & Green, S. A. (1993), “ The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior”, Human Relations, 46, pp. 1431-1440.   
64. Williams, L., & Anderson, S. (1991), “Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors”, Journal of Management, 17, pp. 601-617.
65. Yukl, G. (1989), Leadership in organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
66. Yukl, G. (2002), Leadership in organizations, 5th ed., Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
論文全文使用權限
校內
校內紙本論文立即公開
同意電子論文全文授權校園內公開
校內電子論文立即公開
校外
同意授權
校外電子論文立即公開

如有問題,歡迎洽詢!
圖書館數位資訊組 (02)2621-5656 轉 2487 或 來信