淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館 (TKU Library)
進階搜尋


下載電子全文限經由淡江IP使用) 
系統識別號 U0002-2007201020281300
中文論文名稱 探討幽默式廣告對品牌溝通效果之影響
英文論文名稱 A study of the humorous ads effects on brand communication
校院名稱 淡江大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 98
學期 2
出版年 99
研究生中文姓名 趙小青
研究生英文姓名 Shiao-Ching Chao
學號 797610432
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
口試日期 2010-06-05
論文頁數 108頁
口試委員 指導教授-李月華
委員-徐世同
委員-吳坤山
中文關鍵字 幽默廣告  廣告態度  涉入程度  品牌溝通效果 
英文關鍵字 humorous ads  ad attitude  involvement  brand communication effects 
學科別分類 學科別社會科學管理學
中文摘要 廣告是企業主將商品或服務傳遞給消費者最直接的溝通管道之一,然而在廣告資訊充塞的時代,競爭激烈且同質性高的環境中,市場上品牌眾多,透過廣告要如何能在第一時間吸引消費者目光,且訊息能深刻留在消費者腦海裡,進而達到溝通效果,實非易事,故廣告的呈現方式尤其重要,因此幽默式廣告已漸成為廣告主喜愛的手法之一。
本研究主要探討幽默廣告類型 (情感取向/認知取向/社會取向)對品牌溝通效果的影響。以前則廣告品牌形象與廣告的涉入程度做為干擾變數來探討不同的幽默式廣告類型對品牌溝通效果的影響。
本研究以3(幽默廣告類型)×2(前則廣告品牌形象)及1(非幽默廣告類型)×2(前則廣告品牌形象)的實驗設計,採用讓受測者觀看電視廣告後,用問卷調查的方式收集資料。受測者240位,隨機均分派至八組實驗組。並針對回收的資料,進行敘述性統計、因素分析、信度分析、t檢定、ANOVA分析、相關分析及迴歸分析,最後根據實證之結果提出主要研究結論如下:
1.幽默廣告類型對廣告態度的影響不同
2.幽默式廣告比非幽默式廣告具有較佳的廣告態度
3.情感取向幽默廣告較其他幽默廣告能產生較佳的品牌回憶
4.認知取向幽默廣告較其他幽默廣告能產生較佳的品牌辨識
英文摘要 Advertising is one of the most direct channels of communication that the business owners deliver goods or services to their consumers. However, in the overwhelming advertised information era, with fierce competition and many brands out in the market, it’s not easy to attract consumers in the first glance through advertising, and the message should deeply stay in the consumers’ mind, thus achieve the effective communication. The way of presenting advertisement is important, therefore humorous advertisement has gradually become a favorite tactic for advertisers.
This study discusses how the humorous advertisement types (affective/cognitive/social) influence the brand communication. Using previous brand image advertisement and advertising involvement as factors to explore the effects of different types of humorous advertisement on branding.
In this study, 3(humorous advertisements) x 2(previous brand image advertisement) and 1(non-humorous advertisement) x 2(previous brand image advertisement) are used for the factorial design. After watching TV advertisements, a questionnaire survey is held to collect data. 240 participants were randomly assigned to eight experimental groups and tested. According to the collected data, it is analyzed into descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, t-test, ANOVA analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis. The main conclusions are as follows:
1.The types of the humorous advertisement influence advertisement attitude differently.
2.The humorous advertisement has better advertisement attitude than the non-humorous one.
3.Affective humorous advertisement creates better brand recall than other types.
4.Cognitive humorous advertisement creates better brand recognition than other types.
論文目次 目錄 I
表目錄 III
圖目錄 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第三節 研究流程 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 幽默與幽默廣告 8
第二節 廣告態度 18
第三節 廣告對品牌之溝通效果 22
第四節 廣告涉入程度 25
第五節 幽默廣告的溝通效果 31
第三章 研究方法 37
第一節 研究架構 37
第二節 研究假說 38
第三節 研究設計 43
第四節 變數定義與衡量 51
第五節 問卷設計 56
第六節 資料分析方法 57
第四章 資料分析 59
第一節 樣本結構與信度分析 59
第二節 敘述性統計分析 64
第三節 實驗相關檢定 66
第四節 實驗假說檢定 72
第五章 結論與建議 88
第一節 研究結論 88
第二節 管理意涵 92
第三節 研究限制 93
第四節 後續研究建議 94
參考文獻 95
中文部分 95
英文部分 96
網站 101
附錄 102
前測問卷 102
正式問卷 104
實驗廣告品牌屬性 108

參考文獻 中文部分
王國楨(2006)。全球百大品牌類型之探討。世新大學管理學院財務
金融學系碩士學位論文。
李培蘭(2003)。幽默廣告機制與形式分類之初探-以1997~2001年時
報廣告獎平面類作品為例。國立政治大學廣告學系碩士論文。
唐士祥(1993)。幽默廣告在不同情境下對不同涉入程度產品的說明
效果。國立政治大學心理研究所。未出版,台北市。
陳學志(1991)。幽默理解的認知歷程。國立台灣大學心理學研究所
博士論文。
陳佳蓓(1999)。幽默廣告類別與廣告效果。私立世新大學新聞研究
所碩士論文。
曾杏如(2002)。幽默廣告類型與認知需求對廣告效果之影響。國立
臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
葉子維(2009)。探討幽默式廣告對廣告溝通效果之影響。私立淡江
大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
楊瑜君(2006)。幽默廣告類型、消費者生活型態對廣告效果的影響。
東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
廖經維(2009)。多向度幽默廣告類型之內容分析。輔仁大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
劉家榮(2004)。置入式廣告與一般廣告對廣告溝通效果的影響-以
產品涉入程度與品牌辨識程度為干擾變項。東吳大學國際貿易學系國際企業組碩士論文。未出版,台北市。
蘇文達(2002)。個人因素對不同類型幽默廣告效果之影響-情感密
集度之角色探討。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。未出版,台北市。
羅文琪(2005)。當代雜誌廣告中女性角色的幽默式訴求研究─以產品類別、角色描繪與文化特性角度探討。輔仁大學應用美術學系碩士論文。

英文部分
Beard, F. K. (2005). One hundred years of humor in American advertising. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 54-65.
Bettman, James R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224.
Buijzen, M., and Valkenburg, P. M. (2004). Developing a Typology of Humor in Audiovisual Media. Media Psychology, 6(2), 147-167.
Catanescu, C., and Tom G. (2001). Types of humor in television and magazine advertising, Review of Busines, 22, 92-95.
Chernatony,L. D. and McWilliam G.(1989).Branding terminology:The
real debate,Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 7(July/Aug)
,29-32.
Cochran, L., and Quester, P. (2004). Product involvement and humour in
advertising:An Australian empirical study. Journal of Asia Pacific Marketing, 3(1), 68-88.
Duncan, C. P. and J. E. Nelson, 1985. Effects of Humor in a RadioAdvertising Experiment. Journal of Advertising, 14(2), 33-64.
Gelb, B. D. and C. M. Pickett, (1983). Attitude toward the Ad: Links to Humor and to Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 12(2), 34-42.
Gelb, B. D. and Zinkhan, G. M. (1986). Humor and advertising effectiveness after repeated exposures to a radio commercial. Journal of Advertising, 15(2),15-20, 34.
Houston, M. J. and Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives in involvement. In S. Jain(Ed.), Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions
(184-187). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Kelly,J.P.and Solomon,P.J.(1975). Humor in Television Advertising,
Journal of Advertising,4(3),31-35
Keller,Kevin L.(1993).Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing
Customer-Based Brand Equity, Journal of Marketing Research ,1-22.
Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(Fall), 349-356.
Kotler, P. and K. L. Keller, 2008. Marketing Management: Analysis,
Planning, Implementation, and Control, (13th ed.), NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Kotler,Philip(1996),Marketing Mangagemnt, New Jesey,Prentic-Hall Inc.
LaFave, L.(1977),Ethnic Humor: Form Paradoxes towards Principles, in It’s a Funny Thing, Humor, eds. A. J. Chapman and H. C. Foot, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Laczniak, R. N., Muehling, D. D., and Grossbart, S. (1989). Manipulating message involvement in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 28-38.
Laurent, Giles and Jean-Noel Kapferer (1985). Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.12, 41-53.
Lutz, J. Richard (1985), Affective and Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad: A Conceptual Framework” In Linda F. Alwitt and Andrew A. Mitchell, Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects, New York:Erlbaum, 45-63.
Lutz, R.J., Mackenzie, S.B., and Belch, G.E. (1986), The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130-143.
Mackenzie, Scott B. and Richard J. Lutz(1989),An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, 48-65.
Malaviya, P., Kisielius, J., and Sternthal, B. (1996). The effect of type of elaboration on advertisement processing and judgment. Journal of marketing research, 33, 410-421.
Mela, Carl F., Sunil Gupta, and Donald R. Lehmann (1997), The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 2 (May), 248-261.
McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor: Its origin and development, San Francisco:Freeman.
Murphy, John H., Isabella C.M. Cunningham and Gary Wilcox(1979), “The Impact of Program Environment on Recall of Humorous Television Commercials, Journal of Advertising Research, 8(2), 17-21.
Mitchell, Andrew A. and Olson, J. C. (1981), Are Product Attribute Beliefsthe Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 318-332.
Nevo, O., Nevo, B., and Yin, J. L. S. (2001). Singaporean humor: A cross-cultural,cross-gender comparison. Journal of General Psychology, 128(2), 143-156.
Nerhardt, G. (1970). Humor and inclination to laugh : emotional reactions to stimuli of divergence from a range of expectancy 11(3), 185-195.
Oliver, R. L. and Bearden, W. O. (1983). The role of involvement in
satisfaction processes. In R. P. Bozzi and A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 10,205-255.Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT:
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., and Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., and Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
Petty, Richard E. and Cacioppo, John T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. NY: Springer Verlag.
Speck, P. S. (1987). On humor and humor in advertising, Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, Texas Tech University.
Speck, P. S. (1991).The Framework for the study of Humorous Ads. Current Issues Research in Advertising,13(1/2),In J.H.Leigh and
C.R.Martin Jr. (Eds), An Annual publicationof the division of research Michigan Business School, The University of Michigan, B.Joseph White, Interim Dean. 1-44
Spotts, H. E., Weinberger, M. G., and Parsons, A. L. (1997). Assessing the use and impact of humor on advertising effectiveness: a contingency approach, Journal ofAdvertising, 26(3), 15-32.
Scott, C., Klein, D. M., and Bryant, J. (1990). Consumer response to humor in advertising: A series of field studies using behavioral observation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 498-501.
Stewart,D.and D. Furse.(1986) Effective Television Advertising.Lexington, MA: D.C. Health and Company.
Sternthal B. and Craig C. S.(1973).Humor in Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 37, 12-18
Schultz. D. E., Martin, D., and Brown, W. P. (1984). Strategic advertising campaigns.Chicago: Crain Books, Division of Crain Communications, Inc.
Sherif, M. and Cantril, H (1947), The Psychology of Ego-Involvement,
New York: John wiley and Son.
Suls, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in humor appreciation. In P. E. McGhee & J.H.Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Swaninathan, Vanitha, Stilley, Karen M. and Ahluwalia, Rohini (2009).
When Brand Personality Matters: The Moderating Role of
Attachment Styles. Jouranl of Consumer Research, 35 (April),
985-1002.
Unger L. S. (1996).The Potential for Using Humor in Global Advertising.
International Journal of Humor Research,Vol.9, No.2, pp.143-168
Weinberger, M.G.and Spotts. H.E.(1989).Humor in U.S. versus U.K.Television commercials: A comparison, Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 39-44.
Weinberger, M. G., and Campbell, L. (1990). The use and impact of humor in radio advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(6), 44-52.
Weinberger, M. G. and Campbell, L. (1991). The use and impact of humor in radio advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(Dec1990/Jan 1991), 44-52.
Weinberger M. G. and Gulas C.S (1992). The Impact of Humor in Advertising : A Review.Journal of Advertising, 21 (4), 34-59
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985), Measuring the involvemen construct, Journal
of Consumer Research, 12 (3), 341-352.
Zhang, Y.(1996). Responses to humorous advertising: the moderating effect of need for cognition, Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 15-32.
Zinkhan, G. M. and G. D. Gelb, 1990. Humor Repetition and Advertising
Effectiveness. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 438-441

網站
尼爾森廣告信任度調查(2009),取自http://tw.nielsen.com/site/index.
shtml
論文使用權限
  • 同意紙本無償授權給館內讀者為學術之目的重製使用,於2013-07-26公開。
  • 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2013-07-26起公開。


  • 若您有任何疑問,請與我們聯絡!
    圖書館: 請來電 (02)2621-5656 轉 2281 或 來信